Longitudinal assessment of COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in people with HIV stratified by CD4+ T-cell count in the Netherlands: A two-year follow-up study

Although guidelines for COVID-19 additional vaccination strategies generally prioritise people with advanced HIV infection, recommendations vary globally, with some countries recommending an annual vaccination for all people with HIV (PWH), while others restrict this to PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count ...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:PloS one Ročník 20; číslo 5; s. e0323792
Hlavní autoři: Jongkees, Marlou J., Bogers, Susanne, de Vries, Rory D., GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H., Miranda Afonso, Pedro, Hensley, Kathryn S., Rijnders, Bart J. A., Brinkman, Kees, Rokx, Casper, Roukens, Anna H. E.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States Public Library of Science 01.01.2025
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Témata:
ISSN:1932-6203, 1932-6203
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Although guidelines for COVID-19 additional vaccination strategies generally prioritise people with advanced HIV infection, recommendations vary globally, with some countries recommending an annual vaccination for all people with HIV (PWH), while others restrict this to PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 448 adult PWH. The primary outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1)-specific IgG antibody level at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after completing a primary COVID-19 vaccination series (two doses of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1-S, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S). We compared the antibody kinetics over two years between PWH with a baseline CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL (n = 16) vs. ≥ 200 cells per µL (n = 432) with a mixed-effects model. Secondary outcomes included variables associated with the kinetics of S1-specific antibody levels and the incidence of breakthrough infections. The median most recent CD4+ T-cell count prior to primary vaccination was 140 (IQR 80-165) in the < 200 cells per µL group, and 688 (IQR 520-899) in the ≥ 200 cells per µL group at the time of primary vaccination. S1-specific antibodies were lower in PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 vs. ≥ 200 cells per µL during the two-year follow-up, with predicted S1-specific antibody levels of 514 (95% CI 456-578) vs. 2758 (95% CI 1488-5110) BAU per mL at 12 months (p < 0.001) and 839 (95% CI 732-959) vs. 3505 (95% CI 1712-7175) BAU per mL at 24 months (p < 0.001). The overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 55% and comparable between groups. A CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL, higher age, and a vector-based primary vaccination series were negatively associated with S1-specific antibody levels over time. Long-term humoral responses were lower in PWH with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL compared to those with a CD4+ T-cell count ≥ 200 cells per µL. National COVID-19 vaccine guidelines recommending booster vaccines for all PWH, should therefore specifically emphasise the need for booster vaccines in those with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells per µL. Trial registration: The trial was registered on the International Clinical Trials Platform (registration number: EUCTR2021-001054-57-N).
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: RDdV is supported by the Health~Holland grant EMCLHS20017, co-funded by the PPP Allowance made available by the Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, to stimulate public-private partnerships, and is listed as an inventor of the fusion inhibitory lipopeptide [SARSHRCPEG4]2-chol in a provisional patent application. KSH has received support for attending meetings and travel from Gilead. BJAR declares the receipt of research grants from Gilead and MSD and honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Roche, Gilead, and F2G. KB has received research and educational grants from ViiV and Gilead, as well as consulting fees for advisory boards from ViiV, Gilead, MSD, and AstraZeneca. CR has received research grants from ViiV, Gilead, ZonMW, AIDSfonds, Erasmus MC, and Health~Holland, and honoraria for advisory boards from Gilead and ViiV. AR has received grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Leids Universitair Fonds, participated on the board of an investor-initiated clinical trial on convalescent plasma for COVID-19, and is the chief editor of the Dutch Journal of Infectious Diseases and a member of the European Medicines Agency expert group on vaccines. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323792