Implementation of the IPACK (Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) block into a multimodal analgesic pathway for total knee replacement

The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Korean journal of anesthesiology Ročník 72; číslo 3; s. 238 - 244
Hlavní autori: Kandarian, Brandon, Indelli, Pier F., Sinha, Sanjay, Hunter, Oluwatobi O., Wang, Rachel R., Kim, T. Edward, Kou, Alex, Mariano, Edward R.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Korea (South) Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 01.06.2019
대한마취통증의학회
Predmet:
ISSN:2005-6419, 2005-7563, 2005-7563
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients. With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days. Post-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th-90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0-4.3] vs. 2.5 [0-7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes. Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly.
AbstractList The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients.BACKGROUNDThe Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients.With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days.METHODSWith Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days.Post-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th-90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0-4.3] vs. 2.5 [0-7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes.RESULTSPost-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th-90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0-4.3] vs. 2.5 [0-7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes.Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly.CONCLUSIONSWithin a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly.
The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients. With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days. Post-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th-90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0-4.3] vs. 2.5 [0-7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes. Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly.
Background: The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients. Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days. Results: Post-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th–90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0–4.3] vs. 2.5 [0–7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly. KCI Citation Count: 1
Background The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling posterior knee pain that has not yet been well studied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. We compared pain outcomes in TKA patients before and after implementation of the IPACK with the hypothesis that patients receiving IPACK blocks will report lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 than non-IPACK patients. Methods With Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed data for consecutive TKA patients by a single surgeon 4 months before (PRE) and after (POST) IPACK implementation. All TKA patients received adductor canal catheters and peri-operative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain on POD 0. Other outcomes were daily pain scores, opioid consumption, ambulation distance, length of stay, and adverse events within 30 days. Results Post-implementation, 48/50 (96%) of TKA patients received an IPACK block, and they were compared with 32 patients in the PRE group. On POD 0, the lowest pain score (median [10th–90th percentiles]) was significantly lower for the POST group compared to the PRE group (0 [0–4.3] vs. 2.5 [0–7]; P = 0.003). The highest patient-reported pain scores on any POD were similar between groups with no differences in other outcomes. Conclusions Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, addition of IPACK blocks decreased the lowest pain scores on POD 0. Although other outcomes were unchanged, there may be a role for new opioid-sparing analgesic techniques, and changing clinical practice change can occur rapidly.
Author Kandarian, Brandon
Hunter, Oluwatobi O.
Mariano, Edward R.
Indelli, Pier F.
Wang, Rachel R.
Kou, Alex
Sinha, Sanjay
Kim, T. Edward
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Brandon
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5264-9264
  surname: Kandarian
  fullname: Kandarian, Brandon
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pier F.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4752-8027
  surname: Indelli
  fullname: Indelli, Pier F.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sanjay
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9955-0605
  surname: Sinha
  fullname: Sinha, Sanjay
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Oluwatobi O.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1502-9522
  surname: Hunter
  fullname: Hunter, Oluwatobi O.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Rachel R.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3481-0699
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Rachel R.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: T. Edward
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1183-3556
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, T. Edward
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Alex
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1807-1176
  surname: Kou
  fullname: Kou, Alex
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Edward R.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2735-248X
  surname: Mariano
  fullname: Mariano, Edward R.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002470087$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1Uk1v2yAYtqZOa9f1uuPEsT0kAxuwuUyKon1YrbRq6s4I49cJCQYPk1b5P_uho05arZPGBcTz8T6g52124ryDLHtP8JxiUX7cbtS8nZNqjnFB-avsLMeYzUrGi5PjmVMiTrOLcdzgtIoCY56_yU4LXJa8Kquz7HfdDxZ6cFFF4x3yHYprQPXtYnmNLmvXGRvDAWogPgC4Cb_1gzURlEWLECHskXItWqph3Fl48rh2AFeosV5vkXHRI4X6nY2m923SKafsCkaj0aDi-kHtUecDij4mbJuUKMBglZ6ivcted8qOcHHcz7OfXz7fLb_Nbr5_rZeLm5mmAscZNEQznmtWKsiJ0CBaXEHX6JZonIsKWJP-Ji8UUQITTnGRF21TiLZkpOE5FOfZ1cHXhU5utZFemWlfebkNcvHjrpaMYYorkbj1gdt6tZFDML0K-0kwXfiwkipEoy3IipUdE5xQxQTlVAuGWypaojrS8arDyevTwWvYNT20Oj05KPvC9CXizDplupec0TLPH8NcHg2C_7WDMcrejBqsVQ78bpQ5qQpOq4KRRP3w96znIU-VSIT5gaCDH8cA3TOFYPlYO5lqJ1tJKjnVLgnoPwJtDm1KWY39n-wPNO3d4g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2020_109857
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2020_101909
crossref_primary_10_4103_ija_ija_530_22
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2021_1974840
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000025884
crossref_primary_10_1111_os_13263
crossref_primary_10_4103_TheIAForum_TheIAForum_95_22
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2023_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artd_2023_101292
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000943
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_021_04731_6
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2020_101396
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2021_102681
crossref_primary_10_2217_pmt_2020_0104
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anclin_2022_04_003
crossref_primary_10_5812_ipmn_115222
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_020_05854_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2020_02_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2021_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000001045
crossref_primary_10_29254_2077_4214_2022_3_166_324_331
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2020_101558
crossref_primary_10_17116_anaesthesiology202302134
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_020_03724_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_022_03047_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2022_03_073
crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2024_105782
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13741_023_00346_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2022_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000001056
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000021670
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2020_06_086
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2019_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2019_06_002
crossref_primary_10_23950_jcmk_16681
crossref_primary_10_1097_AIA_0000000000000319
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2024_11_013
Cites_doi 10.4097/kja.d.18.00217
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002198
10.1177/1089253215607066
10.2217/pmt.15.8
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000712
10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.03.002
10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862
10.1097/AAP.0b013e318296b6a0
10.1007/s10067-009-1201-4
10.7863/ultra.33.9.1653
10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.001
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02429.x
10.5792/ksrr.17.088
10.1097/AAP.0000000000000588
10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7
10.1002/jum.14761
10.3928/01477447-20110124-11
10.2217/pmt-2018-0017
10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002132
10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y
10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2019 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2019 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.4097/kja.d.18.00346
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2005-7563
EndPage 244
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_5504089
oai_doaj_org_article_857f59614a59464c950d49d1af1f68f0
PMC6547229
30776878
10_4097_kja_d_18_00346
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 5-W
53G
8JR
8XY
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EF.
ESX
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
TUS
9ZL
ADRAZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
HZB
NPM
7X8
5PM
ABPTK
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-eb1c562c57ae219ce9d08efbcd1c0298e5b75623a1a901640323db39d751b62e3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 43
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000470011100005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2005-6419
2005-7563
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:35:36 EST 2023
Fri Oct 03 12:46:26 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 01:58:52 EST 2025
Thu Oct 02 10:20:03 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:10 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:01:19 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:19:42 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Local infiltration analgesia
IPACK
Total knee arthroplasty
Adductor canal catheter
Multimodal analgesia
Implementation
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-eb1c562c57ae219ce9d08efbcd1c0298e5b75623a1a901640323db39d751b62e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1502-9522
0000-0003-1807-1176
0000-0002-3481-0699
0000-0003-2735-248X
0000-0001-5264-9264
0000-0002-4752-8027
0000-0002-9955-0605
0000-0002-1183-3556
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/857f59614a59464c950d49d1af1f68f0
PMID 30776878
PQID 2183648351
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_5504089
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_857f59614a59464c950d49d1af1f68f0
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6547229
proquest_miscellaneous_2183648351
pubmed_primary_30776878
crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_d_18_00346
crossref_citationtrail_10_4097_kja_d_18_00346
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Korean journal of anesthesiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Korean J Anesthesiol
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
대한마취통증의학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
– name: 대한마취통증의학회
References ref13
ref24
ref12
ref23
ref15
ref14
ref20
ref11
ref22
ref10
ref21
ref2
ref1
Thobhani (ref7) 2017
Kim (ref8) 2018
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
References_xml – ident: ref15
  doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00217
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002198
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1177/1089253215607066
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.8
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000712
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.03.002
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318296b6a0
– start-page: 233
  volume-title: Novel regional techniques for total knee arthroplasty promotereduced hospital length of stay: an analysis of 106 patients
  year: 2017
  ident: ref7
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1201-4
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.9.1653
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.001
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02429.x
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.5792/ksrr.17.088
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000588
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1002/jum.14761
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110124-11
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0017
– year: 2018
  ident: ref8
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002132
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
SSID ssj0000330062
Score 2.35462
Snippet The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for controlling...
Background The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for...
Background: The Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block is a new anesthesiologist- administered analgesic technique for...
SourceID nrf
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 238
SubjectTerms adductor canal catheter
Aged
Analgesia - methods
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anesthesia, Local - methods
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Clinical
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
implementation
ipack
Joint Capsule - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
local infiltration analgesia
Male
Middle Aged
multimodal analgesia
Pain Management
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology
Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
total knee arthroplasty
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
마취과학
Title Implementation of the IPACK (Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) block into a multimodal analgesic pathway for total knee replacement
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776878
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2183648351
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6547229
https://doaj.org/article/857f59614a59464c950d49d1af1f68f0
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002470087
Volume 72
WOSCitedRecordID wos000470011100005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2019, 72(3), , pp.238-244
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2005-7563
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000330062
  issn: 2005-6419
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 19680101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWg4sAFgfgKlMogJOCQNh9ObB_LiopVpWoPIO3Nchwb0mydKk2p-n_4ocw42dUuAnHhFCmxI8fz7HmjjN8Q8taUHIkvi3NnTMwKp2NRZTrmLhO6cLaUpQvFJvjZmVgu5WKr1BfmhI3ywOPEHYmCu0KCE9GFZCUzskhqJutUu9SVwoVoPeFyK5gKezCE6UmoJhqkNkuWylGxEeWdjtpzfVgfpphFmSPz3fJIQbgf_Izv3Z845--pk1u-6OQheTCRSHo8Dv4RuWP9Y_IzCP1eTGeJPO0cBXJH54vj2Sl9P_euWU0SuXRKzgrPF90lHkMeX2f7W6p9TWcagueVXb_j1Fv7gVbg91ra-KGjmoZExIuuhn7aY60QsDbF8sY3-pYCEaZDB7SettCT9jZkfuHQnpCvJ5--zD7HUw2G2DCZDDFs5QYokim4trC5GSvrRFhXmTo1qN5ui4ojhdKplqjWleRZXle5rHmRVmVm86dkz3fePidUlFXOwfSycJwBdIQBtpZV0DdxzCQiIvHaDspMAuVYJ2OlIFBBuymwm6pVKlSwW0TebdpfjtIcf235Ec26aYWS2uEGAE1NQFP_AlpE3gAoVGua0B-v3zrV9goCj7lCvCdCRuT1GjMK1in-fNHedtdXCqloyYDvphF5NmJoM54cNZUEhxngO-jaGfDuE998D1rgWDs6y-SL__GFL8l9oINyTITbJ3tDf21fkXvmx9Bc9QfkLl-Kg7DMfgGRHSu2
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation+of+the+IPACK+%28Infiltration+between+the+Popliteal+Artery+and+Capsule+of+the+Knee%29+block+into+a+multimodal+analgesic+pathway+for+total+knee+replacement&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+anesthesiology&rft.au=Kandarian%2C+Brandon&rft.au=Indelli%2C+Pier+F.&rft.au=Sinha%2C+Sanjay&rft.au=Hunter%2C+Oluwatobi+O.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.pub=Korean+Society+of+Anesthesiologists&rft.issn=2005-6419&rft.eissn=2005-7563&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=244&rft_id=info:doi/10.4097%2Fkja.d.18.00346&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30776878&rft.externalDocID=PMC6547229
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-6419&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-6419&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-6419&client=summon