Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification

Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature ty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior research methods Jg. 49; H. 6; S. 1984 - 2001
Hauptverfasser: Bolognesi, Marianna, Pilgram, Roosmaryn, van den Heerik, Romy
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York Springer US 01.12.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1554-3528, 1554-3528
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses—that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme—that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms.
AbstractList Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses-that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme-that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms.
Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car ... RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses -- that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme -- that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses—that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme—that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms.
Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses-that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme-that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms.Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given concepts. Semantic features are typically collected in experimental settings and then manually annotated by the researchers into feature types (e.g., perceptual features, taxonomic features, etc.) by means of content analyses-that is, by using taxonomies of feature types and having independent coders perform the annotation task. However, the ways in which such content analyses are typically performed and reported are not consistent across the literature. This constitutes a serious methodological problem that might undermine the theoretical claims based on such annotations. In this study, we first offer a review of some of the released datasets of annotated semantic feature norms and the related taxonomies used for content analysis. We then provide theoretical and methodological insights in relation to the content analysis methodology. Finally, we apply content analysis to a new dataset of semantic features and show how the method should be applied in order to deliver reliable annotations and replicable coding schemes. We tackle the following issues: (1) taxonomy structure, (2) the description of categories, (3) coder training, and (4) sustainability of the coding scheme-that is, comparison of the annotations provided by trained versus novice coders. The outcomes of the project are threefold: We provide methodological guidelines for semantic feature classification; we provide a revised and adapted taxonomy that can (arguably) be applied to both concrete and abstract concepts; and we provide a dataset of annotated semantic feature norms.
Author van den Heerik, Romy
Bolognesi, Marianna
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Marianna
  surname: Bolognesi
  fullname: Bolognesi, Marianna
  email: marianna.bolognesi@gmail.com
  organization: Argumentation and Rethoric, Universiteit van Amsterdam
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Roosmaryn
  surname: Pilgram
  fullname: Pilgram, Roosmaryn
  organization: Argumentation and Rethoric, Universiteit van Amsterdam
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Romy
  surname: van den Heerik
  fullname: van den Heerik, Romy
  organization: Argumentation and Rethoric, Universiteit van Amsterdam
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kU1LHjEUhUOx1I_2B7iRgJtupk0mn-NOpNWCUBC7DpnMnTYyk2huZvH-e-ftqyCCru5dPOdwzz2HZC_lBIQcc_ZNGGW_IxeytQ3jumFW2EZ_IAdcKdkI1dq9F_s-OUS8Y0zYlstPZL-1THTasgNycwNT9H2cYt3QmGjIqUKq1Cc_bTDiGb39BzR4BJpHijD7VGOgI_i6FKAplxlpmDxiHGPwNeb0mXwc_YTw5WkekT8_f9xeXDXXvy9_XZxfN0HatjbKQzCcQd8DM7Izaux4z0brwQgfpB68ZuMgvVKiY2EIYENgAoyCzmjdDuKIfN353pf8sABWN0cMME0-QV7Qcauk5q2yZkVPX6F3eSlrxJXqrJHMdlav1MkTtfQzDO6-xNmXjXv-1gqYHRBKRiwwuhDr_8y1-Dg5zty2F7frxa29uG0vbmvNXymfzd_TtDsNrmz6C-XF0W-KHgEJ3J9D
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmp_2020_102376
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10798_021_09696_0
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_025_02814_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10606_020_09376_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_020_00971_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_023_01492_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10503_023_09614_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_020_00999_z
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_020_01488_z
crossref_primary_10_1177_1470357219877538
crossref_primary_10_1108_OIR_01_2019_0027
crossref_primary_10_5209_esim_95092
crossref_primary_10_1080_14680777_2022_2142640
crossref_primary_10_1515_mc_2021_0022
crossref_primary_10_1515_ip_2020_4001
crossref_primary_10_1515_sem_2023_0078
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_020_01439_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13105547
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_023_01160_2
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_021_01660_z
crossref_primary_10_3138_cjc_2022_0017
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_023_02260_9
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_022_01811_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_langcom_2019_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_23311886_2022_2157539
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_newideapsych_2023_101009
crossref_primary_10_1017_langcog_2023_26
crossref_primary_10_31910_rudca_v28_n1_2025_2595
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pragma_2019_04_004
Cites_doi 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
10.1037/h0036351
10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
10.4159/harvard.9780674181816
10.1037/h0031619
10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
10.3758/BF03196439
10.1080/02643290125857
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.001.0001
10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80293-6
10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007
10.1177/0013164415596420
10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4
10.1080/19312450709336664
10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01068.x
10.3758/s13428-012-0263-4
10.1162/089892998563752
10.1177/001316446002000104
10.3758/s13428-013-0323-4
10.3758/MC.37.7.1026
10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
10.1086/266577
10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2564
10.3389/fnhum.2012.00315
10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
10.3758/BF03196311
10.3758/BF03192726
10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.123
10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
10.1162/089892904322926773
10.3758/BRM.40.1.183
10.1080/17470218.2011.560272
10.11613/BM.2012.031
10.1515/cllt.2010.009
10.1037/a0016261
10.1162/coli.07-034-R2
10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x
10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
10.1017/langcog.2016.27
10.3115/1608938.1608948
10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199957996.013.11
10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2016
Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Dec 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2016
– notice: Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Dec 2017
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
4T-
7TK
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0838-6
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Docstoc
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Docstoc
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1554-3528
EndPage 2001
ExternalDocumentID 28039680
10_3758_s13428_016_0838_6
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Marie Curie Actions
  grantid: COGVIM n° 629076 ; Call identifier FP7-PEOPLE-201
GroupedDBID ---
-55
-5G
-BR
-DZ
-EM
-ET
-~C
-~X
0-V
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
23N
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2VQ
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
40E
53G
5GY
7X7
875
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8TC
8UJ
95.
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AAKPC
AANZL
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
AAZMS
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABJUD
ABKCH
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABPPZ
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABUWG
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIWK
ACKIV
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACNCT
ACOKC
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETCA
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARALO
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYQZM
AZFZN
AZQEC
B-.
BAWUL
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
C6C
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FYUFA
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNUQQ
GNWQR
GQ3
GQ6
GQ7
GUQSH
H13
HF~
HMCUK
HMJXF
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IAO
IHR
IKXTQ
INH
IPY
IRVIT
ITC
ITM
IWAJR
J-C
JBSCW
JZLTJ
KOV
LLZTM
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2R
M4Y
MVM
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9J
OHT
OK1
P2P
P9L
PADUT
PF-
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
PT4
R9I
RIG
ROL
RPV
RSV
S16
S1Z
S27
S3B
SBS
SBU
SCLPG
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZN
T13
TN5
TR2
TSG
TUC
TUS
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UPT
UTJUX
UZXMN
VFIZW
VXZ
W48
WH7
WK8
XJT
XOL
XSW
Z7R
Z7S
Z7W
Z81
Z83
Z88
Z8N
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
ZUP
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PRQQA
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
4T-
7TK
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-5aec710ebbe074975f91b0f8ae73ac46da60fd4a55390cdce8cc03e75e97662d3
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 37
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000416323700002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1554-3528
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 10:35:47 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 15 03:52:27 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:10 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:40:51 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:18:06 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:36:59 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Intercoder reliability
Semantic feature norms
Content analysis
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c482t-5aec710ebbe074975f91b0f8ae73ac46da60fd4a55390cdce8cc03e75e97662d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-016-0838-6
PMID 28039680
PQID 1987408986
PQPubID 976348
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1854612587
proquest_journals_1987408986
pubmed_primary_28039680
crossref_citationtrail_10_3758_s13428_016_0838_6
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_016_0838_6
springer_journals_10_3758_s13428_016_0838_6
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20171200
2017-12-00
2017-Dec
20171201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2017
  text: 20171200
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Behavior research methods
PublicationTitleAbbrev Behav Res
PublicationTitleAlternate Behav Res Methods
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Scott (CR47) 1955; 19
Aroyo, Welty (CR2) 2015; 36
Baroni, Barbu, Murphy, Poesio (CR4) 2010; 34
Rosch, Mervis (CR44) 1975; 7
Barsalou, Wiemer-Hastings, Pecher, Zwaan (CR6) 2005
Garrard, Lambon, Hodges, Patterson (CR17) 2001; 18
Cree, McRae, McNorgan (CR12) 1999; 23
Fleiss (CR16) 1971; 76
Pexman, Lupker, Hino (CR40) 2002; 9
McRae, Jones, Reisberg (CR35) 2013
CR30
Keil (CR22) 1979
Tversky (CR50) 1977; 84
Mirman, Magnuson (CR37) 2009; 37
Kremer, Baroni (CR23) 2011; 43
Wu, Barsalou (CR55) 2009; 132
Artstein, Poesio (CR3) 2008; 34
Krippendorff (CR25) 2004; 30
Landauer, Dumais (CR28) 1997; 104
Kaplan, Goldsen, Lasswell, Leites (CR21) 1965
McHugh (CR32) 2012; 22
Medin, Schaffer (CR36) 1978; 85
Barsalou, Lehrer, Kittay (CR5) 1992
CR42
McRae, Boisvert (CR33) 1998; 24
Krippendorff (CR26) 2013
Lenci, Baroni, Cazzolli, Marotta (CR31) 2013; 45
Tversky, Gati (CR51) 1982; 89
Gwet (CR18) 2015; 76
Cann, McRae, Katz (CR8) 2011; 64
McRae, Cree, Seidenberg, McNorgan (CR34) 2005; 37
Schank, Abelson (CR46) 1977
Caramazza, Shelton (CR9) 1998; 10
Bolognesi (CR7) 2016
De Vega, Glenberg, Graesser (CR13) 2008
Feng (CR14) 2015; 11
Murphy (CR39) 2002
Sartori, Lombardi (CR45) 2004; 16
Laiacona, Barbarotto, Capitani (CR27) 1993; 29
Andrews, Vigliocco, Vinson (CR1) 2009; 116
Montefinese, Ambrosini, Fairfield, Mammarella (CR38) 2013; 45
Cree, McRae (CR11) 2003; 132
Cohen (CR10) 1960; 20
Hayes, Krippendorff (CR19) 2007; 1
Jones, Willits, Dennis, Busemeyer, Townsend (CR20) 2015
Pexman, Holyk, Monfils (CR41) 2003; 31
CR29
Spooren, Degand (CR49) 2010; 6
Vinson, Vigliocco (CR53) 2008; 40
Recchia, Jones (CR43) 2012; 6
Fillmore, Bach, Harms (CR15) 1968
Wiemer-Hastings, Xu (CR54) 2005; 29
Krippendorff, Borgatta, Bohrnstedt (CR24) 1970
Vinson, Ponari, Vigliocco (CR52) 2014; 28
Smith, Shoben, Rips (CR48) 1974; 81
PM Pexman (838_CR41) 2003; 31
M Jones (838_CR20) 2015
L Barsalou (838_CR5) 1992
838_CR42
EE Smith (838_CR48) 1974; 81
E Rosch (838_CR44) 1975; 7
L Aroyo (838_CR2) 2015; 36
K McRae (838_CR34) 2005; 37
M Montefinese (838_CR38) 2013; 45
K McRae (838_CR35) 2013
LW Barsalou (838_CR6) 2005
A Caramazza (838_CR9) 1998; 10
D Vinson (838_CR52) 2014; 28
K Wiemer-Hastings (838_CR54) 2005; 29
J Fleiss (838_CR16) 1971; 76
DP Vinson (838_CR53) 2008; 40
A Lenci (838_CR31) 2013; 45
M Bolognesi (838_CR7) 2016
K Krippendorff (838_CR24) 1970
PM Pexman (838_CR40) 2002; 9
D Cann (838_CR8) 2011; 64
K McRae (838_CR33) 1998; 24
A Kaplan (838_CR21) 1965
G Feng (838_CR14) 2015; 11
R Schank (838_CR46) 1977
A Tversky (838_CR51) 1982; 89
C Fillmore (838_CR15) 1968
K Gwet (838_CR18) 2015; 76
A Tversky (838_CR50) 1977; 84
W Spooren (838_CR49) 2010; 6
FC Keil (838_CR22) 1979
M Laiacona (838_CR27) 1993; 29
M Baroni (838_CR4) 2010; 34
838_CR29
K Krippendorff (838_CR25) 2004; 30
R Artstein (838_CR3) 2008; 34
G Kremer (838_CR23) 2011; 43
J Cohen (838_CR10) 1960; 20
K Krippendorff (838_CR26) 2013
G Sartori (838_CR45) 2004; 16
M Vega De (838_CR13) 2008
M McHugh (838_CR32) 2012; 22
D Mirman (838_CR37) 2009; 37
GS Cree (838_CR12) 1999; 23
838_CR30
W Scott (838_CR47) 1955; 19
TK Landauer (838_CR28) 1997; 104
DL Medin (838_CR36) 1978; 85
L-L Wu (838_CR55) 2009; 132
G Recchia (838_CR43) 2012; 6
P Garrard (838_CR17) 2001; 18
GS Cree (838_CR11) 2003; 132
G Murphy (838_CR39) 2002
M Andrews (838_CR1) 2009; 116
A Hayes (838_CR19) 2007; 1
References_xml – volume: 132
  start-page: 163
  year: 2003
  end-page: 201
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello and many other such concrete nouns
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
– volume: 81
  start-page: 214
  year: 1974
  end-page: 241
  ident: CR48
  article-title: Structure and process in semantic memory: A feature model for semantic decisions
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/h0036351
– volume: 84
  start-page: 327
  year: 1977
  end-page: 352
  ident: CR50
  article-title: Features of similarity
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
– year: 1979
  ident: CR22
  publication-title: Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective
  doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674181816
– volume: 76
  start-page: 378
  year: 1971
  end-page: 382
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/h0031619
– volume: 28
  start-page: 737
  year: 2014
  end-page: 746
  ident: CR52
  article-title: How does emotional content affect lexical processing?
  publication-title: Cognition and Emotion
  doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
– volume: 132
  start-page: 173
  year: 2009
  end-page: 189
  ident: CR55
  article-title: Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation
  publication-title: Acta Psychologica
  doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
– volume: 31
  start-page: 842
  year: 2003
  end-page: 855
  ident: CR41
  article-title: Number of features effects and semantic processing
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196439
– volume: 18
  start-page: 125
  year: 2001
  end-page: 174
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts
  publication-title: Cognitive Neuropsychology
  doi: 10.1080/02643290125857
– ident: CR29
– start-page: 139
  year: 1970
  end-page: 150
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability data
  publication-title: Sociological methodology
– year: 2008
  ident: CR13
  publication-title: Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.001.0001
– volume: 29
  start-page: 727
  year: 1993
  end-page: 40
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Perceptual and associative knowledge in category specific impairment of semantic memory: A study of two cases
  publication-title: Cortex
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80293-6
– ident: CR42
– start-page: 129
  year: 2005
  end-page: 163
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Situating abstract concepts
  publication-title: Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007
– start-page: 206
  year: 2013
  end-page: 219
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Semantic memory
  publication-title: The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology
– volume: 76
  start-page: 609
  year: 2015
  end-page: 637
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Testing the difference of correlated agreement coefficients for statistical significance
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/0013164415596420
– year: 1977
  ident: CR46
  publication-title: Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures
– volume: 23
  start-page: 371
  year: 1999
  end-page: 414
  ident: CR12
  article-title: An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4
– volume: 1
  start-page: 77
  year: 2007
  end-page: 89
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data
  publication-title: Communication Methods and Measures
  doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
– volume: 7
  start-page: 573
  year: 1975
  end-page: 605
  ident: CR44
  article-title: Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
  publication-title: Cognitive Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
– volume: 34
  start-page: 222
  year: 2010
  end-page: 254
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Strudel: A distributional semantic model based on properties and types
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01068.x
– volume: 45
  start-page: 440
  year: 2013
  end-page: 461
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0263-4
– year: 2013
  ident: CR26
  publication-title: Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
– start-page: 1
  year: 1968
  end-page: 88
  ident: CR15
  article-title: The case for case
  publication-title: Universals in linguistic theory
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 34
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate–inanimate distinction
  publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1162/089892998563752
– volume: 30
  start-page: 411
  year: 2004
  end-page: 433
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations
  publication-title: Human Communication Research
– year: 2016
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Using semantic feature norms to investigate how the visual and the verbal modes afford metaphor construction and expression
  publication-title: Language and Cognition
– volume: 20
  start-page: 37
  year: 1960
  end-page: 46
  ident: CR10
  article-title: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
– ident: CR30
– volume: 24
  start-page: 558
  year: 1998
  end-page: 572
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Automatic semantic similarity priming
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1218
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1233
  ident: CR31
  article-title: BLIND: A set of semantic feature norms from the congenitally blind
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0323-4
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1026
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1039
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.1026
– volume: 85
  start-page: 207
  year: 1978
  end-page: 238
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Context theory of classification learning
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
– volume: 19
  start-page: 321
  year: 1955
  end-page: 325
  ident: CR47
  article-title: Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding
  publication-title: Public Opinion Quarterly
  doi: 10.1086/266577
– volume: 36
  start-page: 15
  year: 2015
  end-page: 24
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Truth is a lie: Seven myths about human annotation
  publication-title: AI Magazine
  doi: 10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2564
– year: 2002
  ident: CR39
  publication-title: The big book of concepts
– start-page: 232
  year: 2015
  end-page: 254
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Models of semantic memory
  publication-title: Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology
– volume: 6
  start-page: 315
  year: 2012
  ident: CR43
  article-title: The semantic richness of abstract concepts
  publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00315
– volume: 11
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 22
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices
  publication-title: Methodology
  doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
– volume: 9
  start-page: 542
  year: 2002
  end-page: 549
  ident: CR40
  article-title: The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number of features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196311
– volume: 37
  start-page: 547
  year: 2005
  end-page: 559
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/BF03192726
– volume: 89
  start-page: 123
  year: 1982
  end-page: 154
  ident: CR51
  article-title: Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.123
– volume: 29
  start-page: 719
  year: 2005
  end-page: 736
  ident: CR54
  article-title: Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
– volume: 16
  start-page: 439
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 52
  ident: CR45
  article-title: Semantic relevance and semantic disorders
  publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773
– volume: 40
  start-page: 183
  year: 2008
  end-page: 190
  ident: CR53
  article-title: Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.183
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1515
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1542
  ident: CR8
  article-title: False recall in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm: The roles of gist and associative strength
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.560272
– volume: 22
  start-page: 276
  year: 2012
  end-page: 282
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic
  publication-title: Biochemia Medica
  doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031
– start-page: 21
  year: 1992
  end-page: 74
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields
  publication-title: Frames, fields, and contrasts
– volume: 6
  start-page: 241
  year: 2010
  end-page: 266
  ident: CR49
  article-title: Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity
  publication-title: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
  doi: 10.1515/cllt.2010.009
– volume: 116
  start-page: 463
  year: 2009
  end-page: 498
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/a0016261
– volume: 34
  start-page: 555
  year: 2008
  end-page: 596
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics
  publication-title: Computational Linguistics
  doi: 10.1162/coli.07-034-R2
– volume: 43
  start-page: 97
  year: 2011
  end-page: 109
  ident: CR23
  article-title: A set of semantic norms for German and Italian
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x
– volume: 104
  start-page: 211
  year: 1997
  end-page: 240
  ident: CR28
  article-title: A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
– year: 1965
  ident: CR21
  article-title: The reliability of content analysis categories
  publication-title: Language of politics: Studies in quantitative semantics
– year: 2016
  ident: 838_CR7
  publication-title: Language and Cognition
  doi: 10.1017/langcog.2016.27
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 1998
  ident: 838_CR9
  publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1162/089892998563752
– volume: 89
  start-page: 123
  year: 1982
  ident: 838_CR51
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.123
– start-page: 206
  volume-title: The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology
  year: 2013
  ident: 838_CR35
– volume: 6
  start-page: 241
  year: 2010
  ident: 838_CR49
  publication-title: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
  doi: 10.1515/cllt.2010.009
– volume: 29
  start-page: 727
  year: 1993
  ident: 838_CR27
  publication-title: Cortex
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80293-6
– volume: 16
  start-page: 439
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 838_CR45
  publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773
– volume: 1
  start-page: 77
  year: 2007
  ident: 838_CR19
  publication-title: Communication Methods and Measures
  doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
– volume: 45
  start-page: 440
  year: 2013
  ident: 838_CR38
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0263-4
– volume: 22
  start-page: 276
  year: 2012
  ident: 838_CR32
  publication-title: Biochemia Medica
  doi: 10.3758/BF03192726
– volume: 19
  start-page: 321
  year: 1955
  ident: 838_CR47
  publication-title: Public Opinion Quarterly
  doi: 10.1086/266577
– ident: 838_CR42
  doi: 10.3115/1608938.1608948
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1026
  year: 2009
  ident: 838_CR37
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.1026
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1515
  year: 2011
  ident: 838_CR8
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.560272
– volume: 132
  start-page: 163
  year: 2003
  ident: 838_CR11
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
– start-page: 129
  volume-title: Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought
  year: 2005
  ident: 838_CR6
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007
– volume: 84
  start-page: 327
  year: 1977
  ident: 838_CR50
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
– volume: 34
  start-page: 222
  year: 2010
  ident: 838_CR4
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01068.x
– volume: 6
  start-page: 315
  year: 2012
  ident: 838_CR43
  publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00315
– volume: 76
  start-page: 378
  year: 1971
  ident: 838_CR16
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/h0031619
– volume: 85
  start-page: 207
  year: 1978
  ident: 838_CR36
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
– volume: 40
  start-page: 183
  year: 2008
  ident: 838_CR53
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.183
– volume: 23
  start-page: 371
  year: 1999
  ident: 838_CR12
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4
– volume-title: Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
  year: 2013
  ident: 838_CR26
– volume: 24
  start-page: 558
  year: 1998
  ident: 838_CR33
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Universals in linguistic theory
  year: 1968
  ident: 838_CR15
– volume: 116
  start-page: 463
  year: 2009
  ident: 838_CR1
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/a0016261
– volume-title: Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective
  year: 1979
  ident: 838_CR22
  doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674181816
– volume: 36
  start-page: 15
  year: 2015
  ident: 838_CR2
  publication-title: AI Magazine
  doi: 10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2564
– start-page: 139
  volume-title: Sociological methodology
  year: 1970
  ident: 838_CR24
– volume: 81
  start-page: 214
  year: 1974
  ident: 838_CR48
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/h0036351
– volume: 104
  start-page: 211
  year: 1997
  ident: 838_CR28
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
– volume: 34
  start-page: 555
  year: 2008
  ident: 838_CR3
  publication-title: Computational Linguistics
  doi: 10.1162/coli.07-034-R2
– volume: 30
  start-page: 411
  year: 2004
  ident: 838_CR25
  publication-title: Human Communication Research
– volume: 18
  start-page: 125
  year: 2001
  ident: 838_CR17
  publication-title: Cognitive Neuropsychology
  doi: 10.1080/02643290125857
– ident: 838_CR29
– volume: 9
  start-page: 542
  year: 2002
  ident: 838_CR40
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196311
– volume: 43
  start-page: 97
  year: 2011
  ident: 838_CR23
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0028-x
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1218
  year: 2013
  ident: 838_CR31
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0323-4
– volume: 132
  start-page: 173
  year: 2009
  ident: 838_CR55
  publication-title: Acta Psychologica
  doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
– volume: 76
  start-page: 609
  year: 2015
  ident: 838_CR18
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/0013164415596420
– volume: 37
  start-page: 547
  year: 2005
  ident: 838_CR34
  publication-title: Behavior Research Methods
  doi: 10.3758/BF03192726
– volume-title: Language of politics: Studies in quantitative semantics
  year: 1965
  ident: 838_CR21
– volume: 7
  start-page: 573
  year: 1975
  ident: 838_CR44
  publication-title: Cognitive Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
– volume: 28
  start-page: 737
  year: 2014
  ident: 838_CR52
  publication-title: Cognition and Emotion
  doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
– volume: 11
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 838_CR14
  publication-title: Methodology
  doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
– start-page: 232
  volume-title: Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology
  year: 2015
  ident: 838_CR20
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199957996.013.11
– volume-title: The big book of concepts
  year: 2002
  ident: 838_CR39
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001
– ident: 838_CR30
– volume: 29
  start-page: 719
  year: 2005
  ident: 838_CR54
  publication-title: Cognitive Science
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
– volume: 31
  start-page: 842
  year: 2003
  ident: 838_CR41
  publication-title: Memory & Cognition
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196439
– volume-title: Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures
  year: 1977
  ident: 838_CR46
– start-page: 21
  volume-title: Frames, fields, and contrasts
  year: 1992
  ident: 838_CR5
– volume: 20
  start-page: 37
  year: 1960
  ident: 838_CR10
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
– volume-title: Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition
  year: 2008
  ident: 838_CR13
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.001.0001
SSID ssj0038214
Score 2.3866863
Snippet Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given...
Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car → RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given...
Semantic feature norms (e.g., STIMULUS: car ... RESPONSE: <has four wheels>) are commonly used in cognitive psychology to look into salient aspects of given...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1984
SubjectTerms Behavioral Science and Psychology
Classification
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Psychology
Content analysis
Humans
Methodological problems
Norms
Perceptions
Psycholinguistics - methods
Psycholinguistics - standards
Psychology
Qualitative Research
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Research methodology
Semantic analysis
Semantic features
Semantics
Stimulus
Sustainability
Taxonomy
Title Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-016-0838-6
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039680
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1987408986
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1854612587
Volume 49
WOSCitedRecordID wos000416323700002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1554-3528
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0038214
  issn: 1554-3528
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20050201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9RADLZo4dAL78fSUg0SJ1DEJJlJPNwqRMUBVahAtbdo4jjSSiWLmi1S_z12HitQAQnO88jInhl_HjufAV4gIVJmfRJdGhMXsiYJbU1JzV7NU_TN8A559qE8OcHlMnyc_uPu52z3OSQ53NTqVwqofd2nuVM25bRQRmVMih24KdOh1ms4_XQ2X785Zqkbw5e_H_arAbqGKq9FRAdDc3znv5Z4F25PuNIcjRvhHtzg7j7sba-3qwdwqtnHIyv3lVl1RpPUxeKYONGSvDGyZQyJVTPr1vT8VWS-ItPyQP1pOgG3vSEF25pdNCj0IXw5fvf57ftkqqiQkMNsk_jIJJCC65oFOoTStyGtbYuRyzySK5pY2LZx0fs8WGqIkcjmXHoW1FJkTf4Idrt1x0_AMHEj2DKyw-DSRpAaiTNmuUXxc4u6XICdxVzRRDeuVS_OK3E7VFrVKK1KU8xUWlWxgJfbId9Gro2_dT6YdVdNx66v9AXFWQwozc-3zXJgNAoSO15fSh_0TmEdyhIfjzrffk1LdYUC7QJezQr-afI_LeXpP_Xeh71MocGQEnMAu5uLS34Gt-j7ZtVfHMJOucTDYUf_AKR-8I0
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9QwDLdgILEX2PjasQ-CxBOoWtombbI3hJg2cTuhMaa9VanrSidBb1pvSPvvsftxAg2Q4DlJG9lJ_HPs_Azw2qFzmGgbBROHyPikinxdYlSSFfMUbNXdQ55P89nMXVz4T8M77nbMdh9Dkt1JLX4lg9r9Nk6NsCnHmTAquyi7C_cMGywhzD_9fD4ev6lLYtOHL38_7FcDdAtV3oqIdobm8NF_TXEDHg64Ur3rF8Im3KHmMayvjrebJ3Aq2cc9K_eNmjdKktTZ4qgw0JIcKF4yCtmqqUWtWvrGMp-jqqmj_lQNg9tWoYBtyS7qFPoUvhx-OHt_FA0VFSI0LllGNhAypKCyJIYOPre1j0tdu0B5GtBkVch0XZlgbeo1VkgOUaeUW2LUkiVV-gzWmkVDW6AIqWJsGcg4b-KKkRqyM6apduznZmU-AT2KucCBblyqXnwt2O0QaRW9tApJMRNpFdkE3qyGXPZcG3_rvDPqrhi2XVvIDYrRzjtufrVq5g0jUZDQ0OKa-zhrBNY5nuLzXuerv0mpLp85PYG3o4J_-vifpvLin3q_hAdHZyfTYno8-7gN64nAhC49ZgfWllfXtAv38fty3l7tdev6B0im8ok
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ba9VAEB60ivSlXqtHq67gkxK6SXaTXd9EPSiWQ_FS-hY2sxM4oDmlOS303zuTy0GpCuLzXrLM7O58szP5BuC5Q-cw0zYJJg2J8VlMfFNjUpMV8xRs7N8hjw7KxcIdH_vDsc5pN2W7TyHJ4Z8GYWlq1_snsZEjnjPA3e_S3AizcloIu7JLiqtwzUgevbjrn4-mqzh3WWqGUObvh_1qjC4hzEvR0d7ozG_-93Jvwc6IN9XrYYPchivU3oHtzbV3cRc-SVbywNZ9oZatGqdWYaQreaV4Kylka6dWjeroO-tiiaqhnhJUtQx6O4UCwiXrqFf0Pfg6f_flzftkrLSQoHHZOrGBkKEG1TUxpPClbXxa68YFKvOApoih0E00wdrca4xIDlHnVFpiNFNkMd-FrXbV0gNQhBQZcwYyzps0MoJDdtI0NY7936IuZ6AnkVc40pBLNYxvFbsjIq1qkFYlqWciraqYwYvNkJOBg-NvnfcmPVbjcewqeVkx2nnHzc82zXyQJDoSWlqdcR9njcA9x0u8P-h_8zUp4eULp2fwclL2T5P_aSkP_6n3U7hx-HZeHXxYfHwE25mghz5rZg-21qdn9Biu4_l62Z0-6bf4D3ih-20
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability+in+content+analysis%3A+The+case+of+semantic+feature+norms+classification&rft.jtitle=Behavior+research+methods&rft.au=Bolognesi%2C+Marianna&rft.au=Pilgram%2C+Roosmaryn&rft.au=van+den+Heerik%2C+Romy&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1984&rft.epage=2001&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758%2Fs13428-016-0838-6&rft.externalDocID=10_3758_s13428_016_0838_6
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1554-3528&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1554-3528&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1554-3528&client=summon