Current practice, challenges and potential methodological improvements in environmental evaluations of food waste prevention – A discussion paper

•Emissions of GHG from food waste prevention vary largely.•Differences are explained mainly by modeling of the FSC, primarily food production.•End-consumer transports and food preparation can give substantial contributions to GWP.•Modeling of the WMS of non-prevented food waste is of inferior releva...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Resources, conservation and recycling Ročník 101; s. 132 - 142
Hlavní autoři:	Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A., Cánovas, A.
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Elsevier B.V 01.08.2015
Témata:	beef breads cheeses Civil Engineering cooking ecosystem services energy Engineering and Technology Environmental evaluations environmental impact fish food availability Food loss food production Food waste greenhouse gas emissions guidelines Life-cycle assessment Life-cycle thinking Samhällsbyggnadsteknik system boundary Teknik Vattenteknik vegetables Waste minimization Waste prevention Waste reduction Water Engineering Waste reduction GWP PEU Food loss Life-cycle thinking GHG Waste prevention LCA Life-cycle assessment FU Environmental evaluations Food waste LCI WFD Waste minimization FSC LCT WMS
ISSN:	0921-3449, 1879-0658, 1879-0658
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	•Emissions of GHG from food waste prevention vary largely.•Differences are explained mainly by modeling of the FSC, primarily food production.•End-consumer transports and food preparation can give substantial contributions to GWP.•Modeling of the WMS of non-prevented food waste is of inferior relevance to the results.•Sensitivity analyses should focus on FSC assumptions for robustness-check of results. A review was performed of eight previously performed investigations of environmental impacts from end-consumer food waste prevention. The overall aim of the study was to investigate the state of the art in these assessments, identify key factors which could explain seen variations in GWP-emission savings, and suggest methodological improvements leading to increased potentials for cross-study comparisons. Avoided emissions of greenhouse gases can according to reviewed studies reach from 0.8 to 4.4kg CO2-eq./kg prevented food waste. The review shows that differences in calculated environmental benefits largely can be explained by emissions from avoided food production and related services, rather than avoided management of generated food waste. Thus, variations in previous studies are largely explained by differences in system boundary delimitations and assumptions related to the avoided food supply system. The review supports that food production is the overall determining factor for benefits related to food waste prevention in reviewed studies. In addition, consumer transports and end-consumer preparation can have a large impact on overall results, mainly due to the relatively small amount of food transported/prepared per unit energy consumed. The importance of a specific process in the food supply chain on overall results will however depend on several different parameters, such as environmental profile of energy used for cooking. The present study also discusses food categories of relevance to differentiate between when addressing the composition of preventable food waste, with the general recommendation to differentiate between vegetables/fruit, bread, cheese, other dairy products, fish, meat (beef) and meat (other than beef). As the many assumptions necessarily made in assessment of prevented food production have a large impact on the overall results, it is recommended for the LCA-practitioner to clearly present made assumptions. In addition, use of sensitivity analyses, varying the composition of prevented food waste is useful for robustness check. Due to the current diversity in methodological approaches when assessing environmental benefits from food waste prevention, authors would welcome establishment of more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potential for cross-study comparisons.
AbstractList	A review was performed of eight previously performed investigations of environmental impacts from end-consumer food waste prevention. The overall aim of the study was to investigate the state of the art in these assessments, identify key factors which could explain seen variations in GWP-emission savings, and suggest methodological improvements leading to increased potentials for cross-study comparisons. Avoided emissions of greenhouse gases can according to reviewed studies reach from 0.8 to 4.4 kg CO2-eq./kg prevented food waste. The review shows that differences in calculated environmental benefits largely can be explained by emissions from avoided food production and related services, rather than avoided management of generated food waste. This, variations in previous studies are largely explained by differences in system boundary delimitations and assumptions related to the avoided food supply system. The review supports that food production is the overall determining factor for benefits related to food waste prevention in reviewed studies. In addition, consumer transports and end-consumer preparation can have a large impact on overall results, mainly due to the relatively small amount of food transported/prepared per unit energy consumed. The importance of a specific process in the food supply chain on overall results will however depend on several different parameters, such as environmental profile of energy used for cooking. The present study also discusses food categories of relevance to differentiate between when addressing the composition of preventable food waste, with the general recommendation to differentiate between vegetables/fruit, bread, cheese, other dairy products, fish, meat (beef) and meat (other than beef). As the many assumptions necessarily made in assessment of prevented food production have a large impact on the overall results, it is recommended for the LCA-practitioner to clearly present made assumptions. In addition, use of sensitivity analyses, varying the composition of prevented food waste is useful for robustness check. Due to the current diversity in methodological approaches when assessing environmental benefits from food waste prevention, authors would welcome establishment of more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potential for cross-study comparisons. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. A review was performed of eight previously performed investigations of environmental impacts from end-consumer food waste prevention. The overall aim of the study was to investigate the state of the art in these assessments, identify key factors which could explain seen variations in GWP-emission savings, and suggest methodological improvements leading to increased potentials for cross-study comparisons. Avoided emissions of greenhouse gases can according to reviewed studies reach from 0.8 to 4.4kg CO2-eq./kg prevented food waste. The review shows that differences in calculated environmental benefits largely can be explained by emissions from avoided food production and related services, rather than avoided management of generated food waste. Thus, variations in previous studies are largely explained by differences in system boundary delimitations and assumptions related to the avoided food supply system. The review supports that food production is the overall determining factor for benefits related to food waste prevention in reviewed studies. In addition, consumer transports and end-consumer preparation can have a large impact on overall results, mainly due to the relatively small amount of food transported/prepared per unit energy consumed. The importance of a specific process in the food supply chain on overall results will however depend on several different parameters, such as environmental profile of energy used for cooking. The present study also discusses food categories of relevance to differentiate between when addressing the composition of preventable food waste, with the general recommendation to differentiate between vegetables/fruit, bread, cheese, other dairy products, fish, meat (beef) and meat (other than beef). As the many assumptions necessarily made in assessment of prevented food production have a large impact on the overall results, it is recommended for the LCA-practitioner to clearly present made assumptions. In addition, use of sensitivity analyses, varying the composition of prevented food waste is useful for robustness check. Due to the current diversity in methodological approaches when assessing environmental benefits from food waste prevention, authors would welcome establishment of more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potential for cross-study comparisons. •Emissions of GHG from food waste prevention vary largely.•Differences are explained mainly by modeling of the FSC, primarily food production.•End-consumer transports and food preparation can give substantial contributions to GWP.•Modeling of the WMS of non-prevented food waste is of inferior relevance to the results.•Sensitivity analyses should focus on FSC assumptions for robustness-check of results. A review was performed of eight previously performed investigations of environmental impacts from end-consumer food waste prevention. The overall aim of the study was to investigate the state of the art in these assessments, identify key factors which could explain seen variations in GWP-emission savings, and suggest methodological improvements leading to increased potentials for cross-study comparisons. Avoided emissions of greenhouse gases can according to reviewed studies reach from 0.8 to 4.4kg CO2-eq./kg prevented food waste. The review shows that differences in calculated environmental benefits largely can be explained by emissions from avoided food production and related services, rather than avoided management of generated food waste. Thus, variations in previous studies are largely explained by differences in system boundary delimitations and assumptions related to the avoided food supply system. The review supports that food production is the overall determining factor for benefits related to food waste prevention in reviewed studies. In addition, consumer transports and end-consumer preparation can have a large impact on overall results, mainly due to the relatively small amount of food transported/prepared per unit energy consumed. The importance of a specific process in the food supply chain on overall results will however depend on several different parameters, such as environmental profile of energy used for cooking. The present study also discusses food categories of relevance to differentiate between when addressing the composition of preventable food waste, with the general recommendation to differentiate between vegetables/fruit, bread, cheese, other dairy products, fish, meat (beef) and meat (other than beef). As the many assumptions necessarily made in assessment of prevented food production have a large impact on the overall results, it is recommended for the LCA-practitioner to clearly present made assumptions. In addition, use of sensitivity analyses, varying the composition of prevented food waste is useful for robustness check. Due to the current diversity in methodological approaches when assessing environmental benefits from food waste prevention, authors would welcome establishment of more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potential for cross-study comparisons.
Author	Cánovas, A. Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: A. surname: Bernstad Saraiva Schott fullname: Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A. email: anna.bernstad@chemeng.lth.se organization: Water and Environmental Engineering, Lund University, Kemicentrum, Box 124, 210 00 Lund, Sweden – sequence: 2 givenname: A. surname: Cánovas fullname: Cánovas, A. organization: SAGE/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
BookMark	eNqFUctu2zAQFIoUqJP2G8pjD7VLUpREHXowgr6AAL3kvliTq5gGTaqk5KC3_kP-MF9SKm576CXAggS5MzuY2cvqIsRAVfVW8I3gov1w2CTKJoZEZiO5aDa8FFcvqpXQXb_mbaMvqhXvpVjXSvWvqsucD5zzWvf1qnq4nlOiMLExoZmcoffM7NF7CneUGQbLxjiVvkPPjjTto40-3jlTnu44pniiY-lm5gKjcHIphuVdunRCP-PkYsgsDmyI0bJ7zBMVJTotE2Ngj78e2JZZl82c8_Ix4kjpdfVyQJ_pzZ_7qrr9_On2-uv65vuXb9fbm7VRXTOt9U52FhuLtd0NTalhQNOXCBQhqaGVlnCnpO1RD42R2LbCdL0mLUnqztZXFZ7H5nsa5x2MyR0x_YSIDsaYigkoyRImswc_QyYoKF-sP5mCuuuN6msJyg7lMKIFrbADSdhr0RjbyK5ovDtrlKh-zJQnOBaz5D0GinMGoeu2VQ1vFujHM9SkmHOiAYybnrSmhM6D4LDsGw7wb9-w7Bt4Ka4Kv_uP_9fQ88ztmUkl7JOjBNk4CoasK9AJbHTPzvgN2qTVKQ
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1080_09640568_2023_2168524 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2018_05_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_11_016 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13050966 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X16666945 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12571_020_01121_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2018_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2016_09_042 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2020_00010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2018_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44221_025_00450_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cesys_2025_100289 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104723 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104921 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X18778779 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2021_651476 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_02_267 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2024_124808 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X16652958 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2022_01_286 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_6b01993 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11072154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104908 crossref_primary_10_3390_su8070693 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_071 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2019_00090 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2019_10_042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_154903 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_016_1071_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_127152 crossref_primary_10_1515_ijfe_2023_0027
Cites_doi	10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045 10.1021/es103556m 10.18461/ijfsd.v2i4.247 10.1021/es100310d 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.048 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.009 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.05.007 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.005 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.037 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.009 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.030 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.03.004 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.015 10.1177/0734242X06062598 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.023 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.09.004 10.1162/1088198054084653 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.015 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.019 10.1177/0734242X13487584 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.026 10.1007/s11367-010-0186-1 10.1177/0734242X09344876 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.014 10.1177/0734242X0302100603 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00149-3 10.1177/0734242X08096304 10.1177/0734242X09345275 10.1007/s11367-012-0400-4
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2015 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2015 Elsevier B.V.
CorporateAuthor	Institutioner vid LTH Institutionen för processteknik och tillämpad biovetenskap Avdelningen för kemiteknik Departments at LTH Division of Chemical Engineering Department of Process and Life Science Engineering Lunds universitet Faculty of Engineering, LTH Lunds Tekniska Högskola Lund University
CorporateAuthor_xml	– name: Faculty of Engineering, LTH – name: Lund University – name: Avdelningen för kemiteknik – name: Department of Process and Life Science Engineering – name: Division of Chemical Engineering – name: Institutionen för processteknik och tillämpad biovetenskap – name: Institutioner vid LTH – name: Lunds Tekniska Högskola – name: Departments at LTH – name: Lunds universitet
DBID	AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AOWAS D95
DOI	10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004
DatabaseName	CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Lunds universitet
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Engineering Ecology Environmental Sciences
EISSN	1879-0658
EndPage	142
ExternalDocumentID	oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_379c4932_4df2_4c16_84a7_2ea9815cd527 10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_05_004 S0921344915300033
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29P 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JN 9JO AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAHCO AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AARJD AAXUO ABEFU ABFNM ABFYP ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABMMH ABTAH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AHIDL AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BELTK BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q G8K GBLVA HMC HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W JARJE KCYFY KOM LY9 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SDP SEN SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSB SSJ SSO SSR SSZ T5K WUQ ZY4 ~A~ ~G- 9DU AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABDPE ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEGFY AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AOWAS D95
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-8b27da5da3dbf5bf5ffac92014eae4f62deab42d9a8f5c2a661c798e82e287d3
ISICitedReferencesCount	36
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000358970100013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0921-3449 1879-0658
IngestDate	Sun Nov 09 03:33:32 EST 2025 Sat Sep 27 18:45:15 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:18:39 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:51:37 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:18:08 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Keywords	Waste reduction GWP PEU Food loss Life-cycle thinking GHG Waste prevention LCA Life-cycle assessment FU Environmental evaluations Food waste LCI WFD Waste minimization FSC LCT WMS
Language	English
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c475t-8b27da5da3dbf5bf5ffac92014eae4f62deab42d9a8f5c2a661c798e82e287d3
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
PQID	1836645057
PQPubID	24069
PageCount	11
ParticipantIDs	swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_379c4932_4df2_4c16_84a7_2ea9815cd527 proquest_miscellaneous_1836645057 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_05_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_05_004
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2015-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2015-08-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2015 text: 2015-08-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationTitle	Resources, conservation and recycling
PublicationYear	2015
Publisher	Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier B.V
References	Jensen, Stenmarck, Sörme, Dunsö (bib0310) 2011 Laner, Rechberger (bib0145) 2009; 29 Sonesson, Cederberg, Berglund (bib0245) 2009 Olofsson, Ekvall, Sundberg (bib0205) 2004 CONCITO (bib0060) 2010 European Parliament (bib0325) 2008 Takase, Kondo, Washizu (bib0265) 2005; 9 Obersteiner, Schneider (bib0200) 2006 Villanueva, Wenzel (bib0280) 2007; 27 FUSION (bib0105) 2014 Christensen, Emmanuel, Boldrin, Larsen (bib0050) 2009; 27 Lee, Choi, Osako, Dong (bib0155) 2007; 387 Fruergaard, Astrup (bib0100) 2011; 31 Syversen, Marthinsen (bib0260) 2010 Matsuda, Yano, Hirai, Sakai (bib0170) 2011; 17 IPCC (bib0125) 2007 Schau (bib0215) 2012 Carlsson-Kanyama, Engström (bib0040) 2003 Davis, Wallman, Sund, Emanuelsson, Cederberg, Sonesso (bib0070) 2011 Schott, Vukicevic, Bohn, Andersson (bib0230) 2011; 31 Bjarnadottir, Fridriksson, Johnsen, Sletnes (bib0030) 2002 Ekvall (bib0320) 1999; 7 Manfredi, Tonini, Christensen (bib0165) 2011; 55 Watanabe, Fukuoka, Mohamed, Basir (bib0290) 2011 Lebersorger, Schneider (bib0150) 2011; 31 Cleary (bib0055) 2010; 15 FAO (bib0095) 2013 Bernstad, Andersson (bib0020) 2015; 1 ILCD (bib0120) 2011 Betz, Buchli, Göbel, Müller (bib0025) 2015; 35 Ventour (bib0275) 2008 Diggelman, Ham (bib0075) 2003; 21 FAO (bib0330) 2011 WRAP (bib0300) 2010 Ekvall, Assefa, Björklund, Eriksson, Finnveden (bib0080) 2007; 27 European Parliament (bib0085) 1999 Smith, Brown, Ogilvie, Rushton, Bates (bib0235) 2001 Schmidt, Holm, Merrild, Christensen (bib0220) 2007; 27 Andersen, Boldrin, Christensen, Scheutz (bib0005) 2012; 32 Boldrin, Andersen, Møller, Christensen, Favoino (bib0035) 2009; 27 Zhao, Deng (bib0305) 2014; 92 Baky, Eriksson (bib0015) 2003 Bakas, Clavreul, Bernstad, Niero, Gentil, Laurent (bib0010) 2012 la Cour Jansen, Christensen, Davidsson, Lund Hansen, Jönsson, Kirkeby (bib0140) 2007 Sonesson (bib0240) 2005 Venkat (bib0270) 2011; 2 Kantor, Lipton, Manchester, Oliveira (bib0130) 1997 Laurant, Bakas, Clavreul, Bernstad, Niero, Gentil, Hauschild, Christensen (bib0335) 2013; 34 Levis, Barlaz (bib0160) 2011; 45 Engström, Carlsson-Kanyama (bib0315) 2004; 29 Mogensen, Trydeman Knudsen, Hermansen (bib0185) 2009 Wallman, Nilsson (bib0285) 2011 Kirkeby, Birgisdottir, Lund Hansen, Christensen, Bhander, Hauschild (bib0135) 2006; 24 Gentil, Gallo, Christensen (bib0110) 2011; 31 North Sea Foundation (bib0195) 2009 Cederberg, Flysjö, Sonesson, Sund, Davis (bib0045) 2009 Cuéllar, Weber (bib0065) 2010; 44 Møller, Boldrin, Christensen (bib0190) 2009; 27 Mogensen, Hermansen, Trydeman Knudsen (bib0180) 2011 Salhofer, Obersteiner, Schneider, Lebersorger (bib0210) 2008; 28 Gruber, Brandstetter, Bos, Lindner (bib0115) 2014 Cederberg (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0045) 2009 Mogensen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0180) 2011 FAO (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0095) 2013 European Parliament (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0085) 1999 FUSION (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0105) 2014 Matsuda (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0170) 2011; 17 Kantor (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0130) 1997 Lebersorger (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0150) 2011; 31 Christensen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0050) 2009; 27 Andersen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0005) 2012; 32 FAO (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0330) 2011 Wallman (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0285) 2011 Jensen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0310) 2011 Kirkeby (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0135) 2006; 24 Engström (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0315) 2004; 29 Levis (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0160) 2011; 45 Lee (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0155) 2007; 387 Cleary (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0055) 2010; 15 CONCITO (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0060) 2010 Sonesson (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0240) 2005 Ekvall (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0320) 1999; 7 Ekvall (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0080) 2007; 27 Salhofer (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0210) 2008; 28 Schott (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0230) 2011; 31 Syversen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0260) 2010 Bakas (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0010) 2012 Watanabe (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0290) 2011 IPCC (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0125) 2007 Baky (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0015) 2003 WRAP (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0300) 2010 Zhao (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0305) 2014; 92 Obersteiner (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0200) 2006 North Sea Foundation (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0195) 2009 Bernstad (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0020) 2015; 1 la Cour Jansen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0140) 2007 Møller (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0190) 2009; 27 Schau (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0215) 2012 Villanueva (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0280) 2007; 27 European Parliament (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0325) 2008 Mogensen (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0185) 2009 Venkat (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0270) 2011; 2 Olofsson (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0205) 2004 Carlsson-Kanyama (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0040) 2003 Smith (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0235) 2001 Bjarnadottir (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0030) 2002 Manfredi (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0165) 2011; 55 Boldrin (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0035) 2009; 27 Betz (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0025) 2015; 35 Diggelman (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0075) 2003; 21 Gruber (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0115) 2014 Ventour (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0275) 2008 Fruergaard (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0100) 2011; 31 Cuéllar (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0065) 2010; 44 Laner (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0145) 2009; 29 Laurant (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0335) 2013; 34 Davis (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0070) 2011 Gentil (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0110) 2011; 31 Sonesson (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0245) 2009 Takase (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0265) 2005; 9 ILCD (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0120) 2011 Schmidt (10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0220) 2007; 27
References_xml	– volume: 9 start-page: 201 year: 2005 end-page: 219 ident: bib0265 article-title: An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input–output model publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. – year: 2005 ident: bib0240 article-title: Miljömässig jämförelse av olika sätt att framställa en måltid med köttbullar respektive kyckling (hemlagat, halvfabrikat och helfabrikat) – year: 2010 ident: bib0060 article-title: Forbrugerens klimapåvirkning – volume: 44 start-page: 6464 year: 2010 end-page: 6469 ident: bib0065 article-title: Wasted food, wasted energy: the embedded energy in food waste in the United States publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. – volume: 45 start-page: 7438 year: 2011 end-page: 7444 ident: bib0160 article-title: What is the most environmentally beneficial way to treat commercial food waste? publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. – volume: 31 start-page: 811 year: 2011 end-page: 819 ident: bib0230 article-title: Potentials for food waste minimization and effects on potential biogas production through anaerobic digestion publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – year: 2004 ident: bib0205 article-title: Impacts of Swedish waste prevention and the scrap market equilibrium on greenhouse gas emissions publication-title: Improving Model-Based Systems Analysis of Waste Management – volume: 27 start-page: S29 year: 2007 end-page: S46 ident: bib0280 article-title: Paper waste – recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 17 start-page: 743 year: 2011 end-page: 752 ident: bib0170 article-title: Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 21 start-page: 501 year: 2003 end-page: 514 ident: bib0075 article-title: Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – volume: 35 start-page: 218 year: 2015 end-page: 226 ident: bib0025 article-title: Food waste in the Swiss food service industry – magnitude and potential for reduction publication-title: Waste Manag. – year: 1999 ident: bib0085 article-title: EU Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the Landfill of Waste – year: 2011 ident: bib0070 article-title: Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Production of Horticultural Products: Analysis of 17 Products Cultivated in Sweden – volume: 31 start-page: 1924 year: 2011 end-page: 1933 ident: bib0150 article-title: Discussion on the methodology for determining food waste in household waste composition studies publication-title: Waste Manag. – year: 2010 ident: bib0260 article-title: How much food waste? How to measure it and make reliable statistics (in context of prevention) publication-title: Presentation at: Combating Food Waste in the EU 09 – year: 2011 ident: bib0310 article-title: Matavfall 2010 från jord till bord. SMED Rapport Nr 99 2011 – year: 2012 ident: bib0215 article-title: Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Fish Food Products With Emphasis on the Fish Catch Process. Thesis for the Degree of Philosophiae Doctor – year: 2007 ident: bib0125 article-title: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4). Working Group 1 Report. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing – year: 2011 ident: bib0290 article-title: Assessing the potential of reduction and recycling of household waste in Malaysia publication-title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Waste – The Social Context – volume: 27 start-page: 989 year: 2007 end-page: 996 ident: bib0080 article-title: What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 34 start-page: 573 year: 2013 end-page: 588 ident: bib0335 article-title: Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspective’ publication-title: Waste Manage. – year: 2008 ident: bib0325 article-title: Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives – year: 2012 ident: bib0010 article-title: LCA applied to solid waste management systems: a comprehensive review publication-title: Oral Session Presented at: SETAC Europe 18th LCA Case Study Symposium – Sustainability Assessment in the 21st Century – start-page: 2 year: 1997 end-page: 12 ident: bib0130 article-title: Estimating and addressing America's food losses publication-title: Food Rev. – year: 2003 ident: bib0015 article-title: Systems Analysis of Organic Waste Management in Denmark. Environmental Project No. 822 – volume: 31 start-page: 572 year: 2011 end-page: 658 ident: bib0100 article-title: Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 29 start-page: 203 year: 2004 end-page: 213 ident: bib0315 article-title: Food losses in food service institutions. Examples from Sweden publication-title: Food Policy – volume: 387 start-page: 42 year: 2007 end-page: 53 ident: bib0155 article-title: Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea publication-title: Sci. Total Environ. – year: 2002 ident: bib0030 article-title: Guidelines for the Use of LCA in the Waste Management Sector. Nordtest Report TR 517 – volume: 15 start-page: 579 year: 2010 end-page: 589 ident: bib0055 article-title: The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. – volume: 7 start-page: 281 year: 1999 end-page: 294 ident: bib0320 article-title: Key methodological issues for Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Paper Recycling publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. – volume: 31 start-page: 2371 year: 2011 end-page: 2379 ident: bib0110 article-title: Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 55 start-page: 995 year: 2011 end-page: 1004 ident: bib0165 article-title: Environmental assessment of different management options for individual waste fractions by means of life-cycle assessment modelling publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – volume: 1 start-page: 219 year: 2015 end-page: 226 ident: bib0020 article-title: Food waste minimization from a life-cycle perspective publication-title: J. Environ. Manag. – year: 2009 ident: bib0185 article-title: Beregning af klimaaftryk for middagsretter til klimakogebog. Notat til Fødevareministeriet vedrørende. 2. Oktober 2009 – year: 2009 ident: bib0245 article-title: Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Pig Meat Production. Decision Support for Climate Certification – volume: 32 start-page: 31 year: 2012 end-page: 40 ident: bib0005 article-title: Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark: an environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling publication-title: Waste Manag. – year: 2011 ident: bib0330 article-title: Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention – year: 2007 ident: bib0140 article-title: Biowaste – Decision Support Tool for Collection and Treatment of Source-Sorted Organic Municipal Solid Waste. TemaNord 2007:602 – volume: 29 start-page: 606 year: 2009 end-page: 613 ident: bib0145 article-title: Quantitative evaluation of waste prevention on the level of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 27 start-page: 813 year: 2009 end-page: 824 ident: bib0190 article-title: Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – year: 2008 ident: bib0275 article-title: The Food We Waste. Food Waste Report v2. 237 – year: 2014 ident: bib0115 article-title: LCA study of unconsumed food and the influence of consumer behavior publication-title: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector – year: 2009 ident: bib0195 article-title: Climate and the Oceans: The Carbon Footprint of Fisheries – year: 2011 ident: bib0285 article-title: Klimatpåverkan och energianvändning från livsmedelsförpackningar – year: 2010 ident: bib0300 article-title: Waste Arising in the Supply of Food and Drink to Households in the UK. Banbury, UK. Project Code: RSC002-005 – year: 2011 ident: bib0180 article-title: Madspild i fødevareproduktionen – fra primærproduktion til detailled – year: 2014 ident: bib0105 article-title: Fusion Definitional Framework for Food Waste. Final Report 3rd of July, 2014 – year: 2009 ident: bib0045 article-title: Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Swedish Consumption of Meat, Milk and Eggs 1990 and 2005. SIK Report No. 794, Stockholm, Sweden – year: 2013 ident: bib0095 article-title: Food Wastage Footpring – Impact on Natural Resources – volume: 92 start-page: 214 year: 2014 end-page: 221 ident: bib0305 article-title: Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. – volume: 24 start-page: 16 year: 2006 end-page: 26 ident: bib0135 article-title: Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) publication-title: Waste Manage. Res. – year: 2011 ident: bib0120 article-title: Support JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Food Waste Management – A Technical Guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Waste Experts and LCA Practitioners – year: 2006 ident: bib0200 article-title: NÖ Restmüllanalyse 2005/06 – volume: 28 start-page: 246 year: 2008 end-page: 259 ident: bib0210 article-title: Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste publication-title: Waste Manag. – volume: 27 start-page: 800 year: 2009 end-page: 812 ident: bib0035 article-title: Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – volume: 27 start-page: 1519 year: 2007 end-page: 1530 ident: bib0220 article-title: Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy – a Danish case study on waste paper publication-title: Waste Manag. – year: 2003 ident: bib0040 article-title: Fakta om maten och miljön. Konsumtionstrender, miljöpåverkan och livscykelanalyser – year: 2001 ident: bib0235 article-title: Waste Management Options and Climate Change. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment – volume: 2 start-page: 431 year: 2011 end-page: 446 ident: bib0270 article-title: The climate change and economic impacts of food waste in the United States publication-title: Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. – volume: 27 start-page: 707 year: 2009 end-page: 715 ident: bib0050 article-title: C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0240 – start-page: 2 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0130 article-title: Estimating and addressing America's food losses publication-title: Food Rev. – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0275 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0015 – volume: 34 start-page: 573 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0335 article-title: Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspective’ publication-title: Waste Manage. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0285 – volume: 45 start-page: 7438 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0160 article-title: What is the most environmentally beneficial way to treat commercial food waste? publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1021/es103556m – volume: 2 start-page: 431 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0270 article-title: The climate change and economic impacts of food waste in the United States publication-title: Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. doi: 10.18461/ijfsd.v2i4.247 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0010 article-title: LCA applied to solid waste management systems: a comprehensive review – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0070 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0105 – volume: 44 start-page: 6464 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0065 article-title: Wasted food, wasted energy: the embedded energy in food waste in the United States publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1021/es100310d – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0115 article-title: LCA study of unconsumed food and the influence of consumer behavior – volume: 1 start-page: 219 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0020 article-title: Food waste minimization from a life-cycle perspective publication-title: J. Environ. Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.048 – volume: 31 start-page: 572 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0100 article-title: Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.009 – volume: 29 start-page: 606 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0145 article-title: Quantitative evaluation of waste prevention on the level of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.05.007 – volume: 92 start-page: 214 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0305 article-title: Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.005 – volume: 387 start-page: 42 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0155 article-title: Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea publication-title: Sci. Total Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.037 – volume: 55 start-page: 995 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0165 article-title: Environmental assessment of different management options for individual waste fractions by means of life-cycle assessment modelling publication-title: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.009 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0060 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0180 – volume: 31 start-page: 2371 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0110 article-title: Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.030 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0195 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0260 article-title: How much food waste? How to measure it and make reliable statistics (in context of prevention) – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0040 – volume: 29 start-page: 203 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0315 article-title: Food losses in food service institutions. Examples from Sweden publication-title: Food Policy doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.03.004 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0215 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0325 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0200 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0120 – volume: 35 start-page: 218 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0025 article-title: Food waste in the Swiss food service industry – magnitude and potential for reduction publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.015 – volume: 24 start-page: 16 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0135 article-title: Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) publication-title: Waste Manage. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X06062598 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0310 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0030 – volume: 31 start-page: 1924 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0150 article-title: Discussion on the methodology for determining food waste in household waste composition studies publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.023 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0245 – volume: 27 start-page: 1519 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0220 article-title: Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy – a Danish case study on waste paper publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.09.004 – volume: 9 start-page: 201 issue: 1–2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0265 article-title: An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input–output model publication-title: J. Ind. Ecol. doi: 10.1162/1088198054084653 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0290 article-title: Assessing the potential of reduction and recycling of household waste in Malaysia – volume: 27 start-page: 989 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0080 article-title: What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.015 – volume: 27 start-page: S29 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0280 article-title: Paper waste – recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.019 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0185 – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0085 – year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0235 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0045 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0330 – volume: 31 start-page: 811 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0230 article-title: Potentials for food waste minimization and effects on potential biogas production through anaerobic digestion publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13487584 – volume: 28 start-page: 246 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0210 article-title: Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.026 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0095 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0140 – volume: 15 start-page: 579 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0055 article-title: The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0186-1 – volume: 27 start-page: 813 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0190 article-title: Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09344876 – volume: 32 start-page: 31 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0005 article-title: Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark: an environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling publication-title: Waste Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.014 – volume: 21 start-page: 501 issue: 6 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0075 article-title: Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X0302100603 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0300 – volume: 7 start-page: 281 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0320 article-title: Key methodological issues for Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Paper Recycling publication-title: J. Clean. Prod. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00149-3 – volume: 27 start-page: 707 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0050 article-title: C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X08096304 – volume: 27 start-page: 800 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0035 article-title: Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions publication-title: Waste Manag. Res. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09345275 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0125 – volume: 17 start-page: 743 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0170 article-title: Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan publication-title: Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0400-4 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004_bib0205 article-title: Impacts of Swedish waste prevention and the scrap market equilibrium on greenhouse gas emissions
SSID	ssj0003893
Score	2.2924402
SecondaryResourceType	review_article
Snippet	•Emissions of GHG from food waste prevention vary largely.•Differences are explained mainly by modeling of the FSC, primarily food production.•End-consumer... A review was performed of eight previously performed investigations of environmental impacts from end-consumer food waste prevention. The overall aim of the...
SourceID	swepub proquest crossref elsevier
SourceType	Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher
StartPage	132
SubjectTerms	beef breads cheeses Civil Engineering cooking ecosystem services energy Engineering and Technology Environmental evaluations environmental impact fish food availability Food loss food production Food waste greenhouse gas emissions guidelines Life-cycle assessment Life-cycle thinking Samhällsbyggnadsteknik system boundary Teknik Vattenteknik vegetables Waste minimization Waste prevention Waste reduction Water Engineering
Title	Current practice, challenges and potential methodological improvements in environmental evaluations of food waste prevention – A discussion paper
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.004 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1836645057
Volume	101
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000358970100013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1879-0658 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0003893 issn: 1879-0658 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELbKLkhwQFBYUV4yEkeyal07trlVqAg4rDj0UHGxHMeBXVVp1cey-zP4HfxJxq8kFYsWJFaqojZtIjfzZTyefPMNQq81LZkdkiojpBhngBCWFXrIM1YQmRcQcI8s9c0m-MmJmM_l517vZ6qFOV_wuhYXF3J1o6aGfWBsVzr7D-ZuTgo74D0YHbZgdtj-leGT4lKqf3IX0aSWKUGRebXcOpKQLxxxDaQbB3jqUww2lL05MZG2DA6-bZXBPf-jcoLI3zXAxCkNJN5kBq7GlfruHL3W6bauIv83qYDH5wUeP8ZxuWNWODDdrbl0xZpfmzSBXbsANpIv65ZXpF0319BK-bibuhixhjiXvK3gTgIhaLc37jj-IjjUUch-_uboQ87h7HhtNzBUGJxj6TEvwhraGV-hoh0WNCqqKH1Ti53aWLXqpEfVmEtDIaRVtKxgY0a5ElRzRayWYsRMyQi_hQ4JZxJc6OHk43T-qZn4XeznpR3JKBtTv_Jq_uEetfDKQf8pMOoufLpitj4Amj1A9-PKBU8C4h6inq376M7Uq55f9tG9jrJlHx1Nu8jBcQbZPEI_Ijxxgucb3IITAwRwA068D07cBSc-rfEeOHEHnHhZYQdO7MGJW3DiDE9wC07swfkYzd5PZ-8-ZLEtSGYoZ9tMFISXmpV6XBYVg1dVaSPhSlKrLa1yUlpdUFJKLSpmiIYI1HAprCCWCF6Oj9BBvaztE4SZrqwsCClFyak0lZY0twY-ECEgjGYDlCeTKBMl813nloVK3Mgz1dhSOVuqIbyGdICGzYGroBpz_SFvk81VDH5DUKsA8tcf_CqhRMH04J756doudxsFM3aeU5eFGKAvAT7NiP7jPfH0Jk_-DN1tvcdzdLBd7-wLdNucb08365fxLvwF-bIcnQ
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current+practice%2C+challenges+and+potential+methodological+improvements+in+environmental+evaluations+of+food+waste+prevention+-+A+discussion+paper&rft.jtitle=Resources%2C+conservation+and+recycling&rft.au=Bernstad%2C+Anna&rft.au=Canovas%2C+A.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.issn=1879-0658&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=132&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.resconrec.2015.05.004&rft.externalDocID=oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_379c4932_4df2_4c16_84a7_2ea9815cd527
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0921-3449&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0921-3449&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0921-3449&client=summon