Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria

Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Malaria journal Ročník 24; číslo 1; s. 383 - 12
Hlavní autoři: Atobatele, Sunday, Sampson, Sidney, Orya, Evelyn, Okoro, Onyebuchi, Akpiroroh, Ese, Okagbue, Hilary, Gab-deedam, Shiva D., Bademosi, Olufisayo, Atu, Ginini, Lindblade, Kim A., Mukhtar, Al-Mustapha, Ayodeji, Oluwafisayo, Eugene, Eugene C., Aponte, John J., Galles, Natalie, Humes, Michael, Griffith, Kevin, Cooper, Shawna, Ogbulafor, Nnenna, Okoronkwo, Chukwu, Ntadom, Godwin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 07.11.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:1475-2875, 1475-2875
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
AbstractList Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.BACKGROUNDMalaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement.A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.METHODSA mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs.Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.RESULTSOut of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made.While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.CONCLUSIONWhile overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
Abstract Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts.
Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment. However, concerns remain about healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to, and reporting of test results. This study assessed the accuracy of RDT results recorded in health facility registers in two states of Nigeria by comparing them with an unbiased reference standard and explored factors influencing interrater agreement. Methods A mixed-method evaluation was conducted in 16 health facilities across Oyo and Sokoto States. RDTs performed by HCWs were photographed using a digital RDT reader and independently re-interpreted by a trained, independent, objective panel. Surveys of health facilities and HCWs collected data on factors that could influence RDT recording. Interrater agreement between RDT results recorded by HCWs in facility registers and the external panel was assessed using Cohen's kappa. A meta-analytical approach was used to calculate a pooled summary kappa value across facilities, and potential moderators of agreement were examined, including characteristics of facilities, HCWs and RDTs. Results Out of 19,586 RDTs captured, 18,319 were included in the analysis. Overall, 6.2% of RDTs were misrecorded as positive and 3.7% as negative in health facility registers, yielding a positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4%, 87.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9%. The overall percentage agreement was 90.2% (95% CI 89.7%, 90.6%), and the pooled kappa statistic was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85), indicating strong agreement. However, kappa values varied substantially across facilities (range: 0.59, 0.92). Lower agreement was observed in facilities in Sokoto State and in areas with lower malaria prevalence and test positivity. Faint test lines, found in 8.8% of RDTs, were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of results misrecorded as negative. HCWs were more likely to misrecord RDT results as positive when a malaria diagnosis or antimalarial prescription had been made. Conclusion While overall agreement between facility registers and panel-interpreted RDT results was strong, the proportion of results misrecorded as positive and negative highlight the need for improved training, supportive supervision, and mechanisms to promote accurate RDT interpretation and recording. Targeted interventions are essential to ensure the reliability of routine malaria data and support national control efforts. Keywords: RDT, MaCRA, TPR, Malaria Data Accuracy
ArticleNumber 383
Audience Academic
Author Ayodeji, Oluwafisayo
Eugene, Eugene C.
Okoro, Onyebuchi
Cooper, Shawna
Okoronkwo, Chukwu
Mukhtar, Al-Mustapha
Ogbulafor, Nnenna
Atobatele, Sunday
Gab-deedam, Shiva D.
Aponte, John J.
Humes, Michael
Griffith, Kevin
Atu, Ginini
Galles, Natalie
Sampson, Sidney
Okagbue, Hilary
Lindblade, Kim A.
Orya, Evelyn
Bademosi, Olufisayo
Ntadom, Godwin
Akpiroroh, Ese
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sunday
  surname: Atobatele
  fullname: Atobatele, Sunday
  email: sunday.atobatele@sydani.org
  organization: Sydani Group, Sydani Institute for Research and Innovation
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sidney
  surname: Sampson
  fullname: Sampson, Sidney
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Evelyn
  surname: Orya
  fullname: Orya, Evelyn
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Onyebuchi
  surname: Okoro
  fullname: Okoro, Onyebuchi
  organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ese
  surname: Akpiroroh
  fullname: Akpiroroh, Ese
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Hilary
  surname: Okagbue
  fullname: Okagbue, Hilary
  organization: Sydani Institute for Research and Innovation
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Shiva D.
  surname: Gab-deedam
  fullname: Gab-deedam, Shiva D.
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Olufisayo
  surname: Bademosi
  fullname: Bademosi, Olufisayo
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ginini
  surname: Atu
  fullname: Atu, Ginini
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Kim A.
  surname: Lindblade
  fullname: Lindblade, Kim A.
  organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Al-Mustapha
  surname: Mukhtar
  fullname: Mukhtar, Al-Mustapha
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Oluwafisayo
  surname: Ayodeji
  fullname: Ayodeji, Oluwafisayo
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Eugene C.
  surname: Eugene
  fullname: Eugene, Eugene C.
  organization: Sydani Group
– sequence: 14
  givenname: John J.
  surname: Aponte
  fullname: Aponte, John J.
  organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Natalie
  surname: Galles
  fullname: Galles, Natalie
  organization: PMI Insights Project, PATH
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Humes
  fullname: Humes, Michael
  organization: U. S. President’s Malaria Initiative, USAID
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Kevin
  surname: Griffith
  fullname: Griffith, Kevin
  organization: U. S. President’s Malaria Initiative, USAID
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Shawna
  surname: Cooper
  fullname: Cooper, Shawna
  organization: Audere
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Nnenna
  surname: Ogbulafor
  fullname: Ogbulafor, Nnenna
  organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Chukwu
  surname: Okoronkwo
  fullname: Okoronkwo, Chukwu
  organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Godwin
  surname: Ntadom
  fullname: Ntadom, Godwin
  organization: National Malaria Elimination Programme
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41204290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu3SAQhlGVqLm-QBeVpW66ccLFgFkeRb1EitouskeYi8WRDadgL_L2nROnUStVFQuY4ZufGWYu0EnKySP0juAbQnpxWwlVTLSY8hZzgUnL36Bz0kne0l7ykz_OZ-ii1j3GRPaSvkVnHaG4owqfox87a9di7FOTQ1O8zcXFNDYmObAOuSxHC65mM5kSTVPMIbrGRTOmXJdom8XXpTYxNd_i6IG4QqfBTNVfv-yX6PHzp8e7r-3D9y_3d7uH1nZSLm0_uBCoGrwZGMY97WwQLMiBcOYoUQN3pAskECqxsIw5SaRVQ_Dg80RKdonuN1mXzV4fSpxNedLZRP3syGXUBpK3k9fW-9561RMRHDzjjWBOCTNIxY2VUoDWx03rUPLPFerRc6zWT5NJPq9VMyqUoozJDtAPGzoaUI4p5AU-74jrXS-oVJJTDtTNPyhYzs_RQhNDBP9fAe9fMliH2bvXen73CQC6AbbkWosPrwjB-jgMehsGDcOgn4dBH1XZFlQBTtAdvc9rSdCV_0X9AvbmtUU
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12889-017-4398-1
10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01115.x
10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7
10.1186/s12936-025-05352-3
10.4269/ajtmh.18-0364
10.1186/s12936-018-2500-5
10.3390/ijerph17103474
10.4269/ajtmh.18-0901
10.11604/pamj.2018.30.229.13231
10.1371/journal.pgph.0001235
10.1097/MS9.0000000000002925
10.1371/journal.pone.0295049
10.1186/s12936-021-03796-x
10.1186/s12936-024-05075-x
10.4269/ajtmh.22-0181
10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3
10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002203
10.1186/s12936-021-03917-6
10.1111/1469-0691.12152
10.1186/s12936-020-03573-2
10.1371/journal.pone.0223869
10.11613/BM.2012.031
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2025
2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2025
– notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12936-025-05601-5
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals (Selected full-text)
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1475-2875
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776
A862797525
41204290
10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Nigeria
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Nigeria
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  grantid: INV- 043942
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000865
– fundername: United States Agency for International Development
  grantid: No. 7200AA20CA00031
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000200
– fundername: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  grantid: INV- 043942
– fundername: United States Agency for International Development
  grantid: No. 7200AA20CA00031
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29M
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFFHD
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECGQY
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
LGEZI
LOTEE
M1P
M~E
NADUK
NXXTH
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-8bdff29beab300824cf63f7b153d219b5d14f1f12706c33d717c9bfef1fe1773
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001611591500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1475-2875
IngestDate Mon Nov 10 19:21:54 EST 2025
Sat Nov 08 18:08:56 EST 2025
Wed Nov 12 17:02:27 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 03:51:01 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 01:40:59 EST 2025
Thu Nov 13 04:35:39 EST 2025
Sat Nov 08 02:19:58 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords RDT
MaCRA
Malaria Data Accuracy
TPR
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-8bdff29beab300824cf63f7b153d219b5d14f1f12706c33d717c9bfef1fe1773
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12936-025-05601-5
PMID 41204290
PQID 3269923374
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776
proquest_miscellaneous_3269923374
gale_infotracmisc_A862797525
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A862797525
pubmed_primary_41204290
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5
springer_journals_10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-11-07
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-11-07
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-11-07
  day: 07
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Malaria journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev Malar J
PublicationTitleAlternate Malar J
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References M Skjefte (5601_CR28) 2024; 19
MJ Eliades (5601_CR26) 2019; 100
EI Nwaneli (5601_CR3) 2020; 61
5601_CR13
PU Okereke (5601_CR15) 2025; 87
KA Lindblade (5601_CR21) 2025; 24
J Maltha (5601_CR9) 2013; 19
T Visser (5601_CR29) 2021; 20
A Fountain (5601_CR11) 2023; 108
IF Obi (5601_CR18) 2019; 14
S Sun (5601_CR24) 2011; 11
OE Segun (5601_CR2) 2020; 17
F Shuaib (5601_CR12) 2020; 5
SP Kigozi (5601_CR14) 2019; 101
5601_CR19
V Shelus (5601_CR6) 2022; 2
MR Boyce (5601_CR16) 2017; 17
5601_CR17
DA Pfeffer (5601_CR22) 2018; 17
CK Murray (5601_CR7) 2003; 8
K Abba (5601_CR8) 2011; 2011
M Tetteh (5601_CR27) 2021; 20
5601_CR1
MC Mwenda (5601_CR25) 2021; 20
EO Ayandipo (5601_CR20) 2025; 24
5601_CR4
SC Olisakwe (5601_CR10) 2024; 23
ML McHugh (5601_CR23) 2012; 22
5601_CR5
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 470
  year: 2017
  ident: 5601_CR16
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4398-1
– volume: 8
  start-page: 876
  year: 2003
  ident: 5601_CR7
  publication-title: Trop Med Int Health
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01115.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 206
  year: 2025
  ident: 5601_CR21
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05459-7
– volume: 24
  start-page: 132
  year: 2025
  ident: 5601_CR20
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05352-3
– volume: 2011
  year: 2011
  ident: 5601_CR8
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 100
  start-page: 876
  year: 2019
  ident: 5601_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0364
– volume: 17
  start-page: 352
  year: 2018
  ident: 5601_CR22
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2500-5
– ident: 5601_CR19
– volume: 17
  year: 2020
  ident: 5601_CR2
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103474
– volume: 101
  start-page: 137
  year: 2019
  ident: 5601_CR14
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0901
– ident: 5601_CR17
  doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.229.13231
– ident: 5601_CR4
– ident: 5601_CR13
– volume: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 5601_CR6
  publication-title: PLoS Glob Public Health
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001235
– volume: 87
  start-page: 658
  year: 2025
  ident: 5601_CR15
  publication-title: Ann Med Surg
  doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002925
– volume: 19
  year: 2024
  ident: 5601_CR28
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295049
– ident: 5601_CR1
– volume: 20
  start-page: 255
  year: 2021
  ident: 5601_CR27
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03796-x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 249
  year: 2024
  ident: 5601_CR10
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05075-x
– volume: 108
  start-page: 8
  year: 2023
  ident: 5601_CR11
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0181
– volume: 11
  start-page: 145
  year: 2011
  ident: 5601_CR24
  publication-title: Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1007/s10742-011-0077-3
– volume: 5
  year: 2020
  ident: 5601_CR12
  publication-title: BMJ Glob Health
  doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002203
– ident: 5601_CR5
– volume: 20
  start-page: 386
  year: 2021
  ident: 5601_CR25
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03917-6
– volume: 19
  start-page: 408
  year: 2013
  ident: 5601_CR9
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
  doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12152
– volume: 20
  start-page: 39
  year: 2021
  ident: 5601_CR29
  publication-title: Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03573-2
– volume: 14
  year: 2019
  ident: 5601_CR18
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223869
– volume: 22
  start-page: 276
  year: 2012
  ident: 5601_CR23
  publication-title: Biochem Med
  doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031
– volume: 61
  year: 2020
  ident: 5601_CR3
  publication-title: J Prev Med Hyg
SSID ssj0017872
Score 2.440284
Snippet Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before...
Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before treatment....
Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria before...
Abstract Background Malaria remains a major health concern in Nigeria. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used in health facilities to confirm malaria...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 383
SubjectTerms Accuracy and precision
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Diagnosing the Data: Malaria RDT Recording and Reporting Accuracy in Four African Countries and Implications for Surveillance
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data
Documentation
Entomology
Evaluation
Health facilities
Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infectious Diseases
Information management
MaCRA
Malaria
Malaria - diagnosis
Malaria Data Accuracy
Medical care
Microbiology
Molecular diagnostic techniques
Nigeria
Parasitology
Public Health
Quality management
Rapid Diagnostic Tests
RDT
TPR
Tropical Medicine
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEB9K6aEgotbqaisRCh7s0pfN7iY5PovFgzx6KNJbyOZD9uC-8naf0P_emc1u6VPQi8dNQjaZmczML5NMAM6EFYV0sskLzz0ClMBzjZYlF45HtEguyvEuzLevcrVSt7f6-tFTX3QmLKUHToS7QCWuXNCK19GXLgZbC69r20hdWSflmGwbvZ4ZTE3xAxTDYr4io-qLnqwaHbat8gVBkLzaMUNjtv4_dfIjo_RblHQ0PlfP4OnkNbJlGu1z2AvdC3iSttxYukl0BNdL57Yb6-7ZOrK0-YKdMdt5liID9IVVPyyi2dayjb1rPfPprB12zNDrHHrWdmzVfifBfAk3V59vLr_k04MJuSulHHLV-BgL3QTbCLLtSK9aRNmgVvOomZrK8zLySMHm2gnhEco53cSAZYEjU45hv1t34TUwa3ltC8UFIucyIGRCt2TBlUNvSYlYhQw-zuQzdykthhnhhKpNIrZBYpuR2KbK4BNR-KElpbQeC5DRZmK0-RejM_hA_DG08AYkpp3uD-CAKYWVWSI2k1pWBf7uZKclLhi3U_1-5rChKjpl1oX1tjfoymp0eHHSGbxKrH8Yc8kLst2LDM5nWTDTcu__MvU3_2Pqb-GwINml3Wx5AvvDZhtO4cD9HNp-826U_F8JfATN
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-025-05601-5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41204290
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3269923374
https://doaj.org/article/cee8ce9816fd4cfea63d96ab795ac776
Volume 24
WOSCitedRecordID wos001611591500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Public Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: 8C1
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-2875
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017872
  issn: 1475-2875
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20021201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3di9QwEB-8Ox-Ew2-96rlEEHzQ4qZpm_Rx77hDQZdyHsf6FNJ8HH2we7Rdwf_eSdouroqgL4EmaZtOZuY3k8mkAK-YYgnXvIoTQw06KJbGBSJLzDR1iEja8ZALc_WRL5ditSrKMSmsm3a7TyHJoKmDWIv8XeeRyW-YzeK5dyPibA8OEO6EF8eLz1fb2AGyYDKlx_zxvh0ICif1_66PfwKkXyKkAXjO7_3fkO_D3dHQJIuBMx7ALds8hMNhlY4MyUePoFxovWmV_k7WjgzrNfh8ohpDhmCCv8Kmrwod4FqRVt3Uhphhex4-mKCh2nekbsiyvva8_Bguz88uT9_H4z8WYp1y3seiMs4lRWVVxbw5kGqXM8crVIQGlVmVGZo66nx8OteMGfT-dFE5i3WW4jw-gf1m3dgjIErRXCWCMnS2U4teFloycyo0GliCucxG8GaiurwZTtKQwQMRuRwIJZFQMhBKZhGc-InZ9vSnYIeKdXstR6GSCPBCW-SA3BkcuFU5M0WuKl5kSnOeR_DaT6v0stojMdWYcoAD9qdeyQW6c7zgWYKvO97piTKmd5pfTowhfZPfmNbY9aaTaP0WaCPjR0fwdOCY7ZhTmni4n0fwdmIPOWqI7i-f_uzfuj-HO4nnML_UzY9hv2839gXc1t_6umtnsMdXPJQCS3FKZ3BwcrYsL2Zh9QGvyg-fyi-zIEI_AFVYDgk
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1di9QwcNBT8ED89qyeGkHwwStumjZJH1fxOHFdDl2OewtpPo4-2D3aruC_d5K2i6si6GOTNJ1M5jMzkwK8ZJplwogqzSy16KA4mpaoWVJmqEeNZLyItTBnC7FcyvPz8nQsCuumbPcpJBkldWRryd90QTOFhNkinQU3Ii2uwrUc5w2JfJ-_nG1jB0iC2VQe88f3dlRQvKn_d3n8k0L6JUIaFc_x7f8D-Q7cGg1NMh8o4y5ccc09uDmc0pGh-Og-nM6N2bTafCdrT4bzGpyf6MaSIZgQnrDrq0YHuNak1Ze1JXZIz8OJCRqqfUfqhizri0DLD2B1_H717iQd_7GQmlyIPpWV9T4rK6crFsyB3HjOvKhQEFoUZlVhae6pD_Fpbhiz6P2ZsvIO2xzFfXwIe826cY-AaE25ziRl6GznDr0stGRmVBo0sCTzhUvg9YR1dTncpKGiByK5GhClEFEqIkoVCbwNG7MdGW7Bjg3r9kKNTKVQwUvjSkm5twi405zZkutKlIU2QvAEXoVtVYFXe0SmHksOEOBw65WaozsnSlFk-LnDnZHIY2an-8VEGCp0hcS0xq03nULrt0QbGRedwMFAMVuYc5oFdT9L4GgiDzVKiO4vS3_8b8Ofw42T1aeFWnxYfnwC-1mgtnDsLQ5hr2837ilcN9_6umufRTb5ARjZChA
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3di9QwEB_0FBHE74_qqREEH7xym6Zt2sf1Y1E8lgWP495Cmo-jD3aXtiv43zvTtMutiiA-NknbSTKTmV8mMwF4LbRIpJFVnFhuEaA4HpeoWWJhuEeNZLwcYmHOTuRyWZyfl6tLUfzDaffJJRliGihLU9Mfb6wPIl7kxx1pKTo8m8UzghRxdhWupXRpEOH1r2c7PwKyYzKFyvzxvT11NGTt_31tvqScfvGWDkpocef_yb8Lt0cDlM0Dx9yDK665D7fC7h0LQUkPYDU3Zttq84OtPQv7OPgvphvLgpOBnrDqm0ZgXGvW6k1tmQ3H9vDDDA3YvmN1w5b1BfH4QzhdfDx9_yke716ITSplHxeV9T4pK6crQWZCanwuvKxwgbS4yFWZ5annnvzWuRHCIio0ZeUdljmO8_sIDpp1454A05rnOim4QBCeOkRfaOHMeGHQ8CqEz1wEb6cZUJuQYUMNyKTIVRgohQOlhoFSWQTvaJJ2LSk79lCwbi_UKGwKFX9hXFnw3Fsk3Olc2DLXlSwzbaTMI3hDU6xIhnscTD2GIiDBlA1LzRHmyVJmCf7ucK8lyp7Zq341MYmiKjqw1rj1tlNoFZdoO2OnI3gcuGdHc8oTMgNmERxNrKLGlaP7S9ef_lvzl3Bj9WGhTj4vvzyDmwkxG-2Gy0M46Nutew7Xzfe-7toXg8T8BO4YEvQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+recording+and+reporting+of+malaria+rapid+diagnostic+tests+in+Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Malaria+journal&rft.au=Atobatele%2C+Sunday&rft.au=Sampson%2C+Sidney&rft.au=Orya%2C+Evelyn&rft.au=Okoro%2C+Onyebuchi&rft.date=2025-11-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12936-025-05601-5&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12936_025_05601_5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon