Efficacy and safety of apixaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior bioprosthetic valve replacement or valve repair: Insights from the ARISTOTLE trial

Background The optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement or native valve repair remains uncertain. Hypothesis We evaluated the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs warfarin in patients with AF and a history of BPV replacement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Jg. 42; H. 5; S. 568 - 571
Hauptverfasser: Guimarães, Patricia O., Pokorney, Sean D., Lopes, Renato D., Wojdyla, Daniel M., Gersh, Bernard J., Giczewska, Anna, Carnicelli, Anthony, Lewis, Basil S., Hanna, Michael, Wallentin, Lars, Vinereanu, Dragos, Alexander, John H., Granger, Christopher B.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.05.2019
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0160-9289, 1932-8737, 1932-8737
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement or native valve repair remains uncertain. Hypothesis We evaluated the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs warfarin in patients with AF and a history of BPV replacement or native valve repair. Methods Using data from Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) (n = 18 201), a randomized trial comparing apixaban with warfarin in patients with AF, we analyzed the subgroup of patients (n = 251) with prior valve surgery. We contacted sites by telephone to obtain additional data about prior valve surgery. Full data were available for 156 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke/systemic embolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Treatment groups were compared using a Cox regression model. Results In ARISTOTLE, 104 (0.6%) patients had a history of BPV replacement (n = 73 [aortic], n = 26 [mitral], n = 5 [mitral and aortic]) and 52 (0.3%) had a history of valve repair (n = 50 [mitral], n = 2 [aortic]). Among patients with BPVs, 55 were randomized to apixaban and 49 to warfarin. Among those with a history of native valve repair, 32 were randomized to apixaban and 20 to warfarin. Overall clinical event rates were low, with no significant differences between apixaban and warfarin for any outcomes. Conclusions In patients with AF and a history of BPV replacement or repair, the safety and efficacy of apixaban compared with warfarin was consistent with results from ARISTOTLE. These data suggest that apixaban may be reasonable for patients with BPVs or prior valve repair, though future larger randomized trials are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00412984.
Bibliographie:Funding information
Bristol‐Myers Squibb; Pfizer
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
These authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
Michael Hanna is the Employee of Bristol‐Myers Squibb at the time of study conduct.
Funding information Bristol‐Myers Squibb; Pfizer
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.23178