Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

ABSTRACT Background Consensus criteria for classifying tremor disorders were published by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society in 1998. Subsequent advances with regard to essential tremor, tremor associated with dystonia, and other monosymptomatic and indeterminate tremors make...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Movement disorders Jg. 33; H. 1; S. 75 - 87
Hauptverfasser: Bhatia, Kailash P., Bain, Peter, Bajaj, Nin, Elble, Rodger J., Hallett, Mark, Louis, Elan D., Raethjen, Jan, Stamelou, Maria, Testa, Claudia M., Deuschl, Guenther
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2018
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0885-3185, 1531-8257, 1531-8257
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background Consensus criteria for classifying tremor disorders were published by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society in 1998. Subsequent advances with regard to essential tremor, tremor associated with dystonia, and other monosymptomatic and indeterminate tremors make a significant revision necessary. Objectives Convene an international panel of experienced investigators to review the definition and classification of tremor. Methods Computerized MEDLINE searches in January 2013 and 2015 were conducted using a combination of text words and MeSH terms: “tremor”, “tremor disorders”, “essential tremor”, “dystonic tremor”, and “classification” limited to human studies. Agreement was obtained using consensus development methodology during four in‐person meetings, two teleconferences, and numerous manuscript reviews. Results Tremor is defined as an involuntary, rhythmic, oscillatory movement of a body part and is classified along two axes: Axis 1—clinical characteristics, including historical features (age at onset, family history, and temporal evolution), tremor characteristics (body distribution, activation condition), associated signs (systemic, neurological), and laboratory tests (electrophysiology, imaging); and Axis 2—etiology (acquired, genetic, or idiopathic). Tremor syndromes, consisting of either isolated tremor or tremor combined with other clinical features, are defined within Axis 1. This classification scheme retains the currently accepted tremor syndromes, including essential tremor, and provides a framework for defining new syndromes. Conclusions This approach should be particularly useful in elucidating isolated tremor syndromes and syndromes consisting of tremor and other signs of uncertain significance. Consistently defined Axis 1 syndromes are needed to facilitate the elucidation of specific etiologies in Axis 2. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Bibliographie:Further members of the IPMDS Task Force
Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.
Nothing to report.
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures
Dietrich Haubenberger, MHSc, MD; Giovanni Abbruzzese, MD; Julian Benito‐Leon, MD, PhD; Maria Joao Forjaz, PhD; Kelly E. Lyons, PhD; Tiago A. Mestre, MSc, MD; Eng‐King Tan, MD; Joachim Ferreira, MD, PhD
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.27121