Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?

Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative” concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Social justice research Ročník 27; číslo 4; s. 413 - 431
Hlavní autori:	Kugler, Matthew, Jost, John T., Noorbaloochi, Sharareh
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Boston Springer US 01.12.2014 Springer Nature B.V
Predmet:	Anthropology Authoritarianism Authoritarianism (Psychology) Authority Avoidance Avoidance behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Conservatism Discrimination Dominance Enforcement Equity Ethics Fairness Group identity Hostility Ideologies Ideology Justice Liberalism Loyalty Morality Obedience Personality Personality and Social Psychology Philosophy Political psychology Political Science Politics Psychology Purity Social Policy Sociology Theorists Valuation Political orientation Morality Social dominance Authoritarianism Ideology
ISSN:	0885-7466, 1573-6725
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Abstract	Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative” concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to “the authoritarian personality.” We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistically mediated by authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, so that conservatives’ greater valuation of ingroup, authority, and purity concerns is attributable to higher levels of authoritarianism, whereas liberals’ greater valuation of fairness and harm avoidance is attributable to lower levels of social dominance. We also find that ingroup, authority, and purity concerns are positively associated with intergroup hostility and support for discrimination, whereas concerns about fairness and harm avoidance are negatively associated with these variables. These findings might lead some to question the wisdom and appropriateness of efforts to “broaden” scientific conceptions of morality in such a way that preferences based on authoritarianism and social dominance are treated as moral —rather than amoral or even immoral—and suggest that the explicit goal of incorporating conservative ideology into the study of moral psychology (in order to increase ideological diversity) may lead researchers astray.
AbstractList	Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain Italic should include not only 'liberal' ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly 'conservative' concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to 'the authoritarian personality.' We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistically mediated by authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, so that conservatives' greater valuation of ingroup, authority, and purity concerns is attributable to higher levels of authoritarianism, whereas liberals' greater valuation of fairness and harm avoidance is attributable to lower levels of social dominance. We also find that ingroup, authority, and purity concerns are positively associated with intergroup hostility and support for discrimination, whereas concerns about fairness and harm avoidance are negatively associated with these variables. These findings might lead some to question the wisdom and appropriateness of efforts to 'broaden' scientific conceptions of morality in such a way that preferences based on authoritarianism and social dominance are treated as Italic moral DLrather than amoral or even immoralDLand suggest that the explicit goal of incorporating conservative ideology into the study of moral psychology (in order to increase ideological diversity) may lead researchers astray. Reprinted by permission of Springer Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only 'liberal' ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly 'conservative' concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to 'the authoritarian personality.' We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistically mediated by authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, so that conservatives' greater valuation of ingroup, authority, and purity concerns is attributable to higher levels of authoritarianism, whereas liberals' greater valuation of fairness and harm avoidance is attributable to lower levels of social dominance. We also find that ingroup, authority, and purity concerns are positively associated with intergroup hostility and support for discrimination, whereas concerns about fairness and harm avoidance are negatively associated with these variables. These findings might lead some to question the wisdom and appropriateness of efforts to 'broaden' scientific conceptions of morality in such a way that preferences based on authoritarianism and social dominance are treated as moral-rather than amoral or even immoral-and suggest that the explicit goal of incorporating conservative ideology into the study of moral psychology (in order to increase ideological diversity) may lead researchers astray. Adapted from the source document. Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only "liberal" ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly "conservative" concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to "the authoritarian personality." We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistically mediated by authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, so that conservatives' greater valuation of ingroup, authority, and purity concerns is attributable to higher levels of authoritarianism, whereas liberals' greater valuation of fairness and harm avoidance is attributable to lower levels of social dominance. We also find that ingroup, authority, and purity concerns are positively associated with intergroup hostility and support for discrimination, whereas concerns about fairness and harm avoidance are negatively associated with these variables. These findings might lead some to question the wisdom and appropriateness of efforts to "broaden" scientific conceptions of morality in such a way that preferences based on authoritarianism and social dominance are treated as moral--rather than amoral or even immoral--and suggest that the explicit goal of incorporating conservative ideology into the study of moral psychology (in order to increase ideological diversity) may lead researchers astray.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative” concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to “the authoritarian personality.” We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistically mediated by authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, so that conservatives’ greater valuation of ingroup, authority, and purity concerns is attributable to higher levels of authoritarianism, whereas liberals’ greater valuation of fairness and harm avoidance is attributable to lower levels of social dominance. We also find that ingroup, authority, and purity concerns are positively associated with intergroup hostility and support for discrimination, whereas concerns about fairness and harm avoidance are negatively associated with these variables. These findings might lead some to question the wisdom and appropriateness of efforts to “broaden” scientific conceptions of morality in such a way that preferences based on authoritarianism and social dominance are treated as moral —rather than amoral or even immoral—and suggest that the explicit goal of incorporating conservative ideology into the study of moral psychology (in order to increase ideological diversity) may lead researchers astray.
Author	Jost, John T. Kugler, Matthew Noorbaloochi, Sharareh
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Matthew surname: Kugler fullname: Kugler, Matthew email: matthew.b.kugler@gmail.com organization: University of Chicago – sequence: 2 givenname: John T. surname: Jost fullname: Jost, John T. organization: Department of Psychology, New York University – sequence: 3 givenname: Sharareh surname: Noorbaloochi fullname: Noorbaloochi, Sharareh organization: Department of Psychology, New York University
BookMark	eNqNks1u1DAQgC1UJLaFB-BmiQsXgyeJ7SwXtNptodKiHijnyHFmWZesvdhO1d76IHDh0fokOBsOqBI_8sGS5_tmxvYckyPnHRLyHPgr4Fy9jgAFAONQMV4UJROPyAyEKplUhTgiM17XgqlKyifkOMYrzkcLZuTHwvm0xUDX3n-hOtEPPuienvnBdTpZ7yK93KIPt2_oytPFkLY-2KSD1c7GHdWuox-9sVlZ-Z112hmkF8GiSwebnt7se20dXdsWc2K2zBkxXOfgNdKV3WwwYHYizcz93bdD9fu77_TcpcEe6r99Sh5vdB_x2a_9hHw6O71cvmfri3fny8WamaqGxOYoECTmpZBXrTTSFHre5kPBO4O8RtHV0GmsZYWVBkAustOWtdSmbevyhLyc8u6D_zpgTM3ORoN9rx36ITagOJeqBAX_iQKU4t-oLGUly1KMDbx4gF75Ibh850wVcl6IuZSZUhNlgo8x4KYxdnrsFLTtG-DN-LfNNBFNnohmnIhmbAUemPtgdzrc_tUpJidm1n3G8FtPf5R-Aj5UzbE
CODEN	SJREEO
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2021_120713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrp_2025_104638 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2016_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1017_psrm_2023_22 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrp_2019_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1080_15534510_2018_1518786 crossref_primary_10_1080_10511253_2019_1692882 crossref_primary_10_1093_ijpor_edaa030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcps_2017_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2018_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_10888683221124741 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2704938 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500003399 crossref_primary_10_1177_0886260517730027 crossref_primary_10_1080_00224545_2021_1874257 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2020_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_023_01779_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_1745691621991863 crossref_primary_10_1080_02109395_2023_2207300 crossref_primary_10_3390_rel13121215 crossref_primary_10_5334_irsp_1068 crossref_primary_10_1111_lasr_12487 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_817860 crossref_primary_10_1002_per_2055 crossref_primary_10_1080_19331681_2022_2069180 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbusres_2022_113535 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs13090712 crossref_primary_10_1080_14683857_2020_1800283 crossref_primary_10_1080_15205436_2017_1342130 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_01236 crossref_primary_10_1177_00846724221125277 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12534 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12776 crossref_primary_10_1111_josi_12633 crossref_primary_10_1177_19485506231162161 crossref_primary_10_1177_10778012211038974 crossref_primary_10_1075_jlp_17034_ste crossref_primary_10_1017_pls_2020_20 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43545_021_00241_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2018_11_022 crossref_primary_10_1027_1015_5759_a000865 crossref_primary_10_1080_00224545_2021_1900046 crossref_primary_10_1163_15709256_12341339 crossref_primary_10_1080_0735648X_2023_2248085 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12475 crossref_primary_10_1177_14757257231195352 crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12632 crossref_primary_10_1080_19419899_2019_1686055 crossref_primary_10_1177_1948550620933434 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_00615_5 crossref_primary_10_1017_bap_2024_12 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0258910 crossref_primary_10_1177_0033294119899903 crossref_primary_10_1177_1462474520966979 crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_9335_a000447 crossref_primary_10_1177_13591053251317800 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOA_07_2021_2871 crossref_primary_10_1080_00224545_2018_1456396 crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_9335_a000321 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajps_12448 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022343320905355 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40806_018_0165_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs15030265 crossref_primary_10_1111_lasr_12264 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0241144 crossref_primary_10_1177_1948550618817347 crossref_primary_10_1002_casp_2599 crossref_primary_10_1177_10778012231200474 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_579908 crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci13010024 crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6765_12724 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40839_023_00195_z crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12361 crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2622 crossref_primary_10_1177_00332941241264786 crossref_primary_10_1177_0146167216653936 crossref_primary_10_1080_07418825_2018_1537400 crossref_primary_10_1080_15562948_2022_2142720 crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_9335_a000579 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsps_2024_1346857 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcpy_1442 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssresearch_2023_102927 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2017_02_052 crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672241262367 crossref_primary_10_1017_beq_2022_10 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2019_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_024_06179_y crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0137422 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrp_2016_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_0146167220916070 crossref_primary_10_1080_01973533_2020_1754824 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2022_111732 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjso_12280 crossref_primary_10_1177_1088868317698288 crossref_primary_10_1111_jacc_13530 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12671_019_01243_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_02134748_2023_2171560 crossref_primary_10_1093_socrel_srae029 crossref_primary_10_1080_10511253_2025_2555806 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13178_021_00559_w crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_9335_a000391 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_019_04414_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11211_020_00361_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2016_04_080 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7553 crossref_primary_10_3390_genealogy7030065 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44159_023_00161_4 crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672231185484 crossref_primary_10_1177_0956797615615584 crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440251324763 crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2837 crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2024_2433523 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjso_12452 crossref_primary_10_1177_0007650316681556 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_01075_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_016_9544_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s12552_022_09358_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrp_2021_104099 crossref_primary_10_1177_1745691620917336 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41262_025_00411_1 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0190954 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11199_018_0941_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_0146167215591501 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2016_10_062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijintrel_2023_101885 crossref_primary_10_1177_01979183231162622 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10584_025_03898_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12748 crossref_primary_10_1177_00220027231198519 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12742 crossref_primary_10_1177_0093650218793565 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0260624 crossref_primary_10_1002_casp_2559 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11558_022_09479_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12595 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_996250 crossref_primary_10_1111_beer_12826 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_022_00950_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022002719879994 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1308990 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijintrel_2018_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1177_0306624X19899642 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_869121 crossref_primary_10_1080_10495142_2025_2546419 crossref_primary_10_5964_psyct_v10i1_210 crossref_primary_10_1177_00332941241265316 crossref_primary_10_1177_01979183251353452 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_016_9601_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_0093650219855330 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijop_13119 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_023_04554_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_1948550615592243 crossref_primary_10_1080_2153599X_2019_1607540 crossref_primary_10_1177_0091647119837013 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41285_023_00201_2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0261603
Cites_doi	10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x 10.1177/1745691610393980 10.1037/a0012650 10.1080/10478400903028573 10.1080/00224540903232308 10.1111/pops.12006 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x 10.1177/0956797611402514 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 10.1037/a0015141 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 10.1017/CBO9781139175043 10.1037/a0021847 10.1126/science.1222565 10.1017/S0140525X14000430 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_7
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Copyright_xml	– notice: Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 0-V 3V. 7U4 7UB 7XB 88G 8AM 8BJ 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR BGRYB BHHNA CCPQU DPSOV DWI DWQXO FQK FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HEHIP JBE K7. KC- M0O M2L M2M M2O M2S MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL POGQB PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRQQA PSYQQ Q9U WZK
DOI	10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5
DatabaseName	CrossRef ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Psychology Database (Alumni) Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central Criminology Collection Sociological Abstracts ProQuest One Community College Politics Collection Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Central International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep Sociology Collection (OCUL) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) ProQuest Politics Collection Criminal Justice Database Proquest Political Science Psychology Database Research Library Sociology Database (ProQuest) Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef ProQuest One Psychology Research Library Prep ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) Politics Collection Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Criminal Justice International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Sociology Collection Worldwide Political Science Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Sociology Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Political Science ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Sociology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Criminology Collection ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) Criminal Justice Periodicals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Politics Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) ProQuest One Psychology Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Anthropology Law Psychology Philosophy Political Science
EISSN	1573-6725
EndPage	431
ExternalDocumentID	3504720871 10_1007_s11211_014_0223_5
GroupedDBID	-4V -55 -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 0-V 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 186 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDBF ABDZT ABECU ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTAH ABTBU ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACNCT ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUHS ACYUM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZJE ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFFNX AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARALO ARMRJ ASOEW ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYQZM AZFZN AZQEC B-. B0M BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BGRYB BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPSOV DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EAD EAP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMK EPL ESBYG ESI ESO ESX EV9 F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GUQSH GXS H13 HEHIP HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IRVIT ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KC- KDC KOV KOW LAK LLZTM LPU M0O M2L M2M M2O M2S M4Y MA- N2Q NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O-J O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9Q PF- PQQKQ PROAC PSYQQ PT4 PT5 Q2X QF4 QN7 QO5 QOK QOS R-Y R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RSV RZC RZD RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SBS SBU SCLPG SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK6 WK8 YLTOR YNT YZZ Z45 ZMTXR ZOVNA ZY4 ~8M ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT POGQB PRQQA 7U4 7UB 7XB 8BJ 8FK BHHNA DWI FQK JBE K7. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U WZK PUEGO
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e5e16e6e67e04b6c6c2a9b5e150dce08e5d81dae864e4a11e059e5b386acbb83
IEDL.DBID	M2L
ISICitedReferencesCount	197
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000347175100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0885-7466
IngestDate	Tue Oct 21 13:20:22 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 04:07:34 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 06:17:20 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 05:31:01 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:32:52 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:12:23 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:34:39 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	4
Keywords	Political orientation Morality Social dominance Authoritarianism Ideology
Language	English
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c481t-9e5e16e6e67e04b6c6c2a9b5e150dce08e5d81dae864e4a11e059e5b386acbb83
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
PQID	1626925966
PQPubID	54081
PageCount	19
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1700673171 proquest_miscellaneous_1700671135 proquest_miscellaneous_1636463358 proquest_journals_1626925966 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11211_014_0223_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11211_014_0223_5 springer_journals_10_1007_s11211_014_0223_5
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2014-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2014-12-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 12 year: 2014 text: 2014-12-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Boston
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Boston – name: New York
PublicationTitle	Social justice research
PublicationTitleAbbrev	Soc Just Res
PublicationYear	2014
Publisher	Springer US Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml	– name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V
References	PreacherKJHayesAFAsymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator modelsBehavior Research Methods2008408798911869768410.3758/BRM.40.3.879 HaidtJBjorklundFSinnott-ArmstrongWSocial intuitionists reason, in conversationMoral psychology2008Cambridge, MAMIT241254 ShroutPEBolgerNMediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendationsPsychological Methods200274221253070210.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 Nagel, T. (2012). The taste for being moral. [Book review of The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion by J. Haidt and Dignity: Its history and meaning by M. Rosen]. New York Review of Books, December 6 issue, pp. 40–42. StoneWFSmithLDStoneWFLedererGChristieRAuthoritarianism: Left and rightStrength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today1993New YorkSpringer14415610.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_7 BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSDAmazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science201163510.1177/1745691610393980 MilgramSObedience to authority: An experimental view1974New YorkHarper Jones, J.M. (2010). Americans’ opposition to gay marriage eases slightly. Retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/128291/Americans-Opposition-Gay-Marriage-Eases-Slightly.aspx. Rummel, R. J. (1997). Death by government. Transaction Publishers. AdornoTWFrenkel-BrunswikELevinsonDJSanfordRNThe authoritarian personality1950New YorkHarper AllportGWThe nature of prejudice1954Cambridge, MAPerseus Books WhitleyBEJrRight-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudiceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology19997712613410.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126 CarneyDRJostJTGoslingSDPotterJThe secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behindPolitical Psychology20082980784010.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–54. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. AltemeyerBZannaMThe other “authoritarian personality”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology1998San DiegoAcademic Press4792 JacobsinDSinnott-ArmstrongWDoes social intuitionism flatter morality or challenge it?Moral psychology2008Cambridge, MAMIT219232 TurielEEisenbergNDamonWLernerRMThe development of moralityHandbook of child psychology2006Hoboken, NJWiley789857 Saad, L. (2010). Americans’ acceptance of gay relations crosses 50% threshold. Retrieved 25 May, 2010 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/135764/Americans-Acceptance-Gay-Relations-Crosses-Threshold.aspx. Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. Available online from http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf. GrahamJHaidtJNosekBLiberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundationsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology200996102910461937903410.1037/a0015141 JostJTLeft and right, right and wrong. [Book review of The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion by J. Haidt]Science201233752552610.1126/science.1222565 SidaniusJPrattoFBoboLRacism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology19967047649010.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476 WrightJCBarilGThe role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2011471007101210.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014 JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAWSullowayFPolitical conservatism as motivated social cognitionPsychological Bulletin20031293393751278493410.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 RussellBPower: A new social analysis1938LondonGeorge Allen & Unwin GrahamJNosekBAHaidtJIyerRKolevaSDittoPHMapping the moral domainJournal of Personality and Social Psychology201110136638531169622124418210.1037/a0021847 HunterJDCulture wars: The struggle to define America1991New YorkBasic KohlbergLGoslinDAStage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socializationHandbook of socialization theory and research1969ChicagoRand McNally347480 WhitleyBEJrLeeSERelationships of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexualityJournal of Applied Social Psychology20003014417010.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x ShermerMThe believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths2011New YorkTimes/Holt Van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences,47(3), 169–173. GilliganCIn a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development1982Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press MilojevPOsborneDGreavesLMBulbuliaJWilsonMSDaviesCLLiuJHSibleyCGRight-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict different moral signaturesSocial Justice Research20142714917410.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 Haidt, J. (2008). What makes people vote Republican? Retrieved September 09, 2008, from http://edge.org/conversation/what-makes-vote-republican. HaidtJGrahamJJosephCAbove and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundationsPsychological Inquiry20092011011910.1080/10478400903028573 FedericoCMWeberCRErgunDHuntCMapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuitionPolitical Psychology20133458961010.1111/pops.12006 McFarlandSAuthoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudicePolitical Psychology201031425449 HaidtJThe emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgmentPsychological Review20011088148341169912010.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 NapierJLJostJTThe “anti-democratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working class authoritarianismJournal of Social Issues20086459561710.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x HelzerEPizarroDADirty liberals! Reminders of cleanliness promote conservative political and moral attitudesPsychological Science2011225175222142193410.1177/0956797611402514 McAdamsDPAlbaughMFarberEDanielsJLoganRLOlsonBFamily metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their livesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology2008959789901880827210.1037/a0012650 HaidtJThe righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion2012New YorkPantheon SidaniusJPrattoFSocial dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression1999New YorkCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139175043 JostJTThe end of the end of ideologyAmerican Psychologist2006616516701703206710.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 HaidtJGrahamJWhen morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognizeSocial Justice Research2007209811610.1007/s11211-007-0034-z AltemeyerBThe authoritarian specter1996Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press JostJTWestTVGoslingSDPersonality and ideology as determinants of candidate preferences and “Obama conversion” in the 2008 U.S. presidential electionThe Dubois Review: Social Science on Race20096103124 PrattoFSidaniusJStallworthLMMalleBFSocial dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology19946774176310.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 Jost, J. T. (2009). Left & right, right & wrong: A system justification analysis of ideology and morality. Talk Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Tampa, FL. SibleyCGDuckittJBig-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational modelJournal of Social Psychology20091495455612001452010.1080/00224540903232308 HaidtJGrahamJJostJTKayACThorisdottirHPlanet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of moralitySocial and psychological bases of ideology and system justification2009New YorkOxford37140110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 TabachnickBGFidellLSExperimental designs using ANOVA2007Belmont, CAThomson/Brooks/Cole OppenheimerDMMeyvisTDavidenkoNInstructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical powerJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20094586787210.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 J Haidt (223_CR17) 2008 JD Hunter (223_CR22) 1991 C Gilligan (223_CR11) 1982 DP McAdams (223_CR33) 2008; 95 M Shermer (223_CR45) 2011 223_CR37 S Milgram (223_CR35) 1974 TW Adorno (223_CR1) 1950 WF Stone (223_CR50) 1993 223_CR9 223_CR5 CM Federico (223_CR10) 2013; 34 J Graham (223_CR13) 2011; 101 CG Sibley (223_CR47) 2009; 149 223_CR44 J Haidt (223_CR20) 2009; 20 223_CR400 223_CR38 BE Whitley Jr (223_CR53) 1999; 77 F Pratto (223_CR41) 1994; 67 GW Allport (223_CR2) 1954 JL Napier (223_CR39) 2008; 64 B Russell (223_CR43) 1938 E Turiel (223_CR52) 2006 E Helzer (223_CR21) 2011; 22 JT Jost (223_CR29) 2009; 6 BE Whitley Jr (223_CR54) 2000; 30 J Haidt (223_CR16) 2012 DM Oppenheimer (223_CR40) 2009; 45 JC Wright (223_CR55) 2011; 47 J Sidanius (223_CR48) 1999 PE Shrout (223_CR46) 2002; 7 J Haidt (223_CR18) 2007; 20 223_CR15 DR Carney (223_CR7) 2008; 29 J Haidt (223_CR19) 2009 B Altemeyer (223_CR4) 1998 KJ Preacher (223_CR42) 2008; 40 S McFarland (223_CR34) 2010; 31 JT Jost (223_CR28) 2003; 129 JT Jost (223_CR25) 2006; 61 J Sidanius (223_CR49) 1996; 70 223_CR26 223_CR24 D Jacobsin (223_CR23) 2008 M Buhrmester (223_CR6) 2011; 6 L Kohlberg (223_CR30) 1969 B Altemeyer (223_CR3) 1996 JT Jost (223_CR27) 2012; 337 223_CR500 BG Tabachnick (223_CR51) 2007 J Haidt (223_CR14) 2001; 108 J Graham (223_CR12) 2009; 96 P Milojev (223_CR36) 2014; 27
References_xml	– reference: JostJTLeft and right, right and wrong. [Book review of The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion by J. Haidt]Science201233752552610.1126/science.1222565 – reference: Jost, J. T. (2009). Left & right, right & wrong: A system justification analysis of ideology and morality. Talk Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Tampa, FL. – reference: MilojevPOsborneDGreavesLMBulbuliaJWilsonMSDaviesCLLiuJHSibleyCGRight-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict different moral signaturesSocial Justice Research20142714917410.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 – reference: HaidtJThe righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion2012New YorkPantheon – reference: FedericoCMWeberCRErgunDHuntCMapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuitionPolitical Psychology20133458961010.1111/pops.12006 – reference: SidaniusJPrattoFBoboLRacism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology19967047649010.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476 – reference: WrightJCBarilGThe role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2011471007101210.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014 – reference: MilgramSObedience to authority: An experimental view1974New YorkHarper – reference: RussellBPower: A new social analysis1938LondonGeorge Allen & Unwin – reference: HunterJDCulture wars: The struggle to define America1991New YorkBasic – reference: ShroutPEBolgerNMediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendationsPsychological Methods200274221253070210.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 – reference: GrahamJHaidtJNosekBLiberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundationsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology200996102910461937903410.1037/a0015141 – reference: GrahamJNosekBAHaidtJIyerRKolevaSDittoPHMapping the moral domainJournal of Personality and Social Psychology201110136638531169622124418210.1037/a0021847 – reference: HelzerEPizarroDADirty liberals! Reminders of cleanliness promote conservative political and moral attitudesPsychological Science2011225175222142193410.1177/0956797611402514 – reference: AdornoTWFrenkel-BrunswikELevinsonDJSanfordRNThe authoritarian personality1950New YorkHarper – reference: BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSDAmazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science201163510.1177/1745691610393980 – reference: McFarlandSAuthoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudicePolitical Psychology201031425449 – reference: Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. – reference: Haidt, J. (2008). What makes people vote Republican? Retrieved September 09, 2008, from http://edge.org/conversation/what-makes-vote-republican. – reference: AltemeyerBZannaMThe other “authoritarian personality”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology1998San DiegoAcademic Press4792 – reference: JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAWSullowayFPolitical conservatism as motivated social cognitionPsychological Bulletin20031293393751278493410.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 – reference: JacobsinDSinnott-ArmstrongWDoes social intuitionism flatter morality or challenge it?Moral psychology2008Cambridge, MAMIT219232 – reference: ShermerMThe believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths2011New YorkTimes/Holt – reference: HaidtJGrahamJJosephCAbove and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundationsPsychological Inquiry20092011011910.1080/10478400903028573 – reference: PrattoFSidaniusJStallworthLMMalleBFSocial dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology19946774176310.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 – reference: Van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences,47(3), 169–173. – reference: McAdamsDPAlbaughMFarberEDanielsJLoganRLOlsonBFamily metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their livesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology2008959789901880827210.1037/a0012650 – reference: Nagel, T. (2012). The taste for being moral. [Book review of The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion by J. Haidt and Dignity: Its history and meaning by M. Rosen]. New York Review of Books, December 6 issue, pp. 40–42. – reference: TabachnickBGFidellLSExperimental designs using ANOVA2007Belmont, CAThomson/Brooks/Cole – reference: AllportGWThe nature of prejudice1954Cambridge, MAPerseus Books – reference: Rummel, R. J. (1997). Death by government. Transaction Publishers. – reference: PreacherKJHayesAFAsymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator modelsBehavior Research Methods2008408798911869768410.3758/BRM.40.3.879 – reference: Saad, L. (2010). Americans’ acceptance of gay relations crosses 50% threshold. Retrieved 25 May, 2010 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/135764/Americans-Acceptance-Gay-Relations-Crosses-Threshold.aspx. – reference: JostJTThe end of the end of ideologyAmerican Psychologist2006616516701703206710.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 – reference: WhitleyBEJrRight-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudiceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology19997712613410.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126 – reference: Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. Available online from http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf. – reference: HaidtJBjorklundFSinnott-ArmstrongWSocial intuitionists reason, in conversationMoral psychology2008Cambridge, MAMIT241254 – reference: SibleyCGDuckittJBig-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational modelJournal of Social Psychology20091495455612001452010.1080/00224540903232308 – reference: StoneWFSmithLDStoneWFLedererGChristieRAuthoritarianism: Left and rightStrength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today1993New YorkSpringer14415610.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_7 – reference: AltemeyerBThe authoritarian specter1996Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press – reference: OppenheimerDMMeyvisTDavidenkoNInstructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical powerJournal of Experimental Social Psychology20094586787210.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 – reference: HaidtJThe emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgmentPsychological Review20011088148341169912010.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 – reference: HaidtJGrahamJWhen morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognizeSocial Justice Research2007209811610.1007/s11211-007-0034-z – reference: HaidtJGrahamJJostJTKayACThorisdottirHPlanet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of moralitySocial and psychological bases of ideology and system justification2009New YorkOxford37140110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 – reference: WhitleyBEJrLeeSERelationships of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexualityJournal of Applied Social Psychology20003014417010.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x – reference: SidaniusJPrattoFSocial dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression1999New YorkCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139175043 – reference: TurielEEisenbergNDamonWLernerRMThe development of moralityHandbook of child psychology2006Hoboken, NJWiley789857 – reference: NapierJLJostJTThe “anti-democratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working class authoritarianismJournal of Social Issues20086459561710.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x – reference: GilliganCIn a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development1982Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press – reference: Jones, J.M. (2010). Americans’ opposition to gay marriage eases slightly. Retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/128291/Americans-Opposition-Gay-Marriage-Eases-Slightly.aspx. – reference: CarneyDRJostJTGoslingSDPotterJThe secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behindPolitical Psychology20082980784010.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x – reference: JostJTWestTVGoslingSDPersonality and ideology as determinants of candidate preferences and “Obama conversion” in the 2008 U.S. presidential electionThe Dubois Review: Social Science on Race20096103124 – reference: Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–54. – reference: KohlbergLGoslinDAStage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socializationHandbook of socialization theory and research1969ChicagoRand McNally347480 – volume-title: In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development year: 1982 ident: 223_CR11 – ident: 223_CR5 – volume: 29 start-page: 807 year: 2008 ident: 223_CR7 publication-title: Political Psychology doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x – volume: 6 start-page: 3 year: 2011 ident: 223_CR6 publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980 – ident: 223_CR26 – volume: 95 start-page: 978 year: 2008 ident: 223_CR33 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0012650 – volume: 20 start-page: 110 year: 2009 ident: 223_CR20 publication-title: Psychological Inquiry doi: 10.1080/10478400903028573 – volume: 149 start-page: 545 year: 2009 ident: 223_CR47 publication-title: Journal of Social Psychology doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308 – volume-title: The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion year: 2012 ident: 223_CR16 – volume: 34 start-page: 589 year: 2013 ident: 223_CR10 publication-title: Political Psychology doi: 10.1111/pops.12006 – volume-title: The authoritarian personality year: 1950 ident: 223_CR1 – volume: 61 start-page: 651 year: 2006 ident: 223_CR25 publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 – volume-title: Power: A new social analysis year: 1938 ident: 223_CR43 – volume-title: Experimental designs using ANOVA year: 2007 ident: 223_CR51 – volume: 108 start-page: 814 year: 2001 ident: 223_CR14 publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 – ident: 223_CR500 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017 – volume: 47 start-page: 1007 year: 2011 ident: 223_CR55 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014 – volume: 6 start-page: 103 year: 2009 ident: 223_CR29 publication-title: The Dubois Review: Social Science on Race – ident: 223_CR400 – volume-title: Obedience to authority: An experimental view year: 1974 ident: 223_CR35 – start-page: 47 volume-title: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology year: 1998 ident: 223_CR4 – volume: 129 start-page: 339 year: 2003 ident: 223_CR28 publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 – volume: 77 start-page: 126 year: 1999 ident: 223_CR53 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126 – volume: 70 start-page: 476 year: 1996 ident: 223_CR49 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476 – volume: 64 start-page: 595 year: 2008 ident: 223_CR39 publication-title: Journal of Social Issues doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x – volume: 22 start-page: 517 year: 2011 ident: 223_CR21 publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797611402514 – volume: 20 start-page: 98 year: 2007 ident: 223_CR18 publication-title: Social Justice Research doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z – ident: 223_CR24 – ident: 223_CR15 – volume: 31 start-page: 425 year: 2010 ident: 223_CR34 publication-title: Political Psychology – volume: 40 start-page: 879 year: 2008 ident: 223_CR42 publication-title: Behavior Research Methods doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 – start-page: 219 volume-title: Moral psychology year: 2008 ident: 223_CR23 – volume: 96 start-page: 1029 year: 2009 ident: 223_CR12 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0015141 – ident: 223_CR38 – volume: 45 start-page: 867 year: 2009 ident: 223_CR40 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 – volume: 7 start-page: 422 year: 2002 ident: 223_CR46 publication-title: Psychological Methods doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 – start-page: 241 volume-title: Moral psychology year: 2008 ident: 223_CR17 – volume: 27 start-page: 149 year: 2014 ident: 223_CR36 publication-title: Social Justice Research doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0213-7 – start-page: 371 volume-title: Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification year: 2009 ident: 223_CR19 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015 – volume-title: Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression year: 1999 ident: 223_CR48 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139175043 – volume-title: The believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths year: 2011 ident: 223_CR45 – volume: 101 start-page: 366 year: 2011 ident: 223_CR13 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0021847 – volume: 337 start-page: 525 year: 2012 ident: 223_CR27 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1222565 – ident: 223_CR44 – volume-title: The nature of prejudice year: 1954 ident: 223_CR2 – volume-title: Culture wars: The struggle to define America year: 1991 ident: 223_CR22 – ident: 223_CR9 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000430 – start-page: 789 volume-title: Handbook of child psychology year: 2006 ident: 223_CR52 – start-page: 347 volume-title: Handbook of socialization theory and research year: 1969 ident: 223_CR30 – ident: 223_CR37 – volume: 30 start-page: 144 year: 2000 ident: 223_CR54 publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x – volume: 67 start-page: 741 year: 1994 ident: 223_CR41 publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 – volume-title: The authoritarian specter year: 1996 ident: 223_CR3 – start-page: 144 volume-title: Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today year: 1993 ident: 223_CR50 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_7
SSID	ssj0010071
Score	2.4698045
Snippet	Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative”... Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only "liberal" ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly "conservative"... Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain Italic should include not only 'liberal' ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly... Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only 'liberal' ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly 'conservative'...
SourceID	proquest crossref springer
SourceType	Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	413
SubjectTerms	Anthropology Authoritarianism Authoritarianism (Psychology) Authority Avoidance Avoidance behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Conservatism Discrimination Dominance Enforcement Equity Ethics Fairness Group identity Hostility Ideologies Ideology Justice Liberalism Loyalty Morality Obedience Personality Personality and Social Psychology Philosophy Political psychology Political Science Politics Psychology Purity Social Policy Sociology Theorists Valuation
SummonAdditionalLinks	– databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1faxQxEB9s9aEIWk-Lp61E8EkJ7N4muawvUmyLwlmLf0rfliQ3Cwc1J7fXSt_6QfTFj9ZP4iSbvauiFWXfspPdwMxkfsn8A3iCoQi5UshlVlsudOm4RT3mgoRJqVrUNtYpOBwN9_f10VF5kPK4my7avXNJxp16mewWqpHR0VdwsjsFlytwnaydDv0a3r0_XLgOgtFsoaPkQ6FU58r83Sd-NkZLhPmLUzTamr3b_7XKdbiVoCXbbmXhDlxD34OblzohnPVgZWS-9GDtoGtgQEPrKQSOpiZFDwTdvnh2F75v-5imxUYEyJmZszchq58tGzI1rM3wf852pizcuU3DjQNJtp80n5jxY9YmAdPrGHjjkL2dTVLSk2chDNBMPIvBK-aYhx6i7VXxKbKd1MCFtjNGNBfnX-PfL86_sddkLtuAsxf34OPe7oeXr3hq7cCd0PmclygxV0jPEDNhlVNuYEpLgzIbO8w0yjEhaYNaCRQmz5FgIEpbaGWctbrYgFU_9XgfmLI0VKh6kNVCOCO1rdFpqYypCQqj7UPW8bhyqe55aL9xXC0rNgeeVcSzKvCskn14upjyuS36cRXxZic4VdL_psrpnFjSyVKpPjxevCbNDe4Y43F6EmgKJVRRSH0FzTDAiTwv5N9oCAfmfXjWCeWlpfxp4Q_-ifohrA2CVMdInk1Ync9OcAtuuNP5pJk9iir4A2EZLuo priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature
Title	Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?
URI	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1626925966 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1636463358 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1700671135 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1700673171
Volume	27
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000347175100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Criminal Justice Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: M0O dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/criminaljusticeperiodicals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Proquest Political Science customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: M2L dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/politicalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Psychology Database (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: M2M dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/psychology providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Research Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: M2O dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/pqrl providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Sociology Database (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 20241212 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: M2S dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/sociology providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6725 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010071 issn: 0885-7466 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fb9MwELfYxsNeYAzQCqMyE08gi6SxXYeXaWObQGq7aYNpb5HtXKRKIxlNN8SX4bNy5yQtIFEeUCU_OBfV0t35frm_jL0CakKuNQgVFU5Ik3rhwORCojBpXcjChT4Fl6PhZGKurtKz1uFWt2mV3Z0YLuq88uQjfxsj8k4Rq2u9f_NV0NQoiq62IzTW2Aa1lSGpHg9GiygC2c8GRSoxlFp3Uc1QOke9zfBDWgq0YolQv9ulJdj8Iz4azM7Jw_898BZ70AJOftBIyCN2D8pttjay37bZ5uL2-_6Y_TgoQzEWHyHs5nbOx1S7z5djl2re1PG_40cVJ89aRX4FlN9yWn_htsx5U-qLj0N6jQd-Opu2pU0lp2Q_Oy15SFGx14ImhTYO4TvgR-2YFry0ONLshf_e4x_RIDYpZftP2OeT40_vP4h2eIPw0sRzkYKCWAP-hhBJp732A5s63FRR7iEyoHLEyhaMliBtHAMCPVAuMdp650zylK2XVQk7jGuHW4kuBlEhpbfKuAK8UdraAsEuuB6LOtZlvu1sTgM2rrNlT2bidobczojbmeqx14tXbpq2HquIdzsOZ62G19mSvT32cvEYdZMCLraE6pZoEi11kiizgmZIgCGOE_UvGkR6cY-96eTxl6P87eDPVh_8OdsckAKE5Jxdtj6f3cILdt_fzaf1rM82Do8nZ-d9VKnotB8UK6zjsDY7F7ieX1z-BNRRLHs
linkProvider	ProQuest
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB61BYleeBQQgQJLBRfQCj92N2skVFWEqlGdwKGg3szueixFKnZJ0lb9M_wEfiOzfiSARDj1gHKzJ8nK_mbm250XwHP0TciVQi6DwnKhE8ct6pwLApNShShs3afgc9ofj_XxcfJxDX50tTA-rbKzibWhzivnz8hfh8S8E-LqSu2efuN-apSPrnYjNBpYHOLlBW3ZZm-HA3q_L6Jo__3RuwPeThXgTuhwzhOUGCqkTx8DYZVTLjKJpYsyyB0GGmVOJM6gVgKFCUMkBoLSxloZZ62O6XfX4ZogT-hTyEZRuohaeH_dsFbJ-0KpLopal-r5Xmq0cRecvGbM5e9-cElu_4jH1m5u_9b_9oBuw82WULO9RgPuwBqWW7Cemost2FxY98u78H2vrIvNWErbCmbmbOR7E7DlWKkZa_oUvGGDivmTw8qfm5B-lpPZV2bKnDWlzHS7Th9yyD5MJ23pVsl8MqOZlKxOwTEn3E9CbQ68z5EN2jE0ZJQZyezU_73DhuTwm5S53Xvw6Uqe0n3YKKsSHwBTli7FqoiCQghnpLYFOi2VMQWRebQ9CDqoZK7t3O4HiJxky57THl0ZoSvz6MpkD14uvnLatC1ZJbzdISprLdgsW8KpB88Wt8n2-ICSKbE68zKxEiqOpV4h0_eEKAxj-S8ZYrJhD151-P9lKX9b-MPVC38KNw6ORmmWDseHj2Az8spXJyJtw8Z8eoaP4bo7n09m0ye1GjP4ctVq8RONXoT2
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1faxQxEB9sFSmC1rPiadUIPimhu7dJLuuLFM_D4nkeqKVvS5KdhYOaK7fXSt_6QfTFj9ZP4mT_3FXRisi-ZSe7gZnM_JL5B_AUQxFypZDLqLBc6NRxizrngoRJqUIUtqpTsD_qj8f64CCdNH1OyzbavXVJ1jkNoUqTX-wc5cXOKvEtVCajY7DgZIMSLtfgqghx9OG4_mF_6UYIBrSGkZL3hVKtW_N3n_jZMK3Q5i8O0sruDG_994o34WYDOdluLSO34Qr6Dty40CHhtANrI_OlAxuTtrEBDW02oXE0tVEAgaDVl6d34Puur9K32IiAOjML9i5k-7NVo6aS1Zn_L9hgxsJd3CzcRJDE-2n5mRmfszo5mF5XATkO2fv5tEmG8iyEB5qpZ1VQiznkobdofYV8gmzQNHYhNceI5vzsa_X387NvbI_MaB2I9nILPg1ff3z1hjctH7gTOl7wFCXGCunpYySscsr1TGppUEa5w0ijzAlhG9RKoDBxjAQPUdpEK-Os1cldWPczj_eAKUtDiSp6USGEM1LbAp2WypiCIDLaLkQtvzPX1EMPbTkOs1Ul58CzjHiWBZ5lsgvPllOO6mIglxFvt0KUNXqhzGI6P6Z04lSqC0-Wr2lHBzeN8Tg7DjSJEipJpL6Eph9gRhwn8m80hA_jLjxvBfTCUv608Pv_RP0Yrk8Gw2y0N377ADZ6QcCrYJ9tWF_Mj_EhXHMni2k5f1TtzB8JSDqy
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Another+look+at+moral+foundations+theory%3A+do+authoritarianism+and+social+dominance+orientation+explain+liberal-conservative+differences+in+%27moral%27+intuitions%3F&rft.jtitle=Social+justice+research&rft.au=Kugler%2C+Matthew&rft.au=Jost%2C+John+T&rft.au=Noorbaloochi%2C+Sharareh&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.issn=0885-7466&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11211-014-0223-5&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0885-7466&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0885-7466&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0885-7466&client=summon