Surface extraction can provide a reference for micro-CT analysis of retrieved total knee implants

Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee Jg. 21; H. 4; S. 801 - 805
Hauptverfasser: Teeter, Matthew G., Milner, Jaques S., Naudie, Douglas D.R., MacDonald, Steven J.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.08.2014
Elsevier Limited
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0968-0160, 1873-5800, 1873-5800
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness. New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined. The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053mm). An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries. This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
AbstractList Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness. New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined. The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010 mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053 mm). An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries. This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness. New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined. The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053mm). An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries. This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
Abstract Background Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness. Methods New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined. Results The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010 mm) were less (p < 0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053 mm). Conclusions An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries. Clinical relevance This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
Background Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness. Methods New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined. Results The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053mm). Conclusions An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries. Clinical relevance This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness.BACKGROUNDQuantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information. However, to perform these measurements there needs to be an estimate of the original, unworn geometry of the component, often requiring multiple scans of the various sizes of components that have been retrieved. The objective of this study was to determine whether the articular and backside surfaces could be independently segmented from a micro-CT reconstruction of a tibial insert, such that a tibial insert of one thickness could be used as a reference for a tibial insert of a different thickness.New tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined.METHODSNew tibial inserts of a single width but with six different thicknesses were obtained and scanned with micro-CT. An automated method was developed to computationally segment the articular and backside surfaces of the components. Variability between intact and extracted components was determined.The deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010 mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053 mm).RESULTSThe deviations between the comparisons of the extracted surfaces (range, 0.0004 to 0.010 mm) were less (p<0.001) than the baseline deviation between the intact surfaces (range, 0.0002 to 0.053 mm).An extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries.CONCLUSIONSAn extracted surface from one insert thickness could be used to accurately represent the surface of an insert of a different thickness. This greatly enhances the feasibility of performing retrieval studies using micro-CT as a quantitative tool, by reducing the costs and time associated with acquiring, scanning, and reconstructing multiple reference tibial insert geometries.This will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.CLINICAL RELEVANCEThis will add greater detail to studies of retrieved implants, to better establish how implants are functioning in vivo.
Author Naudie, Douglas D.R.
MacDonald, Steven J.
Teeter, Matthew G.
Milner, Jaques S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Matthew G.
  surname: Teeter
  fullname: Teeter, Matthew G.
  email: matthew.teeter@lhsc.on.ca
  organization: Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jaques S.
  surname: Milner
  fullname: Milner, Jaques S.
  organization: Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Douglas D.R.
  surname: Naudie
  fullname: Naudie, Douglas D.R.
  organization: Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Steven J.
  surname: MacDonald
  fullname: MacDonald, Steven J.
  organization: Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk2LFDEQhoOsuLOrf8CDBLx46bHSSXc6Igsy-AULHnYFbyGTrkBmezpjkh6cf2_a2UUYcIVALs9bqTxVF-RsDCMS8pLBkgFr326WdyPisgYmllAOqCdkwTrJq6YDOCMLUG1XFRLOyUVKGwBolWiekfNadA1nii2IuZmiMxYp_srR2OzDSK0Z6S6Gve-RGhrRYcSxIC5EuvU2hmp1S81ohkPyiQZXkBw97rGnOWQz0Lkt6re7wYw5PSdPnRkSvri_L8n3Tx9vV1-q62-fv64-XFdWKMiVqzsQyIVdq66tLVOGS2db3vToJCrXGK56lG2Ncm1l53Ddi4YLCS2rG960_JK8OdYtrf-cMGW99cniUJrAMCXNZqqWjRQFfX2CbsIUy4f-UILzlnW8UK_uqWm9xV7vot-aeNAP8grQHYGiJKXiSVufzaywqPSDZqDnOemNnoXoeU4aygFVovVJ9KH6o6H3xxAWjXuPUSfr58n0PqLNug_-8fjVSdwOfvTWDHd4wPRXgU61Bn0zb8-8PEyUxZHiRynw7t8F_vf6b8Mt03c
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2016_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wear_2020_203552
crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_3601480
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma10040364
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbm_b_33684
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2015_06_036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2015_07_045
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.001
10.1002/jbm.820170510
10.1002/jbm.b.32782
10.1097/01.blo.0000063604.67412.04
10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.096
10.1007/s11999-012-2513-2
10.1177/0954411913486755
10.5435/00124635-200701000-00006
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.040
10.1007/s11999-011-2143-0
10.1088/1742-6596/13/1/074
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.
Elsevier B.V.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2014
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1873-5800
EndPage 805
ExternalDocumentID 3329647031
24853191
10_1016_j_knee_2014_04_009
S096801601400074X
1_s2_0_S096801601400074X
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29L
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8FE
8FH
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKEYQ
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEE
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LK8
M29
M31
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF0
OR.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
UHS
UPT
WOW
WUQ
YQT
Z5R
~G-
~HD
3V.
7RV
7X7
8FI
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKRA
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
FYUFA
GUQSH
HCIFZ
M1P
M2O
M7P
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
LCYCR
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
AGCQF
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f2804e34cb9862c19a37fc635def7e9f5a39de762e7bc78febd45347061253563
ISICitedReferencesCount 9
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000339150500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0968-0160
1873-5800
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 17:13:03 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:17:51 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:53:59 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:17:32 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:08:35 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:28:36 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:27:45 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Retrieval analysis
Total knee arthroplasty
Polyethylene wear
Micro-computed tomography
Language English
License Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-f2804e34cb9862c19a37fc635def7e9f5a39de762e7bc78febd45347061253563
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 24853191
PQID 1534336183
PQPubID 1216385
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1535627574
proquest_journals_1534336183
pubmed_primary_24853191
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_knee_2014_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2014_04_009
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_knee_2014_04_009
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S096801601400074X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_knee_2014_04_009
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
– name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle The knee
PublicationTitleAlternate Knee
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Knowlton, Wimmer (bb0040) 2013 Apr; 101
Teeter, Naudie, Bourne, Holdsworth (bb0030) 2012 Jul; 470
Bills, Brown, Jiang, Blunt (bb0050) 2005; 13
McKellop (bb0010) 2007 Dec; 28
Naudie, Ammeen, Engh, Rorabeck (bb0045) 2007 Jan; 15
Engh, Zimmerman, Hopper, Engh (bb0015) 2013 Jan; 471
Teeter, Naudie, Charron, Holdsworth (bb0020) 2010 Feb; 25
Teeter, Milner, MacDonald, Naudie (bb0025) 2013 Aug; 227
Hood, Wright, Burstein (bb0005) 1983 Sep; 17
Muratoglu, Perinchief, Bragdon, O'Connor, Konrad, Harris (bb0055) 2003 May; 410
Teeter, Naudie, Milner, Holdsworth (bb0035) 2011 Apr; 26
Teeter (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0025) 2013; 227
Teeter (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0035) 2011; 26
Hood (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0005) 1983; 17
Engh (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0015) 2013; 471
Bills (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0050) 2005; 13
McKellop (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0010) 2007; 28
Teeter (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0020) 2010; 25
Naudie (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0045) 2007; 15
Teeter (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0030) 2012; 470
Muratoglu (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0055) 2003; 410
Knowlton (10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0040) 2013; 101
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 829
  year: 1983 Sep
  end-page: 842
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res
– volume: 28
  start-page: 5049
  year: 2007 Dec
  end-page: 5057
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints
  publication-title: Biomaterials
– volume: 227
  start-page: 884
  year: 2013 Aug
  end-page: 889
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Manufacturing lot affects polyethylene tibial insert volume, thickness, and surface geometry
  publication-title: Proc Inst Mech Eng H
– volume: 470
  start-page: 1847
  year: 2012 Jul
  end-page: 1854
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 26
  start-page: 497
  year: 2011 Apr
  end-page: 503
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Determination of reference geometry for polyethylene tibial insert wear analysis
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
– volume: 15
  start-page: 53
  year: 2007 Jan
  end-page: 64
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
– volume: 13
  start-page: 316
  year: 2005
  end-page: 319
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: A metrology solution for the orthopaedic industry
  publication-title: J Phys Conf Ser
– volume: 471
  start-page: 86
  year: 2013 Jan
  end-page: 93
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 25
  start-page: 330
  year: 2010 Feb
  end-page: 332
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Three-dimensional surface deviation maps for analysis of retrieved polyethylene acetabular liners using micro-computed tomography
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
– volume: 410
  start-page: 155
  year: 2003 May
  end-page: 164
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Metrology to quantify wear and creep of polyethylene tibial knee inserts
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 101
  start-page: 449
  year: 2013 Apr
  end-page: 457
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
– volume: 25
  start-page: 330
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0020
  article-title: Three-dimensional surface deviation maps for analysis of retrieved polyethylene acetabular liners using micro-computed tomography
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.001
– volume: 17
  start-page: 829
  issue: 5
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0005
  article-title: Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.820170510
– volume: 101
  start-page: 449
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0040
  article-title: An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts
  publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
  doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32782
– volume: 410
  start-page: 155
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0055
  article-title: Metrology to quantify wear and creep of polyethylene tibial knee inserts
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063604.67412.04
– volume: 26
  start-page: 497
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0035
  article-title: Determination of reference geometry for polyethylene tibial insert wear analysis
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.096
– volume: 471
  start-page: 86
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0015
  article-title: Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2513-2
– volume: 227
  start-page: 884
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0025
  article-title: Manufacturing lot affects polyethylene tibial insert volume, thickness, and surface geometry
  publication-title: Proc Inst Mech Eng H
  doi: 10.1177/0954411913486755
– volume: 15
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0045
  article-title: Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.5435/00124635-200701000-00006
– volume: 28
  start-page: 5049
  issue: 34
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0010
  article-title: The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints
  publication-title: Biomaterials
  doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.040
– volume: 470
  start-page: 1847
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0030
  article-title: How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2143-0
– volume: 13
  start-page: 316
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009_bb0050
  article-title: A metrology solution for the orthopaedic industry
  publication-title: J Phys Conf Ser
  doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/13/1/074
SSID ssj0006945
Score 2.086684
Snippet Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable information....
Abstract Background Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable...
Background Quantitative measurements of damage and wear in orthopaedic components retrieved from patients during revision surgery can provide valuable...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 801
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Device Removal
Geometry
Humans
Knee Prosthesis
Manufacturers
Manufacturing
Medical research
Methods
Micro-computed tomography
Orthopedics
Polyethylene
Polyethylene wear
Principal components analysis
Prosthesis Design
Retrieval analysis
Software utilities
Studies
Total knee arthroplasty
X-Ray Microtomography
Title Surface extraction can provide a reference for micro-CT analysis of retrieved total knee implants
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S096801601400074X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S096801601400074X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.04.009
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853191
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1534336183
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1535627574
Volume 21
WOSCitedRecordID wos000339150500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-5800
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006945
  issn: 0968-0160
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950301
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZ24YEXBIxLYUxGQrxUqZLYqePHqhTBEBXSitQ3y0kcaaNLp940_hK_knMcxymMjouEVEWVYye2z5dzju1zIeRVGMukyIosyDgeM8YmDVIWpgEHWqcm6xuec5tsQozH6XQqP-3tfWt8YTYzUVXp9bW8-q-khjIgNrrO_gW5_UOhAP4D0eEKZIfrHxH-bL0oNXytwHUXLhE4cjrnctfVXZ9ZxJoYXqJFXjCcdPVWeJKFzbO1AWV0NUdvyS-VMehQOdMu8lOjzyLK8KbfADDGZfpwicTb3F0fz2fOueZUozBqN13HGm0Zt9T57pteaw2st_evbQ42d5Tl9ioi7i3l_KZjHwvqDAIN_42jLZzxLWaauqZOLlv37Jssv959uOjhYNFUj9vQtaFsBVxzqD8afoiCZdwLgzPsCPYDlpeoRE1_rFyvjtQyVqG6UXWfHMYikcBBDwfvR9NTL_f70qbE9mN0Llq1NeHPvdulBu1a5lh1Z3Kf3HPrFDqo8fWA7JnqITkaVHo1v_xKX1NrOWyPZI6IdpCjLeQoQI46yFFNPeQoQI42kKMN5Oi8pB5y1EKO4lBoA7lH5PPb0WT4LnCpO4Kcy3AVlHEacsN4nklYMueR1EyUOSi3hSmFkWWimSwMCGIjslykpckKnjAurMLNkj57TA6qeWWeEsokL5mQhShBt9dRX4PKlRZMYyA8E4uoQ6JmJlXu4tpjepWZagwYLxR2WeHsqxB-oeyQrm9zVUd1ubU2awikGn9lkLAKEHhrK_GrVmbpeMVS7UJYhyS-pdODa_32t288btCj2pfAtDLWB8ndIS_9bZAheDCoKzNf2zoJRisXvEOe1Kjz04IhD0FMR8_-eTjPyd2WFxyTg9VibV6QO_lmdb5cnJB9MU1P3Lf0HYYq8yQ
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface+extraction+can+provide+a+reference+for+micro-CT+analysis+of+retrieved+total+knee+implants&rft.jtitle=The+knee&rft.au=Teeter%2C+Matthew+G&rft.au=Milner%2C+Jaques+S&rft.au=Naudie%2C+Douglas+D.R&rft.au=MacDonald%2C+Steven+J&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.knee.2014.04.009&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S096801601400074X&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S096801601400074X
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F09680160%2FS0968016014X00049%2Fcov150h.gif