Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions
Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care. To determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions de...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews Ročník 2; s. CD004910 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
England
23.02.2017
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1469-493X |
| On-line přístup: | Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care.
To determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary/specialty care interface. This is an update of a previously published review.Secondary questions include the following:1. Which shared care interventions or portions of shared care interventions are most effective?2. What do the most effective systems have in common?
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to 12 October 2015.
One review author performed the initial abstract screen; then two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITS) evaluating the effectiveness of shared care interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care and community settings. The intervention was compared with usual care in that setting.
Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies, evaluated study quality and judged the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of results when possible and carried out a narrative synthesis of the remainder of the results. We presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table, using a tabular format to show effect sizes for all outcome types.
We identified 42 studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management (N = 18,859), 39 of which were RCTs, two CBAs and one an NRCT. Of these 42 studies, 41 examined complex multi-faceted interventions and lasted from six to 24 months. Overall, our confidence in results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from moderate to high certainty. Results showed probably few or no differences in clinical outcomes overall with a tendency towards improved blood pressure management in the small number of studies on shared care for hypertension, chronic kidney disease and stroke (mean difference (MD) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 5.25)(based on moderate-certainty evidence). Mental health outcomes improved, particularly in response to depression treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.62; six studies, N = 1708) and recovery from depression (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.26; 10 studies, N = 4482) in studies examining the 'stepped care' design of shared care interventions (based on high-certainty evidence). Investigators noted modest effects on mean depression scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; six studies, N = 3250). Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), processes of care and participation and default rates in shared care services were probably limited (based on moderate-certainty evidence). Studies probably showed little or no difference in hospital admissions, service utilisation and patient health behaviours (with evidence of moderate certainty).
This review suggests that shared care improves depression outcomes and probably has mixed or limited effects on other outcomes. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may account in part for these limited effects. Review findings support the growing evidence base for shared care in the management of depression, particularly stepped care models of shared care. Shared care interventions for other conditions should be developed within research settings, with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and awareness of the need to carry out longer studies to test effectiveness and sustainability over time. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care.
To determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary/specialty care interface. This is an update of a previously published review.Secondary questions include the following:1. Which shared care interventions or portions of shared care interventions are most effective?2. What do the most effective systems have in common?
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to 12 October 2015.
One review author performed the initial abstract screen; then two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITS) evaluating the effectiveness of shared care interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care and community settings. The intervention was compared with usual care in that setting.
Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies, evaluated study quality and judged the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of results when possible and carried out a narrative synthesis of the remainder of the results. We presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table, using a tabular format to show effect sizes for all outcome types.
We identified 42 studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management (N = 18,859), 39 of which were RCTs, two CBAs and one an NRCT. Of these 42 studies, 41 examined complex multi-faceted interventions and lasted from six to 24 months. Overall, our confidence in results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from moderate to high certainty. Results showed probably few or no differences in clinical outcomes overall with a tendency towards improved blood pressure management in the small number of studies on shared care for hypertension, chronic kidney disease and stroke (mean difference (MD) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 5.25)(based on moderate-certainty evidence). Mental health outcomes improved, particularly in response to depression treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.62; six studies, N = 1708) and recovery from depression (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.26; 10 studies, N = 4482) in studies examining the 'stepped care' design of shared care interventions (based on high-certainty evidence). Investigators noted modest effects on mean depression scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; six studies, N = 3250). Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), processes of care and participation and default rates in shared care services were probably limited (based on moderate-certainty evidence). Studies probably showed little or no difference in hospital admissions, service utilisation and patient health behaviours (with evidence of moderate certainty).
This review suggests that shared care improves depression outcomes and probably has mixed or limited effects on other outcomes. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may account in part for these limited effects. Review findings support the growing evidence base for shared care in the management of depression, particularly stepped care models of shared care. Shared care interventions for other conditions should be developed within research settings, with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and awareness of the need to carry out longer studies to test effectiveness and sustainability over time. BACKGROUNDShared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone; however, little is known about the effectiveness of shared care.OBJECTIVESTo determine the effectiveness of shared care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary/specialty care interface. This is an update of a previously published review.Secondary questions include the following:1. Which shared care interventions or portions of shared care interventions are most effective?2. What do the most effective systems have in common?SEARCH METHODSWe searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library to 12 October 2015.SELECTION CRITERIAOne review author performed the initial abstract screen; then two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series analyses (ITS) evaluating the effectiveness of shared care interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care and community settings. The intervention was compared with usual care in that setting.DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSISTwo review authors independently extracted data from the included studies, evaluated study quality and judged the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We conducted a meta-analysis of results when possible and carried out a narrative synthesis of the remainder of the results. We presented the results in a 'Summary of findings' table, using a tabular format to show effect sizes for all outcome types.MAIN RESULTSWe identified 42 studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management (N = 18,859), 39 of which were RCTs, two CBAs and one an NRCT. Of these 42 studies, 41 examined complex multi-faceted interventions and lasted from six to 24 months. Overall, our confidence in results regarding the effectiveness of interventions ranged from moderate to high certainty. Results showed probably few or no differences in clinical outcomes overall with a tendency towards improved blood pressure management in the small number of studies on shared care for hypertension, chronic kidney disease and stroke (mean difference (MD) 3.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 5.25)(based on moderate-certainty evidence). Mental health outcomes improved, particularly in response to depression treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.62; six studies, N = 1708) and recovery from depression (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.26; 10 studies, N = 4482) in studies examining the 'stepped care' design of shared care interventions (based on high-certainty evidence). Investigators noted modest effects on mean depression scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.29, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.20; six studies, N = 3250). Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), processes of care and participation and default rates in shared care services were probably limited (based on moderate-certainty evidence). Studies probably showed little or no difference in hospital admissions, service utilisation and patient health behaviours (with evidence of moderate certainty).AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONSThis review suggests that shared care improves depression outcomes and probably has mixed or limited effects on other outcomes. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may account in part for these limited effects. Review findings support the growing evidence base for shared care in the management of depression, particularly stepped care models of shared care. Shared care interventions for other conditions should be developed within research settings, with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and awareness of the need to carry out longer studies to test effectiveness and sustainability over time. |
| Author | Clyne, Barbara Smith, Susan M Cousins, Gráinne Allwright, Shane O'Dowd, Tom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Susan M surname: Smith fullname: Smith, Susan M organization: HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland – sequence: 2 givenname: Gráinne surname: Cousins fullname: Cousins, Gráinne organization: School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin, Ireland, Dublin 2 – sequence: 3 givenname: Barbara surname: Clyne fullname: Clyne, Barbara organization: HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland – sequence: 4 givenname: Shane surname: Allwright fullname: Allwright, Shane organization: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland – sequence: 5 givenname: Tom surname: O'Dowd fullname: O'Dowd, Tom organization: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230899$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNo1kEtPwzAQhC0EorTwFyofuaT4EdfxEZWnVIkDIHGLNs6mNUrsECdC_fdYarnsSDvfjjQ7J-c-eCRkydmKMybueL5WvFDFavPAWG7Sup8qeUaukmGy3MivGZnH-M2YNJwXl2QmCiFZYcwVce97GLCmNk0Kdggx0nGP1PkRhwYs0grHX0RP-8F1MBwo-JrGHq2Ddjwc75ynHXjYYYd-pKGhbfA7mgI6aoOv3eiCj9fkooE24s1JF-Tz6fFj85Jt355fN_fbzOZaygxA5iiZkKAaZYWyhah4LhpAblXNBXBjjU6A5s1aJ8NKxXLN1pBUay0W5PaY2w_hZ8I4lp2LFtsWPIYplrzQXCkmpUro8oROVYd1eapY_r9H_AFTgmi8 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_medu_15607 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_066883 crossref_primary_10_2196_64438 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aprim_2017_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12890_021_01431_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_020_01011_0 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0275668 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_020_05263_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_022_01933_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_pmrj_13027 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_021_06071_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijun_12365 crossref_primary_10_2196_25220 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18168627 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_09918_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD000984_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2021_106530 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13312_025_00098_2 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_060232 crossref_primary_10_3399_BJGPO_2020_0114 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10552_021_01517_y crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD014713_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11414_024_09891_6 crossref_primary_10_1071_AH20160 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1345316 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1469-493X |
| EndPage | CD004910 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 28230899 |
| Genre | Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 53G 5GY 7PX 9HA ABJNI ACGFO ACGFS AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AYR CGR CUY CVF D7G ECM EIF HYE NPM OEC OK1 P2P RWY WOW ZYTZH 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-aa34e3023a5f5c25c82b142fae1c5d12a19c9730271f6742fc3504706a3507772 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 37 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000396096600017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 10:16:07 EST 2025 Tue Jun 24 01:31:37 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4733-aa34e3023a5f5c25c82b142fae1c5d12a19c9730271f6742fc3504706a3507772 |
| Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3/pdf/full |
| PMID | 28230899 |
| PQID | 1871550335 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1871550335 pubmed_primary_28230899 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2017-02-23 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-02-23 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2017 text: 2017-02-23 day: 23 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Cochrane Database Syst Rev |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| References | 17636778 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub2. |
| References_xml | – reference: 17636778 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub2. |
| SSID | ssj0039118 |
| Score | 2.503932 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty care alone;... BACKGROUNDShared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than primary or specialty... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | CD004910 |
| SubjectTerms | Chronic Disease - therapy Continuity of Patient Care Controlled Before-After Studies Depression - therapy Diabetes Mellitus - therapy Disease Management Family Practice Humans Hypertension - therapy Medicine Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Patient Care Team Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Specialization |
| Title | Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230899 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1871550335 |
| Volume | 2 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000396096600017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwEA_qRHzx-2N-EcHXatMkTfokMh0-uLEHlb2VLE1koO1cp-B_713bzSdB8KWFwkGTXHK_u9_ljpCLTDHvFc8Cb7UJhPWwpZxSQeyT2FsjJK8Y3ecH1e_r4TAZNAG3skmrnJ-J1UGdFRZj5FcMkL1Ezk1eT94D7BqF7GrTQmOZtDhAGUzpUsMFi8BhI-v5reAwumLY91tLfdm5RWAMn2HI_HdoWZmY7uZ_f26LbDTgkt7U2rBNlly-Q9Z6DX2-S8ZYntllFNO9qKkMJAUASLFmxNQb62iTtkUndREKavKMlnWL-tlXLTfO6dsiZ4YWnr4W-QvFE56Cb53VKWB75Kl799i5D5peC4EVivPAGC4cNhAy0ksbSasjDA9545iVGYsMS2yikORkPgZ32lsuQ6HC2MBbAUTfJyt5kbtDQgECjXzEjJNeC5uEIxEKlxkdOxACeNQm5_NJTEGXkaAwuSs-yvRnGtvkoF6JtBlvGiEjCM7h0R-kj8l6hNYXb57zE9LysJPdKVm1n7NxOT2rlASe_UHvG2ujyFU |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shared+care+across+the+interface+between+primary+and+specialty+care+in+management+of+long+term+conditions&rft.jtitle=Cochrane+database+of+systematic+reviews&rft.au=Smith%2C+Susan+M&rft.au=Cousins%2C+Gr%C3%A1inne&rft.au=Clyne%2C+Barbara&rft.au=Allwright%2C+Shane&rft.date=2017-02-23&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=CD004910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2F14651858.CD004910.pub3&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28230899&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28230899&rft.externalDocID=28230899 |