Is reduction better than arthrodesis in situ in surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis? A system review and meta analysis

Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal Jg. 26; H. 3; S. 606 - 618
Hauptverfasser: Bai, Xuedong, Chen, Jiahai, Liu, Liyang, Li, Xiaochuan, Wu, Yaohong, Wang, Deli, Ruan, Dike
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.03.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0940-6719, 1432-0932, 1432-0932
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data. Results Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ ( P  < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS ( P  = 0.36), ODI ( P  = 0.50), lumbar lordosis ( P  = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent ( P  = 0.84), fusion rate ( P  = 0.083) and complication rate ( P  = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group. Conclusions On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level IIa.
AbstractList To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis.PURPOSETo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis.We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data.METHODSWe performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data.Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group.RESULTSSeven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group.On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result.CONCLUSIONSOn the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result.Therapeutic Level IIa.LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IIa.
Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data. Results Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group. Conclusions On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level IIa.
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data. Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group. On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result. Therapeutic Level IIa.
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data. Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ (P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS (P = 0.36), ODI (P = 0.50), lumbar lordosis (P = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent (P = 0.84), fusion rate (P = 0.083) and complication rate (P = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group. On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result. Therapeutic Level IIa.
Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of both observational and randomized clinical trials published up to April 2016 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes included age, sex, operative time, blood loss, and at least 2 years clinical results of Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar lordosis, slippage, fusion rate, the rate of good and excellent and the complication rate. Two authors independently extracted the articles and the predefined data. Results Seven eligible studies, involving four RCTs and three cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients who underwent reduction did achieved better slippage correction comparing with arthrodesis in situ ( P  < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in the case of operative time, blood loss, VAS ( P  = 0.36), ODI ( P  = 0.50), lumbar lordosis ( P  = 0.47), the rate of good and excellent ( P  = 0.84), fusion rate ( P  = 0.083) and complication rate ( P  = 0.33) between the arthrodesis in situ group and the reduction group. Conclusions On the basis on this review, arthrodesis after reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis potentially reduced vertebral slippage. Reduction was neither associated with a longer operative time nor more blood loss. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between reduction and arthrodesis in situ group. Both procedures could be expected to achieve good clinical result. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level IIa.
Author Li, Xiaochuan
Ruan, Dike
Bai, Xuedong
Wu, Yaohong
Wang, Deli
Liu, Liyang
Chen, Jiahai
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Xuedong
  surname: Bai
  fullname: Bai, Xuedong
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jiahai
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Jiahai
  organization: Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Liyang
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Liyang
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Xiaochuan
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xiaochuan
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yaohong
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Yaohong
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Deli
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Deli
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Dike
  surname: Ruan
  fullname: Ruan, Dike
  email: ruandikengh@163.com
  organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Navy General Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkU1v1DAQhi1URLeFH8AFWeLCxcVjJ3F8QlVFP6RKXOAcOc7srqvEXmyHanvv_663WypUCcRp5vC8Mx4_R-TAB4-EvAd-Apyrz4nzum0Yh4ZVLXB294osoJKCcS3FAVlwXXHWKNCH5CilG86h1rx5Qw6FaqWQjViQ-6tEIw6zzS542mPOGGleG09NzOsYBkwuUedpcnl-rHNcOWtGOhlvVjihzzQs6Rhu2SqaAWnaBD9sxzC6lNe79Bd6StM2ZZzKpl8Ob6nxA50wm9KYcVuQt-T10owJ3z3VY_Lj_Ov3s0t2_e3i6uz0mtlKQWa1qKxqQXFQdY8aW60lWN1bYS0f6h6MqGRtdY19XfXCCGvA2r4RQ-nBcHlMPu3nbmL4OWPK3eSSxXE0HsOcOmiVaqtayvY_UKkBVNOqgn58gd6EOZbTHgeWbxa8gkJ9eKLmfsKh20Q3mbjtfrsoAOwBG0NKEZfPCPBu57vb--6K727nu7srGfUiY102O5c5Gjf-Myn2yVS2-BXGPx7919ADZjPAVQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_023_08041_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2022_103541
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_019_03282_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_017_5435_6
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1350064
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2018_05_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2018_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semss_2025_101167
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_022_07408_3
crossref_primary_10_22603_ssrr_2024_0285
crossref_primary_10_1177_2192568218772302
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2023_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_06_047
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_019_3028_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2019_04_105
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00586-015-4177-6
10.1097/00007632-200007010-00016
10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0151
10.1007/s00586-011-1934-z
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145b353
10.1007/s00586-013-2858-6
10.1007/s00330-013-3041-5
10.1007/s00402-013-1857-8
10.1007/s00586-005-1021-4
10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.249
10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.9302
10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009
10.1136/bmj.b2700
10.4103/0974-8237.176623
10.1186/1471-2474-14-245
10.1007/s00590-012-0993-0
10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140
10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.033
10.2106/JBJS.L.01012
10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.481
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a829
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09560
10.1056/NEJMoa070302
10.1007/s00586-016-4415-6
10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.257
10.1007/s00586-005-0901-y
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026
10.1186/1748-7161-6-14
10.1097/00003086-197606000-00003
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
European Spine Journal is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
– notice: European Spine Journal is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00586-016-4810-z
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-0932
EndPage 618
ExternalDocumentID 4318024111
27832362
10_1007_s00586_016_4810_z
Genre Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2WC
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACSNA
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
AOIJS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GX1
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HYE
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OK1
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPM
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TR2
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-524c78170175be9e89931c9bc2cc0d5b1a2435c95eb54b2a2ca1ccb62d2a21a03
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 18
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000396042000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0940-6719
1432-0932
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:09:17 EST 2025
Thu Sep 04 16:30:14 EDT 2025
Tue Dec 02 15:58:41 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:55:25 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:34:52 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:14:04 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:32:29 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Spondylolisthesis
Arthrodesis
Reduction
Lumbar spine
Low-grade
In situ
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c471t-524c78170175be9e89931c9bc2cc0d5b1a2435c95eb54b2a2ca1ccb62d2a21a03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
PMID 27832362
PQID 1873622041
PQPubID 31317
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1877845338
proquest_miscellaneous_1839117687
proquest_journals_1873622041
pubmed_primary_27832362
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_016_4810_z
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00586_016_4810_z
springer_journals_10_1007_s00586_016_4810_z
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European spine journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Spine J
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Spine J
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Gong, Wang, Luo (CR27) 2010; 13
Ekman, Moller, Hedlund (CR11) 2005; 5
Transfeldt, Mehbod (CR9) 2007; 32
CR18
Lian, Hou, Xu, Zeng, Zhao, Liu, Yang, Zhao (CR26) 2014; 23
Uysal, Circi, Ozalay, Derincek, Cinar (CR6) 2012; 22
Etemadifar, Hadi, Masouleh (CR7) 2016; 7
Andersen, Christensen, Langdahl, Ernst, Fruensgaard, Andersen, Rasmussen, Niedermann, Helmig, Holm, Egund, Bünger (CR38) 2013; 2013
Meyerding (CR4) 1931; 13
Guyatt, Oxman, Montori, Vist, Kunz, Brozek, Alonso-Coello, Djulbegovic, Atkins, Falck-Ytter, Williams, Meerpohl, Norris, Akl, Schünemann (CR21) 2011; 64
Naderi, Manisali, Acar, Ozaksoy, Mertol, Arda (CR35) 2003; 99
Riouallon, Lachaniette, Poignard, Allain (CR32) 2013; 99
Liberati, Altman, Tetzlaff, Mulrow, Gotzsche, Ioannidis, Clarke, Devereaux, Kleijnen, Moher (CR17) 2009; 339
El Masry, El Assuity, El Hawary, Weatherley (CR36) 2005; 71
Sears (CR15) 2005; 5
Beutler, Fredrickson, Murtland, Sweeney, Grant, Baker (CR31) 2003; 28
Weinstein, Lurie, Tosteson, Hanscom, Tosteson, Blood, Birkmeyer, Hilibrand, Herkowitz, Cammisa, Albert, Emery, Lenke, Abdu, Longley, Errico, Hu (CR13) 2007; 356
Audat, Darwish, Al, Obaidat, Haddad, Bashaireh, Al-Aboosy (CR24) 2011; 6
Longo, Loppini, Romeo, Maffulli, Denaro (CR5) 2014; 96
Bourghli, Aunoble, Reebye, Le Huec (CR14) 2011; 20
He, Wang, Gong, Griffith, Zeng, Kwok, Leung, Kwok, Ahuja, Leung (CR37) 2014; 24
Ishida, Ohmori, Inoue, Suzuki (CR30) 1999; 81
Spruit, van Jonbergen, de Kleuver (CR34) 2005; 14
Jacobs, Vreeling, De Kleuver (CR10) 2006; 15
Hozo, Djulbegovic, Hozo (CR20) 2005; 5
Tay, Bassi, Yeo, Yue (CR28) 2016; 16
Benli, Cicek, Kaya (CR23) 2006; 52
Hagenmaier, Delawi, Verschoor, Oner, van Susante (CR2) 2013; 14
CR3
Moller, Hedlund (CR12) 2000; 25
Egger, Schneider, Davey (CR22) 1998; 316
Lian, Hou, Xu, Zeng, Zhao, Liu, Zhao, Li (CR25) 2013; 13
Wegmann, Gundermann, Siewe, Eysel, Delank, Sobottke (CR16) 2013; 133
DeWald, Bridwell, DeWald (CR1) 1997
Pan, Hai, Yang, Zhou, Chen, Guo (CR19) 2016; 25
Schulte, Ringel, Quante, Eicker, Muche-Borowski, Kothe (CR8) 2016; 25
Abdu, Lurie, Spratt, Tosteson, Zhao, Tosteson, Herkowitz, Longely, Boden, Emery, Weinstein (CR33) 2009; 34
Fan, Gu, Zhu, Guan, Hu, Wu, Zhang, He (CR29) 2016; 90
4810_CR3
ZM Audat (4810_CR24) 2011; 6
HW Meyerding (4810_CR4) 1931; 13
SP Hozo (4810_CR20) 2005; 5
TL Schulte (4810_CR8) 2016; 25
WCH Jacobs (4810_CR10) 2006; 15
KS Tay (4810_CR28) 2016; 16
A Pan (4810_CR19) 2016; 25
Y Ishida (4810_CR30) 1999; 81
4810_CR18
WA Abdu (4810_CR33) 2009; 34
K Gong (4810_CR27) 2010; 13
T Andersen (4810_CR38) 2013; 2013
A Liberati (4810_CR17) 2009; 339
IT Benli (4810_CR23) 2006; 52
P Ekman (4810_CR11) 2005; 5
L He (4810_CR37) 2014; 24
HS Hagenmaier (4810_CR2) 2013; 14
X Lian (4810_CR25) 2013; 13
M Egger (4810_CR22) 1998; 316
MR Etemadifar (4810_CR7) 2016; 7
W Sears (4810_CR15) 2005; 5
K Wegmann (4810_CR16) 2013; 133
G Riouallon (4810_CR32) 2013; 99
S Naderi (4810_CR35) 2003; 99
RL DeWald (4810_CR1) 1997
UG Longo (4810_CR5) 2014; 96
XF Lian (4810_CR26) 2014; 23
M Spruit (4810_CR34) 2005; 14
EE Transfeldt (4810_CR9) 2007; 32
JN Weinstein (4810_CR13) 2007; 356
WJ Beutler (4810_CR31) 2003; 28
H Moller (4810_CR12) 2000; 25
G Fan (4810_CR29) 2016; 90
M Uysal (4810_CR6) 2012; 22
GH Guyatt (4810_CR21) 2011; 64
A Bourghli (4810_CR14) 2011; 20
MA El Masry (4810_CR36) 2005; 71
References_xml – ident: CR18
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2359
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2367
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4177-6
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1711
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1715
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 1
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00016
– volume: 99
  start-page: 151
  year: 2003
  end-page: 156
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Factors affecting reduction in low-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0151
– start-page: 1201
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1210
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: The textbook of spinal surgery
– volume: 20
  start-page: 663
  year: 2011
  end-page: 668
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Correlation of clinical outcome and spinopelvic sagittal alignment after surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1934-z
– volume: 32
  start-page: S126
  year: 2007
  end-page: S129
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Evidence-based medicine analysis of isthmic spondylolisthesis treatment including reduction versus fusion in situ for high-grade slips
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145b353
– volume: 23
  start-page: 172
  year: 2014
  end-page: 179
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Single segment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2858-6
– volume: 24
  start-page: 441
  year: 2014
  end-page: 448
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Prevalence and risk factors of lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly Chinese men and women
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3041-5
– volume: 133
  start-page: 1639
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1644
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Correlation of reduction and clinical outcome in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1857-8
– volume: 15
  start-page: 391
  year: 2006
  end-page: 402
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1021-4
– volume: 5
  start-page: 36
  year: 2005
  end-page: 44
  ident: CR11
  article-title: The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study
  publication-title: SPINE J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.249
– volume: 52
  start-page: 151
  year: 2006
  end-page: 169
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Comparison of sagittal plane realignment and reduction with posterior instrumentation in developmental low or high dysplastic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Kobe J Med Sci
– volume: 81
  start-page: 240
  year: 1999
  end-page: 244
  ident: CR30
  article-title: Delayed vertebral slip and adjacent disc degeneration with an isthmic defect of the fifth lumbar vertebra
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.9302
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 8
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Degenerative spondylolisthesis is associated with low spinal bone density: a comparative study between spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
– volume: 99
  start-page: 155
  year: 2013
  end-page: 161
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a continuous series of 65 cases with an average follow-up of 6.6 years
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2700
  year: 2009
  ident: CR17
  article-title: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
– volume: 7
  start-page: 43
  year: 2016
  end-page: 49
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Posterolateral instrumented fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up
  publication-title: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
  doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.176623
– volume: 14
  start-page: 245
  year: 2013
  ident: CR2
  article-title: No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-245
– volume: 22
  start-page: 21
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 24
  ident: CR6
  article-title: The surgical treatment for a rare case of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis in L4 and L5 lumbar spine: decompression, reduction and fusion
  publication-title: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
  doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-0993-0
– volume: 316
  start-page: 140
  year: 1998
  end-page: 144
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140
– volume: 13
  start-page: 39
  year: 1931
  end-page: 48
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg
– volume: 90
  start-page: 580
  year: 2016
  end-page: 587
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis: in situ versus reduction
  publication-title: World Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.033
– volume: 96
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 58
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01012
– volume: 71
  start-page: 83
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 87
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Instrumented in situ posterolateral fusion for low-grade lytic spondylolisthesis in adults
  publication-title: Acta Orthop Belg
– volume: 5
  start-page: 13
  year: 2005
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1189
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: is intentional surgical reduction essential?
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.481
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2351
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2360
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Degenerative spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a829
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1277
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1282
  ident: CR21
  article-title: GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
– volume: 13
  start-page: 394
  year: 2010
  end-page: 400
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine
  doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09560
– ident: CR3
– volume: 356
  start-page: 2257
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2270
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1035
  ident: CR31
  article-title: The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1522
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1532
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4415-6
– volume: 5
  start-page: 170
  year: 2005
  end-page: 179
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.257
– volume: 14
  start-page: 828
  year: 2005
  end-page: 832
  ident: CR34
  article-title: A concise follow-up of a previous report: posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0901-y
– volume: 16
  start-page: 182
  year: 2016
  end-page: 190
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion—a 5-year follow-up study
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026
– volume: 6
  start-page: 14
  year: 2011
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Surgical management of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis; a randomized controlled study of the surgical fixation with and without reduction
  publication-title: Scoliosis
  doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-14
– volume: 20
  start-page: 663
  year: 2011
  ident: 4810_CR14
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1934-z
– start-page: 1201
  volume-title: The textbook of spinal surgery
  year: 1997
  ident: 4810_CR1
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1711
  year: 2000
  ident: 4810_CR12
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00016
– volume: 5
  start-page: 13
  year: 2005
  ident: 4810_CR20
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
– volume: 52
  start-page: 151
  year: 2006
  ident: 4810_CR23
  publication-title: Kobe J Med Sci
– volume: 99
  start-page: 151
  year: 2003
  ident: 4810_CR35
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
  doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0151
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 4810_CR38
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
– volume: 16
  start-page: 182
  year: 2016
  ident: 4810_CR28
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026
– volume: 14
  start-page: 828
  year: 2005
  ident: 4810_CR34
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0901-y
– volume: 6
  start-page: 14
  year: 2011
  ident: 4810_CR24
  publication-title: Scoliosis
  doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-14
– volume: 23
  start-page: 172
  year: 2014
  ident: 4810_CR26
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2858-6
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2013
  ident: 4810_CR25
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.481
– volume: 22
  start-page: 21
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 4810_CR6
  publication-title: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
  doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-0993-0
– volume: 316
  start-page: 140
  year: 1998
  ident: 4810_CR22
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140
– volume: 5
  start-page: 170
  year: 2005
  ident: 4810_CR15
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.257
– volume: 133
  start-page: 1639
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: 4810_CR16
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1857-8
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1277
  year: 2011
  ident: 4810_CR21
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
– ident: 4810_CR18
– volume: 24
  start-page: 441
  year: 2014
  ident: 4810_CR37
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3041-5
– volume: 90
  start-page: 580
  year: 2016
  ident: 4810_CR29
  publication-title: World Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.033
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2359
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 4810_CR8
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4177-6
– volume: 5
  start-page: 36
  year: 2005
  ident: 4810_CR11
  publication-title: SPINE J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.249
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2351
  year: 2009
  ident: 4810_CR33
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a829
– volume: 14
  start-page: 245
  year: 2013
  ident: 4810_CR2
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-245
– volume: 96
  start-page: 53
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 4810_CR5
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01012
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2700
  year: 2009
  ident: 4810_CR17
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
– volume: 81
  start-page: 240
  year: 1999
  ident: 4810_CR30
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.9302
– volume: 13
  start-page: 39
  year: 1931
  ident: 4810_CR4
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg
– volume: 71
  start-page: 83
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 4810_CR36
  publication-title: Acta Orthop Belg
– volume: 356
  start-page: 2257
  year: 2007
  ident: 4810_CR13
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302
– volume: 32
  start-page: S126
  year: 2007
  ident: 4810_CR9
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145b353
– volume: 15
  start-page: 391
  year: 2006
  ident: 4810_CR10
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1021-4
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1522
  year: 2016
  ident: 4810_CR19
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4415-6
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2003
  ident: 4810_CR31
  publication-title: Spine
– volume: 99
  start-page: 155
  year: 2013
  ident: 4810_CR32
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009
– volume: 13
  start-page: 394
  year: 2010
  ident: 4810_CR27
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine
  doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09560
– ident: 4810_CR3
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-197606000-00003
– volume: 7
  start-page: 43
  year: 2016
  ident: 4810_CR7
  publication-title: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
  doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.176623
SSID ssj0015906
Score 2.288565
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We...
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. We performed a...
Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods We...
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis.PURPOSETo compare the...
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthrodesis in situ with arthrodesis after reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis. We performed a...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 606
SubjectTerms Blood Loss, Surgical
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Operative Time
Review Article
Spinal Fusion
Spondylolisthesis - surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Visual Analog Scale
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELag5cCltOKV0lZG4gSyiJ2HnVNVoVZFQhUHQHuL_ApdaZuUZLdVe-__ZsZ5QFWxF06xFDsZacbz8Iy_IeQduAiqENYwGVeOpUYVTFVaslxn1njFqywUyP74Is_O1GxWfB0O3LqhrHLUiUFRu8biGflHriToWhGn_PDyF8OuUZhdHVpoPCab2DYb5VzOpoALLHXorYkQcSyXvBizmnEAEc0UxtI5SxWootv7dumBs_kgURrsz8mz_6V8m2wNnic96kVlhzzy9XNy97mjLaK3In-oCXd7KJ6mUxCpc1Cuvpt3dF5T-NgqPFdt0JX0YqqboU1FF801-9lq5ymW3LqbRbMA-TnH1Yf0iPZ40bS_J0N17eiFX2oY9IgoL8j3k-Nvn07Z0JmBWTBmS4heUysR2g-cD-MLD0Fbwm1hrLA2dpnhWoAbZovMmyw1QgurubUmFw7GXMfJS7JRN7V_jaVViTJJxn1m81RWleHWISaNU-DrydxHJB75UtoBthy7ZyzKCXA5sLLEUjVkZXkbkffTksses2Pd5L2Ra-WwfbvyD8si8nZ6DRsPsym69s0K5yRgKCBak-vmSKlS8KhVRF71gjRRhC1OBPwlIh9GyfqLgH-Ru7ue3DfkqUC_IxTJ7ZGNZbvy--SJvVrOu_Yg7I7foSAWrw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Is reduction better than arthrodesis in situ in surgical management of low-grade spondylolisthesis? A system review and meta analysis
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-016-4810-z
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832362
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1873622041
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1839117687
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1877845338
Volume 26
WOSCitedRecordID wos000396042000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1432-0932
  dateEnd: 20171231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015906
  issn: 0940-6719
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1432-0932
  dateEnd: 20171231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015906
  issn: 0940-6719
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1432-0932
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015906
  issn: 0940-6719
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9UwFD-4TWQvzs9ZNy8RfFIKTds06ZNM2VDQy_Bj3LeSpKm7cNcrba_C3v2_PSf9QJkO9KUNNGlDcnI-es75HYBnqCKoPLYmlFFVhqlReagqLcNMC2uc4pXwAbJn7-R8rhaL_HTI427HaPfRJek59ZTsRhXwyPrNwlQh87jcgh1BYDNkon88m1wHIvcFNQkXLswkz0dX5p9e8bswuqJhXvGOeqFzsvdf070Dtwcdkx31RHEXbrj6Htx6P3jR78OPty1rCLKVNoUZn9DD6Bc6Qzo6R47q2mXLljVrl93G3zeNZ5DsYgqWYeuKrdbfwy-NLh2jONsSTf8VEs05jX7JjlgPEs365Bim65JduE5jo4dBeQCfT44_vX4TDuUYQosSrEOTNbWS8PxQ4zAud2ipJdzmxsbWRqUwXMeoe9lcOCNSE-vYam6tyeIS21xHyUPYrte1e0TxVIkyieBO2CyVVWW4LQmIplSo4MnMBRCN-1LYAaucSmasigll2S9vQfFptLzFZQDPpyFfe6CO6zofjptdDGe2LbiSKM3jKOUBPJ0e42kjF4qu3XpDfRKUDmiiyev6SKlSVKNVAPs9IU0zoromMX4lgBcj1fwygb9N9_E_9T6A3Zh0Dx8odwjbXbNxT-Cm_dYt22YGW3Ih_VXNYOfV8fz0w8wfoJ9hsxO1
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELbKFgkuPMQrUMBIcAFFJE4cOwdUFWjVVZdVhQrqLdiOQ1faJiXZpWrv_B1-IzPOA1DF3nrglEhxkknyeR6Z8TeEPAcXQabMaF8ERe7HWqa-LJTwE8WNtjIsuCuQ_TwR06k8PEz318jPfi0MllX2OtEp6rwy-I_8dSgF6FoWxOHmyTcfu0ZhdrVvodHCYs-enULI1rwZv4fv-4Kxne2Dd7t-11XAN6CIFxB5xUYgLR0YTm1TCwFHFJpUG2ZMkHMdKgYuhEm51TzWTDGjQmN0wnLYD1UQwXWvkPU4ihM-Iutvt6f7H4e8BU9dN08kpfMTEaZ9HjVwtKVcYvSe-LEE5Xf-tyW84N5eSM06i7dz8397V7fIjc63plvtZLhN1mx5h_wYN7RGflpEINVu9RLFfAGFSXME5sM2s4bOSgrCL912WTtrQI-HyiBaFXRenfpfa5VbikXF-dm8msMMOcKzN-kWbRmxabsSiKoyp8d2oWCn5Xy5Sz5dypPfI6OyKu0DLB6LpI54aLlJYlEUOjQ5su7kErxZkViPBD0OMtMRs2N_kHk2UEo76GRYjIfQyc498nI45aRlJVk1eKNHSdYpqCb7DRGPPBsOg2rBfJEqbbXEMRGYQohHxaoxQsgYYgbpkfstcAeJsIkLg7t45FWP5D8E-Je4D1eL-5Rc2z34MMkm4-neI3KdoZflSgI3yGhRL-1jctV8X8ya-kk3Nyn5ctkQ_wVVWnTU
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELbKFiEuBQSUlAJGggvIauxNYueAqkK7YtVqtUKAegu249CVtklJdqnaO3-KX8dMXoAq9tYDp0SKk0ySz_PIjL8h5AW4CCoW1jDpZykLjIqZyrRkkQ6tcYpnYV0g-_lITibq-DierpGf3VoYLKvsdGKtqNPC4j_yHa4k6FrhB3wna8sipvuj3bNvDDtIYaa1a6fRQOTQXZxD-Fa9Ge_Dt34pxOjg47v3rO0wwCwo5QVEYYGVSFEHRtS42EHwMeQ2NlZY66eh4VqAO2Hj0JkwMEILq7m1JhIp7HPtD-G6N8i6HELQMyDrbw8m0w99DiOM686eSFDHIsnjLqfq1xSmocJIPmKBAkV4-bdVvOLqXknT1tZvdOd_fm93yUbrc9O9ZpLcI2suv09-jCtaIm8tIpOaelUTxTwChcl0AmbFVbOKznIKwi_r7bKsrQQ97SuGaJHReXHOvpY6dRSLjdOLeTGHmXOCZ-_SPdowZdNmhRDVeUpP3ULDTsMF84B8upYnf0gGeZG7R1hUNlRmGHIX2iiQWWa4TZGNJ1Xg5crIecTvMJHYlrAd-4bMk55quoZRgkV6CKPk0iOv-lPOGraSVYO3O8QkreKqkt9w8cjz_jCoHMwj6dwVSxwDeOcQp8pVY6RUAcQSyiObDYh7ibC5i4C7eOR1h-o_BPiXuFurxX1GbgGuk6Px5PAxuS3Q-aorBbfJYFEu3RNy035fzKryaTtNKfly3Qj_BQcLfZc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is+reduction+better+than+arthrodesis+in+situ+in+surgical+management+of+low-grade+spondylolisthesis%3F+A+system+review+and+meta+analysis&rft.jtitle=European+spine+journal&rft.au=Bai%2C+Xuedong&rft.au=Chen%2C+Jiahai&rft.au=Liu%2C+Liyang&rft.au=Li%2C+Xiaochuan&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00586-016-4810-z&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00586_016_4810_z
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0940-6719&client=summon