PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation

Recently published articles have described criteria to assess qualitative research in the health field in general, but very few articles have delineated qualitative methods to be used in the development of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). In fact, how PROs are developed with subject input through f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality of life research Vol. 19; no. 8; pp. 1087 - 1096
Main Authors: Lasch, Kathryn Eilene, Marquis, Patrick, Vigneux, Marc, Abetz, Linda, Arnould, Benoit, Bayliss, Martha, Crawford, Bruce, Rosa, Kathleen
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer 01.10.2010
Springer Netherlands
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Cognitive psychology
Conceptual frameworks
Content validity
Data collection
Data Collection - methods
Focus groups
Grounded theory
Grounded theory method
Health
Interdisciplinary aspects
Interviews
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Observational research
Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods
Patients
Psychological research
Psychologists
Psychometrics
Public Health
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Quality of Life Research
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Research methodology
Research methods
Sociology
Validation Studies as Topic
Validity
Qualitative research
PRO development
Grounded theory methods
ISSN:0962-9343, 1573-2649, 1573-2649
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recently published articles have described criteria to assess qualitative research in the health field in general, but very few articles have delineated qualitative methods to be used in the development of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). In fact, how PROs are developed with subject input through focus groups and interviews has been given relatively short shrift in the PRO literature when compared to the plethora of quantitative articles on the psychometric properties of PROs. If documented at all, most PRO validation articles give little for the reader to evaluate the content validity of the measures and the credibility and trustworthiness of the methods used to develop them. Increasingly, however, scientists and authorities want to be assured that PRO items and scales have meaning and relevance to subjects. This article was developed by an international, interdisciplinary group of psychologists, psychometricians, regulatory experts, a physician, and a sociologist. It presents rigorous and appropriate qualitative research methods for developing PROs with content validity. The approach described combines an overarching phenomenological theoretical framework with grounded theory data collection and analysis methods to yield PRO items and scales that have content validity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-9343
1573-2649
1573-2649
DOI:10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6