Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review. To determine the effective...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews Vol. 7; p. CD006732 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
19.07.2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1469-493X, 1469-493X |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.
To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.
Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150 ) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs.
It is uncertain whether any interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals are effective because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.
To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.
Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150 ) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs.
It is uncertain whether any interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals are effective because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low. Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.BACKGROUNDShared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review.To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.OBJECTIVESTo determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both.We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.SEARCH METHODSWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.SELECTION CRITERIARandomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures.We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSISWe used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150 ) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs.MAIN RESULTSWe included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type in |
| Author | Politi, Mary C Thomson, Richard Adekpedjou, Rhéda Graham, Ian D Elwyn, Glyn Légaré, France Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert Stacey, Dawn Kryworuchko, Jennifer Turcotte, Stéphane Lyddiatt, Anne |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: France surname: Légaré fullname: Légaré, France organization: Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, Québec, Canada, G1J 0A4 – sequence: 2 givenname: Rhéda surname: Adekpedjou fullname: Adekpedjou, Rhéda – sequence: 3 givenname: Dawn surname: Stacey fullname: Stacey, Dawn – sequence: 4 givenname: Stéphane surname: Turcotte fullname: Turcotte, Stéphane – sequence: 5 givenname: Jennifer surname: Kryworuchko fullname: Kryworuchko, Jennifer – sequence: 6 givenname: Ian D surname: Graham fullname: Graham, Ian D – sequence: 7 givenname: Anne surname: Lyddiatt fullname: Lyddiatt, Anne – sequence: 8 givenname: Mary C surname: Politi fullname: Politi, Mary C – sequence: 9 givenname: Richard surname: Thomson fullname: Thomson, Richard – sequence: 10 givenname: Glyn surname: Elwyn fullname: Elwyn, Glyn – sequence: 11 givenname: Norbert surname: Donner-Banzhoff fullname: Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30025154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkEtLw0AUhQep2If-hTJLN6nzzCRLqVYLBTddiJswjxsTTSY1kwj9906xgqtz4Ps4F-4cTXznAaElJStKCLujIpU0k9lq_UBIqjhbHUYjLtAsgjwROX-d_OtTNA_hgxCeU5pdoSmPE5JKMUNvWz9A_w1-qDsfcNn1uPa2Bx1q_46HCvAYAHclDpXuwWEHtg5Rxa3-PBnmiCvQzVDZiPGh70oIJ66bcI0uyxhwc84F2m8e9-vnZPfytF3f7xIrciqS1BnlgBmhnCi1ZI5SwoQznOVWZCotWWq0VIYxAEpsBqrMnAUgylmrKVug29_ZePxrhDAUbR0sNI320I2hYERxTnOpWFSXZ3U0Lbji0Net7o_F3zvYDwsoZ10 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13112 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_4396250 crossref_primary_10_2196_38424 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_17118 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afaf106 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_070270 crossref_primary_10_12788_jhm_3386 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_25654 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_70171 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_76142 crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_15811 crossref_primary_10_2196_28618 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_l6762 crossref_primary_10_1177_2381468320963781 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12508_023_00403_z crossref_primary_10_34172_hpp_2021_13 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_024_02136_6 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_056677 crossref_primary_10_2196_19474 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10880_024_10014_8 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_48750 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_033791 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_079155 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_025_01172_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2023_1083568 crossref_primary_10_1080_09540261_2022_2085507 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2023_1254836 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_54400 crossref_primary_10_7196_SAMJ_2023_v113i1_16746 crossref_primary_10_2196_71479 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_025_04758_3 crossref_primary_10_1136_heartjnl_2022_321482 crossref_primary_10_2196_46698 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9531266 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11764_022_01230_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s12020_021_02771_5 crossref_primary_10_2196_43106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_04_020 crossref_primary_10_2147_JAA_S526389 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_022_07523_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_nursrep15080273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecinn_2023_100127 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_022_4046_8 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8274202 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_018_0851_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_07738_4 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_022_3877_7 crossref_primary_10_5499_wjr_v10_i1_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2025_1592213 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13187_021_02051_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2021_691251 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD007297_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11156_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_024_05673_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10597_021_00856_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11553_022_00939_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2023_108047 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_037575 crossref_primary_10_1002_pon_70168 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_034142 crossref_primary_10_2196_24954 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11673_025_10457_0 crossref_primary_10_2196_35421 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_896351 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_70029 crossref_primary_10_1093_ijpp_riae066 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneph_2025_1601610 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001431_pub6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_019_4445_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_022_05041_y crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2021_014529 crossref_primary_10_2196_54727 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD016227 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_052566 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_025_03014_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12939_024_02204_5 crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S335080 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_022_00820_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_025_09878_9 crossref_primary_10_2196_65974 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70252 crossref_primary_10_1177_10775587211012995 crossref_primary_10_2196_58096 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_67284 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_020_01197_9 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_071478 crossref_primary_10_1111_nhs_12930 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_024_02087_5 crossref_primary_10_1188_19_CJON_540_542 crossref_primary_10_5812_jcrps_161408 crossref_primary_10_1002_jdd_13343 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1162993 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2022_883138 crossref_primary_10_1177_2327857919081059 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2025_1483035 crossref_primary_10_1161_CIR_0000000000001162 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_018_1872_y crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph16152719 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44265_024_00038_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11102_024_01460_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_16037 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05571_y crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6773_14604 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2136597 crossref_primary_10_36490_journal_jps_com_v8i3_1008 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_020_04661_z crossref_primary_10_2196_50060 crossref_primary_10_3917_rsi_137_0091 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1037447 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_4293102 crossref_primary_10_1177_1559827620971547 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2024_1266065 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_041673 crossref_primary_10_1177_23814683221124090 crossref_primary_10_1177_00207640221140291 crossref_primary_10_1093_rheumatology_keab415 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_022_08599_7 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_055933 crossref_primary_10_2196_59439 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_44515 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2018_026488 crossref_primary_10_2196_17878 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_050804 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjspcare_2020_002284 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_023_00959_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_020_01015_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_025_01162_z crossref_primary_10_2196_48793 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1047951121003413 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2022_2140319 crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_17092 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_029090 crossref_primary_10_2196_69756 crossref_primary_10_1208_s12249_023_02682_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_021_01115_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2020_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_zefq_2019_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_069017 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_57960 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2022_104901 crossref_primary_10_1159_000539055 crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S388432 crossref_primary_10_2147_JMDH_S460499 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_021_2951_x crossref_primary_10_1177_23814683211067522 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2018_024004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00592_024_02319_9 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_n2033 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2019_00896 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2024_2320263 crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X241285418 crossref_primary_10_1002_oby_23647 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_022_3980_9 crossref_primary_10_1183_16000617_0098_2023 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5266039 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_021_01396_y crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18042128 crossref_primary_10_1080_13548506_2024_2407448 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_067468 crossref_primary_10_2196_53150 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2022_050065 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2025_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_05_014 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs12010012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_021_01101_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_025_02329_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_025_03774_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0240371 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_029316 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2020_04_008 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_82615 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_19276 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_021_01494_x crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_036834 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_024_08640_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_23814683241229987 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12812 crossref_primary_10_2196_42033 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_10086_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_07357907_2023_2164895 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9955726 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1469-493X |
| ExternalDocumentID | 30025154 |
| Genre | Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 53G 5GY 7PX 9HA ABJNI ACGFO ACGFS AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AYR CGR CUY CVF D7G ECM EIF HYE NPM OEC OK1 P2P RWY WOW ZYTZH 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4914-6db7de2b47d4fa52d11024db329c4876f26ba57b22ee10c8e7f8dcee07dcca12 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 512 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000440415900041&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1469-493X |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:29:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 24 01:32:06 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4914-6db7de2b47d4fa52d11024db329c4876f26ba57b22ee10c8e7f8dcee07dcca12 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
| PMID | 30025154 |
| PQID | 2073319572 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2073319572 pubmed_primary_30025154 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2018-07-19 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-07-19 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2018 text: 2018-07-19 day: 19 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Cochrane Database Syst Rev |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| References | 25222632 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3. |
| References_xml | – reference: 25222632 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3. |
| SSID | ssj0039118 |
| Score | 2.6861603 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | CD006732 |
| SubjectTerms | Decision Making Decision Support Techniques Health Personnel - education Humans Patient Education as Topic - methods Patient Participation Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
| Title | Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30025154 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2073319572 |
| Volume | 7 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000440415900041&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELaAIsTC-1FeMhKrIbGdOJkQKlQg0apDh4glsmNb7UASCEXi33NO0tIFCYklS5QoPl183919vg-hK0i4AEQrRqzmlHAVe0RyrogIAirhJuPNENdnMRxGSRKP2oJb1dIq53tivVHrInM1clcJYeAugaC35RtxqlGuu9pKaKyiDgMo4yhdIll0ERj8yFFzusgpqbFkfkLYoze-0wCPgui6d19rtVC3fP47zKzDTX_7vx-6g7ZaoInvGs_YRSsm30Mbg7aVvo9enpbYjhUG7IqnuYOQrniAARbiWWVwYXE1cRx1rFsxHvxa61dh9YUnC-4YLpcmfFQHaNx_GPceSSu0QDIe-5yEWgltqOJCcysDqgETUK4Vo3EGCU1oaahkIBSlxvheFhlhIw3R1RMaHMCnh2gtL3JzjDBERMm49al1L6in2ctQGu1JG8axYV10OTdaCn7smhMyN8WsSn_M1kVHjeXTshm4kbI6Ewr4yR-ePkWbgGkiV3714zPUsbBsc47Ws8-PafV-UTsIXIejwTf0QMUy |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions+for+increasing+the+use+of+shared+decision+making+by+healthcare+professionals&rft.jtitle=Cochrane+database+of+systematic+reviews&rft.au=L%C3%A9gar%C3%A9%2C+France&rft.au=Adekpedjou%2C+Rh%C3%A9da&rft.au=Stacey%2C+Dawn&rft.au=Turcotte%2C+St%C3%A9phane&rft.date=2018-07-19&rft.issn=1469-493X&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=CD006732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2F14651858.CD006732.pub4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1469-493X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1469-493X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1469-493X&client=summon |