Surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures: A register-based study in Finland between 1987 and 2009

Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whethe...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Injury Ročník 43; číslo 10; s. 1704 - 1708
Hlavní autoři: Huttunen, Tuomas T., Kannus, Pekka, Lepola, Vesa, Pihlajamäki, Harri, Mattila, Ville M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2012
Témata:
ISSN:0020-1383, 1879-0267, 1879-0267
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used. The study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry. During the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. A marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987–2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.
AbstractList Summary Introduction Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used. Patients and methods The study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry. Results During the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. Conclusions A marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987–2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.
Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used.INTRODUCTIONHumeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used.The study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry.During the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures.RESULTSDuring the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures.A marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987-2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.CONCLUSIONSA marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987-2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.
Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used. The study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry. During the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. A marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987–2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.
Author Huttunen, Tuomas T.
Pihlajamäki, Harri
Kannus, Pekka
Mattila, Ville M.
Lepola, Vesa
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tuomas T.
  surname: Huttunen
  fullname: Huttunen, Tuomas T.
  email: tuomas.huttunen@uta.fi
  organization: Department of Anesthesia, Valkeakoski Regional Hospital, Valkeakoski, Finland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pekka
  surname: Kannus
  fullname: Kannus, Pekka
  organization: Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Vesa
  surname: Lepola
  fullname: Lepola, Vesa
  organization: Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Harri
  surname: Pihlajamäki
  fullname: Pihlajamäki, Harri
  organization: Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ville M.
  surname: Mattila
  fullname: Mattila, Ville M.
  organization: Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22771121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVklFr1TAUx4NM3N30G4jk0Zdez0naph0ijOE2YeDD9Dmk6cmWa5vOJFXut7flTh8EGT4Fwv_3Tzi_c8KOwhSIsdcIWwSs3-22PuzmuN8KQLGFeguIz9gGG9UWIGp1xDYAAgqUjTxmJyntAFCBlC_YsRBKIQrcMHc7xztvzcBzJJNHCplPjt_PI0UzFOneuMxdNDbPkdIZP-eR7nzKFIvOJOp5ynO_5z7wSx8GE3reUf5JFDi2jeLrhQBoX7LnzgyJXj2ep-zr5ccvF9fFzeerTxfnN4UtFeTCda4nrJqyqTowpaxUa9tOtXVbk2lFi9KCBCdK0WMpCMFgVYNwqnJGOYPylL099D7E6ftMKevRJ0vD8jOa5qQRZFUJtfQt0TeP0bkbqdcP0Y8m7vXv2SyB8hCwcUopkvsTQdCrAr3TBwV6VaCh1ouCBTv7C7M-m-ynkKPxw1PwhwNMy5B-eIo6WU_BUu8j2az7yf9vgR18WAV_oz2l3TTHsAjQqNPC6Nt1RdYNwcWSkHIteP_vgqff_wXfssur
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2021_04_025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10195_017_0459_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_BCO_0000000000000802
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_15_98
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00776_013_0497_8
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_66936
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_016_2578_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11678_024_00820_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2024_07_048
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000002808
crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_104B1_BJJ_2021_0987_R1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2024_02_020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_013_1768_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_15_128
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2013_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2016_014076
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rboe_2017_03_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_017_1987_8
crossref_primary_10_1177_2309499019839608
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11552_014_9703_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0020_1383_13_70191_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2022_10_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbo_2017_03_018
crossref_primary_10_1177_1758573218825477
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_51009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2013_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000003286
crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOS_D_18_00142
crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_102B11_BJJ_2020_0993_R1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2015_07_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2024_08_027
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_13_261
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2022_02_033
crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOS_D_22_00432
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_023_04836_8
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c
10.1097/01.bot.0000246466.01287.04
10.5435/00124635-199901000-00007
10.1097/00005131-200003000-00002
10.3109/17453671003635884
10.1302/0301-620X.82B3.9675
10.2106/00004623-200004000-00003
10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
10.2106/00004623-198870040-00018
10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.004
10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8
10.1016/j.hcl.2007.11.004
10.1097/00005131-199905000-00006
10.1097/TA.0b013e3182231af9
10.1097/TA.0b013e318215bedd
10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82
10.1097/00005373-199308000-00009
10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.8113
10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.007
10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00614-7
10.1067/mse.2002.121634
10.1007/s00264-009-0813-2
10.1177/230949900901700202
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1879-0267
EndPage 1708
ExternalDocumentID 22771121
10_1016_j_injury_2012_06_011
S0020138312002331
1_s2_0_S0020138312002331
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Finland
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Finland
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29I
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEE
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
KQ8
L7B
M29
M31
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF~
OR-
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UV1
WUQ
X7M
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~02
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
LCYCR
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
AGCQF
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-fbfde158485b0a43579c9b79696ea92913c030f242d142e10a15602f75fa7fa13
ISICitedReferencesCount 41
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000309386200014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0020-1383
1879-0267
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 12:36:35 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:33 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:12:03 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:02:59 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:24:20 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:30 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:39:14 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Humeral shaft
Surgical treatment
Epidemiology
Humeral fractures
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-fbfde158485b0a43579c9b79696ea92913c030f242d142e10a15602f75fa7fa13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 22771121
PQID 1035527696
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1035527696
pubmed_primary_22771121
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2012_06_011
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_injury_2012_06_011
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_injury_2012_06_011
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0020138312002331
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_injury_2012_06_011
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Injury
PublicationTitleAlternate Injury
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Singisetti, Ambedkar (bib0090) 2010; 34
Mattila, Huttunen, Sillanpaa, Niemi, Pihlajamaki, Kannus (bib0125) 2011; 71
van Staa, Dennison, Leufkens, Cooper (bib0010) 2001; 29
Chapman, Henley, Agel, Benca (bib0070) 2000; 14
Mattila, Sillanpaa, Iivonen, Parkkari, Kannus, Pihlajamaki (bib0120) 2008; 39
Ring, Chin, Taghinia, Jupiter (bib0050) 2007; 62
Koch, Gross, Gerber (bib0030) 2002; 11
Lovald, Mercer, Hanson (bib0095) 2011; 70
McCormack, Brien, Buckley, McKee, Powell, Schemitsch (bib0080) 2000; 82
Rutgers, Ring (bib0065) 2006; 20
Papasoulis, Drosos, Ververidis, Verettas (bib0040) 2010; 41
Salmela, Koistinen (bib0110) 1987; 49
Sarmiento, Zagorski, Zych, Latta, Capps (bib0025) 2000; 82
Farragos, Schemitsch, McKee (bib0075) 1999; 13
Tytherleigh-Strong, Walls, McQueen (bib0015) 1998; 80
Cole, Wijdicks (bib0055) 2007; 23
Heineman, Poolman, Nork, Ponsen, Bhandari (bib0105) 2010; 81
Sarmiento, Latta (bib0020) 1999; 7
Court-Brown, Caesar (bib0005) 2006; 37
Keskimäki, Aro (bib0115) 1991; 2
Heim, Herkert, Hess, Regazzoni (bib0130) 1993; 35
Putti, Uppin, Putti (bib0085) 2009; 17
Ekholm, Tidermark, Tornkvist, Adami, Ponzer (bib0035) 2006; 20
Zagorski, Latta, Zych, Finnieston (bib0045) 1988; 70
Kurup, Hossain, Andrew (bib0100) 2011; 6
Toivanen, Nieminen, Laine, Honkonen, Jarvinen (bib0060) 2005; 29
Putti (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0085) 2009; 17
Tytherleigh-Strong (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0015) 1998; 80
Ring (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0050) 2007; 62
Lovald (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0095) 2011; 70
Keskimäki (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0115) 1991; 2
van Staa (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0010) 2001; 29
Toivanen (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0060) 2005; 29
Singisetti (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0090) 2010; 34
Zagorski (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0045) 1988; 70
Ekholm (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0035) 2006; 20
Sarmiento (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0020) 1999; 7
Sarmiento (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0025) 2000; 82
Heineman (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0105) 2010; 81
Cole (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0055) 2007; 23
Mattila (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0125) 2011; 71
Kurup (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0100) 2011; 6
Mattila (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0120) 2008; 39
Heim (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0130) 1993; 35
Papasoulis (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0040) 2010; 41
Salmela (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0110) 1987; 49
Koch (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0030) 2002; 11
Court-Brown (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0005) 2006; 37
Rutgers (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0065) 2006; 20
Farragos (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0075) 1999; 13
Chapman (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0070) 2000; 14
McCormack (10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0080) 2000; 82
References_xml – volume: 82
  start-page: 478
  year: 2000
  end-page: 486
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume
– volume: 49
  start-page: 480
  year: 1987
  end-page: 482
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Is the discharge register of general hospitals complete and reliable?
  publication-title: Sairaala
– volume: 70
  start-page: 607
  year: 1988
  end-page: 610
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treatment with prefabricated braces
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume
– volume: 20
  start-page: 591
  year: 2006
  end-page: 596
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
– volume: 37
  start-page: 691
  year: 2006
  end-page: 697
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review
  publication-title: Injury
– volume: 20
  start-page: 597
  year: 2006
  end-page: 601
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
– volume: 23
  start-page: 437
  year: 2007
  end-page: 448
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Hand Clinics
– volume: 29
  start-page: 10
  year: 2005
  end-page: 13
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: International Orthopaedics
– volume: 80
  start-page: 249
  year: 1998
  end-page: 253
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume
– volume: 35
  start-page: 226
  year: 1993
  end-page: 232
  ident: bib0130
  article-title: Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures – the Basel experience
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
– volume: 71
  start-page: 939
  year: 2011
  end-page: 942
  ident: bib0125
  article-title: Significant change in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2008 in Finland
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1157
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1158
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
– volume: 81
  start-page: 216
  year: 2010
  end-page: 223
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Acta Orthopaedica
– volume: 34
  start-page: 571
  year: 2010
  end-page: 576
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study
  publication-title: International Orthopaedics
– volume: 82
  start-page: 336
  year: 2000
  end-page: 339
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume
– volume: 41
  start-page: e21
  year: 2010
  end-page: e27
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies
  publication-title: Injury
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1277
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
– volume: 14
  start-page: 162
  year: 2000
  end-page: 166
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
– volume: 6
  start-page: CD005959
  year: 2011
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
  publication-title: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
– volume: 29
  start-page: 517
  year: 2001
  end-page: 522
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales
  publication-title: Bone
– volume: 2
  start-page: 15
  year: 1991
  end-page: 21
  ident: bib0115
  article-title: Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register
  publication-title: International Journal of Health Sciences
– volume: 11
  start-page: 143
  year: 2002
  end-page: 150
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [et al]
– volume: 17
  start-page: 139
  year: 2009
  end-page: 141
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong)
– volume: 7
  start-page: 66
  year: 1999
  end-page: 75
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Functional fracture bracing
  publication-title: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
– volume: 13
  start-page: 258
  year: 1999
  end-page: 267
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Complications of intramedullary nailing for fractures of the humeral shaft: a review
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1373
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1376
  ident: bib0120
  article-title: Coverage and accuracy of diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register
  publication-title: Injury
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1157
  issue: May (5)
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0050
  article-title: Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c
– volume: 20
  start-page: 591
  issue: October (9)
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0035
  article-title: Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246466.01287.04
– volume: 7
  start-page: 66
  issue: January (1)
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0020
  article-title: Functional fracture bracing
  publication-title: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  doi: 10.5435/00124635-199901000-00007
– volume: 14
  start-page: 162
  issue: March–April (3)
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0070
  article-title: Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005131-200003000-00002
– volume: 81
  start-page: 216
  issue: April (2)
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0105
  article-title: Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Acta Orthopaedica
  doi: 10.3109/17453671003635884
– volume: 82
  start-page: 336
  issue: April (3)
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0080
  article-title: Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.82B3.9675
– volume: 82
  start-page: 478
  issue: April (4)
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0025
  article-title: Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00003
– volume: 37
  start-page: 691
  issue: August (8)
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0005
  article-title: Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
– volume: 70
  start-page: 607
  issue: April (4)
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0045
  article-title: Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treatment with prefabricated braces
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870040-00018
– volume: 41
  start-page: e21
  issue: July (7)
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0040
  article-title: Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.004
– volume: 29
  start-page: 10
  issue: February (1)
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0060
  article-title: Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: International Orthopaedics
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8
– volume: 23
  start-page: 437
  issue: November (4)
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0055
  article-title: The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Hand Clinics
  doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.11.004
– volume: 13
  start-page: 258
  issue: May (4)
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0075
  article-title: Complications of intramedullary nailing for fractures of the humeral shaft: a review
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005131-199905000-00006
– volume: 71
  start-page: 939
  issue: October (4)
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0125
  article-title: Significant change in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2008 in Finland
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182231af9
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1273
  issue: May (5)
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0095
  article-title: Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318215bedd
– volume: 2
  start-page: 15
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0115
  article-title: Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register
  publication-title: International Journal of Health Sciences
– volume: 20
  start-page: 597
  issue: October (9)
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0065
  article-title: Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82
– volume: 35
  start-page: 226
  issue: August (2)
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0130
  article-title: Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures – the Basel experience
  publication-title: The Journal of Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005373-199308000-00009
– volume: 80
  start-page: 249
  issue: March (2)
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0015
  article-title: The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: British Volume
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.8113
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1373
  issue: December (12)
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0120
  article-title: Coverage and accuracy of diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.007
– volume: 29
  start-page: 517
  issue: December (6)
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0010
  article-title: Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00614-7
– volume: 11
  start-page: 143
  issue: March–April (2)
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0030
  article-title: The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [et al]
  doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.121634
– volume: 6
  start-page: CD005959
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0100
  article-title: Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
  publication-title: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
– volume: 49
  start-page: 480
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0110
  article-title: Is the discharge register of general hospitals complete and reliable?
  publication-title: Sairaala
– volume: 34
  start-page: 571
  issue: April (4)
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0090
  article-title: Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study
  publication-title: International Orthopaedics
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0813-2
– volume: 17
  start-page: 139
  issue: August (2)
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011_bib0085
  article-title: Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures
  publication-title: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong)
  doi: 10.1177/230949900901700202
SSID ssj0017033
Score 2.2182238
Snippet Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical...
Summary Introduction Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1704
SubjectTerms Adult
Age Distribution
Bone Plates - statistics & numerical data
Epidemiology
Female
Finland - epidemiology
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Internal - statistics & numerical data
Fracture Healing
Humans
Humeral fractures
Humeral Fractures - epidemiology
Humeral Fractures - surgery
Humeral shaft
Incidence
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Registries
Sex Distribution
Surgical treatment
Title Surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures: A register-based study in Finland between 1987 and 2009
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0020138312002331
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0020138312002331
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22771121
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1035527696
Volume 43
WOSCitedRecordID wos000309386200014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1879-0267
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017033
  issn: 0020-1383
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pa9swFBZpu8MuY2O_sm5Fg92KwLJsy-6tjJZ2K6WwbOQmZEeiSVMn-EfpeX_53rNsJ6EL7Q67mCBbMfb7_PRJ-t57hHyRPJA6iThLpQkZeD_BEj-OmEijOAgyL7Jpk13_Ql5exuNxcjUY_O5iYe7mMs_j-_tk-V9NDW1gbAyd_Qdz938KDfAbjA5HMDscn2T4H3XhvNlKQ46EsG5Wn1h5rW11aDE2qi6cHk4fYnUGTJjAcEybuJSzuBByOs1R-NiLuXDpoNltwM2OdVp7ns_qlZ74rK6qOnf-bFSjAGklxf6OocmuOIC5uenHhAuYB8wbHvvLlH3r1fR6rmcAWdzND9oC27ooputrFdzvVW8w1Dj_GsuEYdGrdQfs8jR1QPPW3CmXrjbxAz_vlhxmMDnBx0OFnt-kYXWOe83Ky9vGzL4vJTBLvhr1ei1id2qH7PkyTMAz7h2fn4y_9XtR4BNFF3TZKAMf3hRTSrd_s43fbJu_NDxm9JK8aCcg9NgB5xUZmPw1sR1oaA8aurB0AzS0B80R1XQTMrSBDJ3mtIUMbSFDETIUGxAyb8jP05PR1zPWVuBgWSC9itnUTgwHjhqHqaeBWcskS1KJGZWMBmLNRQaDhAWaN-GBb7inMTDftzK0WlrNxVuymy9y855QkwY2CTNg_DoJIuHpMEojoaFblOooyYZEdO9NZW16eqySMledDnGm3ItX-OIVyjE5HxLW91q69CyPXB92JlFd6DEMlgpw9Ug_-bd-pmw__FJxVcLFCsUPuPkvOKqfhNjo2ZJaR1afcM_PHWYU-HzcyNO5WdRwL09g4kSwwpC8c2Dqn77D4YetZ_bJ89W3-ZHsVkVtPpFn2V01LYsDsiPH8UH7DfwBVm3OQw
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical+treatment+of+humeral-shaft+fractures%3A+a+register-based+study+in+Finland+between+1987+and+2009&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Huttunen%2C+Tuomas+T&rft.au=Kannus%2C+Pekka&rft.au=Lepola%2C+Vesa&rft.au=Pihlajam%C3%A4ki%2C+Harri&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.injury.2012.06.011&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22771121&rft.externalDocID=22771121
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00201383%2FS0020138312X00093%2Fcov150h.gif