Factors Influencing the Implementation of Digital Advance Care Planning: Qualitative Interview Study
Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital inter...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Journal of medical Internet research Ročník 26; číslo 1; s. e50217 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Canada
Journal of Medical Internet Research
16.08.2024
JMIR Publications |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1438-8871, 1439-4456, 1438-8871 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients' advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals.
The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England.
A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels.
Participants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access.
EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients' advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals.
The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England.
A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels.
Participants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access.
EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient’s wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients’ advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals. The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England. A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels. EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. Background Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient’s wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients’ advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals. Objective The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England. Methods A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels. Results Participants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access. Conclusions EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. BackgroundPalliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient’s wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients’ advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England. MethodsA qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels. ResultsParticipants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access. ConclusionsEPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients' advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals.BACKGROUNDPalliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients' advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals.The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England.A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels.METHODSA qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels.Participants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access.RESULTSParticipants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access.EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally.CONCLUSIONSEPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Birtwistle, Jacqueline Foy, Robbie Allsop, Matthew J Bradshaw, Andy Sleeman, Katherine E Richards, Suzanne Evans, Catherine J Carder, Paul Millares Martin, Pablo Twiddy, Maureen |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andy orcidid: 0000-0003-1717-1546 surname: Bradshaw fullname: Bradshaw, Andy – sequence: 2 givenname: Jacqueline orcidid: 0000-0002-6083-589X surname: Birtwistle fullname: Birtwistle, Jacqueline – sequence: 3 givenname: Catherine J orcidid: 0000-0003-0034-7402 surname: Evans fullname: Evans, Catherine J – sequence: 4 givenname: Katherine E orcidid: 0000-0002-9777-4373 surname: Sleeman fullname: Sleeman, Katherine E – sequence: 5 givenname: Suzanne orcidid: 0000-0003-1416-0569 surname: Richards fullname: Richards, Suzanne – sequence: 6 givenname: Robbie orcidid: 0000-0003-0605-7713 surname: Foy fullname: Foy, Robbie – sequence: 7 givenname: Pablo orcidid: 0000-0001-7262-1592 surname: Millares Martin fullname: Millares Martin, Pablo – sequence: 8 givenname: Paul orcidid: 0000-0002-7940-6016 surname: Carder fullname: Carder, Paul – sequence: 9 givenname: Matthew J orcidid: 0000-0002-7399-0194 surname: Allsop fullname: Allsop, Matthew J – sequence: 10 givenname: Maureen orcidid: 0000-0002-3794-1598 surname: Twiddy fullname: Twiddy, Maureen |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39151167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptku1rFDEQxhep2Bf7L8iCCIpcTXY3u4nfjrPVg-IL1c9hNpmcKbvJmWTP9r8316vFK5IPE4bf8zDDPMfFgfMOi-KUkrOKivYdIxXtnhRHtKn5jPOOHvzzPyyOY7wmpCKNoM-Kw1pQRmnbHRX6AlTyIZZLZ4YJnbJuVaafWC7H9YAjugTJeld6U36wK5tgKOd6A05huYCA5dcBnMua9-W3CQa7pTdZ7BKGjcXf5VWa9O3z4qmBIeLpfT0pflycf198ml1--bhczC9nqulYmmljeK2VAdJxpqEFTRpesbbqGuiY7riuaoAehGkpIPa9ANCKUAaU9VXf1ifFcuerPVzLdbAjhFvpwcq7hg8rCSFZNaCsK-yF7llNmqahBgXFRoNqTfZpEVn2er3zWgf_a8KY5GijwiHvi36Ksiai5qIlnGb05Q5dQXa2zvgUQG1xOeeEESEayjN19h8qP42jVfmYxub-nuDNniAzCW_SCqYY5fLq8z774n7aqR9RP-z-99AZeLUDVPAxBjQPCCVyGyB5F6DMvX3EKbuLQJ7WDo_oP-Cfw3Y |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_025_04114_x crossref_primary_10_3310_XCGE3294 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1177/0269216316663881 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209806 10.4135/9781412984249 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2 10.1177/1049909117715217 10.1136/bmj.l84 10.1177/1744987116628922 10.1197/jamia.M2255 10.1177/0269216318758194 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001059 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000265 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.003 10.1177/0269216317734435 10.1177/1049732315617444 10.1186/s12904-019-0498-2 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002798 10.3399/bjgp19X707117 10.1080/2159676x.2017.1393221 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1058736 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4 10.1177/0269216315601346 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000276 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000292 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000327 10.1186/1471-2407-14-960 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060201 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037483 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001689 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 10.1177/146879410200200205 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x 10.1177/0269216316642963 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003422 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 10.1136/bmj.n2061 10.1177/0269216314526272 10.1371/journal.pone.0275991 10.1080/1750984x.2017.1317357 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001396 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 10.1186/s12904-021-00802-6 10.1186/1748-5908-8-18 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003304 10.1093/fampra/cms011 10.1186/1471-2296-11-60 10.1089/jpm.2017.0451 10.3109/02813432.2013.854590 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Andy Bradshaw, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Catherine J Evans, Katherine E Sleeman, Suzanne Richards, Robbie Foy, Pablo Millares Martin, Paul Carder, Matthew J Allsop, Maureen Twiddy. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.08.2024. COPYRIGHT 2024 Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Andy Bradshaw, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Catherine J Evans, Katherine E Sleeman, Suzanne Richards, Robbie Foy, Pablo Millares Martin, Paul Carder, Matthew J Allsop, Maureen Twiddy. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.08.2024. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISN 7X8 DOA |
| DOI | 10.2196/50217 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Canada MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Library & Information Science |
| EISSN | 1438-8871 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_32eb9db5304441fe91e4dac6f2b66ee5 A805099418 39151167 10_2196_50217 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | England United Kingdom |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: England |
| GroupedDBID | --- .4I .DC 29L 2WC 36B 53G 5GY 5VS 77I 77K 7RV 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAKPC AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AEGXH AENEX AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION CNYFK CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAP EBD EBS EJD ELW EMB EMOBN ESX F5P FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICO IEA IHR INH ISN ITC KQ8 M1O M48 NAPCQ OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PPXIY PQQKQ PRQQA RNS RPM SJN SV3 TR2 UKHRP XSB ACUHS ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dff83dcfa0785da6ad048256274a75d78d23aaba9f61aeebb9aadc015a15b2b63 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 2 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001306740400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1438-8871 1439-4456 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:46:04 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 14:35:34 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:57:55 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:17:14 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 16:12:27 EST 2025 Fri Aug 01 03:41:35 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:42:21 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:22:51 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | electronic palliative care coordination systems NPT electronic health record systems qualitative technology Normalization Process Theory advance care planning end of life care palliative care |
| Language | English |
| License | Andy Bradshaw, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Catherine J Evans, Katherine E Sleeman, Suzanne Richards, Robbie Foy, Pablo Millares Martin, Paul Carder, Matthew J Allsop, Maureen Twiddy. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.08.2024. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c475t-dff83dcfa0785da6ad048256274a75d78d23aaba9f61aeebb9aadc015a15b2b63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1717-1546 0000-0002-6083-589X 0000-0001-7262-1592 0000-0003-0034-7402 0000-0003-1416-0569 0000-0002-9777-4373 0000-0002-7940-6016 0000-0002-7399-0194 0000-0003-0605-7713 0000-0002-3794-1598 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/32eb9db5304441fe91e4dac6f2b66ee5 |
| PMID | 39151167 |
| PQID | 3093896081 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_32eb9db5304441fe91e4dac6f2b66ee5 proquest_miscellaneous_3093896081 gale_infotracmisc_A805099418 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A805099418 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A805099418 pubmed_primary_39151167 crossref_primary_10_2196_50217 crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_50217 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-08-16 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-16 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2024 text: 2024-08-16 day: 16 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Canada |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of medical Internet research |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Med Internet Res |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Journal of Medical Internet Research JMIR Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Journal of Medical Internet Research – name: JMIR Publications |
| References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref11 (ref66) 2020 ref10 ref54 Ritchie, L (ref52) 2003 ref16 ref19 Bryman, A (ref39) 2004 McCarthy, S (ref17) 2017; 25 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 Paparella, G (ref2) 2016 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 (ref18) 2008 ref9 ref4 ref6 ref5 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 Stebbins, RA (ref38) 2001 ref71 ref70 Twycross, R (ref1) 2003 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref64 ref63 ref22 Burke, S (ref40) 2016 ref21 ref65 ref28 (ref20) 2016 ref27 ref29 Sparkes, A (ref55) 2014 (ref3) 2015 ref60 ref62 ref61 Papagiannidis, S (ref56) 2022 |
| References_xml | – year: 2003 ident: ref1 publication-title: Introducing Palliative Care – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1177/0269216316663881 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209806 – year: 2008 ident: ref18 publication-title: End of Life Care Strategy promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life – year: 2016 ident: ref2 publication-title: Person-Centred Care in Europe: A Cross-Country Comparison of Health System Performance, Strategies and Structures – volume: 25 start-page: 136 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: ref17 publication-title: J Law Med – year: 2001 ident: ref38 publication-title: Exploratory research in the social sciences doi: 10.4135/9781412984249 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1177/1049909117715217 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l84 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1177/1744987116628922 – year: 2020 ident: ref66 publication-title: Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2255 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1177/0269216318758194 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001059 – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000265 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 – year: 2022 ident: ref56 publication-title: TheoryHub book: A theory resource for students and researchers alike – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.003 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.1177/0269216317734435 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444 – year: 2014 ident: ref55 publication-title: Qualitative Research Methods in Sport, Exercise & Health From Process to Product – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0498-2 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002798 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707117 – ident: ref67 doi: 10.1080/2159676x.2017.1393221 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1058736 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1177/0269216315601346 – year: 2015 ident: ref3 publication-title: WHO global strategy on integrated people-centred health services 2016-2026: Executive Summary – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000276 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000292 – year: 2004 ident: ref39 publication-title: Social research methods – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000327 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-960 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060201 – ident: ref29 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037483 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001689 – ident: ref51 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x – start-page: 330 year: 2016 ident: ref40 publication-title: Rethinking 'validity' and 'trustworthiness' in qualitative inquiry: How might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences?, in Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise – ident: ref19 – ident: ref32 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1177/0269216316642963 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003422 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 – year: 2003 ident: ref52 publication-title: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1177/0269216314526272 – year: 2016 ident: ref20 publication-title: Our Commitment to you for end of life care: the Government Response to the Review of Choice in End of Life Care – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275991 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1080/1750984x.2017.1317357 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001396 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00802-6 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-18 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003304 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms011 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-60 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0451 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.854590 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002 |
| SSID | ssj0020491 |
| Score | 2.4304512 |
| Snippet | Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient's... Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient’s... Background Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a... BackgroundPalliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e50217 |
| SubjectTerms | Advance Care Planning Analysis Electronic Health Records Electronic records England Female Health care industry Humans Interviews as Topic Male Medical personnel Medical record personnel Medical records Palliative Care Palliative treatment Qualitative Research United Kingdom |
| Title | Factors Influencing the Implementation of Digital Advance Care Planning: Qualitative Interview Study |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39151167 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3093896081 https://doaj.org/article/32eb9db5304441fe91e4dac6f2b66ee5 |
| Volume | 26 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001306740400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Library Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: M1O dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/libraryscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LbxMxEB5BQRUSQlBeC21kUAWnqPVu1uvllkIjekiIykPhZI3XdlUJNqhJkPj3zHidiJQDFy4-2HPwY2b9zXrmG4BD62QeKq8Iuanj_kBzEEAjy36BhQ-W8HGpmlhsoppM9GxWT_8o9cUxYR09cLdxR0Xube1sWTCxmQy-ln7gsFEht0p5H9lLCfWsnankahHulbtwlwOdScWOSkbeWzdPJOj_-zN8DVzGS2Z0H-4ldCiG3awewA3f7sFByi0Qr0RKHuLNFMkq92B3nN7HH4IbdeVzWDDWHqGLSRDEE5EE-HvKM2rFPIh3lxdcL0QMuyAAwYlIYl3C6I3ouDUiK7iIfw35CUFw1OGvR_B5dPrp7ft-qqPQbwZVuey7EHThmoAEB0qHCh2ZLUEdckixKl2lXV4gWqyDkui9tTWiawgnoCwtbXPxGHbaeeufgrCoHFbek0NN1m8l5qHQIRxrzF2ee8zgcL3Hpkkk41zr4pshZ4OPwsSjyKC3EfvRsWpcFzjhA9oMMgl27CDVMEk1zL9UI4OXfLyGaS5ajqO5wNViYc4-TsxQM-9NPZA6g9dJKMxppg2mtARaLzNjbUnub0mSHTZbwy_WWmR4iIPXWj9fLQw_NmvyFLXM4EmnXpuFMT8_P4U9-x8Lfg53csJc_Mtbqn3YWV6t_AHcbn4uLxdXPbhZnX_hdlbFVvfg1snpZHrei7ZD7Vh-oL7p2Xj69TdxMB5T |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors+Influencing+the+Implementation+of+Digital+Advance+Care+Planning%3A+Qualitative+Interview+Study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=Bradshaw%2C+Andy&rft.au=Birtwistle%2C+Jacqueline&rft.au=Evans%2C+Catherine+J&rft.au=Sleeman%2C+Katherine+E&rft.date=2024-08-16&rft.pub=Journal+of+Medical+Internet+Research&rft.issn=1439-4456&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F50217&rft.externalDBID=ISN&rft.externalDocID=A805099418 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |