Cognitive impairment in the population-based ural very old study
Background: Despite its marked importance in public health, the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) and its associated factors have only rarely been examined in old populations in general or in Russia at all. Objective: To assess CI prevalence and its determinants in a very elderly population in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in aging neuroscience Jg. 14; S. 912755 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Lausanne
Frontiers Research Foundation
19.07.2022
Frontiers Media S.A |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1663-4365, 1663-4365 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Background: Despite its marked importance in public health, the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) and its associated factors have only rarely been examined in old populations in general or in Russia at all. Objective: To assess CI prevalence and its determinants in a very elderly population in Russia. Methods: The population-based Ural Very Old Study, conducted in rural and urban region in Bashkortostan/Russia, included 1526 (81.1%) out of 1882 eligible individuals aged 85+ years. A series of medical examinations including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the assessment of CI was performed. Results: MMSE data were available for 1442 (94.5%) individuals (mean age:88.3±2.9 years; range:85-103 years). The median MMSE score was 24 (interquartile range:19, 27). Prevalence of any CI (MMSE score <24 points) was 701/1442 (48.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 46.0, 51.2). Prevalence of mild, moderate and severe CI (MMSE score 19-23 points,10-18 points, and ≤9 points,respectively) was 357/1442 (24.8%; 95%CI: 22.5, 27.0), 246/1442 (17.1%; 95%CI: 15.1, 19.0), and 98/1442 (6.8%; 95%CI: 5.5, 8.1), resp.. A lower MMSE score correlated (regression coefficient r2:0.31) with older age (beta:-0.13; P<0.001), rural region of habitation (beta:0.15; P<0.001), lower level of education (beta:0.19; P<0.001), higher depression score (beta:-0.33; P<0.001) (or alternatively, higher prevalence of hearing loss (beta:-0.10; P=0.001), worse visual acuity (beta:-0.10; P=0.001), and lower physical activity (beta:0.06; P=0.04). Conclusions: In this elderly study population from rural and urban Russia, prevalence of any, mild, moderate and severe CI was 48.6%, 24.8%, 17.1%, and 6.8%, resp.. Besides medical and lifestyle factors, vision and hearing impairment were major factors associated with CI. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias, a section of the journal Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Edited by: Carol Brayne, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Reviewed by: James C. Vickers, University of Tasmania, Australia; Maria Skaalum Petersen, University of the Faroe Islands, Faroe Islands; Lei Feng, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Leon Flicker, University of Western Australia, Australia |
| ISSN: | 1663-4365 1663-4365 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fnagi.2022.912755 |