Whole-cell segmentation of tissue images with human-level performance using large-scale data annotation and deep learning
A principal challenge in the analysis of tissue imaging data is cell segmentation—the task of identifying the precise boundary of every cell in an image. To address this problem we constructed TissueNet, a dataset for training segmentation models that contains more than 1 million manually labeled ce...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature biotechnology Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 555 - 565 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.04.2022
Nature Publishing Group |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1087-0156, 1546-1696, 1546-1696 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | A principal challenge in the analysis of tissue imaging data is cell segmentation—the task of identifying the precise boundary of every cell in an image. To address this problem we constructed TissueNet, a dataset for training segmentation models that contains more than 1 million manually labeled cells, an order of magnitude more than all previously published segmentation training datasets. We used TissueNet to train Mesmer, a deep-learning-enabled segmentation algorithm. We demonstrated that Mesmer is more accurate than previous methods, generalizes to the full diversity of tissue types and imaging platforms in TissueNet, and achieves human-level performance. Mesmer enabled the automated extraction of key cellular features, such as subcellular localization of protein signal, which was challenging with previous approaches. We then adapted Mesmer to harness cell lineage information in highly multiplexed datasets and used this enhanced version to quantify cell morphology changes during human gestation. All code, data and models are released as a community resource.
Deep learning algorithms perform as well as humans in identifying cells in tissue images. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Authorship Contributions These authors contributed equally to this work N.F.G., L.K., M.A., and D.V.V. conceived the project. E.M. and D.V.V. conceived the human-in-the-loop approach. L.K. and M.A. conceived the whole-cell segmentation approach. G.M., T.D., E.M., W.G., and D.V.V. developed DeepCell Label. G.M., N.F.G., E.M., I.C., W.G., and D.V.V. developed the human-in-the-loop pipeline. M.S., C.P., W.G., and D.V.V. developed Mesmer’s deep learning architecture. W.G., N.F.G., and D.V.V. developed model training software. C.P. and W.G. developed cloud deployment. M.S., S.C., W.G., and D.V.V. developed metrics software. W.G. developed plug-ins. N.F.G., A.Kong, A.Kagel, J.S., and O.B-T. developed the multiplex image analysis pipeline. A.Kagel and G.M. developed the pathologist evaluation software. N.F.G., G.M., and T.H. supervised training data creation. N.F.G., C.C.F., B.M., K.L., M.F., G.C., Z.A., J.M., and S.W. performed quality control on the training data. E.S., S.G., and T.R. generated MIBI-TOF data for morphological analyses. S.B. helped with experimental design. N.F.G., W.G., and D.V.V. trained the models. N.F.G., W.G., G.M., and D.V.V. performed data analysis. N.F.G., G.M., M.A., and D.V.V. wrote the manuscript. M.A. and D.V.V. supervised the project. All authors provided feedback on the manuscript. |
| ISSN: | 1087-0156 1546-1696 1546-1696 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41587-021-01094-0 |