A comparison between different robust optimum design approaches: Application to tuned mass dampers

This paper is focused on the comparison between different approaches in structural optimization. More precisely, the conventional deterministic optimum design, based on the assumption that the only source of uncertainty concerns the forcing input, is compared to robust single-objective and multi-obj...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Probabilistic engineering mechanics Ročník 25; číslo 1; s. 108 - 118
Hlavní autori: Marano, Giuseppe Carlo, Greco, Rita, Sgobba, Sara
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 2010
Elsevier
Predmet:
ISSN:0266-8920, 1878-4275
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:This paper is focused on the comparison between different approaches in structural optimization. More precisely, the conventional deterministic optimum design, based on the assumption that the only source of uncertainty concerns the forcing input, is compared to robust single-objective and multi-objective optimum design methods. The analysis is developed by considering as case of study a single-degree-of-freedom system with uncertain parameters, subject to random vibrations and equipped with a tuned mass damper device (TMD). The optimization problem concerns the selection of TMD mechanical characteristics able to enlarge the efficiency of the strategy of vibration reduction. Results demonstrate the importance of performing a robust optimum design and show that the multi-objective robust design methodology provides a significant improvement in performance stability, giving a better control of the design solution choice.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0266-8920
1878-4275
DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.08.004