What limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species after their reintroduction: quality or spatial arrangement of habitat
Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous, over 10 years following their reintroduction. During this time, their d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Animal conservation Jg. 12; H. 6; S. 540 - 548 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford, UK
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1367-9430, 1469-1795 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous, over 10 years following their reintroduction. During this time, their distributions appeared to be limited to a few sites although it was thought that more suitable habitats were available. Thus, we question, does the quality or the spatial arrangement of their habitat limit their spread? Although adult individuals of both species can select high-quality plots, we show that selection of suitable plots in the area of reintroduction is spatially constrained. A low colonization probability of unoccupied distant plots of high quality was found for both species. The abandonment of occupied plots in Ma. teleius was also found to be dependent on the distance to occupied plots. We conclude that the spatial distribution of the two species during the 10 years following reintroduction was limited by the spatial arrangement of their habitat, rather than by the availability of high-quality plots. The spatial constraints in movement can explain observed source-sink structures when female butterflies deposit their eggs on low-quality plots. We conclude that although these species have very similar life histories, they require different approaches to their conservation due to subtle differences in adult habitat use and movement. Conservation of Ma. teleius should concentrate on improving local habitat quality, whereas conservation of Ma. nausithous is predicted to be more effective by creating a spatial network of suitable habitat plots, such as along road verges. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous, over 10 years following their reintroduction. During this time, their distributions appeared to be limited to a few sites although it was thought that more suitable habitats were available. Thus, we question, does the quality or the spatial arrangement of their habitat limit their spread? Although adult individuals of both species can select high‐quality plots, we show that selection of suitable plots in the area of reintroduction is spatially constrained. A low colonization probability of unoccupied distant plots of high quality was found for both species. The abandonment of occupied plots in Ma. teleius was also found to be dependent on the distance to occupied plots. We conclude that the spatial distribution of the two species during the 10 years following reintroduction was limited by the spatial arrangement of their habitat, rather than by the availability of high‐quality plots. The spatial constraints in movement can explain observed source–sink structures when female butterflies deposit their eggs on low‐quality plots. We conclude that although these species have very similar life histories, they require different approaches to their conservation due to subtle differences in adult habitat use and movement. Conservation of Ma. teleius should concentrate on improving local habitat quality, whereas conservation of Ma. nausithous is predicted to be more effective by creating a spatial network of suitable habitat plots, such as along road verges. Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous , over 10 years following their reintroduction. During this time, their distributions appeared to be limited to a few sites although it was thought that more suitable habitats were available. Thus, we question, does the quality or the spatial arrangement of their habitat limit their spread? Although adult individuals of both species can select high‐quality plots, we show that selection of suitable plots in the area of reintroduction is spatially constrained. A low colonization probability of unoccupied distant plots of high quality was found for both species. The abandonment of occupied plots in Ma. teleius was also found to be dependent on the distance to occupied plots. We conclude that the spatial distribution of the two species during the 10 years following reintroduction was limited by the spatial arrangement of their habitat, rather than by the availability of high‐quality plots. The spatial constraints in movement can explain observed source–sink structures when female butterflies deposit their eggs on low‐quality plots. We conclude that although these species have very similar life histories, they require different approaches to their conservation due to subtle differences in adult habitat use and movement. Conservation of Ma. teleius should concentrate on improving local habitat quality, whereas conservation of Ma. nausithous is predicted to be more effective by creating a spatial network of suitable habitat plots, such as along road verges. Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous, over 10 years following their reintroduction. During this time, their distributions appeared to be limited to a few sites although it was thought that more suitable habitats were available. Thus, we question, does the quality or the spatial arrangement of their habitat limit their spread? Although adult individuals of both species can select high-quality plots, we show that selection of suitable plots in the area of reintroduction is spatially constrained. A low colonization probability of unoccupied distant plots of high quality was found for both species. The abandonment of occupied plots in Ma. teleius was also found to be dependent on the distance to occupied plots. We conclude that the spatial distribution of the two species during the 10 years following reintroduction was limited by the spatial arrangement of their habitat, rather than by the availability of high-quality plots. The spatial constraints in movement can explain observed source–sink structures when female butterflies deposit their eggs on low-quality plots. We conclude that although these species have very similar life histories, they require different approaches to their conservation due to subtle differences in adult habitat use and movement. Conservation of Ma. teleius should concentrate on improving local habitat quality, whereas conservation of Ma. nausithous is predicted to be more effective by creating a spatial network of suitable habitat plots, such as along road verges Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and Maculinea nausithous, over 10years following their reintroduction. During this time, their distributions appeared to be limited to a few sites although it was thought that more suitable habitats were available. Thus, we question, does the quality or the spatial arrangement of their habitat limit their spread? Although adult individuals of both species can select high-quality plots, we show that selection of suitable plots in the area of reintroduction is spatially constrained. A low colonization probability of unoccupied distant plots of high quality was found for both species. The abandonment of occupied plots in Ma. teleius was also found to be dependent on the distance to occupied plots. We conclude that the spatial distribution of the two species during the 10years following reintroduction was limited by the spatial arrangement of their habitat, rather than by the availability of high-quality plots. The spatial constraints in movement can explain observed source-sink structures when female butterflies deposit their eggs on low-quality plots. We conclude that although these species have very similar life histories, they require different approaches to their conservation due to subtle differences in adult habitat use and movement. Conservation of Ma. teleius should concentrate on improving local habitat quality, whereas conservation of Ma. nausithous is predicted to be more effective by creating a spatial network of suitable habitat plots, such as along road verges. |
| Author | van Langevelde, F. Wynhoff, I. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: van Langevelde, F – sequence: 2 fullname: Wynhoff, I |
| BookMark | eNqNUcFu1DAUjFCRaAvfgI9csthxHMcVQqpaKIgKkKC0t6cXr9P14o23tqPdvfHpOGzVA6d9l_dkz4w0MyfF0eAHUxSE0RnL83Y5Y3WjSiaVmFWUqhmlVctm22fF8dPHUb55I0tVc_qiOIlxSSmrWs6Oiz-3C0zE2ZVNkaSFIXEdDM6J70naeKL9cG8GE6wm3ZiSCb3bZYjR1kSCfX6YSDaQYOyQgp-POlk_nJGHEZ1NO-JDhmOy6AiGgFltZYY0yS-wswnTy-J5jy6aV4_7tLj5-OHnxafy-tvV54vz61LXirGyzT6alndGdl1thETR99nfvGYdKipEb1QnzJypVnSVklzwVldS8rZvNFWV5KfF2V53g9mRnWzBgEHbCB4tONsFDDvYjAEGN6312EXgbS3kRH6zJ6-DfxhNTLCyURvncDB-jMBUnobSQ6C8akXFalFl6Ps9VAcfYzA96CmRnF8KaB0wClPFsISpSZiahKli-FcxbLNA-5_AOtjVZOMA6rvHOKwzu4N5cH7xKx-ZXu7pNiazfaJj-A2N5FLA7dcrqL9Iend5R-F7xr_e43v0gPchp37zo6KMUyapYELwv2Bu24U |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_016_9922_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_011_2025_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2022_107028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10144_013_0377_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_016_9941_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12811 crossref_primary_10_14411_eje_2013_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeog_2013_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvaa051 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12983 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2018_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12100 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2015_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_019_00181_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_bij_12074 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_4598_2011_00138_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_019_00204_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12080_020_00463_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_015_9825_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2011_08_017 crossref_primary_10_3897_nl_47_126025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_012_9479_y crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0065464 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyw085 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0038684 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00599 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_024_00640_w crossref_primary_10_1111_eea_12624 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_012_9492_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_013_9855_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_010_9337_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects13030262 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99041.x 10.1016/0006-3207(84)90040-5 10.2307/3546763 10.1023/A:1009692723056 10.1023/A:1009765529310 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00071.x 10.1098/rspb.2000.1082 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09702.x 10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1828:PCORDF]2.0.CO;2 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230512.x 10.1007/978-3-322-85170-3 10.1068/b250849 10.1007/BF00317080 10.1016/0022-1910(78)90036-7 10.1007/s10841-007-9091-8 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00237.x 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00117.x 10.1007/s00442-008-0986-1 10.1007/BF00695913 10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3 10.1126/science.1165115 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Zoological Society of London Wageningen University & Research |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Zoological Society of London – notice: Wageningen University & Research |
| DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 C1K 7S9 L.6 QVL |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00281.x |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic NARCIS:Publications |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA CrossRef Entomology Abstracts |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Ecology |
| EISSN | 1469-1795 |
| EndPage | 548 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_384577 10_1111_j_1469_1795_2009_00281_x ACV281 ark_67375_WNG_4K70XDX0_P US201301705155 |
| Genre | article |
| GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23M 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABHUG ABITZ ABJNI ABPTK ABPVW ABTAH ABWRO ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CHEAL COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 FBQ FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 L98 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LW7 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIG ROL RX1 SUPJJ UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ABVKB ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIDQK AIDYY AITYG ALVPJ BSCLL HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION O8X 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 C1K 7S9 L.6 0R 31 3N AAPBV GA HZ IA IPNFZ KM NF P4A QVL WT X Y3 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4911-8179683be7bb4e57a5ff146d41ba9055fe9b5ed1985b2973538c27738f6c09273 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 38 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000271952900009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1367-9430 |
| IngestDate | Mon May 10 21:34:01 EDT 2021 Fri Sep 05 17:13:21 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:47:52 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:23:59 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:38:52 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:21:14 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 09 05:32:22 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:00:19 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4911-8179683be7bb4e57a5ff146d41ba9055fe9b5ed1985b2973538c27738f6c09273 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00281.x istex:9FDAE571EC2F9FC63665E7A64B09D21648D0D956 ark:/67375/WNG-4K70XDX0-P ArticleID:ACV281 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PQID | 1328521452 |
| PQPubID | 23462 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_384577 proquest_miscellaneous_1999960077 proquest_miscellaneous_1328521452 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1469_1795_2009_00281_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_1795_2009_00281_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1469_1795_2009_00281_x_ACV281 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_4K70XDX0_P fao_agris_US201301705155 |
| ProviderPackageCode | QVL |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2009 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2009 text: December 2009 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK |
| PublicationTitle | Animal conservation |
| PublicationYear | 2009 |
| Publisher | Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | Tartally, A. & Varga, Z. (2008). Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Acta Zool. Hung. 54, 257-268. Van Langevelde, F., Van der Knaap, W.G.M. & Claassen, G.D.H. (1998). Comparing connectivity in landscape networks. Environ. Plann. B 25, 849-863. Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Armstrong, D.P. (2005). Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1402-1410. Ter Braak, C.F. & Smilauer, P. (1998). Canoco reference manual and users guide to Canoco for Windows (Canoco 4). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Biometry. Schaffers, A.P. & Sýkora, K.V. (2000). Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci. 11, 225-244. Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. (1998). Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79, 2503-2515. Schipper, J., Chanson, J., Chiozza, F., Cox, N., Hoffmann, M., Katariya, V., Lamoreux, J., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Stuart, S.N., Temple, H.J., Baillie, J., Boitani, L., Lacher, T.E., Mittermeier, R.A. & Smith, A.T., et al. (2008). The biogeography of diversity, threat and knowledge in the world's terrestrial and aquatic mammals. Science 322, 225-230. Ertsen, A.C.D., Alkemade, J.R.M. & Wassen, M.J. (1998). Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 135, 113-124. Wynhoff, I. (1998). Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 47-57. Harrison, S. (1994). Resources and dispersal as factors limiting populations of the tussock moth (Orgyia vetusta), a flightless defoliator. Oecologia 99, 27-34. Amler, K., Bahl, A., Henle, K., Kaule, G., Poschlod, P. & Settele, J. (1999). Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co. Van Dyck, H., Talloen, W., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Feenstra, V., Van der Hidde, A. & Wynhoff, I. (2000). Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 267, 861-866. Thomas, J.A. (1984). The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the dusky large blue) and M. teleius (the scarce large blue) in France. Biol. Conserv. 28, 325-347. Hovestadt, T. & Nowicki, P. (2008). Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 137-154. Batáry, P., Körösi, A., Örvössy, N., Kövér, S. & Peregovits, L. (2008). Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges. J. Insect Conserv. 13, 223-230. Ellenberg, H. (1982). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Ulmer Verlag. Nowicki, P., Pepkowska, A., Kudlek, J., Skorka, P., Witek, M., Settele, J. & Woyciechowski, M. (2007). From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 140, 119-129. IUCN. (1995). IUCN/SCC guidelines for reintroductions. Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union. Available at http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/download/English.pdf (accessed 6 July 2009). Anton, C., Musche, M., Hula, V. & Settele, J. (2008). Myrmica host-ants limit the density of the ant-predatory large blue Maculinea nausithous. J. Insect Conserv. 12, 511-517. Rangel, T.F.L., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Bini, L.M. (2006). Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 321-327. Körösi, A., Örvössy, N., Batáry, P., Kövér, S. & Peregovits, L. (2008). Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies. Oecologia 156, 455-464. Nowicki, P., Witek, M., Skorka, P., Settele, J. & Woyciechowski, M. (2005b). Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Popul. Ecol. 47, 193-202. Stettmer, C., Binzenhöfer, B. & Hartmann, P. (2001). Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaβnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund. Nat. Landsch. 76, 278-287. Elmes, G.W. & Thomas, J.A (1992). Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats - interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers. Conserv. 1, 155-169. Doak, P. (2000). Population consequences for restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81, 1828-1841. Schultz, C.B., Russell, C. & Wynn, L. (2008). Restoration, reintroduction, and captive propagation for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 41-61. Wynhoff, I., Grutters, M. & Van Langevelde, F. (2008). Looking for the ants: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species. Anim. Biol. 58, 371-388. Diffendorfer, J.E. (1998). Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81, 417-433. Haddad, N. (2000). Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia. Conserv. Biol. 14, 738-745. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pech, P., Fric, Z. & Konvicka, M. (2007). Species-specificity of the Phengaris (Maculinea) -Myrmica host system: fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 50, 1-21. Van Langevelde, F. (2000). Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations. Ecography 23, 614-622. Cammaerts, M.C., Inwood, M.R., Morgan, E.D., Parry, K. & Tyler, R.C. (1978). Comparative study of the pheromones emitted by workers of the ant Myrmica rubra and Myrmica scabrinodis. J. Insect Physiol. 24, 207-214. Settele, J. (1998). Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis. Stuttgart: Teubner Verlag. Boughton, D.A. (2000). The dispersal system of a butterfly: a test of source-sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis. Am. Nat. 156, 131-144. Fritts, S.H., Bangs, E.E., Fontaine, J.A., Johnson, M.R., Phillips, M.K., Koch, E.D. & Gunson, J.R. (1997). Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. Restor. Ecol. 5, 7-27. 2007; 140 2000; 23 1984; 28 2006; 15 1998 2008; 58 2008; 12 2008; 13 1995 1998; 81 2008; 54 2007; 50 2000; 156 2008; 322 1997; 5 1998; 135 1998; 25 1999 2005; 19 2000; 14 1990 2000; 267 2001 2000 2005a 2000; 11 1987 1994; 99 2000; 81 1982 2005b; 47 1998; 2 1978; 24 1981; 19 2008; 156 1992; 1 1998; 79 2001; 76 Cammaerts M.C. (e_1_2_6_9_1) 1981 Pech P. (e_1_2_6_28_1) 2007; 50 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 Schaffers A.P. (e_1_2_6_30_1) 2000; 11 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 Elmes G.W. (e_1_2_6_14_1) 1987 Moilanen A. (e_1_2_6_24_1) 1998; 79 e_1_2_6_42_1 Ter Braak C.F. (e_1_2_6_36_1) 1998 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 Nowicki P. (e_1_2_6_26_1) 2005 Hovestadt T. (e_1_2_6_21_1) 2008; 54 Stettmer C. (e_1_2_6_34_1) 2001; 76 Boughton D.A. (e_1_2_6_7_1) 2000; 156 Nowicki P. (e_1_2_6_25_1) 2007; 140 Schultz C.B. (e_1_2_6_32_1) 2008; 54 Wynhoff I. (e_1_2_6_43_1) 2008; 58 Amler K. (e_1_2_6_2_1) 1999 e_1_2_6_8_1 IUCN. (e_1_2_6_22_1) 1995 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 Hanski I. (e_1_2_6_18_1) 1999 Tartally A. (e_1_2_6_35_1) 2008; 54 e_1_2_6_3_1 Ellenberg H. (e_1_2_6_12_1) 1982 e_1_2_6_23_1 Binzenhöfer B. (e_1_2_6_6_1) 2000 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 |
| References_xml | – reference: Diffendorfer, J.E. (1998). Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81, 417-433. – reference: Doak, P. (2000). Population consequences for restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81, 1828-1841. – reference: Schultz, C.B., Russell, C. & Wynn, L. (2008). Restoration, reintroduction, and captive propagation for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 41-61. – reference: Fritts, S.H., Bangs, E.E., Fontaine, J.A., Johnson, M.R., Phillips, M.K., Koch, E.D. & Gunson, J.R. (1997). Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. Restor. Ecol. 5, 7-27. – reference: Ertsen, A.C.D., Alkemade, J.R.M. & Wassen, M.J. (1998). Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 135, 113-124. – reference: Harrison, S. (1994). Resources and dispersal as factors limiting populations of the tussock moth (Orgyia vetusta), a flightless defoliator. Oecologia 99, 27-34. – reference: Amler, K., Bahl, A., Henle, K., Kaule, G., Poschlod, P. & Settele, J. (1999). Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co. – reference: Nowicki, P., Witek, M., Skorka, P., Settele, J. & Woyciechowski, M. (2005b). Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Popul. Ecol. 47, 193-202. – reference: Haddad, N. (2000). Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia. Conserv. Biol. 14, 738-745. – reference: Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. – reference: Elmes, G.W. & Thomas, J.A (1992). Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats - interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers. Conserv. 1, 155-169. – reference: Van Langevelde, F. (2000). Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations. Ecography 23, 614-622. – reference: Wynhoff, I. (1998). Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 47-57. – reference: Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Berlin: Springer Verlag. – reference: Rangel, T.F.L., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Bini, L.M. (2006). Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 321-327. – reference: Settele, J. (1998). Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis. Stuttgart: Teubner Verlag. – reference: Stettmer, C., Binzenhöfer, B. & Hartmann, P. (2001). Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaβnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund. Nat. Landsch. 76, 278-287. – reference: Thomas, J.A. (1984). The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the dusky large blue) and M. teleius (the scarce large blue) in France. Biol. Conserv. 28, 325-347. – reference: Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. (1998). Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79, 2503-2515. – reference: Cammaerts, M.C., Inwood, M.R., Morgan, E.D., Parry, K. & Tyler, R.C. (1978). Comparative study of the pheromones emitted by workers of the ant Myrmica rubra and Myrmica scabrinodis. J. Insect Physiol. 24, 207-214. – reference: Nowicki, P., Pepkowska, A., Kudlek, J., Skorka, P., Witek, M., Settele, J. & Woyciechowski, M. (2007). From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 140, 119-129. – reference: Van Dyck, H., Talloen, W., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Feenstra, V., Van der Hidde, A. & Wynhoff, I. (2000). Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 267, 861-866. – reference: Pech, P., Fric, Z. & Konvicka, M. (2007). Species-specificity of the Phengaris (Maculinea) -Myrmica host system: fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 50, 1-21. – reference: IUCN. (1995). IUCN/SCC guidelines for reintroductions. Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union. Available at http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/download/English.pdf (accessed 6 July 2009). – reference: Batáry, P., Körösi, A., Örvössy, N., Kövér, S. & Peregovits, L. (2008). Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges. J. Insect Conserv. 13, 223-230. – reference: Armstrong, D.P. (2005). Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1402-1410. – reference: Ellenberg, H. (1982). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Ulmer Verlag. – reference: Boughton, D.A. (2000). The dispersal system of a butterfly: a test of source-sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis. Am. Nat. 156, 131-144. – reference: Wynhoff, I., Grutters, M. & Van Langevelde, F. (2008). Looking for the ants: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species. Anim. Biol. 58, 371-388. – reference: Schipper, J., Chanson, J., Chiozza, F., Cox, N., Hoffmann, M., Katariya, V., Lamoreux, J., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Stuart, S.N., Temple, H.J., Baillie, J., Boitani, L., Lacher, T.E., Mittermeier, R.A. & Smith, A.T., et al. (2008). The biogeography of diversity, threat and knowledge in the world's terrestrial and aquatic mammals. Science 322, 225-230. – reference: Van Langevelde, F., Van der Knaap, W.G.M. & Claassen, G.D.H. (1998). Comparing connectivity in landscape networks. Environ. Plann. B 25, 849-863. – reference: Körösi, A., Örvössy, N., Batáry, P., Kövér, S. & Peregovits, L. (2008). Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies. Oecologia 156, 455-464. – reference: Schaffers, A.P. & Sýkora, K.V. (2000). Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci. 11, 225-244. – reference: Tartally, A. & Varga, Z. (2008). Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Acta Zool. Hung. 54, 257-268. – reference: Hovestadt, T. & Nowicki, P. (2008). Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 137-154. – reference: Ter Braak, C.F. & Smilauer, P. (1998). Canoco reference manual and users guide to Canoco for Windows (Canoco 4). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Centre for Biometry. – reference: Anton, C., Musche, M., Hula, V. & Settele, J. (2008). Myrmica host-ants limit the density of the ant-predatory large blue Maculinea nausithous. J. Insect Conserv. 12, 511-517. – start-page: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 98 – volume: 23 start-page: 614 year: 2000 end-page: 622 article-title: Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations publication-title: Ecography – volume: 81 start-page: 1828 year: 2000 end-page: 1841 article-title: Population consequences for restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat publication-title: Ecology – start-page: 144 year: 2005a end-page: 149 – volume: 156 start-page: 131 year: 2000 end-page: 144 article-title: The dispersal system of a butterfly publication-title: a test of source–sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis – volume: 11 start-page: 225 year: 2000 end-page: 244 article-title: Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction publication-title: a comparison with field measurements – volume: 12 start-page: 511 year: 2008 end-page: 517 article-title: host‐ants limit the density of the ant‐predatory large blue publication-title: J. Insect Conserv. – volume: 81 start-page: 417 year: 1998 end-page: 433 article-title: Testing models of source–sink dynamics and balanced dispersal publication-title: Oikos – year: 1987 – volume: 54 start-page: 41 year: 2008 end-page: 61 article-title: Restoration, reintroduction, and captive propagation for at‐risk butterflies publication-title: a review of British and American conservation efforts – year: 2001 – volume: 13 start-page: 223 year: 2008 end-page: 230 article-title: Species‐specific distribution of two sympatric butterflies across different meadow edges publication-title: J. Insect Conserv. – volume: 99 start-page: 27 year: 1994 end-page: 34 article-title: Resources and dispersal as factors limiting populations of the tussock moth ( ), a flightless defoliator publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 79 start-page: 2503 year: 1998 end-page: 2515 article-title: Metapopulation dynamics publication-title: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure – volume: 47 start-page: 193 year: 2005b end-page: 202 article-title: Population ecology of the endangered butterflies and and the implications for conservation publication-title: Popul. Ecol. – volume: 322 start-page: 225 year: 2008 end-page: 230 article-title: The biogeography of diversity, threat and knowledge in the world's terrestrial and aquatic mammals publication-title: Science – volume: 5 start-page: 7 year: 1997 end-page: 27 article-title: Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – year: 1990 – year: 1998 – volume: 58 start-page: 371 year: 2008 end-page: 388 article-title: Looking for the ants publication-title: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species – volume: 19 start-page: 1402 year: 2005 end-page: 1410 article-title: Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad‐scale declines of species publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 54 start-page: 257 year: 2008 end-page: 268 article-title: Host ant use of in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) publication-title: Acta Zool. Hung. – year: 1982 – volume: 50 start-page: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 21 article-title: Species‐specificity of the ( ) – host system publication-title: fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – volume: 24 start-page: 207 year: 1978 end-page: 214 article-title: Comparative study of the pheromones emitted by workers of the ant and publication-title: J. Insect Physiol. – volume: 14 start-page: 738 year: 2000 end-page: 745 article-title: Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 76 start-page: 278 year: 2001 end-page: 287 article-title: Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaβnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge und . Teil 1 publication-title: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund – volume: 19 start-page: 185 year: 1981 end-page: 192 – volume: 15 start-page: 321 year: 2006 end-page: 327 article-title: Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography publication-title: Global Ecol. Biogeogr. – volume: 156 start-page: 455 year: 2008 end-page: 464 article-title: Restricted within‐habitat movement and time‐constrained egg laying of female butterflies publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 140 start-page: 119 year: 2007 end-page: 129 article-title: From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations publication-title: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies – year: 1995 – volume: 135 start-page: 113 year: 1998 end-page: 124 article-title: Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands publication-title: Plant Ecol. – volume: 28 start-page: 325 year: 1984 end-page: 347 article-title: The behaviour and habitat requirements of (the dusky large blue) and (the scarce large blue) in France publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 54 start-page: 137 year: 2008 end-page: 154 article-title: Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches publication-title: analysis of mark–release–recapture data using randomization procedures – volume: 25 start-page: 849 year: 1998 end-page: 863 article-title: Comparing connectivity in landscape networks publication-title: Environ. Plann. B – volume: 267 start-page: 861 year: 2000 end-page: 866 article-title: Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous butterfly? publication-title: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. – volume: 2 start-page: 47 year: 1998 end-page: 57 article-title: Lessons from the reintroduction of and in the Netherlands publication-title: J. Insect Conserv. – volume: 1 start-page: 155 year: 1992 end-page: 169 article-title: Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats – interaction between butterflies and their ant hosts publication-title: Biodivers. Conserv. – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99041.x – start-page: 144 volume-title: Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(84)90040-5 – start-page: 185 volume-title: Biosystematics of social insects. Systematics association special year: 1981 ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.2307/3546763 – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1009692723056 – ident: e_1_2_6_42_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1009765529310 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00071.x – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1082 – volume-title: Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht year: 1982 ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09702.x – volume-title: Metapopulation ecology year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1828:PCORDF]2.0.CO;2 – volume: 54 start-page: 257 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 article-title: Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian Basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) publication-title: Acta Zool. Hung. – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230512.x – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-85170-3 – volume-title: Canoco reference manual and users guide to Canoco for Windows (Canoco 4) year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 – volume-title: Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1068/b250849 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00317080 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(78)90036-7 – volume: 54 start-page: 41 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 article-title: Restoration, reintroduction, and captive propagation for at‐risk butterflies publication-title: a review of British and American conservation efforts – volume: 11 start-page: 225 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 article-title: Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction publication-title: a comparison with field measurements – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9091-8 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Populationsökologische Studien an Tagfaltern 2 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 – volume: 54 start-page: 137 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 article-title: Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches publication-title: analysis of mark–release–recapture data using randomization procedures – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00237.x – volume: 140 start-page: 119 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 article-title: From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations publication-title: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies – volume-title: IUCN/SCC guidelines for reintroductions year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 – volume: 50 start-page: 1 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 article-title: Species‐specificity of the Phengaris (Maculinea) –Myrmica host system publication-title: fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00117.x – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-0986-1 – volume: 79 start-page: 2503 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 article-title: Metapopulation dynamics publication-title: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure – volume: 58 start-page: 371 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_43_1 article-title: Looking for the ants publication-title: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00695913 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3 – volume: 76 start-page: 278 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 article-title: Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaβnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1 publication-title: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1165115 – volume-title: Populationsbiologie in der Naturschutzpraxis year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 – volume: 156 start-page: 131 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 article-title: The dispersal system of a butterfly publication-title: a test of source–sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis |
| SSID | ssj0012831 |
| Score | 2.06498 |
| Snippet | Population growth and spread of recently reintroduced species is crucial for the success of their reintroduction. We analysed what limits the spread of two... |
| SourceID | wageningen proquest crossref wiley istex fao |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 540 |
| SubjectTerms | adults butterflies colonization connectivity conservation dispersal eggs ellenberg indicator values expansion-retraction habitat management habitat quality habitats large blue life history Maculinea nausithous Maculinea teleius metapopulation population population growth probability reintroduction scale |
| Title | What limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species after their reintroduction: quality or spatial arrangement of habitat |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-4K70XDX0-P/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1469-1795.2009.00281.x https://www.proquest.com/docview/1328521452 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1999960077 http://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs%2F384577 |
| Volume | 12 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000271952900009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1469-1795 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0012831 issn: 1367-9430 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9swFBZbukFf1t1KvRsajL15-CJF1l5GaZsNVkLZli1vwrq4hAa72EnTPO6f7xzZSfEYo4w9xRBLWPJ3pO9Y53yHkDeR40xzZ0OWWA0OSl6E4IKJ0AxZZFyhU629iOupGI-z6VSedfFPmAvT6kNsP7ihZfj1Gg08183vRi5RXpNvZCeTLH4HfHInARjzAdk5_jKanG7PFGAj7bKwRIii4_24nj_21dus7hZ5BRQWZ_-6x0d3V2D6pc-F6lNcv0eN9v7n6B6SBx1TpYcttB6RO658TO6feJXr9RPyE0W_6RzzoxoKLJI2l8A_La0KulhVFNzsc1S0nhmq21rY8zXFtE7wzKkvTE79GQWt3QyD5W2rYvuetlmea1rVcDvABh4hr2tMgcDvmNg9SosDRf7wlExGJ9-OPoVdPYfQMFhTwwxGM8xS7YTWzHGR86KAUVoW61xGHMPeEDaxzLjGklqwFptEiDQrhiaSwLP2yaCsSndAqJZDJ-Df1GoGhM5iKopOLLjEwthUsoCIzYtTphM7x5obc9VzeqTCCcZSnFL5CVbXAYm3LS9bwY9btDkAbKj8HNZlNfma4GkwyhQBVwvIWw-YbV95fYGxdIKrH-OPin0W0fR4GqmzgLzeIEqBheOxTV66atmoOE0yjoLyyV_ukei4ojZTQNIbOKoSC1I1CjXEO9Sp1bJW5Rx_wOAblWaMYyvu0XjrIavDo-9w8ewf2z0nu0lXiCOKX5DBol66l-SeuVrMmvpVZ7m_ANqoQQc |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bb9MwFLZgA7EX7mgZNyMh3oJyseuYFzRtK0Mr1QQr9O0oTpypokqmpF3XR_455zhpURFCE-IpkRJbsfMd-zu2z3cYex1YKYy0uS-i3KCDkhY-umDKz3oiyGxhYmOciOtADYfJeKxPu3RAFAvT6kOsF9zIMtx4TQZOC9K_W7kmfU250p2MkvAtEsptgahCuG8ffu6PButNBZxJuzAs5ZPq-ObBnj_WtTFb3SzSCjksdf_VBiHdWaDtly4YapPjukmqf--_Nu8-u9txVb7fgusBu2HLh-z2kdO5Xj5iP0j2m08pQqrhyCN5c4EMNOdVwWeLiqOjfU6a1pOMmzYb9nTJKbATfXPuUpNzt0vBazuh4_J5q2P7jrdxnkte1fg6Agc_Ia1rCoKglUyqnsTFkSS_f8xG_aOzg2O_y-jgZwJHVT_B1vSS2FhljLBSpbIosJW5CE2qA0kH3wg4oU6koaRaOBpnkVJxUvSyQCPTesK2yqq0u4wb3bMKn8a5EUjpcgpGMVGOTrHK8lgLj6nVn4OskzunrBtT2HB7NFAHUzJODa6D4cpj4brkRSv5cY0yuwgOSM9xZIbRl4j2g0moCNmax944xKzrSuvvdJpOSfg2_ADiRAXjw3EApx57tYIUoI3Txk1a2mreQBhHiSRJ-egv72hyXUmdyWPxLzxCSSmpGiAV8Q52sJjXUE7pgibfQJwISaWkg-O1mwz7B1_xZu8fy71kd47PPg1g8HF48pTtRF1ajiB8xrZm9dw-Z7eyy9mkqV90ZvwTEllE9w |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELagC2gvPBdteBoJcQvKw65jLmi13QLaqqqAQm9WHDuriiqpkpZuj_xzZpy0KAihFeKUSImt2Jmxv7E930fIy8Byprk1PouMhgAlzX0IwYSf9VmQ2VzHWjsS15EYj5PZTE5aOSDMhWn4IfYLbugZbrxGB7dLk__u5RL5NfmOdzJKwtcAKA8Yasr0yMHg43A62m8qwEzapmEJH1nHuwd7_lhXZ7a6nqclYFjs_ssOID3cgO8XLhmqi3HdJDW881-bd5fcbrEqPWmM6x65Zov75OaZ47nePiA_kPabLjBDqqaAI2m9BARqaJnT1aakEGhfIKf1PKO6UcNebCkmdkJsTp00OXW7FLSyczwubxoe2ze0yfPc0rKC18Fw4BPSqsIkCFzJxOqRXBxA8tsjMh2efT5977eKDn7GYFT1E2hNP4m1FVozy0XK8xxaaVioUxlwPPiGhhPKhGsU1YLROIuEiJO8nwUSkNZD0ivKwh4TqmXfCngaG80A0hlMRtGRgaBYZCaWzCNi9-dU1tKdo-rGQnXCHqmwg1GMUyrXwerSI-G-5LKh_LhCmWMwDpVewMispp8i3A9GoiJAax555SxmX1dafcPTdIKrr-N3ip2LYDaYBWrikRc7k1Lg47hxkxa2XNcqjKOEI6V89Jd3JIauyM7kkfiXPaoCJalqhSzirdmpzbpSxQIv4PK1ihPGsRR35njlJquT0y9w8-gfyz0ntyaDoRp9GJ8_JodRq8oRhE9Ib1Wt7VNyI_u-mtfVs9aLfwI2a0Ry |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What+limits+the+spread+of+two+congeneric+butterfly+species+after+their+reintroduction%3A+quality+or+spatial+arrangement+of+habitat%3F&rft.jtitle=Animal+conservation&rft.au=van+Langevelde%2C+F.&rft.au=Wynhoff%2C+I.&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1469-1795.2009.00281.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_4K70XDX0_P |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |