Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance

Literature is examined to support the contention that student evaluations of teaching (SET) should not be used for summative evaluation of university faculty. Recommendations for alternatives to SET are provided.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Cogent education Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 1304016 - 1304023
Main Author:	Hornstein, Henry A.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Abingdon Cogent 01.01.2017 Cogent OA Taylor & Francis Ltd Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects:	College Administration College Faculty College Students Competence Consumer Economics Departments Educational Assessment Educational History Educational Quality Educational research Evaluation Methods Faculty Evaluation Faculty Promotion Instructional Effectiveness Literature Reviews Observation Opinions Organizational Change Paper (Material) Rating Scales Statistical Data Student Attitudes Student Evaluation Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance student evaluations of teaching Student Satisfaction Student Surveys Summative Evaluation Teacher Competencies Teacher Competency Testing Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Evaluation Teacher evaluations teaching teaching evaluation Tenure Test Validity university faculty evaluation Validity
ISSN:	2331-186X, 2331-186X
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!