Analyzing community structure subject to incomplete sampling hierarchical community model vs. canonical ordinations
Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) Jg. 100; H. 8; S. 1 - 14 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
John Wiley and Sons, Inc
01.08.2019
Ecological Society of America |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0012-9658, 1939-9170, 1939-9170 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of “expected” (mean) abundance (λ̂ij) and realized abundance (N̂ij : direct estimate of site- and species-specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that N̂ij yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while λ̂ij yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of N̂ij followed by λ̂ij, percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on λ̂ij rather than N̂ij clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of "expected" (mean) abundance ( λ^ij ) and realized abundance ( N^ij : direct estimate of site- and species-specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that N^ij yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while λ^ij yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of N^ij followed by λ^ij , percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on λ^ij rather than N^ij clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations.Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of "expected" (mean) abundance ( λ^ij ) and realized abundance ( N^ij : direct estimate of site- and species-specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that N^ij yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while λ^ij yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of N^ij followed by λ^ij , percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on λ^ij rather than N^ij clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of “expected” (mean) abundance (λ^ij) and realized abundance (N^ij: direct estimate of site‐ and species‐specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that N^ij yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while λ^ij yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of N^ij followed by λ^ij, percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on λ^ij rather than N^ij clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of "expected" (mean) abundance ( ) and realized abundance ( : direct estimate of site- and species-specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of followed by , percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on rather than clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of “expected” (mean) abundance (λ̂ij) and realized abundance (N̂ij : direct estimate of site- and species-specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that N̂ij yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while λ̂ij yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA. Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of N̂ij followed by λ̂ij, percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on λ̂ij rather than N̂ij clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCMs and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA. However, since HCMs provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCMs would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. Recently developing hierarchical community models ( HCM s) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization. However, pros and cons of incorporating incomplete sampling in the analysis and related design issues remain unknown. In this study, we compared HCM and canonical redundancy analysis ( RDA ) carried out with 10 different dissimilarity coefficients to evaluate how each approach restores true community abundance data sampled with imperfect detection. We conducted simulation experiments with varying numbers of sampling sites, visits, mean detectability and mean abundance. Performance of HCM was measured by estimates of “expected” (mean) abundance () and realized abundance (: direct estimate of site‐ and species‐specific abundance). We also compared HCM and different types of RDA (normal, partial, and weighted), all performed with the same ten different dissimilarity coefficients, with unequal number of visits to sampling sites. In addition, we applied the models to a virtual survey carried out on the Barro Colorado Island tree plot data for which we know true community abundance. Simulation experiments showed that yielded by HCM best restored the underlying abundance of constituent species among 12 abundance estimates by HCM and RDA regardless if the sampling was equal or unequal. Mean abundance predominantly affected the performance of HCM and RDA while yielded by HCM had comparable performance to percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity coefficients of RDA . Relative performance of RDA types depended on the combination of dissimilarity coefficients and the distribution of sampling effort. Best performance of followed by , percentage difference and Gower dissimilarity were also observed for the analysis of tree plot data, and graphical plots (triplots) based on rather than clearly separated the effects of two environmental covariates on the abundance of constituent species. Under our conditions of model evaluation and the method, we concluded that, in terms of assessing the environmental dependence of abundance, HCM s and RDA can have comparable performance if we can choose appropriate dissimilarity coefficients for RDA . However, since HCM s provide straightforward biological interpretations of parameter estimates and flexibility of the analysis, HCM s would be useful in many situations as well as conventional canonical ordinations. |
| Author | Yamaura, Yuichi Blanchet, F. Guillaume Higa, Motoki |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yuichi surname: Yamaura fullname: Yamaura, Yuichi – sequence: 2 givenname: F. Guillaume surname: Blanchet fullname: Blanchet, F. Guillaume – sequence: 3 givenname: Motoki surname: Higa fullname: Higa, Motoki |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqF0c1LHDEUAPBQFF1tof9AZaCXXmbNSzL5AC-y2CoIXuyhp5DJZkqWmck2yVCmf32z7KpQKuaSEH7v8T7O0NEYRofQR8BLwJhcOjsviWjUO7QARVWtQOAjtMAYSK14I0_RWUobXA4weYJOKQAFKcUCXV2Ppp__-PFnZcMwTKPPc5VynGyeoqvS1G6czVUOlR8L2PYul19THiXkPTruTJ_ch8N9jr5_vXlc3db3D9_uVtf3tWUCl2o612LFTMuFNdSIDtOWY0q5YcxhLJVt2VoyS6gD0bGGFUxMw9fQSWIVpefoyz7vNoZfk0tZDz5Z1_dmdGFKmlDBgCvK4W1KKAGQRMpCP_9DN2GKZRw7xQUVhJCmqIuDmtrBrfU2-sHEWT-NsIDlHtgYUoqu09Znk30YczS-14D1bke67EjvdvRS4nPAU87_0HpPf_veza86fbP6cfCf9n6TcojPvnTDVAOc_gXwWKcE |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107390 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0312849 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119073 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2024_107515 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_6059 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_021_04954_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2024_105316 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_024_00563_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13234797 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1002/eap.1845 10.1111/ecog.02445 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 10.1111/2041-210X.12843 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.007 10.2307/3235676 10.1111/biom.12734 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/oik.02838 10.1111/1365-2745.12021 10.1126/science.283.5401.554 10.1016/B978-0-444-53868-0.50018-6 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01922.x 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00127.x 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1185:SDPDFS]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/2041-210X.12502 10.1111/2041-210X.12552 10.1007/s11284-016-1340-4 10.1111/2041-210X.12501 10.2326/osj.12.73 10.1890/ES12-00116.1 10.1007/BF00141781 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890316.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x 10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.002 10.1890/13-0648.1 10.1111/2041-210X.12856 10.1111/ele.12141 10.1111/2041-210X.12518 10.1111/ddi.12255 10.1007/s13253-017-0304-7 10.1002/ece3.2244 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.009 10.4319/lo.1998.43.7.1403 10.1890/03-0178 10.2307/1937249 10.2307/2937074 10.1007/s10531-012-0244-z 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.x 10.2307/1938672 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/2041-210X.12386 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[842:ESRAAB]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/2041-210X.12236 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007 10.1214/ss/1177011136 10.1111/ele.12757 10.1002/ecs2.2028 10.1007/s004420100716 10.2307/2347998 10.1890/10-1251.1 10.1016/j.tree.2013.10.012 10.1111/2041-210X.12723 10.32614/CRAN.package.jagsUI 10.1007/978-3-662-03664-8 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2019 by the Ecological Society of America 2019 by the Ecological Society of America. 2019 Ecological Society of America |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 by the Ecological Society of America – notice: 2019 by the Ecological Society of America. – notice: 2019 Ecological Society of America |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.2759 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA MEDLINE CrossRef Entomology Abstracts |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Ecology Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 1939-9170 |
| EndPage | 14 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 31131887 10_1002_ecy_2759 ECY2759 26749516 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Colorado |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Colorado |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X 0R~ 1OB 1OC 2AX 33P 4.4 5GY 85S AAESR AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAIHA AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABAWQ ABBHK ABCUV ABEFU ABGFU ABJNI ABLJU ABPFR ABPLY ABPPZ ABPQH ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHIC ACHJO ACKOT ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSTJ ACUBG ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADMHG ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFFPM AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AGHNM AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIAGR AIDAL AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB AQVQM AZFZN AZVAB BENPR BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BRXPI CBGCD CS3 CUYZI D0L DCZOG DEVKO DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD F5P HF~ HGLYW IAO IEA IGH IGS IOF IPO IPSME JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST LATKE LEEKS LITHE LOXES LU7 LUTES LYRES MEWTI MV1 MW2 N9A NHB NXSMM O9- OK1 P2P P2W PALCI ROL RSZ RWL RXW SA0 SJN SUPJJ TAE TN5 U5U UHB UKR V62 WBKPD WH7 WOHZO WXSBR XSW YR2 YV5 YYM YZZ Z0I ZCA ZO4 ZZTAW ~02 ~KM .-4 0VX 29G 2KS 3V. 42X 53G 692 6TJ 7X2 7X7 7XC 88A 88E 88I 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 8WZ A.K A6W AAFWJ AAHHS ABDQB ABRJW ABUWG ABYAD ACCFJ ACKIV ACTWD ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AEUYN AFKRA AFQQW AGNAY AIWBW AJBDE AS~ ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BCR BCU BEC BES BHPHI BKSAR BLC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU D1J DDYGU DOOOF DWQXO E.L FVMVE FYUFA GNUQQ GTFYD GUQSH HCIFZ HGD HMCUK HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF IAG IEP ITC JSODD KQ8 LK8 M0K M0L M1P M2O M2P M7P MVM OMK PATMY PCBAR PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSQYO PYCSY Q2X QZG R05 RJQFR SAMSI SJFOW UBC UKHRP VOH VQA WHG WYJ XIH Y6R YXE YYP ZCG AAYXX ABUFD ADXHL AFFHD AIQQE CITATION LH4 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ YIN Z5M 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9feb094ab67ca3a7f03b60336a44e0089cb4d84c23e17f4540942a56d1f82c933 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 10 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000478103000021&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 17:16:04 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 12:45:46 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 06 17:56:33 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:31:24 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:24:14 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:26:22 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:39:36 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:17:09 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Keywords | N-mixture model sampling effort hierarchical community model (HCM) RV coefficient dissimilarity coefficient partial RDA correlation matrix triplot weighted RDA redundancy analysis (RDA) covariance matrix sampling design |
| Language | English |
| License | 2019 by the Ecological Society of America. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4709-9feb094ab67ca3a7f03b60336a44e0089cb4d84c23e17f4540942a56d1f82c933 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 31131887 |
| PQID | 2267372225 |
| PQPubID | 34868 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2374169361 proquest_miscellaneous_2232118288 proquest_journals_2267372225 pubmed_primary_31131887 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ecy_2759 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_2759 wiley_primary_10_1002_ecy_2759_ECY2759 jstor_primary_26749516 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | August 2019 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2019 text: August 2019 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Brooklyn |
| PublicationTitle | Ecology (Durham) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Ecology |
| PublicationYear | 2019 |
| Publisher | John Wiley and Sons, Inc Ecological Society of America |
| Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley and Sons, Inc – name: Ecological Society of America |
| References | 2017; 40 2017; 8 2000; 89 2015; 30 2016b; 31 2016; 31 1999; 283 1999; 44 2014; 29 2011; 14 1998; 43 2016a; 6 1993; 3 2016a; 7 1992; 7 2018; 9 2010; 1 2013; 16 2002; 83 2013; 12 1982; 63 2019; 29 2018; 74 2003; 84 2016b; 7 2012; 21 1992; 3 2017; 20 2015; 6 2012 1986; 56 2017; 22 1982; 31 1999; 69 2013; 101 1998 2008 2005 1964; 26 2016; 125 2002 2014; 84 2001; 129 2010; 41 2018; 26 1957; 22 2016; 7 2012; 3 2006; 87 1986; 67 2011; 92 2015; 21 2017 2016 2015 2011; 48 2016a; 31 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_47_1 Rao C. R. (e_1_2_8_50_1) 1964; 26 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_49_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_66_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_64_1 e_1_2_8_62_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_60_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_59_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_57_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 Marchant R. (e_1_2_8_37_1) 1999; 44 e_1_2_8_53_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 Royle J. A. (e_1_2_8_51_1) 2008 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_67_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_65_1 e_1_2_8_63_1 Kéry M. (e_1_2_8_31_1) 2016 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_61_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_58_1 McCune B. (e_1_2_8_38_1) 2002 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_56_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_54_1 e_1_2_8_52_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 1 start-page: 118 year: 2010 end-page: 122 article-title: Do not log‐transform count data publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 31 start-page: 289 year: 2016b end-page: 305 article-title: Study of biological communities subject to imperfect detection: bias and precision of community ‐mixture abundance models in small‐sample situations publication-title: Ecological Research – volume: 8 start-page: 1408 year: 2017 end-page: 1414 article-title: The central role of mean‐variance relationships in the analysis of multivariate abundance data: a response to Roberts (2017) publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 8 start-page: e02028 year: 2017 article-title: Community distance sampling models allowing for imperfect detection and temporary emigration publication-title: Ecosphere – year: 2005 – volume: 21 start-page: 1365 year: 2012 end-page: 1380 article-title: Biodiversity of man‐made open habitats in an underused country: a class of multispecies abundance models for count data publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 43 start-page: 1403 year: 1998 end-page: 1409 article-title: How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? publication-title: Limnology and Oceanography – volume: 12 start-page: 73 year: 2013 end-page: 88 article-title: Confronting imperfect detection: behavior of binomial mixture models under varying circumstances of visits, sampling sites, detectability, and abundance, in small‐sample situations publication-title: Ornithological Science – volume: 41 start-page: 149 year: 2010 end-page: 172 article-title: Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics – volume: 31 start-page: 736 year: 2016 end-page: 737 article-title: Incorporating imperfect detection into joint models of communities: a response to Warton et al publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 7 start-page: 428 year: 2016b end-page: 436 article-title: Uncovering hidden spatial structure in species communities with spatially explicit joint species distribution models publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 3 start-page: 79 year: 2012 article-title: Seeing the forest and the trees: multilevel models reveal both species and community patterns publication-title: Ecosphere – year: 1998 – volume: 283 start-page: 554 year: 1999 end-page: 557 article-title: Light‐gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest publication-title: Science – volume: 6 start-page: 828 year: 2015 end-page: 835 article-title: For testing the significance of regression coefficients, go ahead and log‐transform count data publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 31 start-page: 737 year: 2016a end-page: 738 article-title: Extending joint models in community ecology: a response to Beissinger et al publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 22 start-page: 498 year: 2017 end-page: 522 article-title: Generalized linear latent variable models for multivariate count and biomass data in ecology publication-title: Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics – volume: 30 start-page: 766 year: 2015 end-page: 779 article-title: So many variables: joint modeling in community ecology publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 87 start-page: 842 year: 2006 end-page: 854 article-title: Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability publication-title: Ecology – volume: 84 start-page: 3078 year: 2003 end-page: 3089 article-title: Co‐inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables publication-title: Ecology – volume: 20 start-page: 561 year: 2017 end-page: 576 article-title: How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 129 start-page: 271 year: 2001 end-page: 280 article-title: Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 87 start-page: 2614 year: 2006 end-page: 2625 article-title: Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions publication-title: Ecology – year: 2008 – volume: 67 start-page: 1167 year: 1986 end-page: 1179 article-title: Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis publication-title: Ecology – volume: 101 start-page: 183 year: 2013 end-page: 191 article-title: Imperfect detection is the rule rather than the exception in plant distribution studies publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 3 start-page: 89 year: 2012 end-page: 101 article-title: Distance‐based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 3 start-page: 157 year: 1992 end-page: 164 article-title: Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 84 start-page: 491 year: 2014 end-page: 511 article-title: Consensus RDA across dissimilarity coefficients for canonical ordination of community composition data publication-title: Ecological Monographs – volume: 29 start-page: 97 year: 2014 end-page: 106 article-title: Detecting diversity: emerging methods to estimate species diversity publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 26 start-page: 329 year: 1964 end-page: 358 article-title: The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research publication-title: Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A – year: 2015 – volume: 7 start-page: 529 year: 2016 end-page: 537 article-title: A hierarchical distance sampling model to estimate abundance and covariate associations of species and communities publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 74 start-page: 369 year: 2018 end-page: 377 article-title: On the reliability of N‐mixture models for count data publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 48 start-page: 67 year: 2011 end-page: 75 article-title: Modelling community dynamics based on species‐level abundance models from detection/nondetection data publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 7 start-page: 549 year: 2016a end-page: 555 article-title: Using latent variable models to identify large networks of species‐to‐species associations at different spatial scales publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 26 start-page: 64 year: 2018 end-page: 70 article-title: The species richness/abundance–area relationship of bees in an early successional tree plantation publication-title: Basic and Applied Ecology – volume: 3 start-page: 197 year: 1993 end-page: 199 article-title: Real data are messy publication-title: Statistics and Computing – volume: 92 start-page: 289 year: 2011 end-page: 295 article-title: Making more out of sparse data: hierarchical modeling of species communities publication-title: Ecology – volume: 40 start-page: 281 year: 2017 end-page: 295 article-title: Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities publication-title: Ecography – volume: 6 start-page: 399 year: 2015 end-page: 411 article-title: Model‐based approaches to unconstrained ordination publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 69 start-page: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 24 article-title: Distance‐based redundancy analyses: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments publication-title: Ecological Monographs – volume: 63 start-page: 1121 year: 1982 end-page: 1133 article-title: Randomness, area, and species richness publication-title: Ecology – volume: 44 start-page: 1840 year: 1999 end-page: 1841 article-title: How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? A comment on the conclusions of Cao et al. publication-title: Limnology and Oceanography – volume: 22 start-page: 415 year: 1957 end-page: 427 article-title: Concluding remarks publication-title: Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology – volume: 6 start-page: 4836 year: 2016a end-page: 4848 article-title: Estimating species – area relationships by modeling abundance and frequency subject to incomplete sampling publication-title: Ecology and Evolution – volume: 21 start-page: 46 year: 2015 end-page: 54 article-title: Mapping large‐scale bird distributions using occupancy models and citizen data with spatially biased sampling effort publication-title: Diversity and Distributions – year: 2016 – volume: 16 start-page: 951 year: 2013 end-page: 963 article-title: Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 125 start-page: 975 year: 2016 end-page: 987 article-title: A new cost‐effective approach to survey ecological communities publication-title: Oikos – year: 2012 – volume: 8 start-page: 443 year: 2017 end-page: 452 article-title: Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species‐to‐species associations depend on the environmental context publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 29 start-page: e01845 year: 2019 article-title: Multispecies hierarchical modeling reveals variable responses of African carnivores to management alternatives publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 9 start-page: 340 year: 2018 end-page: 353 article-title: An efficient extension of N‐mixture models for multi‐species abundance estimation publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 56 start-page: 201 year: 1986 end-page: 220 article-title: Bird community dynamics in a temperate deciduous forest: long‐term trends at Hubbard Brook publication-title: Ecological Monographs – year: 2002 – volume: 7 start-page: 457 year: 1992 end-page: 472 article-title: Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences publication-title: Statistical Science – volume: 7 start-page: 882 year: 2016b end-page: 890 article-title: Three points to consider when choosing a LM or GLM test for count data publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 89 start-page: 564 year: 2000 end-page: 572 article-title: Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons publication-title: Oikos – volume: 14 start-page: 19 year: 2011 end-page: 28 article-title: Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 31 start-page: 244 year: 1982 end-page: 255 article-title: Procedures for reduced‐rank regression publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) – year: 2017 – volume: 83 start-page: 1185 year: 2002 end-page: 1198 article-title: Species diversity patterns derived from species‐area models publication-title: Ecology – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1002/eap.1845 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1111/ecog.02445 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 – ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12843 – ident: e_1_2_8_59_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.007 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.2307/3235676 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1111/biom.12734 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1111/oik.02838 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12021 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1126/science.283.5401.554 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53868-0.50018-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_61_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039 – ident: e_1_2_8_64_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01922.x – volume-title: Applied hierarchical modeling in ecology: analysis of distribution, abundance and species richness using R and BUGS. Volume 1. Prelude and static models year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_57_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00127.x – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1185:SDPDFS]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12502 – ident: e_1_2_8_60_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12552 – ident: e_1_2_8_67_1 doi: 10.1007/s11284-016-1340-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12501 – ident: e_1_2_8_62_1 doi: 10.2326/osj.12.73 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1890/ES12-00116.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00141781 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890316.x – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.002 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1890/13-0648.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 – volume-title: Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12856 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1111/ele.12141 – ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12518 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1111/ddi.12255 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1007/s13253-017-0304-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_66_1 doi: 10.1002/ece3.2244 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.009 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.4319/lo.1998.43.7.1403 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1890/03-0178 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.2307/1937249 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.2307/2937074 – ident: e_1_2_8_65_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0244-z – volume-title: Analysis of ecological communities year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.x – ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 doi: 10.2307/1938672 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12386 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[842:ESRAAB]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12236 – ident: e_1_2_8_58_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136 – volume: 26 start-page: 329 year: 1964 ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 article-title: The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research publication-title: Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.1111/ele.12757 – ident: e_1_2_8_63_1 doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2028 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1007/s004420100716 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.2307/2347998 – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1890/10-1251.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.10.012 – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12723 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.jagsUI – volume: 44 start-page: 1840 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 article-title: How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? A comment on the conclusions of Cao et al. publication-title: Limnology and Oceanography – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03664-8 |
| SSID | ssj0000148 |
| Score | 2.3589687 |
| Snippet | Recently developing hierarchical community models (HCMs) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization.... Recently developing hierarchical community models ( HCM s) accounting for incomplete sampling are promising approaches to understand community organization.... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley jstor |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Abundance Coefficients Colorado Communities Community structure Computer simulation Constituents correlation matrix covariance matrix Dependence dissimilarity coefficient Environmental assessment Estimates hierarchical community model (HCM) islands Mathematical models Models, Biological N‐mixture model Parameter estimation partial RDA Redundancy redundancy analysis (RDA) RV coefficient Sampling sampling design sampling effort Species surveys trees triplot weighted RDA |
| Subtitle | hierarchical community model vs. canonical ordinations |
| Title | Analyzing community structure subject to incomplete sampling |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26749516 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fecy.2759 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31131887 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2267372225 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2232118288 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2374169361 |
| Volume | 100 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000478103000021&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1939-9170 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000148 issn: 0012-9658 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3daxQxEB_sVaEvatWzq7VEEH3adjfJ5sM3qXf4UIqIhfNpSXJJKZQ76e4Vzr_eyWZv20IVwacNu5NsSGYmM5PkNwDvggtUFdrmzht0UJwUuQoqRuK8nZe0UNy4LtmEPD1Vs5n-2p-qjHdhEj7EEHCLktHp6yjgxjZHN6Ch3q0Pqaz0FmxTZFs-gu3P36ZnJ7fAo3ivh2keIU420LMFPdrUvbMYpfOI91madw3XbuWZPvmfPj-Fx729ST4lBtmFB37xDB6lDJRrLE1cXxpPbq68YYVe5pvn0Ha4Jb9wiSMu3SZp1yTBzq6uPGlWNoZySLskEeghgg23-NbEk-qL848k5trudiuQGW410GXgIdfNIcG5XXaXMwn6wRcpONm8gLPp5Pvxl7zP1ZA7Lgud6-AteorGCukMMzIUzIqCMWE492hnaGf5XHFHmS9liLB_mlNTiXkZFHWasTGM8G9-D4hnKtDKVdxWBbZd2CAL40VgQvl5EC6DD5tJq10PZB7zaVzWCYKZ1jjMdRzmDN4OlD8TeMc9NONu3gcCKiQ6jaXIYH_DCHUv102NxmrM64NKENsePqNExm0Ws_DLVaRhNLptSv2FhkVLWDNRZvAyMdnQAVaWqGiVzOB9x0t_7Ho9Of4Rn6_-lfA17KC9p9P5xX0YIav4N_DQXbcXzdUBbMmZOuil6Dc5xCCt |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-NDgQvfBcCA4yE4ClbYjv-gCc0Wg1RKoQ2aTxFjmujSahFSzqp_PWc4yTbpIGQeIqVnB3LvrPvzr7fAbzy1lOV6Sq1zqCBYqVIlVfBE-eqRU4zxY1tk03I-VwdH-svW_Cuj4WJ-BCDwy1IRrteBwEPDum9c9RQZze7VBb6Gmxz5KJiBNsfvk6PZhfQo3i3ENM0YJz02LMZ3evrXtqN4oXEq1TNy5pru_VM7_xXp-_C7U7jJO8ji9yDLbe8DzdiDsoNlia2K40n50FvWKGT-voBNC1yyS_c5IiN8STNhkTg2fWpI_W6Cs4c0qxIgHoIcMMNvjXhrvry-1sSsm235xXIDhcaaHPwkLN6l-DsrtrwTIKW8El0T9YP4Wg6Odw_SLtsDanlMtOp9q5CW9FUQlrDjPQZq0TGmDCcO9Q0tK34QnFLmculD8B_mlNTiEXuFbWasTGM8G_uMRDHlKeFLXhVZNh2VnmZGSc8E8otvLAJvOlnrbQdlHnIqPGjjCDMtMRhLsMwJ_ByoPwZ4TuuoBm3Ez8QUCHRbMxFAjs9J5SdZNclqqshsw8ug9j28BllMhy0mKVbrQMNo8FwU-ovNCzowpqJPIFHkcuGDrA8x6VWyQRet8z0x66Xk_1v4fnkXwlfwM2Dw8-zcvZx_ukp3ELtT8fbjDswQrZxz-C6PWtO6tPnnTD9BqImI7U |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3_a9UwED_mpuIvfn9anRpB9KdubZLmi_4k23sojscQB_OnkqaJDOS9sfYNnn-9l6btNpgi-FNDe0lDcpfcXXKfA3jjracq01VqnUEDxUqRKq-CJ85VdU4zxY3tkk3I-VwdH-vDDfgwxMJEfIjR4RYko1uvg4C709rvXqCGOrveobLQN2CLF1qgVG7tf50dHVxCj-L9QkzTgHEyYM9mdHeoe2U3ihcSr1M1r2qu3dYzu_dfnb4Pd3uNk3yMLPIANtziIdyKOSjXWJravjSZXgS9YYVe6ptH0HbIJb9wkyM2xpO0axKBZ1dnjjSrKjhzSLskAeohwA23-NaEu-qLH-9JyLbdnVcgO1xqoMvBQ86bHYKzu-zCMwlawifRPdk8hqPZ9Nvep7TP1pBaLjOdau8qtBVNJaQ1zEifsUpkjAnDuUNNQ9uK14pbylwufQD-05yaQtS5V9RqxiawiX9zT4E4pjwtbMGrIsO2s8rLzDjhmVCu9sIm8G6YtdL2UOYho8bPMoIw0xKHuQzDnMDrkfI0wndcQzPpJn4koEKi2ZiLBLYHTih7yW5KVFdDZh9cBrHt8TPKZDhoMQu3XAUaRoPhptRfaFjQhTUTeQJPIpeNHWB5jkutkgm87Zjpj10vp3vfw_PZvxK-gtuH-7Py4PP8y3O4g8qfjpcZt2ETuca9gJv2vD1pzl72svQb-kIjMA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing+community+structure+subject+to+incomplete+sampling%3A+hierarchical+community+model+vs.+canonical+ordinations&rft.jtitle=Ecology+%28Durham%29&rft.au=Yamaura%2C+Yuichi&rft.au=Blanchet%2C+F+Guillaume&rft.au=Higa%2C+Motoki&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.issn=1939-9170&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e02759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fecy.2759&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |