Transport losses in market weight pigs: II. U.S. incidence and economic impact
An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered d...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Translational animal science Ročník 4; číslo 2; s. 1103 - 1112 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
US
Oxford University Press
01.04.2020
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 2573-2102, 2573-2102 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered daily totals in a secure online database for the following variables: 1) pigs slaughtered, 2) dead on arrival (DOA; dead on the truck), 3) euthanized on arrival (EOA; non-ambulatory pig with an injury that required euthanasia), 4) dead in pen (DIP; died after unloading), and 5) non-ambulatory (pig unable to move or keep up with the rest of the group from unloading to stunning). Total dead pigs were calculated as DOA + EOA + DIP, and total losses were calculated as non-ambulatory + total dead. The economic impact was estimated based on the 4-yr weighted averages from USDA annual reports for market swine slaughtered (108,470,550 pigs), live market weight (126.9 kg), and live market price ($1.44/kg). The 4-yr weighted averages for total dead, non-ambulatory, and total losses were 0.26%, 0.63%, and 0.88%, respectively. Total dead consisted of 0.15% DOA, 0.05% EOA, and 0.05% DIP. The months with the highest rates of total dead were July (0.29%), August (0.32%), and September (0.30%), while the lowest incidence rates occurred in February (0.22%), March (0.22%), and April (0.22%). The months with the highest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of October (0.70%), November (0.71%), and December (0.70%), whereas the lowest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of April (0.57%), May (0.53%), and June (0.54%). The following assumptions were used in the economic analysis: 1) dead pigs received no value and 2) non-ambulatory pigs were discounted 30%. Based on these assumptions, the annual cost to the industry for dead and non-ambulatory pigs was estimated to be $52 M ($0.48 per pig marketed) and $37 M ($0.35 per pig marketed), respectively. Therefore, total losses represent approximately $89 M in economic losses or $0.83 per pig marketed. This is the first industry-wide survey on the incidence of transport losses in market weight pigs at U.S. slaughter facilities, and this information is important for establishing an industry baseline and benchmark for transport losses that can be used for measuring industry improvements. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered daily totals in a secure online database for the following variables: 1) pigs slaughtered, 2) dead on arrival (DOA; dead on the truck), 3) euthanized on arrival (EOA; non-ambulatory pig with an injury that required euthanasia), 4) dead in pen (DIP; died after unloading), and 5) non-ambulatory (pig unable to move or keep up with the rest of the group from unloading to stunning). Total dead pigs were calculated as DOA + EOA + DIP, and total losses were calculated as non-ambulatory + total dead. The economic impact was estimated based on the 4-yr weighted averages from USDA annual reports for market swine slaughtered (108,470,550 pigs), live market weight (126.9 kg), and live market price ($1.44/kg). The 4-yr weighted averages for total dead, non-ambulatory, and total losses were 0.26%, 0.63%, and 0.88%, respectively. Total dead consisted of 0.15% DOA, 0.05% EOA, and 0.05% DIP. The months with the highest rates of total dead were July (0.29%), August (0.32%), and September (0.30%), while the lowest incidence rates occurred in February (0.22%), March (0.22%), and April (0.22%). The months with the highest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of October (0.70%), November (0.71%), and December (0.70%), whereas the lowest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of April (0.57%), May (0.53%), and June (0.54%). The following assumptions were used in the economic analysis: 1) dead pigs received no value and 2) non-ambulatory pigs were discounted 30%. Based on these assumptions, the annual cost to the industry for dead and non-ambulatory pigs was estimated to be $52 M ($0.48 per pig marketed) and $37 M ($0.35 per pig marketed), respectively. Therefore, total losses represent approximately $89 M in economic losses or $0.83 per pig marketed. This is the first industry-wide survey on the incidence of transport losses in market weight pigs at U.S. slaughter facilities, and this information is important for establishing an industry baseline and benchmark for transport losses that can be used for measuring industry improvements. An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered daily totals in a secure online database for the following variables: 1) pigs slaughtered, 2) dead on arrival (DOA; dead on the truck), 3) euthanized on arrival (EOA; non-ambulatory pig with an injury that required euthanasia), 4) dead in pen (DIP; died after unloading), and 5) non-ambulatory (pig unable to move or keep up with the rest of the group from unloading to stunning). Total dead pigs were calculated as DOA + EOA + DIP, and total losses were calculated as non-ambulatory + total dead. The economic impact was estimated based on the 4-yr weighted averages from USDA annual reports for market swine slaughtered (108,470,550 pigs), live market weight (126.9 kg), and live market price ( $1.44/kg). The 4-yr weighted averages for total dead, non-ambulatory, and total losses were 0.26%, 0.63%, and 0.88%, respectively. Total dead consisted of 0.15% DOA, 0.05% EOA, and 0.05% DIP. The months with the highest rates of total dead were July (0.29%), August (0.32%), and September (0.30%), while the lowest incidence rates occurred in February (0.22%), March (0.22%), and April (0.22%). The months with the highest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of October (0.70%), November (0.71%), and December (0.70%), whereas the lowest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of April (0.57%), May (0.53%), and June (0.54%). The following assumptions were used in the economic analysis: 1) dead pigs received no value and 2) non-ambulatory pigs were discounted 30%. Based on these assumptions, the annual cost to the industry for dead and non-ambulatory pigs was estimated to be $ 52 M ( $0.48 per pig marketed) and $ 37 M ( $0.35 per pig marketed), respectively. Therefore, total losses represent approximately $ 89 M in economic losses or $0.83 per pig marketed. This is the first industry-wide survey on the incidence of transport losses in market weight pigs at U.S. slaughter facilities, and this information is important for establishing an industry baseline and benchmark for transport losses that can be used for measuring industry improvements. Key words: fatigued, injured, mortality, non-ambulatory, swine, transport An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered daily totals in a secure online database for the following variables: 1) pigs slaughtered, 2) dead on arrival (DOA; dead on the truck), 3) euthanized on arrival (EOA; non-ambulatory pig with an injury that required euthanasia), 4) dead in pen (DIP; died after unloading), and 5) non-ambulatory (pig unable to move or keep up with the rest of the group from unloading to stunning). Total dead pigs were calculated as DOA + EOA + DIP, and total losses were calculated as non-ambulatory + total dead. The economic impact was estimated based on the 4-yr weighted averages from USDA annual reports for market swine slaughtered (108,470,550 pigs), live market weight (126.9 kg), and live market price ($1.44/kg). The 4-yr weighted averages for total dead, non-ambulatory, and total losses were 0.26%, 0.63%, and 0.88%, respectively. Total dead consisted of 0.15% DOA, 0.05% EOA, and 0.05% DIP. The months with the highest rates of total dead were July (0.29%), August (0.32%), and September (0.30%), while the lowest incidence rates occurred in February (0.22%), March (0.22%), and April (0.22%). The months with the highest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of October (0.70%), November (0.71%), and December (0.70%), whereas the lowest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of April (0.57%), May (0.53%), and June (0.54%). The following assumptions were used in the economic analysis: 1) dead pigs received no value and 2) non-ambulatory pigs were discounted 30%. Based on these assumptions, the annual cost to the industry for dead and non-ambulatory pigs was estimated to be $52 M ($0.48 per pig marketed) and $37 M ($0.35 per pig marketed), respectively. Therefore, total losses represent approximately $89 M in economic losses or $0.83 per pig marketed. This is the first industry-wide survey on the incidence of transport losses in market weight pigs at U.S. slaughter facilities, and this information is important for establishing an industry baseline and benchmark for transport losses that can be used for measuring industry improvements.An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of 2012 to 2015 to determine the incidence, seasonal patterns, and estimated economic impact of dead and non-ambulatory pigs. Each plant entered daily totals in a secure online database for the following variables: 1) pigs slaughtered, 2) dead on arrival (DOA; dead on the truck), 3) euthanized on arrival (EOA; non-ambulatory pig with an injury that required euthanasia), 4) dead in pen (DIP; died after unloading), and 5) non-ambulatory (pig unable to move or keep up with the rest of the group from unloading to stunning). Total dead pigs were calculated as DOA + EOA + DIP, and total losses were calculated as non-ambulatory + total dead. The economic impact was estimated based on the 4-yr weighted averages from USDA annual reports for market swine slaughtered (108,470,550 pigs), live market weight (126.9 kg), and live market price ($1.44/kg). The 4-yr weighted averages for total dead, non-ambulatory, and total losses were 0.26%, 0.63%, and 0.88%, respectively. Total dead consisted of 0.15% DOA, 0.05% EOA, and 0.05% DIP. The months with the highest rates of total dead were July (0.29%), August (0.32%), and September (0.30%), while the lowest incidence rates occurred in February (0.22%), March (0.22%), and April (0.22%). The months with the highest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of October (0.70%), November (0.71%), and December (0.70%), whereas the lowest rates of non-ambulatory pigs were observed during the months of April (0.57%), May (0.53%), and June (0.54%). The following assumptions were used in the economic analysis: 1) dead pigs received no value and 2) non-ambulatory pigs were discounted 30%. Based on these assumptions, the annual cost to the industry for dead and non-ambulatory pigs was estimated to be $52 M ($0.48 per pig marketed) and $37 M ($0.35 per pig marketed), respectively. Therefore, total losses represent approximately $89 M in economic losses or $0.83 per pig marketed. This is the first industry-wide survey on the incidence of transport losses in market weight pigs at U.S. slaughter facilities, and this information is important for establishing an industry baseline and benchmark for transport losses that can be used for measuring industry improvements. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Ritter, Matthew J Yoder, Chad L Jones, Corey L Calvo-Lorenzo, Michelle S Carr, Scott N |
| AuthorAffiliation | Elanco Animal Health , Greenfield, IN |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Elanco Animal Health , Greenfield, IN |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Matthew J surname: Ritter fullname: Ritter, Matthew J organization: Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN – sequence: 2 givenname: Chad L surname: Yoder fullname: Yoder, Chad L organization: Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN – sequence: 3 givenname: Corey L surname: Jones fullname: Jones, Corey L organization: Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN – sequence: 4 givenname: Scott N surname: Carr fullname: Carr, Scott N organization: Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN – sequence: 5 givenname: Michelle S surname: Calvo-Lorenzo fullname: Calvo-Lorenzo, Michelle S email: mcalvo-lorenzo@elanco.com organization: Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN |
| BookMark | eNp9kl1rHCEUhqWkNGmaq_4BoVAKZSd-zI7ai0II_VgIyUWTa3GcMxvTGZ2q0yb_vi67JR-E4oXied7Xc47nNdrzwQNCbympKFH8OJt0nG-NITV9gQ7YUvAFo4TtPTjvo6OUbgghVCnVUPIK7XMmyJJweYDOL6PxaQox4yGkBAk7j0cTf0LGf8CtrzOe3Dp9wqtVha-qH1WJW9eBt4CN7zDY4MPoLHbjZGx-g172ZkhwtNsP0dXXL5en3xdnF99WpydnC1vLOi9q4KID1XPZ1n3flEI44YZbzqygVkrbtaa1LVBgfa1YR2RJXNhOqdZKJYEfos9b32luR-gs-BzNoKfoSu53OhinH0e8u9br8FsLRpRoaDH4sDOI4dcMKevRJQvDYDyEOWlWM8EJpUIW9N0T9CbM0ZfyNKeCiiUrfb2n1mYA7Xwfyrt2Y6pPGk4awRrOClU9Q5XVQWli-drelftHAroV2Fi-J0Kvrcsmu7Apyw2aEr2ZA13mQO_moGg-PtH868vz9PstHebpv-BfYJ_Bxg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0327469 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2022_7445 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14040555 crossref_primary_10_3390_metabo15010054 crossref_primary_10_1093_tas_txaf100 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10611_024_10176_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2023_105931 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2023_105961 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skab027 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2025_1657185 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13253_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_metabo14080424 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2022_790570 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40813_022_00279_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fanim_2022_1051572 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1136/vetrec.165.1.13 10.3389/fvets.2017.00067 10.2527/jas.2012-6114 10.3389/fvets.2019.00036 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-294 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30735-X |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. 2020 COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. 2020 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. |
| DBID | TOX AAYXX CITATION 8FE 8FH ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1093/tas/txaa041 |
| DatabaseName | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection CrossRef ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Local Electronic Collection Information ProQuest : Biological Science Collection journals [unlimited simultaneous users] ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Biological Sciences Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: TOX name: Oxford Academic : Oxford Journals Open Access Collection journals [open access] url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Agriculture |
| EISSN | 2573-2102 |
| EndPage | 1112 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC7209761 A630672632 10_1093_tas_txaa041 10.1093/tas/txaa041 |
| GeographicLocations | United States United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: United States--US |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ AAFWJ AAPXW AAVAP ABEJV ABGNP ABPTD ABXVV ACGFS AFPKN AFULF ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMNDL BAYMD BTTYL EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ GROUPED_DOAJ H13 IAO ITC KSI ML0 M~E O9- OK1 ROX RPM TOX AAYXX AFFHD AFKRA BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU CITATION HCIFZ M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQGLB 8FE 8FH ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ LK8 PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PUEGO 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-4e37de9f38b4ff6093303a3c32c71c88cdbabcbe1e2f492d089617cd99bc898e3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M7P |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 17 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000567403900059&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2573-2102 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 04 02:03:25 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 11:08:41 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 20 13:21:53 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:18:48 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:07:53 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:31:24 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:21:17 EST 2025 Mon Jan 27 07:34:58 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | swine mortality injured fatigued transport non-ambulatory |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c484t-4e37de9f38b4ff6093303a3c32c71c88cdbabcbe1e2f492d089617cd99bc898e3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171752999?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 32705038 |
| PQID | 3171752999 |
| PQPubID | 7121334 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7209761 proquest_miscellaneous_2427301178 proquest_journals_3171752999 gale_infotracmisc_A630672632 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A630672632 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_tas_txaa041 crossref_primary_10_1093_tas_txaa041 oup_primary_10_1093_tas_txaa041 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-04-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2020 text: 2020-04-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | US |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: US – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Translational animal science |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
| References | Holtkamp (2020072914371623600_CIT0009) 2015 Ellis (2020072914371623600_CIT0004) 2006 Rioja-Lang (2020072914371623600_CIT0017) 2019; 6 Deen (2020072914371623600_CIT0002) 2004 Schwartzkopf-Genswein (2020072914371623600_CIT0019) 2012; 92 NOAA (2020072914371623600_CIT0013) 2020 Topel (2020072914371623600_CIT0022) 1968; 49 USDA-NASS (2020072914371623600_CIT0023) 2018 NPB (2020072914371623600_CIT0014) 2017 Smith (2020072914371623600_CIT0020) 1937 NACMCF (2020072914371623600_CIT0012) 2018; 81 Johnson (2020072914371623600_CIT0010) 2013; 91 FSIS (2020072914371623600_CIT0007) 2015 FSIS (2020072914371623600_CIT0008) 2016 Maes (2020072914371623600_CIT0011) 2001; 9 Rademacher (2020072914371623600_CIT0016) 2005 Peterson (2020072914371623600_CIT0015) 2017; 4 Deen (2020072914371623600_CIT0001) 2011 Zurbrigg (2020072914371623600_CIT0024) 2017; 97 FSIS (2020072914371623600_CIT0006) 2014 FSIS (2020072914371623600_CIT0005) 2013 Ritter (2020072914371623600_CIT0018) 2009; 25 Sutherland (2020072914371623600_CIT0021) 2009; 165 Ellis (2020072914371623600_CIT0003) 2003 |
| References_xml | – start-page: 446 volume-title: Pork production. Marketing; market classes and grades year: 1937 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0020 – year: 2017 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0014 – start-page: 186 year: 2005 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0016 article-title: Factors associated with the incidence of mortality during transport of market hogs – year: 2020 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0013 – year: 2018 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0023 – year: 2015 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0009 article-title: PEDv in the US: overview, history, lessons – start-page: 387 year: 2011 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0001 article-title: Estimates of opportunity costs associated with mortality and inadequate growth rates in the US – volume-title: Market swine condemned ante-mortem for deads in USDA inspected plants for the calendar year of 2015. FOIA Case #2016–113 year: 2016 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0008 – volume-title: Market swine condemned ante-mortem for deads in USDA inspected plants for the calendar year of 2014. FOIA Case #2015–188 year: 2015 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0007 – volume: 165 start-page: 13 year: 2009 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0021 article-title: Effects of variations in the environment, length of journey and type of trailer on the mortality and morbidity of pigs being transported to slaughter publication-title: Vet. Rec doi: 10.1136/vetrec.165.1.13 – volume: 4 start-page: 67 year: 2017 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0015 article-title: Use of temperature, humidity, and slaughter condemnation data to predict increases in transport losses in three classes of swine and resulting foregone revenue publication-title: Front. Vet. Sci doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00067 – volume: 49 start-page: 40 year: 1968 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0022 article-title: Porcine stress syndrome publication-title: Mod. Vet. Pract – volume: 91 start-page: 2481 year: 2013 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0010 article-title: 2011 and 2012 Early Careers Achievement Awards: farm and pig factors touching welfare during the marketing process publication-title: J. Anim. Sci doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6114 – volume: 9 start-page: 267 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0011 article-title: A retrospective study of mortality in grow-finish pigs in a multi-site production system publication-title: J. Swine Health Prod – start-page: 1 year: 2003 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0003 article-title: Analysis of the current situation: what do downers cost the industry and what can we do about it? – volume-title: Market swine condemned ante-mortem for deads in USDA inspected plants for the calendar year of 2013. FOIA Case #2014–200 year: 2014 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0006 – year: 2004 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0002 article-title: Lost income in grow/finish: the problem of lightweight, cull, and dead pigs – volume: 97 start-page: 339 year: 2017 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0024 article-title: Pig-level risk factors for in-transit losses in swine: a review publication-title: Can. J. Anim. Sci – volume: 6 start-page: 36 year: 2019 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0017 article-title: A review of swine transportation research on priority welfare issues: a Canadian perspective publication-title: Front. Vet. Sci doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00036 – volume: 92 start-page: 227 year: 2012 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0019 article-title: Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review publication-title: Meat Sci doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010 – volume-title: Market swine condemned ante-mortem for deads in USDA inspected plants for the calendar year of 2012. FOIA Case #2013–100 year: 2013 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0005 – start-page: 205 year: 2006 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0004 article-title: Impact of season on production: transport losses – volume: 81 start-page: 115 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0012 article-title: Response to questions posed by the Department of Defense regarding microbiological criteria as indicators of process control or insanitary conditions. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Food Safety and Inspection Service; Office of Public Health Science publication-title: J. Food Prot doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-294 – volume: 25 start-page: 404 year: 2009 ident: 2020072914371623600_CIT0018 article-title: Transport losses in market weight pigs: I. A review of definitions, incidence and economic impact publication-title: Prof. Anim. Sci doi: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30735-X |
| SSID | ssj0001999610 |
| Score | 2.227613 |
| Snippet | An industry survey representing approximately 310 million (M) market weight pigs was conducted with 20 U.S. slaughter facilities over the calendars years of... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref oup |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1103 |
| SubjectTerms | Accidents Animal Health and Well Being Animal welfare Annual reports Casualties Economic analysis Economic aspects Economic impact Ethical aspects Hogs Livestock losses Logistics Management Measurement Pork industry Slaughter Surveys Swine Transportation Unloading Weight |
| Title | Transport losses in market weight pigs: II. U.S. incidence and economic impact |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171752999 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2427301178 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7209761 |
| Volume | 4 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000567403900059&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals [open access] customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVASL databaseName: Oxford Academic : Oxford Journals Open Access Collection journals [open access] customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: TOX dateStart: 20170201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://academic.oup.com/journals/ providerName: Oxford University Press – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2573-2102 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001999610 issn: 2573-2102 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-xjQd44HsiUIqRJiEhpU1it7Z5QQVtohKUCDZUniLbcaDSSEuTAX8-PtftiIT2wmNiy7Z8vg-f734HcERLTs2IyzhR1ShmZaliqSWLJVNYAI5mla8Z-fkdn83EfC7z4HBrQljlViZ6QV0uDfrIh07POU3nhKd8tfoRY9UofF0NJTT24ABREqgP3csvfSxozadJSMtzd_dhq5ph-1uphKUdRRTEcSfHDU3NbqDkX5rn5Pb_rvkO3Ao2J5lsDslduGbre3Bz8nUdcDfsfZjtQM7J-RLfgcmiJt99RjT55b2nZOXGfUmm0wE5G3waEPTR-3qkRNUlsSG_mWyyLh_A2cnx6Zu3cSi1EBsmWBszS3lpZUWFZlU19m4OqqihmeGpEcKUWmmjbWqzismsTITbWG5KKbURUlh6CPv1srYPgSR65GxgvLm4m56zJ7Uel0xnZqRUmlSURfBiu--FCTjkWA7jvNi8h9PCEakIRIrgaNd5tYHf-He350jAApnSjWVUyC1wK0J4q2IyxpsRQtNH0Ov0dMxkOs1P3RG4eqreltZFYPemuCR0BM92zTg2hrDVdnnRFM4W8tKUiwh451jtpkOo725LvfjmIb95lji7MX109eSP4UaG7gAfWNSD_XZ9YZ_AdfOzXTTrPuzxuejDwevjWf6x750Pfc8v7l8-fZ9_cV-nH-Z_AIDvIak |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3bbtMwGP41BhJwwRkRKMxIQ0hIaRPbbWIkhCpgWrVSTWJDu_N8ClQaaWkyBi_FM2I7TkcktLtdcG3LjuPP__kAsE10RtQwY3EiimFMtRYxk4zGjArXAI7gwveM_DzNZrP86Ijtb8DvNhfGhVW2NNETar1QzkY-sHzOcjpLPNnb5ffYdY1y3tW2hUYDiz3z68yqbNWbyXt7vy8w3vlw8G43Dl0FYkVzWsfUkEwbVpBc0qIYeY2eCKIIVlmq8lxpKaSSJjW4oAzrJGeWyyvNmFQ5yw2x616Bq1aMwLkPFdw_t-k47SFNQhqgXXlQi2pQ_xQioWmH8QXy38mpc6JtNzDzL063c_t_-0d34FaQqdG4eQR3YcOU9-Dm-Msq1BUx92G2LuKOThbOz43mJfrmM77RmbcOo6U9x2s0mfTRYf9THzkfhO-3ikSpkQn526jJKn0Ah5dyoIewWS5K8whQIodWxneamdVkrbws5UhTidVQiDQpCI3gVXvPXIU6667dxwlv_P2EW1DwAIoItteTl015kX9Pe-kAwx3RsWspEXIn7Be58l18PHKanyu9H0GvM9MSC9UZ3rKQu3irXostHshZxc-BFcHz9bBb24XolWZxWnEr63lukeURZB0Yr7dzpcy7I-X8qy9pnuHEysXp44s334Lruwcfp3w6me09gRvYmT58EFUPNuvVqXkK19SPel6tnvl3ieD4skH-BzEXegU |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transport+losses+in+market+weight+pigs%3A+II.+U.S.+incidence+and+economic+impact&rft.jtitle=Translational+animal+science&rft.au=Ritter%2C+Matthew+J&rft.au=Yoder%2C+Chad+L&rft.au=Jones%2C+Corey+L&rft.au=Carr%2C+Scott+N&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.eissn=2573-2102&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Ftas%2Ftxaa041 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2573-2102&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2573-2102&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2573-2102&client=summon |