Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria
Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Malaria journal Ročník 24; číslo 1; s. 383 - 12 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
London
BioMed Central
07.11.2025
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1475-2875, 1475-2875 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Background
Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.
Methods
A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.
Results
Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.
Conclusion
While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.
A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.
Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.
While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.BACKGROUNDMalaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.METHODSA mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.RESULTSOut of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.CONCLUSIONWhile overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Keywords: RDT, MaCRA, TPR, Malaria Data Accuracy Abstract Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. |
| ArticleNumber | 383 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Ayodeji, Oluwafisayo Eugene, Eugene C. Okoro, Onyebuchi Cooper, Shawna Okoronkwo, Chukwu Mukhtar, Al-Mustapha Ogbulafor, Nnenna Atobatele, Sunday Gab-deedam, Shiva D. Aponte, John J. Humes, Michael Griffith, Kevin Atu, Ginini Galles, Natalie Sampson, Sidney Okagbue, Hilary Lindblade, Kim A. Orya, Evelyn Bademosi, Olufisayo Ntadom, Godwin Akpiroroh, Ese |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sunday surname: Atobatele fullname: Atobatele, Sunday email: sunday.atobatele@sydani.org organization: Sydani Group, Sydani Institute for Research and Innovation – sequence: 2 givenname: Sidney surname: Sampson fullname: Sampson, Sidney organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 3 givenname: Evelyn surname: Orya fullname: Orya, Evelyn organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 4 givenname: Onyebuchi surname: Okoro fullname: Okoro, Onyebuchi organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme – sequence: 5 givenname: Ese surname: Akpiroroh fullname: Akpiroroh, Ese organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 6 givenname: Hilary surname: Okagbue fullname: Okagbue, Hilary organization: Sydani Institute for Research and Innovation – sequence: 7 givenname: Shiva D. surname: Gab-deedam fullname: Gab-deedam, Shiva D. organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 8 givenname: Olufisayo surname: Bademosi fullname: Bademosi, Olufisayo organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 9 givenname: Ginini surname: Atu fullname: Atu, Ginini organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 10 givenname: Kim A. surname: Lindblade fullname: Lindblade, Kim A. organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH – sequence: 11 givenname: Al-Mustapha surname: Mukhtar fullname: Mukhtar, Al-Mustapha organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 12 givenname: Oluwafisayo surname: Ayodeji fullname: Ayodeji, Oluwafisayo organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 13 givenname: Eugene C. surname: Eugene fullname: Eugene, Eugene C. organization: Sydani Group – sequence: 14 givenname: John J. surname: Aponte fullname: Aponte, John J. organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH – sequence: 15 givenname: Natalie surname: Galles fullname: Galles, Natalie organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH – sequence: 16 givenname: Michael surname: Humes fullname: Humes, Michael organization: U. S. President’s Malaria Initiative, USAID – sequence: 17 givenname: Kevin surname: Griffith fullname: Griffith, Kevin organization: U. S. President’s Malaria Initiative, USAID – sequence: 18 givenname: Shawna surname: Cooper fullname: Cooper, Shawna organization: Audere – sequence: 19 givenname: Nnenna surname: Ogbulafor fullname: Ogbulafor, Nnenna organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme – sequence: 20 givenname: Chukwu surname: Okoronkwo fullname: Okoronkwo, Chukwu organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme – sequence: 21 givenname: Godwin surname: Ntadom fullname: Ntadom, Godwin organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41204290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kstu3SAQhlGVqLm-QBeVpW66ccLFgFkeRb1EitouskeYi8WRDadgL_L2nROnUStVFQuY4ZufGWYu0EnKySP0juAbQnpxWwlVTLSY8hZzgUnL36Bz0kne0l7ykz_OZ-ii1j3GRPaSvkVnHaG4owqfox87a9di7FOTQ1O8zcXFNDYmObAOuSxHC65mM5kSTVPMIbrGRTOmXJdom8XXpTYxNd_i6IG4QqfBTNVfv-yX6PHzp8e7r-3D9y_3d7uH1nZSLm0_uBCoGrwZGMY97WwQLMiBcOYoUQN3pAskECqxsIw5SaRVQ_Dg80RKdonuN1mXzV4fSpxNedLZRP3syGXUBpK3k9fW-9561RMRHDzjjWBOCTNIxY2VUoDWx03rUPLPFerRc6zWT5NJPq9VMyqUoozJDtAPGzoaUI4p5AU-74jrXS-oVJJTDtTNPyhYzs_RQhNDBP9fAe9fMliH2bvXen73CQC6AbbkWosPrwjB-jgMehsGDcOgn4dBH1XZFlQBTtAdvc9rSdCV_0X9AvbmtUU |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/s12889-017-4398-1 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01115.x 10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7 10.1186/s12936-025-05352-3 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0364 10.1186/s12936-018-2500-5 10.3390/ijerph17103474 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0901 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.229.13231 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001235 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002925 10.1371/journal.pone.0295049 10.1186/s12936-021-03796-x 10.1186/s12936-024-05075-x 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0181 10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002203 10.1186/s12936-021-03917-6 10.1111/1469-0691.12152 10.1186/s12936-020-03573-2 10.1371/journal.pone.0223869 10.11613/BM.2012.031 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2025 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2025 – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-025-05601-5 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Public Health |
| EISSN | 1475-2875 |
| EndPage | 12 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776 A862797525 41204290 10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Nigeria |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Nigeria |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grantid: INV- 043942 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000865 – fundername: United States Agency for International Development grantid: No. 7200AA20CA00031 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000200 – fundername: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grantid: INV- 043942 – fundername: United States Agency for International Development grantid: No. 7200AA20CA00031 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29M 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECGQY EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 LGEZI LOTEE M1P M~E NADUK NXXTH O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-8bdff29beab300824cf63f7b153d219b5d14f1f12706c33d717c9bfef1fe1773 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001611591500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1475-2875 |
| IngestDate | Mon Nov 10 19:21:54 EST 2025 Sat Nov 08 18:08:56 EST 2025 Wed Nov 12 17:02:27 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 03:51:01 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 01:40:59 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 04:35:39 EST 2025 Sat Nov 08 02:19:58 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | RDT MaCRA Malaria Data Accuracy TPR |
| Language | English |
| License | 2025. The Author(s). |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-8bdff29beab300824cf63f7b153d219b5d14f1f12706c33d717c9bfef1fe1773 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776 |
| PMID | 41204290 |
| PQID | 3269923374 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776 proquest_miscellaneous_3269923374 gale_infotracmisc_A862797525 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A862797525 pubmed_primary_41204290 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5 springer_journals_10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-11-07 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-11-07 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2025 text: 2025-11-07 day: 07 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Malaria journal |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Malar J |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Malar J |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | M Skjefte (5601_CR28) 2024; 19 MJ Eliades (5601_CR26) 2019; 100 EI Nwaneli (5601_CR3) 2020; 61 5601_CR13 PU Okereke (5601_CR15) 2025; 87 KA Lindblade (5601_CR21) 2025; 24 J Maltha (5601_CR9) 2013; 19 T Visser (5601_CR29) 2021; 20 A Fountain (5601_CR11) 2023; 108 IF Obi (5601_CR18) 2019; 14 S Sun (5601_CR24) 2011; 11 OE Segun (5601_CR2) 2020; 17 F Shuaib (5601_CR12) 2020; 5 SP Kigozi (5601_CR14) 2019; 101 5601_CR19 V Shelus (5601_CR6) 2022; 2 MR Boyce (5601_CR16) 2017; 17 5601_CR17 DA Pfeffer (5601_CR22) 2018; 17 CK Murray (5601_CR7) 2003; 8 K Abba (5601_CR8) 2011; 2011 M Tetteh (5601_CR27) 2021; 20 5601_CR1 MC Mwenda (5601_CR25) 2021; 20 EO Ayandipo (5601_CR20) 2025; 24 5601_CR4 SC Olisakwe (5601_CR10) 2024; 23 ML McHugh (5601_CR23) 2012; 22 5601_CR5 |
| References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 470 year: 2017 ident: 5601_CR16 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4398-1 – volume: 8 start-page: 876 year: 2003 ident: 5601_CR7 publication-title: Trop Med Int Health doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01115.x – volume: 24 start-page: 206 year: 2025 ident: 5601_CR21 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7 – volume: 24 start-page: 132 year: 2025 ident: 5601_CR20 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05352-3 – volume: 2011 year: 2011 ident: 5601_CR8 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 100 start-page: 876 year: 2019 ident: 5601_CR26 publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0364 – volume: 17 start-page: 352 year: 2018 ident: 5601_CR22 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2500-5 – ident: 5601_CR19 – volume: 17 year: 2020 ident: 5601_CR2 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103474 – volume: 101 start-page: 137 year: 2019 ident: 5601_CR14 publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0901 – ident: 5601_CR17 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.229.13231 – ident: 5601_CR4 – ident: 5601_CR13 – volume: 2 year: 2022 ident: 5601_CR6 publication-title: PLoS Glob Public Health doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001235 – volume: 87 start-page: 658 year: 2025 ident: 5601_CR15 publication-title: Ann Med Surg doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002925 – volume: 19 year: 2024 ident: 5601_CR28 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295049 – ident: 5601_CR1 – volume: 20 start-page: 255 year: 2021 ident: 5601_CR27 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03796-x – volume: 23 start-page: 249 year: 2024 ident: 5601_CR10 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05075-x – volume: 108 start-page: 8 year: 2023 ident: 5601_CR11 publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0181 – volume: 11 start-page: 145 year: 2011 ident: 5601_CR24 publication-title: Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol doi: 10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3 – volume: 5 year: 2020 ident: 5601_CR12 publication-title: BMJ Glob Health doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002203 – ident: 5601_CR5 – volume: 20 start-page: 386 year: 2021 ident: 5601_CR25 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03917-6 – volume: 19 start-page: 408 year: 2013 ident: 5601_CR9 publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12152 – volume: 20 start-page: 39 year: 2021 ident: 5601_CR29 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03573-2 – volume: 14 year: 2019 ident: 5601_CR18 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223869 – volume: 22 start-page: 276 year: 2012 ident: 5601_CR23 publication-title: Biochem Med doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031 – volume: 61 year: 2020 ident: 5601_CR3 publication-title: J Prev Med Hyg |
| SSID | ssj0017872 |
| Score | 2.440284 |
| Snippet | Background
Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before... Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment.... Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before... Abstract Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 383 |
| SubjectTerms | Accuracy and precision Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Diagnosing the Data: Malaria RDT Recording and Reporting Accuracy in Four African Countries and Implications for Surveillance Diagnosis Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data Documentation Entomology Evaluation Health facilities Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data Humans Infectious Diseases Information management MaCRA Malaria Malaria - diagnosis Malaria Data Accuracy Medical care Microbiology Molecular diagnostic techniques Nigeria Parasitology Public Health Quality management Rapid Diagnostic Tests RDT TPR Tropical Medicine |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1Ni9UwMOjqQRC_P56uEkHwoMW2SfNxfIqLp8eii-wtpPlYerBvafsE_70zSfvwqQh6KTRJw3Qyn5nJhJCXUXkd61IXUfKy4LUUhdWVw4dn3ral8jxdNiE3G3V-rk_nQ2Hjku2-hCSTpE5srcTbETUTJsw2RYluRNFcJddA3Slkx0-fv-xjB0CC9XI85o_fHaigVKn_d3n8k0L6JUKaFM_J7f8D-Q65NRuadJ0p4y65Evp75GbepaP58NF9crp2bjdY951uI837NTA_tb2nOZiAb9D11YID3Fk62MvOU5_T82BiCobqNNKup5vuAmn5ATk7-XD2_mMx37FQOC7lVKjWx1jrNtiWoTnAXRQsyhYEoQdh1ja-4rGKGJ8WjjEP3p_TbQzQFiop2UNy1G_78JhQy5hTQUkvG8stFplxLII_13o0cupmRV4vWDeXuZKGSR6IEiYjygCiTEKUgdHvcGH2I7EKdmrYDhdmZioDCl65ABQgogfAgxXMa2FbqRvrpBQr8gqX1SCvToBMOx85AICx6pVZgzsntWwQuOODkcBj7qD7xUIYBrswMa0P291owPrVYCMzyVfkUaaYPcy8qlHdlyvyZiEPM0uI8S-__uTfhj8lN2qkMNzqlsfkaBp24Rm57r5N3Tg8T6zxA0H8CEA priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-025-05601-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41204290 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3269923374 https://doaj.org/article/cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776 |
| Volume | 24 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001611591500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20020101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20020101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20020101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Public Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: 8C1 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1475-2875 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017872 issn: 1475-2875 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20021201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96-iCI-O3quUQQfNBybdN2kse94w59cCnnIetTSPNx9MHusdsV_O-dadrjVkFffAnkgzD5zSQzk48JY2-DdCrkqUoCFGlS5FAlRmWWEiecaVLpiuGzCVgu5Wql6htffdGdsBgeOAJ3hIu4tF7JrAqusMGbSjhVmQZUaSzAEGwbrZ7JmRrPD1AM8-mJjKyOtqTV6LJtmaTkgiTlnhoaovX_uSbfUEq_nZIOyufsIXswWo18Eal9xG757jG7H7fceHxJ9ITVC2t3G2N_8nXgcfMFO-OmczyeDFAOq74b9GZbwzfmqnXcxbt22DFHq7Pf8rbjy_aSBPMpuzg7vTj5mIwfJiS2AOgT2bgQctV40wjS7YhXJQI0uKo5XJma0mVFyAIdNldWCIeunFVN8FjmMwDxjB10686_YNwIYaWX4KA0haGIMVYEdM4aRxZLXs7Y-wk-fRXDYujBnZCVjmBrBFsPYGtsfUwIX7ekkNZDATJaj4zW_2L0jL0j_miaeD2Cacb3A0gwhbDSC_TNQEFJxB3utcQJY_eq30wc1lRFt8w6v95tNZqyCg1eAcWMPY-sv6a5yHLS3emMfZhkQY_TffuXob_8H0N_xe7lJLu0mw2H7KDf7Pxrdtf-6NvtZs5uwwqGVGIqT7I5u3N8uqzP58OcwFz96XP9DXPnX77-Avl2DOU |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1di9QwMOgpeCB-n67eaQTBBy22Tdokj6t43OG5HLrIvYV8Ln2we7RdwX_vTD8WV0XQl0KTNEwn85mZTAh5EaVXMU9VEgVPE56LMjEqc_jwzBubSs_7yybEYiEvLtT5eCisnbLdp5BkL6l7tpblmxY1EybMFkmKbkRSXCXXOGgsTOT79PnLNnYAJJhPx2P--N2OCuor9f8uj39SSL9ESHvFc3z7_0C-Q26NhiadD5Rxl1wJ9T1yc9ilo8Pho_vkfO7cpjHuO11HOuzXwPzU1J4OwQR8g66vBhzgytDGXFae-iE9DyamYKh2La1quqhWSMsPyPL4_fLdSTLesZA4LkSXSOtjzJUNxjI0B7iLJYvCgiD0IMxs4TMes4jx6dIx5sH7c8rGAG0hE4IdkL16XYdHhBrGnAxSeFEYbrDIjGMR_Dnr0cjJixl5NWFdXw6VNHTvgchSD4jSgCjdI0rD6Le4MNuRWAW7b1g3Kz0ylQYFL11QMiujB8CDKZlXpbFCFcYJUc7IS1xWjbzaATLNeOQAAMaqV3oO7pxQokDgDndGAo-5ne7nE2Fo7MLEtDqsN60G61eBjcwEn5GHA8VsYeZZjuo-nZHXE3noUUK0f_n1x_82_Bm5cbL8eKbPThcfnpD9HKkNt73FIdnrmk04Itfdt65qm6c9m_wAqfcLJA |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR1di9QwMOgpIojfnqunRhB88Mq1Tdokj-vHoijLgofcW0jzcfTB7tJ2D_z3zjTtcqsiiC-FJtN2OpnJzGQyE0JeBelUyFOVBMHThOeiTIzKLF4cc6ZKpePDYRNiuZRnZ2p1KYt_2O0-hSRjTgNWaWr6k40LUcRledKhlsLNs0WSokuRFFfJNY6HBqG__vXbLo4A7JhPqTJ_fG5PHQ1V-3-fmy8pp1-ipYMSWtz5f_TvktujAUrnkWPukSu-uU9uxdU7GpOSHpDV3Npta-wPug40ruPAt6hpHI1BBryDru8GHOPa0NZsakdd3LYHL6ZgwPYdrRu6rM-Rxx-S08WH03cfk_HshcRyIfpEVi6EXFXeVAzNBG5DyYKoYIJ0MMlVhct4yALGrUvLmAOv0KoqeGjzmRDsETlo1o1_TKhhzEovhROF4QaLz1gWwM-rHBo_eTEjb6YR0JtYYUMPnoksdSSUBkLpgVAaoN_iIO0gsTr20LBuz_UobBoUv7ReyawMDhD3pmROlaYSqjBWiHJGXuMQa5ThHohpxlQEQBirYek5uHlCiQKRO9qDBNmze90vJybR2IUb1hq_3nYarGIFtjMTfEYOI_fscOZZjmZAOiPHE6vocebo_vLrT_4N_AW5sXq_0F8-LT8_JTdzZDZcDRdH5KBvt_4ZuW4v-rprnw8S8xOImRQI |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+recording+and+reporting+of+malaria+rapid+diagnostic+tests+in+Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Malaria+journal&rft.au=Sunday+Atobatele&rft.au=Sidney+Sampson&rft.au=Evelyn+Orya&rft.au=Onyebuchi+Okoro&rft.date=2025-11-07&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12936-025-05601-5&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |