Evidence for colorectal cancer screening
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is benefici...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Baillière's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 417 - 425 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2010
Elsevier Limited |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1521-6918, 1532-1916, 1532-1916 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is beneficial.
This paper outlines the evidence for efficacy from randomised trials for the most commonly used CRC screening tests to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the average-risk population.
Four randomised trials have investigated the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood screening on CRC mortality, with a combined CRC mortality risk reduction of 15–17% in an intention-to-screen analysis, and 25% for those people who attended screening. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been evaluated in three randomised trials. The observed reduction in CRC incidence varied between 23 and 80%, and between 27 and 67% for CRC mortality, respectively (intention-to-screen analyses) in the trials with long follow-up time. No randomised trials exist in other CRC screening tools, included colonoscopy screening.
FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the two CRC screening methods which have been tested in randomised trials and shown to reduce CRC mortality. These tests can be recommended for CRC screening. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is beneficial. This paper outlines the evidence for efficacy from randomised trials for the most commonly used CRC screening tests to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the average-risk population. Four randomised trials have investigated the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood screening on CRC mortality, with a combined CRC mortality risk reduction of 15-17% in an intention-to-screen analysis, and 25% for those people who attended screening. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been evaluated in three randomised trials. The observed reduction in CRC incidence varied between 23 and 80%, and between 27 and 67% for CRC mortality, respectively (intention-to-screen analyses) in the trials with long follow-up time. No randomised trials exist in other CRC screening tools, included colonoscopy screening. FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the two CRC screening methods which have been tested in randomised trials and shown to reduce CRC mortality. These tests can be recommended for CRC screening. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is beneficial. This paper outlines the evidence for efficacy from randomised trials for the most commonly used CRC screening tests to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the average-risk population. Four randomised trials have investigated the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood screening on CRC mortality, with a combined CRC mortality risk reduction of 15–17% in an intention-to-screen analysis, and 25% for those people who attended screening. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been evaluated in three randomised trials. The observed reduction in CRC incidence varied between 23 and 80%, and between 27 and 67% for CRC mortality, respectively (intention-to-screen analyses) in the trials with long follow-up time. No randomised trials exist in other CRC screening tools, included colonoscopy screening. FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the two CRC screening methods which have been tested in randomised trials and shown to reduce CRC mortality. These tests can be recommended for CRC screening. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is beneficial. This paper outlines the evidence for efficacy from randomised trials for the most commonly used CRC screening tests to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the average-risk population. Four randomised trials have investigated the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood screening on CRC mortality, with a combined CRC mortality risk reduction of 15-17% in an intention-to-screen analysis, and 25% for those people who attended screening. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been evaluated in three randomised trials. The observed reduction in CRC incidence varied between 23 and 80%, and between 27 and 67% for CRC mortality, respectively (intention-to-screen analyses) in the trials with long follow-up time. No randomised trials exist in other CRC screening tools, included colonoscopy screening. FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the two CRC screening methods which have been tested in randomised trials and shown to reduce CRC mortality. These tests can be recommended for CRC screening.The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%. CRC is a good candidate for screening, because it is a disease with high prevalence, has recognised precursors, and early treatment is beneficial. This paper outlines the evidence for efficacy from randomised trials for the most commonly used CRC screening tests to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the average-risk population. Four randomised trials have investigated the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood screening on CRC mortality, with a combined CRC mortality risk reduction of 15-17% in an intention-to-screen analysis, and 25% for those people who attended screening. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been evaluated in three randomised trials. The observed reduction in CRC incidence varied between 23 and 80%, and between 27 and 67% for CRC mortality, respectively (intention-to-screen analyses) in the trials with long follow-up time. No randomised trials exist in other CRC screening tools, included colonoscopy screening. FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the two CRC screening methods which have been tested in randomised trials and shown to reduce CRC mortality. These tests can be recommended for CRC screening. |
| Author | Bretthauer, Michael |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michael surname: Bretthauer fullname: Bretthauer, Michael email: michael.bretthauer@rikshospitalet.no organization: Centre for Colorectal Cancer Screening, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20833346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkl1rFDEUhoNU7If-AG9kwYt6M-vJ9wyCIKVaoeCFen3IZs6UrLPJmswW-u-bYVuEBdurfL3Pe5L35JQdxRSJsbcclhy4-bherrY3SwF1DWYJoF-wE66laHjHzdE8F7wxHW-P2Wkpa4AKdd0rdiyglVIqc8I-XN6GnqKnxZDywqcxZfKTGxfe1c28KD4TxRBvXrOXgxsLvXkYz9jvr5e_Lq6a6x_fvl98uW68avXU8N6uhLFqMMJDC1z7fnBaQGetaVeDtdQrLcFCq7gXQPXIabKtrRAMIOUZO9_7bnP6u6My4SYUT-PoIqVdQasVgJJKVeX7A-U67XKsl0MOUljNa9mqeveg2q021OM2h43Ld_gYQRXYvcDnVEqmAX2Y3BRSnLILY_XCOWxcYw0b57ARDNawK8kPyEfzp5hPe4ZqhreBMhYf5vz7MAePfQpP0p8PaD-GGLwb_9AdlX_vxyIQ8Of8Aeb-89p6MIZXg-7_Bs8UvwcGybpW |
| CODEN | BPRCB6 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2014_12_007 crossref_primary_10_2217_crc_15_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11888_013_0201_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11888_013_0203_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2011_12_030 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2016_5027 crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6947_11_74 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2012_12_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_apm_12397 crossref_primary_10_1111_codi_14033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13187_025_02608_z crossref_primary_10_1097_NCC_0000000000000367 crossref_primary_10_1186_1479_5876_11_253 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2796_2011_02399_x crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_5908_7_51 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0092921 crossref_primary_10_1186_1476_4598_13_21 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0065821 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13277_014_1845_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_synres_2020_100068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2013_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1002_adtp_201900127 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcla_24878 crossref_primary_10_1002_agt2_740 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00108_014_3601_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_015_1972_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0b013e318233a986 crossref_primary_10_1155_2011_792362 crossref_primary_10_3109_1354750X_2015_1068860 crossref_primary_10_5812_ijcm_7743 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2013_1376 crossref_primary_10_5604_01_3001_0053_3997 crossref_primary_10_1515_amma_2016_0046 crossref_primary_10_1158_1940_6207_CAPR_13_0053 crossref_primary_10_1111_apm_12161 crossref_primary_10_1186_1476_4598_10_85 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0040476 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20236082 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00726_016_2215_2 crossref_primary_10_5301_JBM_2012_9107 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2516_2012_02846_x crossref_primary_10_14442_general_14_40 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11306_011_0357_5 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_6830713 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_016_1261_6 |
| Cites_doi | 10.3109/00365528509091663 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.032 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08268-5 10.1258/096914107782912059 10.1136/bmj.c2831 10.1056/NEJMp0805920 10.1136/bmj.b1846 10.1056/NEJMe0903924 10.1097/01.ede.0000181313.61948.76 10.1136/gut.50.1.29 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 10.1136/gut.2009.192948 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.001 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7 10.1002/bjs.6136 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040 10.1080/003655299750026443 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.023 10.1080/00365520310003002 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00005 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X 10.1093/jnci/dji175 10.1136/gut.2004.052282 10.1136/bmj.a2261 10.1080/00365520410003182 10.1055/s-0029-1244131 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x 10.1093/jnci/91.5.434 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203 10.1093/jnci/94.23.1763 10.1007/s10350-004-6496-2 10.1136/gut.45.4.588 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2010 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1532-1916 |
| EndPage | 425 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2731703541 20833346 10_1016_j_bpg_2010_06_005 S1521691810000661 1_s2_0_S1521691810000661 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACLOT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKEYQ BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CAG COF DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OC. ON0 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SSH SSZ SV3 T5K UHS WOW Z5R ~G- ~HD 7RV AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW AZQEC BENPR M0T M1P M2O RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU LCYCR 9DU AAYXX CITATION AGCQF AGRNS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-1d7b2674f62c08015cdfa52097768bf77ed453070841c20e520a5e7872670f033 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 58 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000283392300007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1521-6918 1532-1916 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 15:04:08 EDT 2025 Sat Oct 25 11:06:26 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:47 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:34:07 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:20:25 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:29:29 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:56 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:25:38 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | Colorectal cancer screening |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c485t-1d7b2674f62c08015cdfa52097768bf77ed453070841c20e520a5e7872670f033 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 20833346 |
| PQID | 1032751209 |
| PQPubID | 1226366 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_754004344 proquest_journals_1032751209 pubmed_primary_20833346 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_06_005 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_06_005 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1521691810000661 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_bpg_2010_06_005 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-08-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2010 text: 2010-08-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands – name: Kidlington |
| PublicationTitle | Baillière's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Limited |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Limited |
| References | Imperiale, Wagner, Lin, Larkin, Rogge, Ransohoff (bib27) 2000; 343 Mandel, Bond, Church, Snover, Bradley, Schuman (bib16) 1993; 328 Zheng, Chen, Liu, Ma, Yu, Chen (bib22) 2003; 46 van Rossum, van Rijn, Laheij, van Oijen, Fockens, van Krieken (bib10) 2008; 135 Levin, Farraye, Schoen, Hoff, Atkin, Bond (bib26) 2005; 54 Bretthauer, Skovlund, Grotmol, Thiis-Evensen, Gondal, Huppertz-Hauss (bib29) 2003; 2003 Lindholm, Brevinge, Haglin (bib20) 2008; 95 Whitlock, Lin, Liles, Beil, Fu (bib8) 2008; 149 Levin, Lieberman, McFarland, Andrews, Brooks, Dash (bib25) 2008; 134 Hundt, Haug, Brenner (bib11) 2009; 150 Fracchia, Senore, Armaroli, Ferraris, Placido, Musso (bib30) 2010; 42 Hoff, Grotmol, Skovlund, Bretthauer (bib33) 2009; 338 Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Hardcastle, Chamberlain, Robinson, Moss, Amar (bib18) 1996; 348 Bretthauer (bib35) 2010; 340 Hewitson, Glasziou, Watson, Towler, Irvig (bib7) 2008; 103 UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial investigators (bib39) 2002; 359 Hanley (bib23) 2005; 16 Jorgensen, Kronborg, Fenger (bib14) 2002; 50 Mandel, Church, Bond, Ederer, Geisser, Mongin (bib21) 2000; 30 von Karsa, Anttila, Ronco, Ponti, Malila, Arbyn (bib6) 2008 Cuzick, Cafferty, Edwards, Møller, Duffy (bib34) 2007; 14 Segnan, Senore, Andreoni, Aste, Bonelli, Crosta (bib37) 2002; 94 Atkin, Rogers, Cardwell, Cook, Cuzick, Wardle (bib28) 2004; 126 Ransohoff (bib42) 2005; 129 Malila, Oivanen, Malminiemi, Hakama (bib9) 2008; 337 Kronborg, Jorgensen, Fenger, Rasmussen (bib15) 2004; 39 bib43 Redberg, Walsh (bib4) 2008; 359 Mandel, Church, Ederer, Bond (bib17) 1999; 91 Robinson, Hardcastle, Moss, Amar, Chamberlain, Armitage (bib19) 1999; 45 Wilson, Jungner (bib3) 1968 Allison (bib12) 2010; 138 Weissfeld, Schoen, Pinsky, Bresalier, Church, Yurgalevitch (bib36) 2005; 97 Thiis-Evensen, Hoff, Sauar, Langmark, Majak, Vatn (bib31) 1999; 34 Northern-European Initiative on colorectal cancer (NordICC) (bib44) Kronborg, Fenger, Olsen, Jørgensen, Søndergaard (bib13) 1996; 348 Hoff, Dominitz (bib41) 2010; 59 Atkin, Edwards, Kralj-Hans, Wooldrage, Hart, Northover (bib32) 2010; 375 Gondal, Grotmol, Hofstad, Bretthauer, Eide, Hoff (bib40) 2003; 38 Bretthauer (bib5) 2009; 361 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Colorectal Cancer (bib24) 2008; 149 Globocan (bib1) 2002 Hoff, Vatn, Gjone, Larsen, Sauar (bib38) 1985; 20 Fracchia (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib30) 2010; 42 Cuzick (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib34) 2007; 14 Mandel (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib21) 2000; 30 von Karsa (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib6) 2008 Zheng (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib22) 2003; 46 Hanley (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib23) 2005; 16 Whitlock (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib8) 2008; 149 Kronborg (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib15) 2004; 39 Atkin (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib32) 2010; 375 Mandel (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib17) 1999; 91 Weissfeld (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib36) 2005; 97 Levin (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib25) 2008; 134 Kronborg (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib13) 1996; 348 Hoff (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib41) 2010; 59 Imperiale (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib27) 2000; 343 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib2 Lindholm (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib20) 2008; 95 Hoff (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib38) 1985; 20 Bretthauer (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib29) 2003; 2003 Ransohoff (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib42) 2005; 129 Hardcastle (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib18) 1996; 348 Wilson (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib3) 1968 Redberg (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib4) 2008; 359 Robinson (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib19) 1999; 45 Allison (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib12) 2010; 138 Bretthauer (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib35) 2010; 340 Levin (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib26) 2005; 54 Segnan (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib37) 2002; 94 Bretthauer (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib5) 2009; 361 Jorgensen (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib14) 2002; 50 Atkin (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib28) 2004; 126 Northern-European Initiative on colorectal cancer (NordICC) (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib44) Mandel (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib16) 1993; 328 Hundt (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib11) 2009; 150 Malila (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib9) 2008; 337 Thiis-Evensen (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib31) 1999; 34 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Colorectal Cancer (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib24) 2008; 149 Gondal (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib40) 2003; 38 UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial investigators (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib39) 2002; 359 van Rossum (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib10) 2008; 135 Globocan (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib1) Hoff (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib33) 2009; 338 Hewitson (10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib7) 2008; 103 |
| References_xml | – volume: 359 start-page: 2309 year: 2008 end-page: 2311 ident: bib4 article-title: Pay now, benefits may follow — the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 359 start-page: 1291 year: 2002 end-page: 1300 ident: bib39 article-title: Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial publication-title: Lancet – volume: 348 start-page: 1467 year: 1996 end-page: 1471 ident: bib13 article-title: Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test publication-title: Lancet – volume: 337 start-page: a2261 year: 2008 ident: bib9 article-title: Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental design publication-title: Br Med J – volume: 149 start-page: 638 year: 2008 end-page: 658 ident: bib8 article-title: Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Ann Intern Med – ident: bib43 article-title: Colorectal cancer screening in average-risk population: immunochemical 11 fecal occult blood testing versus colonoscopy – volume: 54 start-page: 807 year: 2005 end-page: 813 ident: bib26 article-title: Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group publication-title: Gut – volume: 34 start-page: 414 year: 1999 end-page: 420 ident: bib31 article-title: Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 361 start-page: 300 year: 2009 end-page: 301 ident: bib5 article-title: The capsule and colorectal cancer screening – the crux of the matter publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 134 start-page: 1570 year: 2008 end-page: 1595 ident: bib25 article-title: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 343 start-page: 169 year: 2000 end-page: 174 ident: bib27 article-title: Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 2003 start-page: 635 year: 2003 end-page: 642 ident: bib29 article-title: Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – year: 1968 ident: bib3 article-title: Principles and practice of mass screening for disease – volume: 16 start-page: 786 year: 2005 end-page: 790 ident: bib23 article-title: Analysis of mortality data from cancer screening studies. Looking in the right window publication-title: Epidemiology – volume: 149 start-page: 627 year: 2008 end-page: 637 ident: bib24 article-title: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 38 start-page: 635 year: 2003 end-page: 642 ident: bib40 article-title: The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 14 start-page: 178 year: 2007 end-page: 185 ident: bib34 article-title: Surrogate endpoints for cancer screening trials: general principles and an illustration using the UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial publication-title: J Med Screen – volume: 103 start-page: 1541 year: 2008 end-page: 1549 ident: bib7 article-title: Cochran systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): an update publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 375 start-page: 1624 year: 2010 end-page: 1633 ident: bib32 article-title: Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet – volume: 39 start-page: 846 year: 2004 end-page: 851 ident: bib15 article-title: Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 91 start-page: 434 year: 1999 end-page: 437 ident: bib17 article-title: Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 42 start-page: 448 year: 2010 end-page: 455 ident: bib30 article-title: Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training publication-title: Endosocpy – volume: 340 start-page: c2831 year: 2010 ident: bib35 article-title: Which tool is best for colorectal cancer screening? Flexible sigmoidoscopy shows promise, but randomised data are needed publication-title: Br Med J – volume: 97 start-page: 989 year: 2005 end-page: 997 ident: bib36 article-title: Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 126 start-page: 1247 year: 2004 end-page: 1256 ident: bib28 article-title: Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 50 start-page: 29 year: 2002 end-page: 32 ident: bib14 article-title: A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds publication-title: Gut – volume: 348 start-page: 1472 year: 1996 end-page: 1477 ident: bib18 article-title: Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Lancet – volume: 46 start-page: 51 year: 2003 end-page: 58 ident: bib22 article-title: Cluster randomization trial of sequence mass screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – year: 2008 ident: bib6 article-title: Cancer screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council recommendation on cancer screening – First Report – volume: 338 start-page: b1846 year: 2009 ident: bib33 article-title: Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised trial publication-title: Br Med J – volume: 95 start-page: 1029 year: 2008 end-page: 1036 ident: bib20 article-title: Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 94 start-page: 1763 year: 2002 end-page: 1772 ident: bib37 article-title: Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoccopy”—SCORE publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – reference: Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. – ident: bib44 – volume: 20 start-page: 351 year: 1985 end-page: 355 ident: bib38 article-title: Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. design of a population screening study publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – year: 2002 ident: bib1 article-title: database – volume: 138 start-page: 1648 year: 2010 end-page: 1652 ident: bib12 article-title: Colorectal cancer screening guidelines: the importance of evidence and transparency publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 45 start-page: 588 year: 1999 end-page: 592 ident: bib19 article-title: The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Gut – volume: 59 start-page: 407 year: 2010 end-page: 414 ident: bib41 article-title: Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? publication-title: Gut – volume: 150 start-page: 162 year: 2009 end-page: 169 ident: bib11 article-title: Comparative evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal adenoma detection publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 129 start-page: 1815 year: 2005 ident: bib42 article-title: Have we oversold colonoscopy? publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 328 start-page: 1365 year: 1993 end-page: 1371 ident: bib16 article-title: Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 30 start-page: 1603 year: 2000 end-page: 1607 ident: bib21 article-title: The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 135 start-page: 82 year: 2008 end-page: 90 ident: bib10 article-title: Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 20 start-page: 351 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib38 article-title: Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. design of a population screening study publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3109/00365528509091663 – volume: 149 start-page: 627 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib24 article-title: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243 – volume: 348 start-page: 1467 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib13 article-title: Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7 – year: 1968 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib3 – volume: 129 start-page: 1815 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib42 article-title: Have we oversold colonoscopy? publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.032 – volume: 149 start-page: 638 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib8 article-title: Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245 – volume: 359 start-page: 1291 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib39 article-title: Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08268-5 – volume: 14 start-page: 178 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib34 article-title: Surrogate endpoints for cancer screening trials: general principles and an illustration using the UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/096914107782912059 – volume: 340 start-page: c2831 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib35 article-title: Which tool is best for colorectal cancer screening? Flexible sigmoidoscopy shows promise, but randomised data are needed publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2831 – volume: 359 start-page: 2309 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib4 article-title: Pay now, benefits may follow — the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0805920 – volume: 338 start-page: b1846 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib33 article-title: Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised trial publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1846 – volume: 361 start-page: 300 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib5 article-title: The capsule and colorectal cancer screening – the crux of the matter publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0903924 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib6 – ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib2 – volume: 16 start-page: 786 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib23 article-title: Analysis of mortality data from cancer screening studies. Looking in the right window publication-title: Epidemiology doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000181313.61948.76 – volume: 50 start-page: 29 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib14 article-title: A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.50.1.29 – volume: 2003 start-page: 635 issue: 38 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib29 article-title: Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 134 start-page: 1570 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib25 article-title: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 – volume: 59 start-page: 407 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib41 article-title: Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.192948 – volume: 138 start-page: 1648 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib12 article-title: Colorectal cancer screening guidelines: the importance of evidence and transparency publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.001 – volume: 348 start-page: 1472 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib18 article-title: Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7 – volume: 95 start-page: 1029 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib20 article-title: Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.6136 – volume: 343 start-page: 169 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib27 article-title: Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302 – volume: 135 start-page: 82 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib10 article-title: Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040 – volume: 34 start-page: 414 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib31 article-title: Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/003655299750026443 – volume: 126 start-page: 1247 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib28 article-title: Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.023 – volume: 38 start-page: 635 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib40 article-title: The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/00365520310003002 – ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib1 – volume: 150 start-page: 162 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib11 article-title: Comparative evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal adenoma detection publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00005 – volume: 328 start-page: 1365 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib16 article-title: Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901 – volume: 375 start-page: 1624 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib32 article-title: Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X – volume: 97 start-page: 989 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib36 article-title: Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji175 – volume: 54 start-page: 807 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib26 article-title: Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.052282 – volume: 337 start-page: a2261 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib9 article-title: Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental design publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2261 – volume: 39 start-page: 846 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib15 article-title: Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/00365520410003182 – volume: 42 start-page: 448 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib30 article-title: Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training publication-title: Endosocpy doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244131 – volume: 103 start-page: 1541 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib7 article-title: Cochran systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): an update publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x – volume: 91 start-page: 434 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib17 article-title: Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.5.434 – volume: 30 start-page: 1603 issue: 343 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib21 article-title: The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203 – volume: 94 start-page: 1763 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib37 article-title: Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoccopy”—SCORE publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.23.1763 – ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib44 – volume: 46 start-page: 51 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib22 article-title: Cluster randomization trial of sequence mass screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6496-2 – volume: 45 start-page: 588 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005_bib19 article-title: The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.45.4.588 |
| SSID | ssj0001699 |
| Score | 2.1770751 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing during the past decades, and the lifetime risk for CRC in industrialised countries is about 5%.... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 417 |
| SubjectTerms | Aged Clinical Trials as Topic Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer screening Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Middle Aged Occult Blood Sigmoidoscopy |
| Title | Evidence for colorectal cancer screening |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1521691810000661 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1521691810000661 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20833346 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1032751209 https://www.proquest.com/docview/754004344 |
| Volume | 24 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000283392300007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1532-1916 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001699 issn: 1521-6918 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19990401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9NAEF6FFCFeEDeBUvmBB0Tkyseej6UqAiQqpBYpb6u1ve6hyonspOrPZ8a76wRKyyHxYkW2N2vPfJ7ZOZeQN5WsFFgNZVwZbsFAUTY2VNoYwKGMKY1htOg3mxCHh3I2U19Ho6NQC3N5IZpGXl2pxX9lNZwDZmPp7F-we_hTOAG_gelwBLbD8Y8YH_YJ7RMIsSc1yjTsAoL8bacgJsB0DQorhHMNul36oLlEp7TopgWoi6GGqgeI7wt0ujvdD-WUJ6ZbtnNs69n-4J5_j-m_p2bl8LCZmu8dDBvpbd7rFSpf1mlGvaDM0pgrLzttEJ5ZDPYf35SurkLao4huiErqaja91qWu_PmaQHe-hfPdYnHi8_AweMTW2mvIKTzCR8In6iMWHE3irUwwJcdka-_TwezzoKDhLtW30fWvEILdfdrfTxPdtFy5yRzplyXHD8kDb09Eew4Hj8jINo_JvS8-Y-IJeRvgEAEcojUcIgeHaIDDU_Ltw8Hx_sfY744Rl1SyZZxWosi4oDXPsFt8ysqqNpjUJMCCLGohbEUZSnRJ0zJLLFwyzIJ8hkFJneT5MzJu5o19QaK8krWsGS9YqcBcN6qAdTtnhleMGy7phCSBCLr0reNxB5MLHXIEzzXQTSPddJ8nySbk3TBk4fqm3HZzFiirQ0EwqDANILhtkPjVINv5b7HTqe4ynehrwJgQOoz060y3fvzdhNuB6Xo9R5IDyLAAfUKi4TKIaIy7mcbOV50WDBVlToGOzx1WBpJkYAHlOeUv_-2RXpH76y92m4yX7cq-JnfLy-VZ1-6QO2Imdzz6vwNOKbos |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence+for+colorectal+cancer+screening&rft.jtitle=Bailli%C3%A8re%27s+best+practice+%26+research.+Clinical+gastroenterology&rft.au=Bretthauer%2C+Michael&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1521-6918&rft.eissn=1532-1916&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.bpg.2010.06.005&rft.externalDocID=S1521691810000661 |
| thumbnail_m | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15216918%2FS1521691810X00051%2Fcov150h.gif |