A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands

Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response curves (PRC) and species classification according to their preferential habitats to monitor changes in community composition. Following large‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Restoration ecology Jg. 21; H. 3; S. 363 - 371
Hauptverfasser: Poulin, Monique, Andersen, Roxane, Rochefort, Line
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2013
Wiley
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1061-2971, 1526-100X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response curves (PRC) and species classification according to their preferential habitats to monitor changes in community composition. Following large‐scale restoration of a cut‐over peatland, vegetation was surveyed biannually over 8 years. We evaluated whether the establishing plant communities fell within the range of natural variation. We used both general diversity curves and PRC applied on plant species grouped by preferred habitat to compare restored sites and unrestored sites to a reference ecosystem. After 8 years, diversity and richness differed between the sites, with Forest and Ruderal species more prominent in unrestored sites, and Peatland, Forest, and Wetland species dominant in restored sites. The PRC revealed that the restored site became rapidly dominated by typical peatland plants, the main drivers of temporal changes being Sphagnum rubellum, Pohlia nutans, and Mylia anomala. Some differences remained between the restored and the undisturbed species pools: the former had more herbaceous species associated with wetlands such as Calamagrostis canadensis and Typha latifolia and the latter had more forested species like Kalmia angustifolia throughout the study. PRC revealed to be an efficient tool identifying species driving changes at the community level after restoration. In our case study, examining PRC scores after classifying species according to their preferred habitat allowed to illustrate objectively how restoration promotes target species (associated to peatlands) and how lack of intervention benefits ruderal species.
AbstractList Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response curves (PRC) and species classification according to their preferential habitats to monitor changes in community composition. Following large‐scale restoration of a cut‐over peatland, vegetation was surveyed biannually over 8 years. We evaluated whether the establishing plant communities fell within the range of natural variation. We used both general diversity curves and PRC applied on plant species grouped by preferred habitat to compare restored sites and unrestored sites to a reference ecosystem. After 8 years, diversity and richness differed between the sites, with Forest and Ruderal species more prominent in unrestored sites, and Peatland, Forest, and Wetland species dominant in restored sites. The PRC revealed that the restored site became rapidly dominated by typical peatland plants, the main drivers of temporal changes being Sphagnum rubellum, Pohlia nutans, and Mylia anomala. Some differences remained between the restored and the undisturbed species pools: the former had more herbaceous species associated with wetlands such as Calamagrostis canadensis and Typha latifolia and the latter had more forested species like Kalmia angustifolia throughout the study. PRC revealed to be an efficient tool identifying species driving changes at the community level after restoration. In our case study, examining PRC scores after classifying species according to their preferred habitat allowed to illustrate objectively how restoration promotes target species (associated to peatlands) and how lack of intervention benefits ruderal species.
Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response curves (PRC) and species classification according to their preferential habitats to monitor changes in community composition. Following large-scale restoration of a cut-over peatland, vegetation was surveyed biannually over 8 years. We evaluated whether the establishing plant communities fell within the range of natural variation. We used both general diversity curves and PRC applied on plant species grouped by preferred habitat to compare restored sites and unrestored sites to a reference ecosystem. After 8 years, diversity and richness differed between the sites, with Forest and Ruderal species more prominent in unrestored sites, and Peatland, Forest, and Wetland species dominant in restored sites. The PRC revealed that the restored site became rapidly dominated by typical peatland plants, the main drivers of temporal changes being Sphagnum rubellum, Pohlia nutans, and Mylia anomala. Some differences remained between the restored and the undisturbed species pools: the former had more herbaceous species associated with wetlands such as Calamagrostis canadensis and Typha latifolia and the latter had more forested species like Kalmia angustifolia throughout the study. PRC revealed to be an efficient tool identifying species driving changes at the community level after restoration. In our case study, examining PRC scores after classifying species according to their preferred habitat allowed to illustrate objectively how restoration promotes target species (associated to peatlands) and how lack of intervention benefits ruderal species. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response curves (PRC) and species classification according to their preferential habitats to monitor changes in community composition. Following large‐scale restoration of a cut‐over peatland, vegetation was surveyed biannually over 8 years. We evaluated whether the establishing plant communities fell within the range of natural variation. We used both general diversity curves and PRC applied on plant species grouped by preferred habitat to compare restored sites and unrestored sites to a reference ecosystem. After 8 years, diversity and richness differed between the sites, with Forest and Ruderal species more prominent in unrestored sites, and Peatland , Forest , and Wetland species dominant in restored sites. The PRC revealed that the restored site became rapidly dominated by typical peatland plants, the main drivers of temporal changes being Sphagnum rubellum , Pohlia nutans , and Mylia anomala . Some differences remained between the restored and the undisturbed species pools: the former had more herbaceous species associated with wetlands such as Calamagrostis canadensis and Typha latifolia and the latter had more forested species like Kalmia angustifolia throughout the study. PRC revealed to be an efficient tool identifying species driving changes at the community level after restoration. In our case study, examining PRC scores after classifying species according to their preferred habitat allowed to illustrate objectively how restoration promotes target species (associated to peatlands) and how lack of intervention benefits ruderal species.
Author Poulin, Monique
Andersen, Roxane
Rochefort, Line
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Monique
  surname: Poulin
  fullname: Poulin, Monique
  email: monique.poulin@fsaa.ulaval.ca
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group and Département de phytologie, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, Université Laval Québec, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Roxane
  surname: Andersen
  fullname: Andersen, Roxane
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group and Département de phytologie, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, Université Laval Québec, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Line
  surname: Rochefort
  fullname: Rochefort, Line
  organization: Peatland Ecology Research Group and Département de phytologie, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, Université Laval Québec, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27378881$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqNkV1v0zAUhi00JLbBf7CEkLhJ8Ef8hRBSlY2BNg0ogyGEZLmO07rLkmKnavvvcZqxi90w39jSed7j95z3CBy0XesAgBjlOJ03yxwzwjOM0M-cIExyhKRU-fYJOLwvHKQ34jgjSuBn4CjGJUKYSUkPwe8JvHQbOFmtQmfsAtZdgFfB2BvfzuEPN3e96X3XwnJh2rmDpu5dgFMX-y7sC2_hBJYmOvitX1c7uPH9An5xpm9MW8Xn4Gltmuhe3N3H4PuH06vyY3bx-exTObnIbCEKlVFWIS4QM0TyWolKqsJVMySIUpQWM2bozAojJFIUVahyTDA-41xKW1EnLabH4PXYNw3xZ53M6VsfrWuSCdeto8aFQowIXvD_o5QRonAhVUJfPkCX3Tq0aZBEUSEow4gk6tUdZaI1TR1Ma33Uq-BvTdhpIqiQUg4e34-cDV2MwdXa-nG3fTC-0RjpIU-91ENseohND3nqfZ56mxrIBw3-_fEI6btRuvGN2z1ap6enpdwvIhvlPvZuey834UbzNB7T15dnurw-Pzn_9RXpKf0LQKPF8Q
CODEN REECFA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_00221686_2023_2241844
crossref_primary_10_3390_w14223659
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14449
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjb_2016_0281
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2015_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120243
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_019_00844_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_015_0922_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2022_128160
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_014_0129_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13720
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2017_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12237
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_22_1355_2025
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14015
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13245
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_163583
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2014_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2023_103811
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2210
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12329
crossref_primary_10_3389_frai_2024_1371411
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12367
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2013_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2020_105976
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2015_10_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_020_08645_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2017_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12834
crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_10715
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_70361
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_2348
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12675
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12054
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00248_017_0957_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_76843_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2019_01_023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_023_01726_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_015_5396_4
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_47879_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2015_04_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_018_9594_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13545
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2013_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12656
crossref_primary_10_1890_ES14_00093_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2022_106874
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2014_06_016
crossref_primary_10_1017_wsc_2018_64
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_10_2885_2013
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_012_9280_4
crossref_primary_10_1139_facets_2024_0142
crossref_primary_10_1002_iroh_202102097
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_022_00547_x
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjb_2017_0145
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2013_12_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2024_107496
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_3052
Cites_doi 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003293.x
10.1139/x93-258
10.2307/1478999
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02223.x
10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01118.x
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.017
10.1007/s13157-009-0015-0
10.1017/CBO9780511608384
10.1016/0169-5347(95)90007-1
10.1007/s004420100716
10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0104:WCBMAA]2.0.CO;2
10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.019
10.1139/b05-025
10.1017/CBO9780511615146
10.1002/etc.5620180207
10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00834.x
10.1093/jxb/erf106
10.2307/3544935
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00704.x
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.002
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00163.x
10.1639/0007-2745(1964)67[427:TOOAIS]2.0.CO;2
10.1515/9782763712222
10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_17
10.2307/3243564
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.00982.x
10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00022.x
10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00005.x
10.1007/BF00032163
10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00928.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 Society for Ecological Restoration
2014 INIST-CNRS
2013 Society for Ecological Restoration
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 Society for Ecological Restoration
– notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2013 Society for Ecological Restoration
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
7SN
7ST
7U6
7UA
C1K
F1W
H97
L.G
SOI
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00889.x
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Environment Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Sustainability Science Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA

Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Ecology
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1526-100X
EndPage 371
ExternalDocumentID 2952373761
27378881
10_1111_j_1526_100X_2012_00889_x
REC889
ark_67375_WNG_CWKDKZQ0_R
Genre article
Report
Feature
Case Study
GroupedDBID .3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OB
1OC
29P
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AETEA
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BIYOS
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
D0L
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
F00
F01
F04
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
Y6R
YV5
ZO4
ZY4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
ALUQN
AAYXX
CITATION
O8X
IQODW
7SN
7ST
7U6
7UA
C1K
F1W
H97
L.G
SOI
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4749-35d06705a286f97d894edb07299334b5a3bc7a780930d0de5756b6688cd3e8c13
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 79
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000318185500010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1061-2971
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 18:28:52 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 09:40:07 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 28 16:50:31 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:14:37 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:06:06 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:25:01 EST 2025
Wed Jul 16 12:25:15 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 11 03:32:56 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords cut-over bog
reference ecosystem
trajectory analysis
multivariate analyses
plant diversity
Tracking
restoration ecology
principal response curves
Bogs
indicator species
Biological indicator
plant succession
Vegetation dynamics
Multivariate analysis
Biodiversity
Vegetation succession
Peat bog
Case study
Plant
Ecosystem
Plant marsh community
Ecological recovery
Trajectory
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4749-35d06705a286f97d894edb07299334b5a3bc7a780930d0de5756b6688cd3e8c13
Notes Appendix S1. List of the 233 species found with the LPI method for the restored and unrestored sites and in quadrats sampled in seven natural peatlands composing the reference ecosystem. Each species was attributed to one of the six habitat preference categories. For Peatland species, both bryophytes and vascular plants were identified according to Payette and Rochefort (2001). For Wetland and Facultative wetland species, vascular plants were identified according to the Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Québec (2008). For the rest of the vascular plants, we referred to Boivin (1992; for Cyperaceae) and to Marie-Victorin (1995). For nonvascular plants other than those found preferentially in peatlands, we referred to Sims and Baldwin (1996) for Sphagnum, to Ireland et al. (1987) and J. Faubert (2010, Société québécoise de bryologie, Québec, Canada, personal communication) for mosses, to Jean Faubert for liverworts, and to Brodo et al. (2001) for lichens. The species classification into the six habitat preference categories was based on habitat species preferences in regions South of the 48° parallel. Although some species can be found in more than one category, we used exclusive classification so that each species was attributed to only one category. We chose not to associate Picea mariana to Facultative wetland category and classified it as a Forest species. Some species were too generalists to be attributed to a particular category and were classified as Other species.Appendix S2. Frequencies of occurrence of species identified as indicator species by the principal response curve (see Figs. 5 & 6) from the year prior to restoration (0) and the years after (2, 4, 6, and 8). Values for the restored and unrestored sites are from the LPI method (presence-absence) and those for the reference ecosystem are from percent cover in 1-m2 quadrats (see Methods). The grey line is the average value (and standard error) of the reference ecosystem.
istex:AED1D34C3175FD5A6F4D0006AFC65F5229309DA3
ArticleID:REC889
ark:/67375/WNG-CWKDKZQ0-R
ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1337735102
PQPubID 31740
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1490527646
proquest_miscellaneous_1352291489
proquest_journals_1337735102
pascalfrancis_primary_27378881
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1526_100X_2012_00889_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1526_100X_2012_00889_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1526_100X_2012_00889_x_REC889
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_CWKDKZQ0_R
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2013
  text: May 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Hoboken, NJ
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Restoration ecology
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley
References Brix, H., K. Dyhr-Jensen, and B. Lorenzen. 2002. Root-zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. Growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:2441-2450.
Quinty, F., and L. Rochefort. 2003. Peatland restoration guide. 2nd edition. Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association and New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Québec, Canada.
Powelson, R. A., and V. J. Lieffers. 1992. Effects of light and nutrients on biomass allocation in Calamagrostis canadensis. Ecography 15:31-36.
Clymo, R. S. 1964. The origin of acidity in Sphagnum bogs. The Bryologist 67:427-431.
Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, New York.
Van den Brink, P. J., and C. J. F. ter Braak. 1999. Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community stress. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:138-148.
Andersen, R., L. Rochefort, and M. Poulin. 2010. Peat, water and plant tissue chemistry monitoring: a seven-year case study in a restored peatlands. Wetlands 30:159-170.
Manly, B. J. F. 1992. The design and analysis of research studies. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Tangen, B. A., M. G. Butler, and M. J. Ell. 2003. Weak correspondence between macroinvertebrate assemblages and land use in prairie pothole region wetlands, USA. Wetlands 23:104-115.
Lieffers, V. J., S. E. MacDonald, and E. H. Hogg. 1993. Ecology of and control strategies for Calamagrostis canadensis in boreal forest sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:2070-2077.
Pellerin, S., and C. Lavoie. 2003. Reconstructing the recent dynamics of mires using a multitechnique approach. Journal of Ecology 91:1008-1021.
Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Québec. 2008. Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables, Note explicative sur la ligne naturelle des hautes eaux : la méthode botanique experte. Gouvernement du Québec, Canada (avalable from http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/eau/rives/note-explic.pdf).
Lucchese, M., J. M. Waddington, M. Poulin, R. Pouliot, L. Rochefort, and M. Strack. 2010. Organic matter accumulation in a restored peatland: evaluating restoration success. Ecological Engineering 36:482-488.
R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (available from http://www.R-project.org).
Pouliot, R., L. Rochefort, and E. Karofeld. 2011a. Initiation of microtopography in revegetated cutover peatlands. Applied Vegetation Science 14:158-171.
Tuittila, E.-S., H. Vasander, and J. Laine. 2000. Impact of rewetting on the vegetation of a cut-away peatland. Applied Vegetation Science 3:205-212.
Block, W. M., A. B. Franklin, J. P. Ward Jr, J. L Ganey, and G. C. White. 2001. Implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9:293-303.
Kercher, S. M., C. B. Frieswyk, and J. B. Zedler. 2003. Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:899-906.
Payette, S., and L. Rochefort, editors. 2001. Écologie des tourbières du Québec-Labrador. Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Canada.
Rydin, H. 1993. Interspecific competition between Sphagnum mosses on a raised bog. Oikos 66:413-423.
Gignac, L. D. 1992. Niche structure, resource partitioning and species interactions of mire bryophytes relative to climatic and ecological gradients in Western Canada. The Bryologist 95:406-418.
Vitt, D. H., and W.-L. Chee. 1990. The relationships of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89:87-106.
Pakeman, R. J. 2004. Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. Journal of Ecology 92:893-905.
Shantz, M. A., and J. S. Price. 2006. Hydrological changes following restoration of the Bois-des-Bel Peatland, Quebec, 1999-2002. Journal of Hydrology 331:-553.
Dyhr-Jensen, K., and H. Brix. 1996. Effects of pH on ammonium uptake by Typha latifolia L. Plant, Cell, and Environment 19:1431-1436.
Sims, R. A., and K. A. Baldwin. 1996. Sphagnum species in northwestern Ontario: a field guide to their identification. NODA/NFP Technical Report TR-30. NWST Technical Report TR-101. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.
Marie-Victorin, Fr. 1995. Flore laurentienne. 3rd edition. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Canada.
Ireland, R. R., G. R. Brassard, W. B. Schofield, and D. H. Vitt. 1987. Checklist of the mosses of Canada II. Lindbergia 13:1-62.
Vandvik, V., E. Heegaard, E. I. Måren, and P. Aarrestad. 2005. Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post-fire succession in heathlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:139-149.
Leps, J., and P. Smilauer. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Brodo, I. M., S. Duran Sharnoff, and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Konisky, R. A., D. M. Burdick, M. Dionne, and H. A. Neckles. 2006. A regional assessment of Salt Marsh restoration and monitoring in the Gulf of Maine. Restoration Ecology 14:516-525.
Poulin, M., L. Rochefort, F. Quinty, and C. Lavoie. 2005. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:539-557.
Van Breemen, N. 1995. How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:270-275.
Palik, B. J., and D. Kastendick. 2010. Response of seasonal pond plant communities to upland forest harvest in northern Minnesota forests, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 260:628-637.
SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona (available from http://www.ser.org/pdf/primer3.pdf).
Legendre, P., and E. D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
1987; 13
1993; 23
2010; 36
1996; 19
2002; 53
2000; 3
1993; 66
2006; 14
1995; 10
2009
2003; 14
2008
1996
2005; 42
1995
2011b
2006
2010; 260
2004
1964; 67
2003
1992
1992; 15
2005; 83
2001; 129
2011; 19
2011a; 14
2006; 331
1992; 95
1990; 89
2004; 92
2003; 91
2001
1999; 18
2001; 9
1992; 25
2010; 30
1989
2003; 23
SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group) (e_1_2_6_36_1) 2004
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
e_1_2_6_30_1
Bonham C. D. (e_1_2_6_6_1) 1989
Sims R. A. (e_1_2_6_38_1) 1996
e_1_2_6_19_1
Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Québec (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2008
Payette S. (e_1_2_6_26_1) 2001
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
Quinty F. (e_1_2_6_32_1) 2003
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
Brodo I. M. (e_1_2_6_8_1) 2001
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_39_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_43_1
Boivin B. (e_1_2_6_5_1) 1992
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
e_1_2_6_40_1
R Development Core Team. (e_1_2_6_33_1) 2009
Ireland R. R. (e_1_2_6_13_1) 1987
e_1_2_6_9_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_44_1
Marie‐Victorin Fr. (e_1_2_6_21_1) 1995
e_1_2_6_28_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
Belyea L. R. (e_1_2_6_3_1) 2004
References_xml – reference: Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Québec. 2008. Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables, Note explicative sur la ligne naturelle des hautes eaux : la méthode botanique experte. Gouvernement du Québec, Canada (avalable from http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/eau/rives/note-explic.pdf).
– reference: R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (available from http://www.R-project.org).
– reference: Andersen, R., L. Rochefort, and M. Poulin. 2010. Peat, water and plant tissue chemistry monitoring: a seven-year case study in a restored peatlands. Wetlands 30:159-170.
– reference: Tuittila, E.-S., H. Vasander, and J. Laine. 2000. Impact of rewetting on the vegetation of a cut-away peatland. Applied Vegetation Science 3:205-212.
– reference: Vitt, D. H., and W.-L. Chee. 1990. The relationships of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89:87-106.
– reference: Palik, B. J., and D. Kastendick. 2010. Response of seasonal pond plant communities to upland forest harvest in northern Minnesota forests, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 260:628-637.
– reference: Van Breemen, N. 1995. How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:270-275.
– reference: Pellerin, S., and C. Lavoie. 2003. Reconstructing the recent dynamics of mires using a multitechnique approach. Journal of Ecology 91:1008-1021.
– reference: Manly, B. J. F. 1992. The design and analysis of research studies. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
– reference: Quinty, F., and L. Rochefort. 2003. Peatland restoration guide. 2nd edition. Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association and New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Québec, Canada.
– reference: Sims, R. A., and K. A. Baldwin. 1996. Sphagnum species in northwestern Ontario: a field guide to their identification. NODA/NFP Technical Report TR-30. NWST Technical Report TR-101. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.
– reference: Konisky, R. A., D. M. Burdick, M. Dionne, and H. A. Neckles. 2006. A regional assessment of Salt Marsh restoration and monitoring in the Gulf of Maine. Restoration Ecology 14:516-525.
– reference: Dyhr-Jensen, K., and H. Brix. 1996. Effects of pH on ammonium uptake by Typha latifolia L. Plant, Cell, and Environment 19:1431-1436.
– reference: Rydin, H. 1993. Interspecific competition between Sphagnum mosses on a raised bog. Oikos 66:413-423.
– reference: Tangen, B. A., M. G. Butler, and M. J. Ell. 2003. Weak correspondence between macroinvertebrate assemblages and land use in prairie pothole region wetlands, USA. Wetlands 23:104-115.
– reference: Gignac, L. D. 1992. Niche structure, resource partitioning and species interactions of mire bryophytes relative to climatic and ecological gradients in Western Canada. The Bryologist 95:406-418.
– reference: Brodo, I. M., S. Duran Sharnoff, and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
– reference: Legendre, P., and E. D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
– reference: Leps, J., and P. Smilauer. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
– reference: Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, New York.
– reference: Payette, S., and L. Rochefort, editors. 2001. Écologie des tourbières du Québec-Labrador. Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Canada.
– reference: Van den Brink, P. J., and C. J. F. ter Braak. 1999. Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community stress. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:138-148.
– reference: Shantz, M. A., and J. S. Price. 2006. Hydrological changes following restoration of the Bois-des-Bel Peatland, Quebec, 1999-2002. Journal of Hydrology 331:-553.
– reference: Ireland, R. R., G. R. Brassard, W. B. Schofield, and D. H. Vitt. 1987. Checklist of the mosses of Canada II. Lindbergia 13:1-62.
– reference: Clymo, R. S. 1964. The origin of acidity in Sphagnum bogs. The Bryologist 67:427-431.
– reference: Poulin, M., L. Rochefort, F. Quinty, and C. Lavoie. 2005. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:539-557.
– reference: SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona (available from http://www.ser.org/pdf/primer3.pdf).
– reference: Pouliot, R., L. Rochefort, and E. Karofeld. 2011a. Initiation of microtopography in revegetated cutover peatlands. Applied Vegetation Science 14:158-171.
– reference: Powelson, R. A., and V. J. Lieffers. 1992. Effects of light and nutrients on biomass allocation in Calamagrostis canadensis. Ecography 15:31-36.
– reference: Vandvik, V., E. Heegaard, E. I. Måren, and P. Aarrestad. 2005. Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post-fire succession in heathlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:139-149.
– reference: Kercher, S. M., C. B. Frieswyk, and J. B. Zedler. 2003. Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:899-906.
– reference: Brix, H., K. Dyhr-Jensen, and B. Lorenzen. 2002. Root-zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. Growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:2441-2450.
– reference: Lucchese, M., J. M. Waddington, M. Poulin, R. Pouliot, L. Rochefort, and M. Strack. 2010. Organic matter accumulation in a restored peatland: evaluating restoration success. Ecological Engineering 36:482-488.
– reference: Marie-Victorin, Fr. 1995. Flore laurentienne. 3rd edition. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Canada.
– reference: Pakeman, R. J. 2004. Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. Journal of Ecology 92:893-905.
– reference: Lieffers, V. J., S. E. MacDonald, and E. H. Hogg. 1993. Ecology of and control strategies for Calamagrostis canadensis in boreal forest sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:2070-2077.
– reference: Block, W. M., A. B. Franklin, J. P. Ward Jr, J. L Ganey, and G. C. White. 2001. Implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9:293-303.
– year: 2011b
– volume: 10
  start-page: 270
  year: 1995
  end-page: 275.
  article-title: How bogs down other plants
  publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution
– year: 2009
– volume: 18
  start-page: 138
  year: 1999
  end-page: 148.
  article-title: Principal response curves: analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of biological community stress
  publication-title: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
– volume: 83
  start-page: 539
  year: 2005
  end-page: 557.
  article-title: Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands in eastern Canada
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Botany
– year: 2001
– year: 1989
– year: 2003
– volume: 14
  start-page: 158
  year: 2011a
  end-page: 171.
  article-title: Initiation of microtopography in revegetated cutover peatlands
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– year: 1996
– volume: 30
  start-page: 159
  year: 2010
  end-page: 170.
  article-title: Peat, water and plant tissue chemistry monitoring: a seven‐year case study in a restored peatlands
  publication-title: Wetlands
– volume: 15
  start-page: 31
  year: 1992
  end-page: 36.
  article-title: Effects of light and nutrients on biomass allocation in
  publication-title: Ecography
– volume: 95
  start-page: 406
  year: 1992
  end-page: 418.
  article-title: Niche structure, resource partitioning and species interactions of mire bryophytes relative to climatic and ecological gradients in Western Canada
  publication-title: The Bryologist
– volume: 36
  start-page: 482
  year: 2010
  end-page: 488.
  article-title: Organic matter accumulation in a restored peatland: evaluating restoration success
  publication-title: Ecological Engineering
– year: 1992
– volume: 9
  start-page: 293
  year: 2001
  end-page: 303.
  article-title: Implementation of monitoring studies to evaluate the success of ecological restoration on wildlife
  publication-title: Restoration Ecology
– volume: 23
  start-page: 104
  year: 2003
  end-page: 115.
  article-title: Weak correspondence between macroinvertebrate assemblages and land use in prairie pothole region wetlands, USA
  publication-title: Wetlands
– volume: 14
  start-page: 516
  year: 2006
  end-page: 525.
  article-title: A regional assessment of Salt Marsh restoration and monitoring in the Gulf of Maine
  publication-title: Restoration Ecology
– volume: 67
  start-page: 427
  year: 1964
  end-page: 431.
  article-title: The origin of acidity in bogs
  publication-title: The Bryologist
– volume: 66
  start-page: 413
  year: 1993
  end-page: 423.
  article-title: Interspecific competition between mosses on a raised bog
  publication-title: Oikos
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1008
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1021.
  article-title: Reconstructing the recent dynamics of mires using a multitechnique approach
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 53
  start-page: 2441
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2450.
  article-title: Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects L. Growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Botany
– volume: 14
  start-page: 899
  year: 2003
  end-page: 906.
  article-title: Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 115
  year: 2004
  end-page: 131
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1
  year: 1992
  end-page: 232.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1
  year: 1987
  end-page: 62.
– start-page: 381
  year: 2006
  end-page: 426
– volume: 129
  start-page: 271
  year: 2001
  end-page: 280.
  article-title: Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
  publication-title: Oecologia
– volume: 42
  start-page: 139
  year: 2005
  end-page: 149.
  article-title: Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post‐fire succession in heathlands
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 89
  start-page: 87
  year: 1990
  end-page: 106.
  article-title: The relationships of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– year: 2008
– volume: 19
  start-page: 587
  year: 2011
  end-page: 598
– year: 2004
– volume: 3
  start-page: 205
  year: 2000
  end-page: 212.
  article-title: Impact of rewetting on the vegetation of a cut‐away peatland
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– year: 1995
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1431
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1436.
  article-title: Effects of pH on ammonium uptake by L
  publication-title: Plant, Cell, and Environment
– volume: 331
  start-page: 1999
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2002.
  article-title: Hydrological changes following restoration of the Bois‐des‐Bel Peatland, Quebec
  publication-title: Journal of Hydrology
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2070
  year: 1993
  end-page: 2077.
  article-title: Ecology of and control strategies for in boreal forest sites
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Forest Research
– volume: 260
  start-page: 628
  year: 2010
  end-page: 637.
  article-title: Response of seasonal pond plant communities to upland forest harvest in northern Minnesota forests, USA
  publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management
– volume: 92
  start-page: 893
  year: 2004
  end-page: 905.
  article-title: Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi‐site analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003293.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1139/x93-258
– ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
  doi: 10.2307/1478999
– start-page: 115
  volume-title: Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02223.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01118.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.017
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1007/s13157-009-0015-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511608384
– volume-title: R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(95)90007-1
– volume-title: Lichens of North America
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1007/s004420100716
– ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
  doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0104:WCBMAA]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.019
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  doi: 10.1139/b05-025
– volume-title: Peatland restoration guide
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615146
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Checklist of the mosses of Canada II
  year: 1987
  ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1002/etc.5620180207
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00834.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf106
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.2307/3544935
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00704.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.002
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00163.x
– volume-title: Measurements for terrestrial vegetation
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(1964)67[427:TOOAIS]2.0.CO;2
– volume-title: Flore laurentienne
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
– volume-title: Écologie des tourbières du Québec‐Labrador
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1515/9782763712222
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-31913-9_17
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.2307/3243564
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.00982.x
– volume-title: Sphagnum species in northwestern Ontario: a field guide to their identification
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00022.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00005.x
– volume-title: The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00032163
– volume-title: Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables, Note explicative sur la ligne naturelle des hautes eaux : la méthode botanique experte
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01118.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00928.x
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Provancheria
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
SSID ssj0015883
Score 2.3294573
Snippet Developing objective tools for tracking progress of restored sites is of general concern. Here, we present an innovative approach based on principal response...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 363
SubjectTerms Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Calamagrostis canadensis
Case studies
Community composition
Community ecology
community structure
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
cut-over bog
Demecology
ecosystems
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Environmental restoration
felling
forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitats
indicator species
Kalmia angustifolia
multivariate analyses
Mylia anomala
Peatlands
Plant communities
plant diversity
Plant species
plant succession
Plants (botany)
Plants and fungi
Pohlia nutans
principal response curves
reference ecosystem
Restoration
restoration ecology
Species
Species classification
Sphagnum rubellum
Synecology
temporal variation
Tracking
trajectory analysis
Typha latifolia
Vegetation
Wetlands
Title A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-CWKDKZQ0-R/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2012.00889.x
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1337735102
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1352291489
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1490527646
Volume 21
WOSCitedRecordID wos000318185500010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1526-100X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015883
  issn: 1061-2971
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3da9RAEB_kTsEXP6rFaC0riG-RJJvN7vp2XO8UWg49bHuIsGyyGxHlKpertP-9M5s0NiBSxLeD7ByXufn4ZfKbGYCXTiW6FqWLa1_bmDJGbHOVxtJieqqFyFyoQ54cycVCrVb6fcd_ol6Ydj5EX3Ajzwjxmhzcls3QyUVWYBhJVsTQormbSunXiCfHGZqxGMH4YDk_PurfKQilWro9_p5My3TI6_njdw2S1Zj0fkHkSdug_up28cUAmV7HtyFBze__z1t7APc6mMomrV09hFt-vQN3ZmHE9eUO7M5-98fhsS5ANI_g84Rh2GSTblI5Q0jMMB1WVJBnJ_5LR25kbVMDCxvK2TJstwkX3rAJm2JiZcRvvGRUJWYYtbehI_kxHM9nH6fv4m6BQ1zlMtcxF47agITNVFFr6ZTOvStpVrnmPC-F5WWFRoHmwhOXOI_QsSiLQqnKca-qlO_CaH229k-A2Vw6BKdeey3ymiOuxSTDq1I5r3RZlxHIq3_KVN10c1qy8d1ce8pBpdKM5pUhpZqgVHMRQdpL_mgnfNxA5lUwhl7Abr4RQ04Kc7p4a6anhweHnz4kZhnB_sBaegFEjVR8SCPYuzIf00WPxqScS8kxWmYRvOgvo9_Tyxy79mfndAaRs8aHWf2XM7lORCaLvIhABIO78R2a5WyKH57-o9wzuJuFvSHEDN2D0XZz7p_D7ern9muz2e888xcfuTR8
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9NAEB_kquiLH6eH0fNcQXyLJNnd7K5vpdd60lq03EcRYUmyGxGlJ21P7v57Zza5eAWRQ3wrZKc009_M_DKZD4CXTiemlqWLa18XMUWMuBA6jVWB4amWMnMhD3k8UdOpns_Nh3YdEPXCNPMhuoQbWUbw12TglJDetHKZ5ehHkjmVaNHgTa3NaySUPYGoQrj39mejo0n3UkFq3dTb4w_KjEo3C3v--F0b0apHij-n6slihQqsm80XG9T0KsENEWp077_e23242xJV1m-Q9QBu-MU23BqGIdcX27Az_N0hh8daF7F6CJ_7DB0n67ezyhmSYoYBsaKUPDv2X9ryRta0NbCwo5zNwn6bcOEN67MBhlZGFY4XjPLEDP32OvQkP4Kj0fBwcBC3KxziSihhYi4dNQLJItN5bZTTRnhX0rRyw7koZcHLCmGBgOGJS5xH8piXea515bjXVcp3YGtxuvCPgRVCOaSn3ngjRc2R2WKY4VWpndemrMsI1OVfZat2vjmt2fhurzznoFJpSvPcklJtUKo9jyDtJH80Mz6uIfMqoKETKJbfqEZOSXsyfWsHJ-P98aePiZ1FsLcBl04AeSOlH9IIdi_xY1v_sbIp50px9JdZBC-6y2j59DqnWPjTMzqD3Nng46z5yxlhEpmpXOQRyIC4a9-hnQ0H-OHJP8o9h9sHh-8ndvJuOn4Kd7KwRYTqRHdha70888_gZvVz_XW13GvN9BegxDhs
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3ra9RAEB_kTsUvPqrFaK0riN8iSTab3fXbcQ-VO4562PYQYUmymyLKtdxdpf3vndmksQGRIn4LZCdkJ_P47WQeAK-tinQlChtWrspD8hhhnqo4lDm6p0qIxPo45NFMzudqudQHzTggqoWp-0O0ATfSDG-vScHdma26Wi6SDO1ItKQULWq8qZR-i4Cyn9JMmR70R4vJ4az9qSCUqvPt8YUSLeNuYs8fn9XxVn1i_AVlT-YbZGBVT77oQNPrANd7qMmD_7q3h3C_AapsUEvWI7jlVjtwZ-ybXF_uwO74d4UcLmtMxOYxfB0wNJxs0PQqZwiKGTrEkkLy7MidNOmNrC5rYH5GOVv4-Tb-xjs2YEN0rYwyHC8ZxYkZ2u2tr0l-AoeT8efhh7AZ4RCWqUx1yIWlQiCRJyqrtLRKp84W1K1cc54WIudFiWKBAsMjG1mH4DErskyp0nKnypjvQm91unJPgeWptAhPnXZapBVHZItuhpeFsk7poioCkFefypRNf3Mas_HDXDvnIFOpS_PSEFONZ6q5CCBuKc_qHh83oHnjpaElyNffKUdOCnM8f2-Gx9PR9MunyCwC2O-IS0uAuJHCD3EAe1fyYxr7sTEx51JytJdJAK_a26j59DsnX7nTc1qD2FnjcVb_ZU2qI5HILM0CEF7ibrxDsxgP8eLZP9K9hLsHo4mZfZxPn8O9xA8RoTTRPeht1-fuBdwuf26_bdb7jZb-AtZCN-c
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+New+Approach+for+Tracking+Vegetation+Change+after+Restoration%3A+A+Case+Study+with+Peatlands&rft.jtitle=Restoration+ecology&rft.au=POULIN%2C+Monique&rft.au=ANDERSEN%2C+Roxane&rft.au=ROCHEFORT%2C+Line&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=371&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2012.00889.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=27378881
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1061-2971&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1061-2971&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1061-2971&client=summon