Clinical Efficacy of Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizers With Different Interfaces in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma
Nebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a jet nebulizer is available in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Respiratory care Ročník 65; číslo 10; s. 1451 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
United States
01.10.2020
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1943-3654, 1943-3654 |
| On-line prístup: | Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Nebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a jet nebulizer is available in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer to a jet nebulizer combined with a mouthpiece or mask in children with asthma exacerbations admitted to the emergency department.
We conducted a single-blinded randomized clinical trial of 217 children (2-18 y old) with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department. Assessment of severity was defined by our acute asthma score, adapted from the Pediatric Asthma Score. Subjects were randomized to receive bronchodilator treatment via vibrating mesh nebulizer (
= 108) or jet nebulizer (
109) and were treated until they achieved a mild asthma score and were discharged or until a decision to admit was made. All subjects were treated per our acute asthma clinical pathway algorithm for the emergency department with modifications to allow for blinding, assessment of treatment, and data collection. Outcome variables included hospital admission rate, number of treatments, and time to mild asthma score.
There was a significant difference in baseline asthma score between subjects treated with the vibrating mesh nebulizer and those treated with the jet nebulizer (
= .042), but no other significant differences in demographics existed between groups. To adjust for effect of baseline asthma score, a multiple logistic regression model was used to model admission. The vibrating mesh nebulizer group had a lower probability of being admitted to the hospital (
= .062), and they required significantly fewer treatments (
< .001) and less time to reach a mild asthma score (
= .004) than those in the jet nebulizer group. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission (
= .032).
Subjects treated with a vibrating mesh nebulizer required significantly fewer treatments and less time to achieve a mild asthma score. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission compared to jet nebulizer. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02774941.). |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Nebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a jet nebulizer is available in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer to a jet nebulizer combined with a mouthpiece or mask in children with asthma exacerbations admitted to the emergency department.
We conducted a single-blinded randomized clinical trial of 217 children (2-18 y old) with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department. Assessment of severity was defined by our acute asthma score, adapted from the Pediatric Asthma Score. Subjects were randomized to receive bronchodilator treatment via vibrating mesh nebulizer (
= 108) or jet nebulizer (
109) and were treated until they achieved a mild asthma score and were discharged or until a decision to admit was made. All subjects were treated per our acute asthma clinical pathway algorithm for the emergency department with modifications to allow for blinding, assessment of treatment, and data collection. Outcome variables included hospital admission rate, number of treatments, and time to mild asthma score.
There was a significant difference in baseline asthma score between subjects treated with the vibrating mesh nebulizer and those treated with the jet nebulizer (
= .042), but no other significant differences in demographics existed between groups. To adjust for effect of baseline asthma score, a multiple logistic regression model was used to model admission. The vibrating mesh nebulizer group had a lower probability of being admitted to the hospital (
= .062), and they required significantly fewer treatments (
< .001) and less time to reach a mild asthma score (
= .004) than those in the jet nebulizer group. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission (
= .032).
Subjects treated with a vibrating mesh nebulizer required significantly fewer treatments and less time to achieve a mild asthma score. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission compared to jet nebulizer. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02774941.). Nebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a jet nebulizer is available in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer to a jet nebulizer combined with a mouthpiece or mask in children with asthma exacerbations admitted to the emergency department.BACKGROUNDNebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a jet nebulizer is available in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer to a jet nebulizer combined with a mouthpiece or mask in children with asthma exacerbations admitted to the emergency department.We conducted a single-blinded randomized clinical trial of 217 children (2-18 y old) with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department. Assessment of severity was defined by our acute asthma score, adapted from the Pediatric Asthma Score. Subjects were randomized to receive bronchodilator treatment via vibrating mesh nebulizer (n = 108) or jet nebulizer (n = 109) and were treated until they achieved a mild asthma score and were discharged or until a decision to admit was made. All subjects were treated per our acute asthma clinical pathway algorithm for the emergency department with modifications to allow for blinding, assessment of treatment, and data collection. Outcome variables included hospital admission rate, number of treatments, and time to mild asthma score.METHODSWe conducted a single-blinded randomized clinical trial of 217 children (2-18 y old) with a moderate to severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department. Assessment of severity was defined by our acute asthma score, adapted from the Pediatric Asthma Score. Subjects were randomized to receive bronchodilator treatment via vibrating mesh nebulizer (n = 108) or jet nebulizer (n = 109) and were treated until they achieved a mild asthma score and were discharged or until a decision to admit was made. All subjects were treated per our acute asthma clinical pathway algorithm for the emergency department with modifications to allow for blinding, assessment of treatment, and data collection. Outcome variables included hospital admission rate, number of treatments, and time to mild asthma score.There was a significant difference in baseline asthma score between subjects treated with the vibrating mesh nebulizer and those treated with the jet nebulizer (P = .042), but no other significant differences in demographics existed between groups. To adjust for effect of baseline asthma score, a multiple logistic regression model was used to model admission. The vibrating mesh nebulizer group had a lower probability of being admitted to the hospital (P = .062), and they required significantly fewer treatments (P < .001) and less time to reach a mild asthma score (P = .004) than those in the jet nebulizer group. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission (P = .032).RESULTSThere was a significant difference in baseline asthma score between subjects treated with the vibrating mesh nebulizer and those treated with the jet nebulizer (P = .042), but no other significant differences in demographics existed between groups. To adjust for effect of baseline asthma score, a multiple logistic regression model was used to model admission. The vibrating mesh nebulizer group had a lower probability of being admitted to the hospital (P = .062), and they required significantly fewer treatments (P < .001) and less time to reach a mild asthma score (P = .004) than those in the jet nebulizer group. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission (P = .032).Subjects treated with a vibrating mesh nebulizer required significantly fewer treatments and less time to achieve a mild asthma score. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission compared to jet nebulizer. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02774941.).CONCLUSIONSSubjects treated with a vibrating mesh nebulizer required significantly fewer treatments and less time to achieve a mild asthma score. In subjects with a mask interface, the vibrating mesh nebulizer significantly reduced the probability of admission compared to jet nebulizer. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02774941.). |
| Author | Luckett, Peter M Shockley, Courtney M Moody, Gerald B Ari, Arzu Huang, Rong |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gerald B surname: Moody fullname: Moody, Gerald B email: gerald.moody@childrens.com organization: Department of Respiratory Care, Children's Health - Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. gerald.moody@childrens.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Peter M surname: Luckett fullname: Luckett, Peter M organization: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas – sequence: 3 givenname: Courtney M surname: Shockley fullname: Shockley, Courtney M organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas – sequence: 4 givenname: Rong surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Rong organization: Research Administration, Children's Health - Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas – sequence: 5 givenname: Arzu surname: Ari fullname: Ari, Arzu organization: Department of Respiratory Care, Texas State University, Round Rock, Texas |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkDtPwzAYRS1URB-wMiKPLCl-xUnGqhQoKg-J1xg5zmfqKnGK7Qzl11OJIjGdMxzd4Y7RwHUOEDqnZCponl15CFutPExJlvL8CI1oIXjCZSoG_3yIxiFsCGFSpMUJGnLGSJFRNkJ-3lhntWrwwpg99Q53Br_byqto3Sd-gLDGytX4HiJ-hKpv7Df4gD9sXONrawx4cBEvXQRvlIaArcPPUFsVvdX4pa82oOOhn4W4btUpOjaqCXB24AS93Sxe53fJ6ul2OZ-tEi1kERNmhMi5AkkkZ4JymQGFvBYZ1ExTkVNdgZE1Ncpk2khhKkhJUdREA9tryibo8nd367uvHkIsWxs0NI1y0PWhZDznKSUFyffpxSHtqxbqcuttq_yu_PuJ_QDvnG3h |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_pan_14354 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sna_2024_116009 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22207891 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_emc_2025_06_015 crossref_primary_10_1080_17476348_2024_2361048 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCP_0000000000000941 crossref_primary_10_1111_nicc_12774 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2023_1258846 crossref_primary_10_1097_pq9_0000000000000814 crossref_primary_10_1183_23120541_00027_2021 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10033_021_00635_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2023_122695 crossref_primary_10_1177_17511437231199899 crossref_primary_10_1097_PEC_0000000000003372 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jconrel_2025_01_017 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos14101509 crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2022_1999926 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jconrel_2022_10_052 crossref_primary_10_1080_17476348_2023_2183194 crossref_primary_10_4187_respcare_10980 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejps_2023_106474 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmed_2025_107966 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.4187/respcare.07538 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
| EISSN | 1943-3654 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 32209712 |
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .GJ 04C 0R~ 123 1KJ 29P 36B 53G 5VS 6AZ 6PF 8RF AAQQT AAWTL AAYJJ ACBNA ACCJX ADBBV ADOJX AENEX AFFNX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BMSDO BTFSW CGR CUY CVF EBD EBS ECM ECT EIF EIHBH EJD F5P H13 HW5 INR JXZBJ MJL N4W NPM OHT OK1 PV9 RHI RML RZL SJN WH7 WHG XOL XZL YJK YOJ YQI YQJ ZXP 7X8 BAIFH BBTPI J8X SAUOL SCNPE SFC |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-2f4483ae6063241367e1e8d47ed2c1481cbef6d1faf7cf64fbe5099d0ce2be552 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 24 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000574672900006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1943-3654 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 13:47:20 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:44 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Keywords | vibrating mesh nebulizers aerosols children severe albuterol jet nebulizer emergency department pediatric asthma moderate |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c469t-2f4483ae6063241367e1e8d47ed2c1481cbef6d1faf7cf64fbe5099d0ce2be552 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/respcare/65/10/1451.full.pdf |
| PMID | 32209712 |
| PQID | 2383510908 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2383510908 pubmed_primary_32209712 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-Oct 20201001 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2020 text: 2020-Oct |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Respiratory care |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Respir Care |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| SSID | ssj0026459 |
| Score | 2.3934798 |
| Snippet | Nebulizers are commonly used in emergency departments to deliver bronchodilators to children with asthma exacerbations. However, no clinical study comparing a... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1451 |
| SubjectTerms | Administration, Inhalation Adolescent Aerosols Albuterol Asthma - drug therapy Bronchodilator Agents Child Child, Preschool Drug Delivery Systems Humans Nebulizers and Vaporizers Surgical Mesh Treatment Outcome |
| Title | Clinical Efficacy of Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizers With Different Interfaces in Pediatric Subjects With Asthma |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209712 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2383510908 |
| Volume | 65 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000574672900006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9swEBZtM0pf2q7ruv4aNxh9irbYkiPnqYQ2oQwS8pBteQuWdCKB1klrd9D99dPZSvI0KPTF-MECI5_u7rs7fx9jX7UWSqUouJIdyaXFiOvIOm5bInFGOhPZtBKbUMNhOpl0RqHgVoSxypVPrBy1XRiqkX_3oUUkNEWYXi8fOalGUXc1SGhss4bwqQxZtZqsuwgxEaVUXWUpuGgnsiZtlFGqiJl7SbNV33zIFOn_08sqzPQP3vqCh2w_JJjQrS3iPdvC_IjtDkIL_YhdjWqy6pcmjDf_XhVNuILRhsb65QN7CpSh99Ajmgm_AhYOfhG8plFpGGAxgyy38ANLGKJ-vp__9bkk_J6XM7gNuislVCVHR4NfMM9hrQwC3mNRCSg83y3K2UN2zH72e-ObOx4UGrjxsLrksfPoTmToUZCgBl1bYYSplQptbDzQioxG17aRy5wyri2dRp-gdGzLYOxvk_gj28kXOX5iQKxUQrpY6ZaQaaZ1oowVLSQ-H7SoT9mX1bZP_QmgtkaW4-K5mG42_pSd1N9uuqypOqbeXRFJVnz2itXnbC8mMF1N6l2whvPnHy_ZO_OnnBdPnyvT8tfhaPAPw5XbaQ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+Efficacy+of+Vibrating+Mesh+and+Jet+Nebulizers+With+Different+Interfaces+in+Pediatric+Subjects+With+Asthma&rft.jtitle=Respiratory+care&rft.au=Moody%2C+Gerald+B&rft.au=Luckett%2C+Peter+M&rft.au=Shockley%2C+Courtney+M&rft.au=Huang%2C+Rong&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.issn=1943-3654&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1451&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187%2Frespcare.07538&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1943-3654&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1943-3654&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1943-3654&client=summon |