A comparison between different robust optimum design approaches: Application to tuned mass dampers

This paper is focused on the comparison between different approaches in structural optimization. More precisely, the conventional deterministic optimum design, based on the assumption that the only source of uncertainty concerns the forcing input, is compared to robust single-objective and multi-obj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Probabilistic engineering mechanics Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 108 - 118
Main Authors: Marano, Giuseppe Carlo, Greco, Rita, Sgobba, Sara
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 2010
Elsevier
Subjects:
ISSN:0266-8920, 1878-4275
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper is focused on the comparison between different approaches in structural optimization. More precisely, the conventional deterministic optimum design, based on the assumption that the only source of uncertainty concerns the forcing input, is compared to robust single-objective and multi-objective optimum design methods. The analysis is developed by considering as case of study a single-degree-of-freedom system with uncertain parameters, subject to random vibrations and equipped with a tuned mass damper device (TMD). The optimization problem concerns the selection of TMD mechanical characteristics able to enlarge the efficiency of the strategy of vibration reduction. Results demonstrate the importance of performing a robust optimum design and show that the multi-objective robust design methodology provides a significant improvement in performance stability, giving a better control of the design solution choice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0266-8920
1878-4275
DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.08.004