Limited Utility of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Testing in HIV Clinic Among Men Who Have Sex With Men

The reverse algorithm for syphilis diagnosis consists of a treponemal antibody screening immunoassay followed by confirmatory nontreponemal antibody testing. It is increasingly used in the United States despite studies suggesting limited cost-effectiveness in high-prevalence groups. In this retrospe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted diseases Jg. 48; H. 9; S. 675
Hauptverfasser: Dionne-Odom, Jodie, Van Der Pol, Barbara, Boutwell, Alex, Biligowda, Niranjan, Schmid, Daphne G, Hook, 3rd, Edward W
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.09.2021
Schlagworte:
Algorithms
Cross-Sectional Studies
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV Infections - epidemiology
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Male
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Syphilis - diagnosis
Syphilis - epidemiology
Syphilis Serodiagnosis
Treponema pallidum
ISSN:1537-4521, 1537-4521
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The reverse algorithm for syphilis diagnosis consists of a treponemal antibody screening immunoassay followed by confirmatory nontreponemal antibody testing. It is increasingly used in the United States despite studies suggesting limited cost-effectiveness in high-prevalence groups. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we included men who have sex with men tested with the reverse algorithm in an Alabama HIV clinic between March 2015 and February 2017. Trep-Sure enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was used for the initial screen, followed by reflex nontreponemal reactive rapid plasma reagin (RPR) testing of specimens with positive results. Sociodemographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record and stratified according to EIA screen positivity. Quantitative EIA antibody index values were collected to assess test performance at various thresholds. Among 1693 men tested for syphilis with the reverse algorithm in HIV clinic, 808 (48%) had a positive initial EIA screen. A majority (53%) of men with subsequent RPR testing had a nonreactive RPR (EIA+/RPR-), and 19% (19/98) of these EIA+/RPR- samples tested had a negative confirmatory Treponema pallidum particle agglutination testing result. Analysis of quantitative EIA index values using a receiver operating characteristics curve suggested that a threshold >8 (rather the current threshold of antibody index 1.2) improved the performance of the test. Among men who have sex with men tested in HIV clinic, the syphilis reverse algorithm was inefficient because of high rates of prior syphilis and false-positive EIA screening. Frequent syphilis screening in high-prevalence populations is an important part of the US epidemic response, and the traditional algorithm is preferred.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1537-4521
1537-4521
DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001386