Uncertainty and risk of misleading conclusions: an umbrella review of the quality of the evidence for ankle arthroscopy
Background and purpose: Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta orthopaedica Jg. 96; S. 574 - 583 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sweden
MJS Publishing, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
25.07.2025
Medical Journals Sweden |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1745-3674, 1745-3682, 1745-3682 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Background and purpose: Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options.Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted on March 22, 2025. 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Systematic reviews assessing ankle arthroscopy versus any surgery or nonoperative treatment were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR 2 criteria, along with an evaluation of whether the GRADE tool was appropriately applied.Results: The literature search identified 430 studies, of which 29 systematic reviews were included after the screening process. These reviews covered various conditions, including lateral ankle instability, osteoarthritis, fractures, and osteochondral defects. None of the systematic reviews included RCTs comparing arthroscopic procedures with nonoperative treatment. A methodological assessment using AMSTAR 2 criteria identified multiple critical flaws across all reviews, leading to an overall confidence rating of “critically low” for each. 1 study adequately applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.Conclusion: The efficacy of ankle arthroscopic procedures remains based solely on observational evidence. Given the critically low methodological quality of existing reviews, conclusions suggesting benefits of ankle arthroscopy, particularly over open procedures, are unreliable and insufficient to inform clinical recommendations. RCTs comparing ankle arthroscopy with nonoperative treatments or sham surgery are urgently needed. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options.
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted on March 22, 2025. 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Systematic reviews assessing ankle arthroscopy versus any surgery or nonoperative treatment were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR 2 criteria, along with an evaluation of whether the GRADE tool was appropriately applied.
The literature search identified 430 studies, of which 29 systematic reviews were included after the screening process. These reviews covered various conditions, including lateral ankle instability, osteoarthritis, fractures, and osteochondral defects. None of the systematic reviews included RCTs comparing arthroscopic procedures with nonoperative treatment. A methodological assessment using AMSTAR 2 criteria identified multiple critical flaws across all reviews, leading to an overall confidence rating of "critically low" for each. 1 study adequately applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
The efficacy of ankle arthroscopic procedures remains based solely on observational evidence. Given the critically low methodological quality of existing reviews, conclusions suggesting benefits of ankle arthroscopy, particularly over open procedures, are unreliable and insufficient to inform clinical recommendations. RCTs comparing ankle arthroscopy with nonoperative treatments or sham surgery are urgently needed. Background and purpose: Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted on March 22, 2025. 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Systematic reviews assessing ankle arthroscopy versus any surgery or nonoperative treatment were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR 2 criteria, along with an evaluation of whether the GRADE tool was appropriately applied. Results: The literature search identified 430 studies, of which 29 systematic reviews were included after the screening process. These reviews covered various conditions, including lateral ankle instability, osteoarthritis, fractures, and osteochondral defects. None of the systematic reviews included RCTs comparing arthroscopic procedures with nonoperative treatment. A methodological assessment using AMSTAR 2 criteria identified multiple critical flaws across all reviews, leading to an overall confidence rating of “critically low” for each. 1 study adequately applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. Conclusion: The efficacy of ankle arthroscopic procedures remains based solely on observational evidence. Given the critically low methodological quality of existing reviews, conclusions suggesting benefits of ankle arthroscopy, particularly over open procedures, are unreliable and insufficient to inform clinical recommendations. RCTs comparing ankle arthroscopy with nonoperative treatments or sham surgery are urgently needed. Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing ankle arthroscopy with equivalent open procedures or nonoperative options. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted on March 22, 2025. 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Systematic reviews assessing ankle arthroscopy versus any surgery or nonoperative treatment were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR 2 criteria, along with an evaluation of whether the GRADE tool was appropriately applied.METHODS A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted on March 22, 2025. 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Systematic reviews assessing ankle arthroscopy versus any surgery or nonoperative treatment were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR 2 criteria, along with an evaluation of whether the GRADE tool was appropriately applied.The literature search identified 430 studies, of which 29 systematic reviews were included after the screening process. These reviews covered various conditions, including lateral ankle instability, osteoarthritis, fractures, and osteochondral defects. None of the systematic reviews included RCTs comparing arthroscopic procedures with nonoperative treatment. A methodological assessment using AMSTAR 2 criteria identified multiple critical flaws across all reviews, leading to an overall confidence rating of "critically low" for each. 1 study adequately applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.RESULTSThe literature search identified 430 studies, of which 29 systematic reviews were included after the screening process. These reviews covered various conditions, including lateral ankle instability, osteoarthritis, fractures, and osteochondral defects. None of the systematic reviews included RCTs comparing arthroscopic procedures with nonoperative treatment. A methodological assessment using AMSTAR 2 criteria identified multiple critical flaws across all reviews, leading to an overall confidence rating of "critically low" for each. 1 study adequately applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. The efficacy of ankle arthroscopic procedures remains based solely on observational evidence. Given the critically low methodological quality of existing reviews, conclusions suggesting benefits of ankle arthroscopy, particularly over open procedures, are unreliable and insufficient to inform clinical recommendations. RCTs comparing ankle arthroscopy with nonoperative treatments or sham surgery are urgently needed.CONCLUSION The efficacy of ankle arthroscopic procedures remains based solely on observational evidence. Given the critically low methodological quality of existing reviews, conclusions suggesting benefits of ankle arthroscopy, particularly over open procedures, are unreliable and insufficient to inform clinical recommendations. RCTs comparing ankle arthroscopy with nonoperative treatments or sham surgery are urgently needed. |
| Author | Karjalainen, Teemu Ponkilainen, Ville Laurema, Anniina Laaksonen, Juho Miettinen, Mikko Mattila, Ville M Panula, Valtteri |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ville orcidid: 0000-0002-5026-4560 surname: Ponkilainen fullname: Ponkilainen, Ville – sequence: 2 givenname: Valtteri orcidid: 0000-0001-6638-3188 surname: Panula fullname: Panula, Valtteri – sequence: 3 givenname: Juho surname: Laaksonen fullname: Laaksonen, Juho – sequence: 4 givenname: Anniina surname: Laurema fullname: Laurema, Anniina – sequence: 5 givenname: Mikko surname: Miettinen fullname: Miettinen, Mikko – sequence: 6 givenname: Ville M surname: Mattila fullname: Mattila, Ville M – sequence: 7 givenname: Teemu orcidid: 0000-0002-5650-895X surname: Karjalainen fullname: Karjalainen, Teemu |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40711444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9Uk1vGyEURFWqJnH7CypVHHuxw9cuSy9VFfUjUqRemjNi4WGTrMGB3UT-98WxYzU59AS8NzMPzZtzdBJTBIQ-UrJgXJALKkXDWykWjLBmIQTn5A0621XnvO3YyfEuxSk6L-WWEN4JRd6hU0EkpUKIM_R4Ey3k0YQ4brGJDudQ7nDyeB3KAMaFuMQ2RTtMJaRYvlQMntZ9hmEwOMNDgMcdelwBvp_MEKrK4Vl7Dqo49ilX1t0A2ORxlVOxabN9j956MxT4cDhn6ObH9z-Xv-bXv39eXX67nlshxTiXzkPXs44o2VvhOweCOAGeWeFquWl6IqWTrfSm4byrXWC9asE3xjplPZ-hq72uS-ZWb3JYm7zVyQT9VEh5qeuvgh1Ayw56SW0DrWTCK6os5QZarqqxnvaqan3da22mfg3OQhyzGV6IvuzEsNLL9KApY4oRSqrC54NCTvcTlFFXm-3OywhpKpozzllLmrrMGfr077DjlOfVVQDfA2y1tGTwRwglehcQ_RwQvQuIfgpIZalXLBtGM9bd1h-H4b_cvzMlwao |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2340_17453674_2025_44757 crossref_primary_10_2340_17453674_2025_44795 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.001 10.1007/s00167-018-5100-6 10.1097/MD.0000000000024998 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.039 10.1530/EOR-21-0075 10.1007/s00167-016-4041-1 10.1097/MD.0000000000039656 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.12.001 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003 10.1177/23259671211015207 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.043 10.1186/s13018-023-03597-9 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.026 10.1136/bmj.j4008 10.2340/17453674.2024.42635 10.1001/jama.2009.1242 10.1159/000322940 10.2340/17453674.2024.41930 10.1371/journal.pone.0289554 10.1007/s00590-023-03825-2 10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.002 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.315 10.1186/s13018-020-01708-4 10.1136/bmj.n71 10.1002/14651858.ED000142 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.03.010 10.1177/1071100715620455 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313042 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.284 10.1186/s13018-020-01886-1 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.060 10.2106/JBJS.H.01576 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001308 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.011 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004014 10.1177/23259671221137923 10.3390/jcm12103574 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005 10.1002/ajim.20547 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.016 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD 10.2106/JBJS.I.00251 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7503 10.1186/s13018-023-04292-5 10.7759/cureus.48460 10.1001/jama.2010.651 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.001 10.1136/bmj-2024-081902 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.034 10.1177/15563316231204616 10.1097/00003086-198404000-00019 10.1136/bmj.39379.359560.AD 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597 10.31222/osf.io/82wau 10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101852 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 The Author(s) 2025 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 The Author(s) 2025 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.2340/17453674.2025.44330 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1745-3682 |
| EndPage | 583 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_78eb71c5e6724f919c13ae639330f1b9 PMC12292010 40711444 10_2340_17453674_2025_44330 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .55 04C 0YH 23M 2QV 2WC 34G 36B 39C 4.4 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 6PF AAFWJ AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABNNA ACGFO ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADCVX ADOJX ADRBQ AEGXH AENEX AFKVX AFPKN AJWEG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BMSDO CAG CITATION CS3 DXH E3Z EAP EBC EBD EBS EBX ECF ECT EHN EIHBH EMB EMK EMOBN ENC ENX EPL EPT ESX F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HYE KQ8 M48 O9- OK1 OVT P2P Q~Q RDKPK RNS RPM SV3 TFDNU TFW TR2 TUS W2D X7M ~1N CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7dfe8b28097bc4f8de40d4ef2c4db2855b077d767fa5338e40e2b96ef5acd9cf3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 2 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001546273900011&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1745-3674 1745-3682 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:30:18 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:29:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 18:52:41 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 30 01:43:21 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:41:35 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:31:04 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-7dfe8b28097bc4f8de40d4ef2c4db2855b077d767fa5338e40e2b96ef5acd9cf3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6638-3188 0000-0002-5026-4560 0000-0002-5650-895X |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/78eb71c5e6724f919c13ae639330f1b9 |
| PMID | 40711444 |
| PQID | 3233260544 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_78eb71c5e6724f919c13ae639330f1b9 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12292010 proquest_miscellaneous_3233260544 pubmed_primary_40711444 crossref_primary_10_2340_17453674_2025_44330 crossref_citationtrail_10_2340_17453674_2025_44330 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20250725 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-07-25 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 7 year: 2025 text: 20250725 day: 25 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Sweden |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Sweden |
| PublicationTitle | Acta orthopaedica |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Acta Orthop |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | MJS Publishing, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation Medical Journals Sweden |
| Publisher_xml | – name: MJS Publishing, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation – name: Medical Journals Sweden |
| References | 118989 118987 118988 118992 119003 118993 119004 118990 119001 118991 119002 118996 119007 118997 119008 118994 119005 118995 119006 119000 118978 118979 118976 118977 118981 118982 118980 118985 118986 118983 118984 118967 118968 118965 118966 118969 118970 118971 118974 118975 118972 118973 118956 118957 118998 119009 118999 118958 118959 119014 118960 119015 119012 119013 118963 118964 118961 119016 118962 119010 119011 |
| References_xml | – ident: 118987 doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.001 – ident: 118997 doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5100-6 – ident: 118960 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024998 – ident: 118981 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.039 – ident: 118980 – ident: 119002 doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0075 – ident: 118985 doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4041-1 – ident: 119001 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039656 – ident: 118961 doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.12.001 – ident: 118970 doi: 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003 – ident: 118959 doi: 10.1177/23259671211015207 – ident: 118977 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE – ident: 118982 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.043 – ident: 118989 doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03597-9 – ident: 118994 doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.026 – ident: 118978 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008 – ident: 118964 doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42635 – ident: 119009 doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1242 – ident: 119012 doi: 10.1159/000322940 – ident: 118963 doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41930 – ident: 118990 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289554 – ident: 119000 doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03825-2 – ident: 118983 doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.002 – ident: 118991 doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.315 – ident: 118986 doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01708-4 – ident: 119016 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 – ident: 118967 doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142 – ident: 118992 doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.03.010 – ident: 118962 doi: 10.1177/1071100715620455 – ident: 118966 doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313042 – ident: 118995 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.284 – ident: 118976 – ident: 119004 doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01886-1 – ident: 119013 doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.060 – ident: 118972 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01576 – ident: 118974 doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16 – ident: 119006 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001308 – ident: 119010 doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147 – ident: 118958 doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.011 – ident: 118968 doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004014 – ident: 119015 doi: 10.1177/23259671221137923 – ident: 118998 doi: 10.3390/jcm12103574 – ident: 118979 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005 – ident: 119011 doi: 10.1002/ajim.20547 – ident: 119014 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.016 – ident: 118965 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD – ident: 118971 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00251 – ident: 119008 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7503 – ident: 119003 doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04292-5 – ident: 118996 doi: 10.7759/cureus.48460 – ident: 119005 doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.651 – ident: 118957 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.001 – ident: 118969 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081902 – ident: 118993 doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.034 – ident: 118999 doi: 10.1177/15563316231204616 – ident: 118956 doi: 10.1097/00003086-198404000-00019 – ident: 119007 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39379.359560.AD – ident: 118973 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597 – ident: 118975 doi: 10.31222/osf.io/82wau – ident: 118988 doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6 – ident: 118984 doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101852 |
| SSID | ssj0038490 |
| Score | 2.4576962 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background and purpose: Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to... Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of... Ankle arthroscopy is being increasingly utilized, but its potential benefits and harms remain unclear. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 574 |
| SubjectTerms | Ankle arthroscopy Ankle Injuries - surgery Ankle Joint - surgery Arthroscopy Arthroscopy - methods Evidence based medicine Foot and ankle Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Research waste Systematic Reviews as Topic Uncertainty |
| Title | Uncertainty and risk of misleading conclusions: an umbrella review of the quality of the evidence for ankle arthroscopy |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40711444 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3233260544 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12292010 https://doaj.org/article/78eb71c5e6724f919c13ae639330f1b9 |
| Volume | 96 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001546273900011&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-3682 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0038490 issn: 1745-3674 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis Online Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-3682 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0038490 issn: 1745-3674 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 20050101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWg4sAFgfjaFiojcSQ0sSexzQ0QFaeKA5X2ZvlTrbRkq-4uaP99Z-JktYsQXDjGdhTLb2LPs8dvGHvbhk4741zlTBAV5E5Xzrtc-YBTn1De-wxDsgl1caHnc_NtL9UXxYQVeeAycGdKJ6-a0KZOCcimMaGRLuG6ikQ8N364uodez0SmyhwsNZjxKmRbyU5B0RsSEuozKqMi5IaifQ8gKQB6b00apPv_5G_-Hja5tw6dP2aPRgeSfywdf8Lupf4p-3WJ2A1n--std33kFDHOl5kjiosSJs-R-IbFhjbHVh-wDd_8QDaMRsDL7RVqjc4gL7cst9NjGrOOcnRuOeV3TxzH7Io0MJc322fs8vzL989fqzGlQhVAwbpSMSftha6N8gGyjgnqCCmLABGL29bXSkXVqezQD9RYm4Q3XcqtC9GELJ-zo37Zp5eMu1ADeBMblxpIKntSjkFnJWgPTkc5Y2IaVBtGvXFKe7GwyDsICTshYQkJOyAxY-92L90UuY2_N_9EaO2aklb2UIAWZEcLsv-yoBl7M2FtERU6MHF9Wm5WVgopie8BzNiLgv3uU0SEkYxijT6wioO-HNb011eDfncjKEVYUx__j96fsIc0HrTdLNpX7Gh9u0mv2YPwc329uj1l99Vcnw7_xh1qXhE- |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty+and+risk+of+misleading+conclusions%3A+an+umbrella+review+of+the+quality+of+the+evidence+for+ankle+arthroscopy&rft.jtitle=Acta+orthopaedica&rft.au=PONKILAINEN%2C+Ville&rft.au=PANULA%2C+Valtteri&rft.au=LAAKSONEN%2C+Juho&rft.au=LAUREMA%2C+Anniina&rft.date=2025-07-25&rft.pub=MJS+Publishing%2C+on+behalf+of+the+Nordic+Orthopedic+Federation&rft.issn=1745-3674&rft.eissn=1745-3682&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=583&rft_id=info:doi/10.2340%2F17453674.2025.44330&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40711444&rft.externalDocID=PMC12292010 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1745-3674&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1745-3674&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1745-3674&client=summon |