Prognostic factors and predictors of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two phase III studies

[Display omitted] •Prognostic and predictive factors for survival in patients with HCC were identified.•Vascular invasion, high alpha-fetoprotein, and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were prognostic for poorer overall survival.•Survival benefit with sorafenib was observed across all patien...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of hepatology Ročník 67; číslo 5; s. 999 - 1008
Hlavní autoři: Bruix, Jordi, Cheng, Ann-Lii, Meinhardt, Gerold, Nakajima, Keiko, De Sanctis, Yoriko, Llovet, Josep
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.11.2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:0168-8278, 1600-0641, 1600-0641
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:[Display omitted] •Prognostic and predictive factors for survival in patients with HCC were identified.•Vascular invasion, high alpha-fetoprotein, and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were prognostic for poorer overall survival.•Survival benefit with sorafenib was observed across all patient subgroups.•Greater sorafenib benefit in patients with liver-confined disease, hepatitis C virus, and low NLR. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) vs. placebo in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in two phase III studies, SHARP (Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol) and Asia Pacific (AP). To assess prognostic factors for HCC and predictive factors of sorafenib benefit, we conducted a pooled exploratory analysis from these placebo-controlled phase III studies. To identify potential prognostic factors for OS, univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses were performed for baseline variables by Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (HRs) and median OS were evaluated across pooled subgroups. To assess factors predictive of sorafenib benefit, the interaction term between treatment for each subgroup was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. In 827 patients (448 sorafenib; 379 placebo) analyzed, strong prognostic factors for poorer OS identified from MV analysis in both treatment arms were presence of macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; ⩽ vs. >median [3.1]). Sorafenib OS benefit was consistently observed across all subgroups. Significantly greater OS sorafenib benefit vs. placebo was observed in patients without extrahepatic spread (EHS; HR, 0.55 vs. 0.84), with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (HR, 0.47 vs. 0.81), and a low NLR (HR, 0.59 vs. 0.84). In this exploratory analysis, presence of MVI, high AFP, and high NLR were prognostic factors of poorer OS. Sorafenib benefit was consistently observed irrespective of prognostic factors. Lack of EHS, HCV, and lower NLR were predictive of a greater OS benefit with sorafenib. This exploratory pooled analysis showed that treatment with sorafenib provides a survival benefit in all subgroups of patients with HCC; however, the magnitude of benefit is greater in patients with disease confined to the liver (without extrahepatic spread), or in those with hepatitis C virus, or a lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, an indicator of inflammation status. These results help inform the prognosis of patients receiving sorafenib therapy and provide further refinements for the design of trials testing new agents vs. sorafenib. Clinical Trial Numbers: NCT00105443 and NCT00492752.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.026