Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program

Building on an idea in Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003), this article investigates the application of synthetic control methods to comparative case studies. We discuss the advantages of these methods and apply them to study the effects of Proposition 99, a large-scale tobacco control program that Calif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 105; no. 490; pp. 493 - 505
Main Authors: Abadie, Alberto, Diamond, Alexis, Hainmueller, Jens
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Alexandria, VA American Statistical Association 01.06.2010
Assoc
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
ISSN:0162-1459, 1537-274X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Building on an idea in Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003), this article investigates the application of synthetic control methods to comparative case studies. We discuss the advantages of these methods and apply them to study the effects of Proposition 99, a large-scale tobacco control program that California implemented in 1988. We demonstrate that, following Proposition 99, tobacco consumption fell markedly in California relative to a comparable synthetic control region. We estimate that by the year 2000 annual per-capita cigarette sales in California were about 26 packs lower than what they would have been in the absence of Proposition 99. Using new inferential methods proposed in this article, we demonstrate the significance of our estimates. Given that many policy interventions and events of interest in social sciences take place at an aggregate level (countries, regions, cities, etc.) and affect a small number of aggregate units, the potential applicability of synthetic control methods to comparative case studies is very large, especially in situations where traditional regression methods are not appropriate.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0162-1459
1537-274X
DOI:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746