Container fleet renewal considering multiple sulfur reduction technologies and uncertain markets amidst COVID-19

The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production Vol. 317; p. 128361
Main Authors: Zhao, Yuzhe, Ye, Jiajun, Zhou, Jingmiao
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2021
Subjects:
ISSN:0959-6526, 1879-1786
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare stable operation plans under the highly uncertain shipping market. Considering three sulfur reduction technologies, namely, fuel-switching, scrubber, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel engine, this paper develops a robust optimization model based on two-stage stochastic linear programming (SLP) to formulate a decision plan for container fleet, which can deal with various uncertainties in future: freight demand, ship charter rate, fuel price, retrofit time and Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA) ratio. The main decision contents include ship acquisition, ship retrofit, ship sale, ship charter, route assignment, and speed optimization. The effectiveness of our plan was verified through a case study on two liner routes from the Far East to Northwest America, operated by COSCO Shipping Lines. The results from SLP model show that large-capacity fuel-switching ships and their LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits should be included in the long-term investment and operation plan; slow-steaming is an important operational decision for ocean liner shipping; if the current SECA boundary is not further expanded or the sulfur emission restrictions not further tightened, the scrubber ship will have no advantage in investment cost and operation. However, considering the probabilities of more flexible scenarios, the results from the robust model suggest that it is beneficial to install scrubber on medium-capacity fuel-switching ships, and carry out more LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits for large-capacity fuel-switching ships. Compared with SLP, this robust strategy greatly reduces sulfur emissions while slightly pushing up carbon emissions. •A robust optimization model was established based on two-stage stochastic linear programming.•Three sulfur reduction technologies were integrated into fleet renewal decisions.•Various uncertainties in liner shipping market amidst COVID-19 were considered.•Strategic and tactical decisions were optimized at the same time.•A real case of COSCO-Liner under the influence of COVID-19 is studied to demonstrate the effectiveness.
AbstractList The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare stable operation plans under the highly uncertain shipping market. Considering three sulfur reduction technologies, namely, fuel-switching, scrubber, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel engine, this paper develops a robust optimization model based on two-stage stochastic linear programming (SLP) to formulate a decision plan for container fleet, which can deal with various uncertainties in future: freight demand, ship charter rate, fuel price, retrofit time and Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA) ratio. The main decision contents include ship acquisition, ship retrofit, ship sale, ship charter, route assignment, and speed optimization. The effectiveness of our plan was verified through a case study on two liner routes from the Far East to Northwest America, operated by COSCO Shipping Lines. The results from SLP model show that large-capacity fuel-switching ships and their LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits should be included in the long-term investment and operation plan; slow-steaming is an important operational decision for ocean liner shipping; if the current SECA boundary is not further expanded or the sulfur emission restrictions not further tightened, the scrubber ship will have no advantage in investment cost and operation. However, considering the probabilities of more flexible scenarios, the results from the robust model suggest that it is beneficial to install scrubber on medium-capacity fuel-switching ships, and carry out more LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits for large-capacity fuel-switching ships. Compared with SLP, this robust strategy greatly reduces sulfur emissions while slightly pushing up carbon emissions.
The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare stable operation plans under the highly uncertain shipping market. Considering three sulfur reduction technologies, namely, fuel-switching, scrubber, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel engine, this paper develops a robust optimization model based on two-stage stochastic linear programming (SLP) to formulate a decision plan for container fleet, which can deal with various uncertainties in future: freight demand, ship charter rate, fuel price, retrofit time and Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA) ratio. The main decision contents include ship acquisition, ship retrofit, ship sale, ship charter, route assignment, and speed optimization. The effectiveness of our plan was verified through a case study on two liner routes from the Far East to Northwest America, operated by COSCO Shipping Lines. The results from SLP model show that large-capacity fuel-switching ships and their LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits should be included in the long-term investment and operation plan; slow-steaming is an important operational decision for ocean liner shipping; if the current SECA boundary is not further expanded or the sulfur emission restrictions not further tightened, the scrubber ship will have no advantage in investment cost and operation. However, considering the probabilities of more flexible scenarios, the results from the robust model suggest that it is beneficial to install scrubber on medium-capacity fuel-switching ships, and carry out more LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits for large-capacity fuel-switching ships. Compared with SLP, this robust strategy greatly reduces sulfur emissions while slightly pushing up carbon emissions.The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare stable operation plans under the highly uncertain shipping market. Considering three sulfur reduction technologies, namely, fuel-switching, scrubber, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel engine, this paper develops a robust optimization model based on two-stage stochastic linear programming (SLP) to formulate a decision plan for container fleet, which can deal with various uncertainties in future: freight demand, ship charter rate, fuel price, retrofit time and Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA) ratio. The main decision contents include ship acquisition, ship retrofit, ship sale, ship charter, route assignment, and speed optimization. The effectiveness of our plan was verified through a case study on two liner routes from the Far East to Northwest America, operated by COSCO Shipping Lines. The results from SLP model show that large-capacity fuel-switching ships and their LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits should be included in the long-term investment and operation plan; slow-steaming is an important operational decision for ocean liner shipping; if the current SECA boundary is not further expanded or the sulfur emission restrictions not further tightened, the scrubber ship will have no advantage in investment cost and operation. However, considering the probabilities of more flexible scenarios, the results from the robust model suggest that it is beneficial to install scrubber on medium-capacity fuel-switching ships, and carry out more LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits for large-capacity fuel-switching ships. Compared with SLP, this robust strategy greatly reduces sulfur emissions while slightly pushing up carbon emissions.
The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background, liner companies now face the challenge to find suitable sulfur reduction technologies, make reasonable decisions on fleet renewal, and prepare stable operation plans under the highly uncertain shipping market. Considering three sulfur reduction technologies, namely, fuel-switching, scrubber, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel engine, this paper develops a robust optimization model based on two-stage stochastic linear programming (SLP) to formulate a decision plan for container fleet, which can deal with various uncertainties in future: freight demand, ship charter rate, fuel price, retrofit time and Sulfur Emission Control Area (SECA) ratio. The main decision contents include ship acquisition, ship retrofit, ship sale, ship charter, route assignment, and speed optimization. The effectiveness of our plan was verified through a case study on two liner routes from the Far East to Northwest America, operated by COSCO Shipping Lines. The results from SLP model show that large-capacity fuel-switching ships and their LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits should be included in the long-term investment and operation plan; slow-steaming is an important operational decision for ocean liner shipping; if the current SECA boundary is not further expanded or the sulfur emission restrictions not further tightened, the scrubber ship will have no advantage in investment cost and operation. However, considering the probabilities of more flexible scenarios, the results from the robust model suggest that it is beneficial to install scrubber on medium-capacity fuel-switching ships, and carry out more LNG dual-fuel engine retrofits for large-capacity fuel-switching ships. Compared with SLP, this robust strategy greatly reduces sulfur emissions while slightly pushing up carbon emissions. •A robust optimization model was established based on two-stage stochastic linear programming.•Three sulfur reduction technologies were integrated into fleet renewal decisions.•Various uncertainties in liner shipping market amidst COVID-19 were considered.•Strategic and tactical decisions were optimized at the same time.•A real case of COSCO-Liner under the influence of COVID-19 is studied to demonstrate the effectiveness.
ArticleNumber 128361
Author Zhao, Yuzhe
Zhou, Jingmiao
Ye, Jiajun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yuzhe
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5852-6617
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Yuzhe
  email: zhaoyuzhe@dlmu.edu.cn
  organization: Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jiajun
  surname: Ye
  fullname: Ye, Jiajun
  email: yejiajun0940@163.com
  organization: Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jingmiao
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5216-4304
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Jingmiao
  email: zhoujingmiao123@163.com
  organization: Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
BookMark eNqFkUuLFDEYRYOMOD2jP0HI0k21SSqvQlCkfQ0MzEbdhph81ZM2lbRJagb_vdV0I-imV4Hk3sMl5wpdpJwAoZeUrCmh8vVuvXMR9iWvGWF0TZnuJX2CVlSroaNKywu0IoMYOimYvERXte4IoYoo_gxd9lxQqjhdof0mp2ZDgoLHCNBwgQSPNmKXUw0eSkhbPM2xhX0EXOc4zmXJ-Nm1kBNu4O5TjnkboGKbPJ6Tg3IA4smWn9CW2yn42vDm7vvNh44Oz9HT0cYKL07nNfr26ePXzZfu9u7zzeb9bee4Uq3rmVMEhLPgLbGUaD9orygHKhgwL6QijI9UeGl765zSXmtOPGOj5Vpw2l-jt0fufv4xgXeQWrHR7EtYhv022Qbz70sK92abH4zmjPaMLYBXJ0DJv2aozUyhOojRJshzNUz2UhCluTgfFYoxJrXol6g4Rl3JtRYY_y6ixBzEmp05iTUHseYodum9-a_nQrMHB8v4EM-23x3bsPz4Q4BiqguwqPKhgGvG53CG8Aec3sVC
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oceaneng_2024_118939
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cie_2024_110339
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2025_144939
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oceaneng_2023_114670
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oceaneng_2024_117488
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15118674
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8805483
crossref_primary_10_3390_su16051947
crossref_primary_10_3390_su17188107
crossref_primary_10_3390_jmse12060973
crossref_primary_10_3390_app12178452
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rtbm_2024_101112
crossref_primary_10_1080_03088839_2024_2378457
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12351_024_00858_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2025_07_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ocecoaman_2023_106564
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_110951
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.007
10.1080/030888300286680
10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.019
10.1080/03088839.2013.819132
10.1080/03088839.2010.486635
10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.025
10.3390/su13010237
10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.001
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.954
10.1016/j.trc.2012.05.002
10.1016/j.trb.2020.11.003
10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.001
10.1016/j.tre.2014.09.010
10.3233/ISP-1979-2629402
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.029
10.1016/j.omega.2019.07.003
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.015
10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.009
10.1111/j.1475-3995.1999.tb00167.x
10.1016/j.tre.2020.102004
10.1080/03088839.2013.821210
10.1080/03088839600000087
10.1287/trsc.2014.0566
10.1080/03088839.2016.1237781
10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010
10.1016/j.trd.2020.102641
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.013
10.1057/jors.1971.55
10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.012
10.1016/j.tre.2016.03.013
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 Elsevier Ltd
2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2021 Elsevier Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

AGRICOLA
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1879-1786
EndPage 128361
ExternalDocumentID PMC8421322
10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128361
S0959652621025749
GroupedDBID --K
--M
..I
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
9JN
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAHCO
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AARJD
AAXUO
ABFYP
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHHHB
AHIDL
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AXJTR
BELTK
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
IHE
J1W
JARJE
K-O
KCYFY
KOM
LY9
M41
MO0
MS~
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SPC
SPCBC
SSJ
SSR
SSZ
T5K
~G-
29K
9DU
AAHBH
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABFNM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADHUB
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEGFY
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
CITATION
D-I
EFKBS
EJD
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
HMC
HVGLF
HZ~
R2-
SEN
SEW
WUQ
ZY4
~HD
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-32c70e5caeda0a108d98d714e152e2d567024f15d6a3acc78d8840d22fa485413
ISICitedReferencesCount 21
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000696396500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0959-6526
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 16:53:15 EDT 2025
Mon Sep 29 04:55:05 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 27 23:34:23 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 20:53:19 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:05:36 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:43:23 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Sulfur reduction technologies
Maritime fleet renewal problem (MFRP)
Robust optimization
Stochastic linear programming
Sulfur emission control area (SECA)
Language English
License Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-32c70e5caeda0a108d98d714e152e2d567024f15d6a3acc78d8840d22fa485413
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-5216-4304
0000-0002-5852-6617
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8421322
PMID 34511741
PQID 2572226853
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8421322
proquest_miscellaneous_2636507845
proquest_miscellaneous_2572226853
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128361
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128361
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128361
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of cleaner production
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Fagerholt (bib13) 1999; 6
Schinas, Stefanakos (bib34) 2012; 25
Psaraftis, Kontovas (bib33) 2021; 13
Wijsmuller (bib42) 1979; 26
Wang, Fagerholt, Wallace (bib40) 2018; 79
Nielsen, Schack (bib28) 2012
(bib12) 2020
Clarksons (bib9) 2020
Yin, Fan, Yang, Li (bib45) 2013; 41
Xie, Wang, Chen (bib44) 2000; 27
Lindstad, Eskeland, Psaraftis, Sandaas, Strømman (bib20) 2015; 110
Lirn, Lin, Shang (bib22) 2013; 41
Zhao, Fan, Fagerholt, Zhou (bib46) 2021; 90
Abadie, Goicoechea (bib2) 2019; 67
Maritimemanual (bib23) 2020
Fischer, Nokhart, Olsen, Fagerholt, Rakke, Stalhane (bib15) 2016; 91
(bib18) 2018
(bib1) 2020
Nikos (bib29) 2020
Pantuso, Fagerholt, Wallace (bib30) 2016; 50
Clarksons (bib10) 2020
Sharafian, Bloomers, Merida (bib35) 2019; 131
(bib26) 2020
Nicholson, Pullen (bib27) 1971; 22
LIoyd (bib21) 2013
Fagerholt, Gausel, Rakke, Psaraftis (bib14) 2015; 52
Meng, Wang (bib24) 2010; 37
Wang, Ju, Fu (bib41) 2020; 218
Soundararajan, Han (bib37) 2014; 61
Bakkehaug, Eidem, Fagerholt, Hvattum (bib5) 2014; 72
Wu, Wang, Gilbert (bib43) 2021; 143
Skålnes, Fagerholt, Pantuso, Wang (bib36) 2020; 96
Halvorsen-Weare, Fagerholt (bib17) 2011
Kong, Chen, Zou, Yang (bib19) 2013
Gu, Stein, Wang (bib16) 2019; 74
Patricksson, Erikstad (bib31) 2016; 44
Æsøy, Stenersen (bib4) 2013
Brynolf, Magnusson, Fridell, Andersson (bib7) 2014; 28
Patricksson, Fagerholt, Rakke (bib32) 2015; 56
Clarksons (bib11) 2021
Meng, Wang, WANG (bib25) 2012; 223
Ammar (bib3) 2019; 69
Cho, Perakis (bib8) 1996; 23
Tan, Duru, Thepsithar (bib38) 2020; 140
Tankers (bib39) 2020
Balland, Erikstad, Fagerholt (bib6) 2014; 84
Maritimemanual (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib23) 2020
Zhao (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib46) 2021; 90
Nikos (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib29) 2020
Clarksons (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib10)
Wijsmuller (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib42) 1979; 26
LIoyd (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib21) 2013
Clarksons (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib9)
Kong (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib19) 2013
Lindstad (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib20) 2015; 110
(10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib18) 2018
Tan (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib38) 2020; 140
Nielsen (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib28) 2012
Bakkehaug (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib5) 2014; 72
Wu (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib43) 2021; 143
Wang (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib40) 2018; 79
Halvorsen-Weare (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib17) 2011
Meng (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib25) 2012; 223
Cho (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib8) 1996; 23
Brynolf (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib7) 2014; 28
Lirn (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib22) 2013; 41
Fagerholt (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib13) 1999; 6
Nicholson (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib27) 1971; 22
Fagerholt (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib14) 2015; 52
Skålnes (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib36) 2020; 96
Ammar (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib3) 2019; 69
Fischer (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib15) 2016; 91
Balland (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib6) 2014; 84
Clarksons (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib11)
Gu (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib16) 2019; 74
Xie (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib44) 2000; 27
Abadie (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib2) 2019; 67
Yin (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib45) 2013; 41
Patricksson (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib32) 2015; 56
(10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib1) 2020
Tankers (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib39) 2020
(10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib26) 2020
Pantuso (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib30) 2016; 50
Psaraftis (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib33) 2021; 13
Wang (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib41) 2020; 218
Æsøy (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib4) 2013
Patricksson (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib31) 2016; 44
Schinas (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib34) 2012; 25
Meng (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib24) 2010; 37
Sharafian (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib35) 2019; 131
Soundararajan (10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib37) 2014; 61
References_xml – volume: 74
  start-page: 318
  year: 2019
  end-page: 338
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Can an emission trading scheme really reduce CO
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 249
  year: 1996
  end-page: 259
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Optimal liner fleet routing strategy
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Clarkson's Dr. Martin's predictions for future shipping
– volume: 91
  start-page: 51
  year: 2016
  end-page: 67
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Robust planning and disruption management in roll-on roll-off liner shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib1
  article-title: MEPC 75/7/15: Reduction of GHG emissions from ships: fourth IMO GHG study 2020 – final report
– year: 2013
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels
– volume: 13
  start-page: 237
  year: 2021
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Decarbonization of maritime transport: is there light at the end of the tunnel?
  publication-title: Sustainability
– volume: 218
  year: 2020
  ident: bib41
  article-title: Comparative life cycle cost analysis of low-pressure fuel gas supply systems for LNG fueled ships
  publication-title: Energy
– year: 2021
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Newbuild ordering update...how is 2021 shaping up?
– volume: 22
  start-page: 211
  year: 1971
  end-page: 220
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Dynamic programming applied to ship fleet management
  publication-title: J. Oper. Res. Soc.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 81
  year: 2012
  end-page: 99
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
– volume: 223
  start-page: 96
  year: 2012
  end-page: 105
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Short-term liner ship fleet planning with container transshipment and uncertain container shipment demand
  publication-title: Eur. J. Oper. Res.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 390
  year: 2016
  end-page: 407
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Uncertainty in fleet renewal: a case from maritime transportation
  publication-title: Transport. Sci.
– volume: 56
  start-page: 346
  year: 2015
  end-page: 358
  ident: bib32
  article-title: The fleet renewal problem with regional emission limitations: case study from Roll-on/Roll-off shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
– volume: 96
  year: 2020
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Risk control in maritime shipping investments
  publication-title: Omega
– year: 2020
  ident: bib12
  article-title: We deliver value
– volume: 37
  start-page: 329
  year: 2010
  end-page: 346
  ident: bib24
  article-title: A chance constrained programming model for short-term liner ship fleet planning problems
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 94
  year: 2016
  end-page: 111
  ident: bib31
  article-title: A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– volume: 61
  start-page: 735
  year: 2014
  end-page: 738
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Probabilistic analysis of marine fuels in emission controlled areas
  publication-title: Energy Procedia
– volume: 27
  start-page: 53
  year: 2000
  end-page: 63
  ident: bib44
  article-title: A dynamic model and algorithm for fleet planning
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– year: 2013
  ident: bib19
  article-title: The trends of LNG/CNG application in the transportation industry in China
– volume: 140
  year: 2020
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Assessment of relative fuel cost for dual fuel marine engines along major Asian container shipping routes
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
– volume: 41
  start-page: 149
  year: 2013
  end-page: 158
  ident: bib45
  article-title: Slow steaming of liner trade: its economic and environmental impacts
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– volume: 110
  start-page: 94
  year: 2015
  end-page: 101
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Maritime shipping and emissions: a three-layered, damage-based approach
  publication-title: Ocean Eng.
– volume: 79
  start-page: 54
  year: 2018
  end-page: 66
  ident: bib40
  article-title: Planning for charters: a stochastic maritime fleet composition and deployment problem
  publication-title: Omega
– volume: 67
  start-page: 433
  year: 2019
  end-page: 448
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Powering newly constructed vessels to comply with ECA regulations under fuel market prices uncertainty: diesel or dual fuel engine?
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 6
  year: 2014
  end-page: 18
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
– year: 2011
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Robust supply vessel planning
  publication-title: Network Optimization
– year: 2020
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The world's leading provider of integrated shipping services
– volume: 26
  start-page: 32
  year: 1979
  end-page: 43
  ident: bib42
  article-title: Investment and replacement analysis in shipping
  publication-title: Int. Shipbuild. Prog.
– volume: 90
  start-page: 102641
  year: 2021
  ident: bib46
  article-title: Reducing sulfur and nitrogen emissions in shipping economically?
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
– year: 2018
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Guidance on the development of a ship implementation plan for the consistent implementation of the 0.50% sulfur limit under MARPOL ANNEX VI
– volume: 41
  start-page: 159
  year: 2013
  end-page: 175
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Green shipping management capability and firm performance in the container shipping industry
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 57
  year: 2015
  end-page: 73
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
– volume: 131
  start-page: 332
  year: 2019
  end-page: 346
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Natural gas as a ship fuel: assessment of greenhouse gas and air pollutant reduction potential
  publication-title: Energy Pol.
– year: 2012
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Vessel emission study: comparison of various abatement technologies to meet emission levels for ECA’s
– year: 2020
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Ship repair sector in coronavirus shock. Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide
– volume: 84
  start-page: 283
  year: 2014
  end-page: 292
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Concurrent design of vessel machinery system and air emission controls to meet future air emissions regulations
  publication-title: Ocean Eng.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib39
  article-title: Downside risk in an oversupplied market
– volume: 6
  start-page: 453
  year: 1999
  end-page: 464
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Optimal fleet design in a ship routing problem
  publication-title: Int. Trans. Oper. Res.
– volume: 143
  start-page: 124
  year: 2021
  end-page: 159
  ident: bib43
  article-title: The robust bulk ship routing problem with batched cargo selection
  publication-title: Transp. Res. Part B Methodol.
– volume: 69
  start-page: 66
  year: 2019
  end-page: 76
  ident: bib3
  article-title: An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Largest container ships in the world
– year: 2020
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Successful delivery of 15-meter 254SMO high grade stainless steel desulfurization tower
– year: 2013
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Low emission LNG fuelled ships for environmental friendly operations in Arctic areas
  publication-title: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
– volume: 72
  start-page: 60
  year: 2014
  end-page: 76
  ident: bib5
  article-title: A stochastic programming formulation for strategic fleet renewal in shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
– volume: 79
  start-page: 54
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib40
  article-title: Planning for charters: a stochastic maritime fleet composition and deployment problem
  publication-title: Omega
  doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.007
– volume: 27
  start-page: 53
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib44
  article-title: A dynamic model and algorithm for fleet planning
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/030888300286680
– volume: 56
  start-page: 346
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib32
  article-title: The fleet renewal problem with regional emission limitations: case study from Roll-on/Roll-off shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.019
– volume: 41
  start-page: 159
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib22
  article-title: Green shipping management capability and firm performance in the container shipping industry
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.819132
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib23
– volume: 37
  start-page: 329
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib24
  article-title: A chance constrained programming model for short-term liner ship fleet planning problems
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2010.486635
– volume: 223
  start-page: 96
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib25
  article-title: Short-term liner ship fleet planning with container transshipment and uncertain container shipment demand
  publication-title: Eur. J. Oper. Res.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.025
– volume: 13
  start-page: 237
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib33
  article-title: Decarbonization of maritime transport: is there light at the end of the tunnel?
  publication-title: Sustainability
  doi: 10.3390/su13010237
– volume: 28
  start-page: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib7
  article-title: Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.001
– ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib10
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib21
– volume: 61
  start-page: 735
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib37
  article-title: Probabilistic analysis of marine fuels in emission controlled areas
  publication-title: Energy Procedia
  doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.954
– volume: 25
  start-page: 81
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib34
  article-title: Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.05.002
– ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib9
– volume: 143
  start-page: 124
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib43
  article-title: The robust bulk ship routing problem with batched cargo selection
  publication-title: Transp. Res. Part B Methodol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.11.003
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib26
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib19
– volume: 69
  start-page: 66
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib3
  article-title: An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.001
– volume: 72
  start-page: 60
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib5
  article-title: A stochastic programming formulation for strategic fleet renewal in shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.09.010
– ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib11
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib17
  article-title: Robust supply vessel planning
– volume: 26
  start-page: 32
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib42
  article-title: Investment and replacement analysis in shipping
  publication-title: Int. Shipbuild. Prog.
  doi: 10.3233/ISP-1979-2629402
– volume: 110
  start-page: 94
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib20
  article-title: Maritime shipping and emissions: a three-layered, damage-based approach
  publication-title: Ocean Eng.
  doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.029
– volume: 96
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib36
  article-title: Risk control in maritime shipping investments
  publication-title: Omega
  doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.07.003
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib4
  article-title: Low emission LNG fuelled ships for environmental friendly operations in Arctic areas
– volume: 131
  start-page: 332
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib35
  article-title: Natural gas as a ship fuel: assessment of greenhouse gas and air pollutant reduction potential
  publication-title: Energy Pol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.015
– volume: 74
  start-page: 318
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib16
  article-title: Can an emission trading scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.009
– volume: 6
  start-page: 453
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib13
  article-title: Optimal fleet design in a ship routing problem
  publication-title: Int. Trans. Oper. Res.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.1999.tb00167.x
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib28
– volume: 140
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib38
  article-title: Assessment of relative fuel cost for dual fuel marine engines along major Asian container shipping routes
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102004
– volume: 41
  start-page: 149
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib45
  article-title: Slow steaming of liner trade: its economic and environmental impacts
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.821210
– volume: 23
  start-page: 249
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib8
  article-title: Optimal liner fleet routing strategy
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/03088839600000087
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib18
– volume: 50
  start-page: 390
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib30
  article-title: Uncertainty in fleet renewal: a case from maritime transportation
  publication-title: Transport. Sci.
  doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0566
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib29
– volume: 44
  start-page: 94
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib31
  article-title: A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance
  publication-title: Marit. Pol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1237781
– volume: 52
  start-page: 57
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib14
  article-title: Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas
  publication-title: Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib39
– volume: 90
  start-page: 102641
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib46
  article-title: Reducing sulfur and nitrogen emissions in shipping economically?
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102641
– volume: 84
  start-page: 283
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib6
  article-title: Concurrent design of vessel machinery system and air emission controls to meet future air emissions regulations
  publication-title: Ocean Eng.
  doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.013
– volume: 22
  start-page: 211
  year: 1971
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib27
  article-title: Dynamic programming applied to ship fleet management
  publication-title: J. Oper. Res. Soc.
  doi: 10.1057/jors.1971.55
– volume: 67
  start-page: 433
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib2
  article-title: Powering newly constructed vessels to comply with ECA regulations under fuel market prices uncertainty: diesel or dual fuel engine?
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Transport Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.012
– volume: 91
  start-page: 51
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib15
  article-title: Robust planning and disruption management in roll-on roll-off liner shipping
  publication-title: Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.03.013
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib1
– volume: 218
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361_bib41
  article-title: Comparative life cycle cost analysis of low-pressure fuel gas supply systems for LNG fueled ships
  publication-title: Energy
SSID ssj0017074
Score 2.470732
Snippet The onset of 2020 is marked by stricter restrictions on maritime sulfur emissions and the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this background,...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 128361
SubjectTerms carbon
case studies
COVID-19 infection
energy costs
freight
Maritime fleet renewal problem (MFRP)
markets
Robust optimization
Stochastic linear programming
sulfur
Sulfur emission control area (SECA)
Sulfur reduction technologies
Title Container fleet renewal considering multiple sulfur reduction technologies and uncertain markets amidst COVID-19
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128361
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2572226853
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636507845
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8421322
Volume 317
WOSCitedRecordID wos000696396500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1879-1786
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017074
  issn: 0959-6526
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLe6jgMcEJ-iG0xGQlyqlHzbPU6jE0NVx6GbOi6WG9u0VZuGthkTfz3PsZOmGrBx4BJVjt289v3y_Pye388IvZMyCcBLTZwxJ74TSqocrmDVOg5pKDR_Finq1i77ZDCgo1H3S6OhylqY6zlJU3pz083-q6qhDZStS2f_Qd3Vl0IDfAalwxXUDtd7KV7zTXFd0tdWc51w1pyVPwoWEHM0p44NVNsI1_lc5SvoIwyLbHtThtphBV0kFmDeM7sG2ouiQBpaF1Ox3rRPzi_PPjrWEt12b0EqroXIDKVsLd3_dcKL-OxV_nNSwerKxPKnfJbXOi5z05p-W0z5sh6h8L1qr1s91BhHpjK-tLqBKdm0dhNmycCQst8y6Sa6MOvMQG4QuaOf0Nn236XQHpyz04t-nw17o-H77LujTxfTWXh71Moe2vdJ1KVNtH981ht9rvJNxDV83aWk21qvD7998p-8mNoqZXePbc1pGT5Bj6068LFByVPUkOkz9KjGQfkcZRVecIEXbPGCa3jBJV6wwQuu8ILreMGAF1zhBVu8YIMXXOLlBbo47Q1PPjn2GA4nCQnZOIGfEFdGCZeCu9xzqehSQbxQgusnfRHFBPw85UUi5gFPEkIFpaErfF_xkEbgJL1EzXSZylcIqwAWJIHHRSwj8IoUd4Nx1PUV2BHCwVNtobD8W1liOer1USlzVm5GnDGrDaa1wYw2WqhTDcsMSctdA2ipM2Y9TeNBMkDdXUPfljpmYIl1eg3epmW-ZjD5wU-Iwf_9S584gCURoWHUQmQHIJXgmu999046nRS87zT0dezo4B4SHKKH2zfxNWpuVrl8gx4k15vpenWE9siIHtl34BcQ-tLk
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Container+fleet+renewal+considering+multiple+sulfur+reduction+technologies+and+uncertain+markets+amidst+COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cleaner+production&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yuzhe&rft.au=Ye%2C+Jiajun&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Jingmiao&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.volume=317&rft.spage=128361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jclepro.2021.128361&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-6526&client=summon