A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Recent Computational Thinking Assessments
Computational thinking (CT) is regarded as an essential twenty-first century competency and it is already embedded in K-12 curricula across the globe. However, research on assessing CT has lagged, with few assessments being implemented and validated. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic grouping...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Journal of science education and technology Ročník 28; číslo 6; s. 651 - 676 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Dordrecht
Springer Science + Business Media
01.12.2019
Springer Netherlands Springer Springer Nature B.V |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1059-0145, 1573-1839 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Computational thinking (CT) is regarded as an essential twenty-first century competency and it is already embedded in K-12 curricula across the globe. However, research on assessing CT has lagged, with few assessments being implemented and validated. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic grouping of CT assessments. This scoping review examines 39 empirical studies published within the last five years, coded by the specific competencies outlined in existing CT frameworks, to identify and classify the key features of existing CT assessments. Results show that most studies target K-12 settings, focus on interventions that promote CT concepts and practices, adopt a quasi-experimental design, use selected-response items as the dominant testing form, and mainly assess algorithmic thinking, abstraction, problem decomposition, logical thinking, and data. Finally, few CT assessments have been validated in educational settings. Implications include identifying gaps in the CT assessment literature, deepening our understanding of the nature of CT, focusing on the validation of CT assessments, and guiding researchers and practitioners in choosing developmentally appropriate CT assessments. Cognitive and educational implications for future research inquiry include the development of new assessment tools that comprehensively assess CT and its relation to learning. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Computational thinking (CT) is regarded as an essential twenty-first century competency and it is already embedded in K-12 curricula across the globe. However, research on assessing CT has lagged, with few assessments being implemented and validated. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic grouping of CT assessments. This scoping review examines 39 empirical studies published within the last five years, coded by the specific competencies outlined in existing CT frameworks, to identify and classify the key features of existing CT assessments. Results show that most studies target K-12 settings, focus on interventions that promote CT concepts and practices, adopt a quasi-experimental design, use selected-response items as the dominant testing form, and mainly assess algorithmic thinking, abstraction, problem decomposition, logical thinking, and data. Finally, few CT assessments have been validated in educational settings. Implications include identifying gaps in the CT assessment literature, deepening our understanding of the nature of CT, focusing on the validation of CT assessments, and guiding researchers and practitioners in choosing developmentally appropriate CT assessments. Cognitive and educational implications for future research inquiry include the development of new assessment tools that comprehensively assess CT and its relation to learning. |
| Audience | Elementary Secondary Education Academic |
| Author | Lu, Chang Adams, Cathy Cutumisu, Maria |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Maria surname: Cutumisu fullname: Cutumisu, Maria – sequence: 2 givenname: Cathy surname: Adams fullname: Adams, Cathy – sequence: 3 givenname: Chang surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Chang |
| BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1236554$$DView record in ERIC |
| BookMark | eNp9kdtq3DAQhkVJoTm9QKBg6LUTSaPj5bJsDyFQSNJrocjyRtu15Urelr59J3XaQi-CBBpm_m8k_XNCjsY8RkIuGL1klOqryqiVqqXMttRqa1t4RY6Z1NAyA_YIYyqxxIR8Q05q3VFKrbH0mNytmruQpzRum9v4PcUfTe6bzTClkoLfY65GX8Jjk0eMQxznZp2H6TD7OeURBfePafz6RK9qjbUOqKhn5HXv9zWeP5-n5Mv7zf36Y3vz-cOn9eqmDUKZufVKeeGp6HlPtWcKdNTG8u6BPQCYwFjX8w7ASy86CBwk9VZp4F0neexAwil5t_SdSv52iHV2u3wo-KrqOHDcWgmDqstFtfX76NLY57n4gKuLQwpoY58wv9JMWINeWgTeLkBED9xU0uDLT7e5ZhyUlALrZqmHkmstsXchLX5g47R3jLqnmbhlJg5n4n7PxAGi_D_0T_sXIVigiuJxG8u_b75IPf9iV-dc_t4jjLIWBIdfgimoOw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_022_09961_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci14101124 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecresq_2023_05_013 crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_15578 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11583_1 crossref_primary_10_22430_22565337_2950 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12887_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_024_10364_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s40692_023_00300_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_edurev_2023_100520 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_025_10475_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci12120899 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40692_020_00177_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241309074 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12545 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci12050305 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_023_00455_2 crossref_primary_10_2478_rem_2024_0018 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2023_2240657 crossref_primary_10_1109_TE_2021_3105938 crossref_primary_10_3390_mti6020013 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci14111250 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331221098793 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331221114183 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2021_735088 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09798_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4029 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12528_021_09305_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2020_104060 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331211033158 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2024_2380163 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2023_107749 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12744_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13377_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2023_101340 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jchemed_2c00037 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci15010003 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15031983 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11189_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13745_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2025_101955 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2021_1877988 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12921 crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2022_2160394 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2024_2365566 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci15030306 crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2024_2398502 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331221133822 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2025_105281 crossref_primary_10_1080_15391523_2025_2536561 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331211051043 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci14080833 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci13111101 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09777_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2023_2245687 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci15030344 crossref_primary_10_1080_08993408_2020_1866939 crossref_primary_10_1145_3415582 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2023_3335931 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241249956 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_023_10089_2 crossref_primary_10_4000_12xon crossref_primary_10_3390_app12083785 crossref_primary_10_24193_adn_16_1_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_023_10052_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_025_10494_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_023_10231_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_03057267_2021_1963580 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2022_104562 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1511/2017.124.13 10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474681 10.1145/2676723.2677295 10.1002/jrsm.1123 10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.001.0001 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021 10.1109/RITA.2018.2809941 10.1145/3414583 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146561 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 10.1080/1364557032000119616 10.3102/0013189X12463051 10.1007/s10758-011-9175-0 10.1007/s11092-013-9185-7 10.1007/s10639-018-9724-4 10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008 10.1145/1929887.1929905 10.1080/15391523.2014.888272 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507306 10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8 10.1177/0735633115608444 10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0 10.15388/infedu.2018.08 10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142 10.1145/2677091 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248 10.1109/C-M.1977.217672 10.1186/s41239-017-0080-z 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004 10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 10.1145/3055258 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877417 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.003 10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 10.1145/1378704.1378713 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.005 10.1080/10494820.2017.1337036 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003 10.1007/s11251-017-9421-5 10.1145/3104982 10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020 10.1007/s10639-017-9658-2 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.003 10.1145/1610252.1610265 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047 10.28945/3521 10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 10.15388/infedu.2018.05 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Springer Nature B.V. 2019 COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer Journal of Science Education and Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer Nature B.V. 2019 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer – notice: Journal of Science Education and Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN 3V. 7X2 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FK ABJCF AEUYN AFKRA AHOVV ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR CCPQU D1I DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ KB. L6V LK8 M0K M7P M7S P5Z P62 PATMY PCBAR PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEDU PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Education Research Index Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Materials Science Database ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Agricultural Science Database Biological Science Database Engineering Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Materials Science Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering collection Environmental Science Collection |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ERIC Agricultural Science Database ProQuest One Education ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Materials Science Collection SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection Materials Science Database ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection ProQuest Materials Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) |
| DatabaseTitleList | Agricultural Science Database ERIC |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: KB. name: Materials Science Database url: http://search.proquest.com/materialsscijournals sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Education Sciences (General) |
| EISSN | 1573-1839 |
| ERIC | EJ1236554 |
| EndPage | 676 |
| ExternalDocumentID | A714981009 EJ1236554 10_1007_s10956_019_09799_3 48699342 |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CA) grantid: RES0046075 – fundername: Killam Trusts (CA) grantid: RES0043207 – fundername: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grantid: RES0034954 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000155 – fundername: CanCode |
| GroupedDBID | -W8 -~C .86 .GO .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 203 29L 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2N9 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7X2 7XC 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAHSB AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AAPKM AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWBS AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYZH ABAKD ABAKF ABBBX ABBHK ABBRH ABBXA ABDBE ABDZT ABECU ABFSG ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIVO ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABWNU ABXPI ABXSQ ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACSTC ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADHJG ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUPB AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFHIU AFKRA AFLOW AFOHR AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHPBZ AHSBF AHWEU AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AIKPN AILAN AITGF AIXLP AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARMRJ ASPBG ATCPS ATHPR AVWKF AXYYD AYFIA AYQZM AZFZN B-. BA0 BBNVY BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKSAR BSONS CCPQU CS3 CSCUP D1I D1J D1K DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBLON EBS EDJ EIOEI ESBYG FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ7 GQ8 GXS HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IAO IER IHE IJ- IKXTQ IPSME ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JAAYA JBMMH JBSCW JCJTX JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPL JST JZLTJ K6- KB. KDC KOV L6V LAK LK5 LK8 LLZTM M0K M4Y M7P M7R M7S MA- NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I OAM P19 P2P P62 P9Q PATMY PCBAR PDBOC PF0 PHGZM PHGZT PQEDU PT4 PT5 PTHSS PYCSY QOK QOS R-Y R89 R9I ROL RPX RSV S16 S27 S3B SA0 SAP SDH SDM SHS SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WIP WK8 YLTOR YQT Z45 ZMTXR ~A9 ~EX -51 -5C -5G -BR -EM -Y2 1SB 2.D 28- 2P1 2VQ 5QI AAAVM AANTL AARHV AAYTO ABQSL ABULA ACBXY ACEZS ACYUM ADINQ ADMHC ADULT AEBTG AEFIE AEKMD AFEXP AFGCZ AGGDS AHKAY AJBLW BAPOH BBWZM BEMZW BIOZK CAG COF EJD GQ6 H13 JSODD KOW N2Q NDZJH O-J O9J OVD R4E RHV RNI RZC RZD RZK S1Z S26 S28 SCLPG SDA T16 TEORI WK6 XSW Z83 Z8W Z92 ZWUKE AAYXX ABRTQ ADHKG AFFHD AGQPQ CITATION PQGLB 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN 3V. 8FK AHOVV AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-a66a4a04f2f07a1637e7892db1b338c11df2d33a5a4d3c2350a96732dd52ed353 |
| IEDL.DBID | RSV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 80 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000501074700006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1059-0145 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 04 22:13:03 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 10:25:12 EST 2025 Tue Dec 02 16:46:32 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:28:03 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:09:27 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:34:08 EST 2025 Thu Jun 19 22:09:15 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | false |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Learning and assessment Computational thinking Programming and programming languages Computational literacy K-12 education Coding |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c468t-a66a4a04f2f07a1637e7892db1b338c11df2d33a5a4d3c2350a96732dd52ed353 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Literature Review-2 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2475-9647 |
| PQID | 2322327648 |
| PQPubID | 2043721 |
| PageCount | 26 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2322327648 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A714981009 eric_primary_EJ1236554 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10956_019_09799_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_019_09799_3 springer_journals_10_1007_s10956_019_09799_3 jstor_primary_48699342 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2019-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2019 text: 2019-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Dordrecht |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Dordrecht – name: New York |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of science education and technology |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Sci Educ Technol |
| PublicationYear | 2019 |
| Publisher | Springer Science + Business Media Springer Netherlands Springer Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Science + Business Media – name: Springer Netherlands – name: Springer – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | KayAGoldbergAPersonal dynamic mediaComputer1977103314110.1109/C-M.1977.217672 PellasNVosinakisSThe effect of simulation games on learning computer programming: a comparative study on high school students’ learning performance by assessing computational problem-solving strategiesEducation and Information Technologies20182362423245210.1007/s10639-018-9724-4 MouzaCMarzocchiAPanYPollockLDevelopment, implementation, and outcomes of an equitable computer science after-school program: Findings from middle-school studentsJournal of Research on Technology in Education20164828410410.1080/15391523.2016.1146561 Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2017). Implicit intelligence beliefs of computer science students: Exploring change across the semester. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 179–196. GoldsteinSPrinciottaDNaglieriJAHandbook of intelligence. Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts2015New York, NYSpringer KafaiYBResnickMConstructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world1996HillsdaleErlbaum DenningPJFreemanPAThe profession of IT: computing’s paradigmCommunications of the ACM20095212283010.1145/1610252.1610265 Wilson, C., Sudol, L. A., Stephenson, C., & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: the failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. Association for Computing Machinery, 26. Román-GonzálezMPérez-GonzálezJCMoreno-LeónJRoblesGCan computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking TestInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction201818475810.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004 AirasianPWCruikshankKAMayerREPintrichPRRathsJWittrockMCAndersonLWKrathwohlDRA taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition)2001New YorkLongman DennerJWernerLCampeSOrtizEPair programming: under what conditions is it advantageous for middle school students?Journal of Research on Technology in Education201446327729610.1080/15391523.2014.888272 LeonardJBussAGamboaRMitchellMFasholaOSHubertTAlmughyirahSUsing robotics and game design to enhance children's self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skillsJournal of Science Education and Technology201625686087610.1007/s10956-016-9628-2 DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy. MIT Press. KorkmazÖA validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS)Computers & Education20125941162116910.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021 McMillan, J. H., Hellsten, L. M., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (Canadian ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson. HsuTCChangSCHungYTHow to learn and how to teach computational thinking: suggestions based on a review of the literatureComputers & Education201812629631010.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004 BasuSBiswasGKinnebrewJSLearner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environmentUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction201727155310.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 BatiKYetişirMIÇalişkanIGüneşGGül SaçanETeaching the concept of time: a steam-based program on computational thinking in science educationCogent Education20185111610.1080/2331186X.2018.1507306 WitherspoonEBHigashiRMSchunnCDBaehrECShoopRDeveloping computational thinking through a virtual robotics programming curriculumACM Trans. Comput. Educ.20171814:14:2010.1145/3104982 KorkmazÖÇakirRÖzdenMYA validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)Computers in Human Behavior20177255856910.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38–43. FronzaIIoiniNECorralLTeaching computational thinking using agile software engineering methods: a framework for middle schoolsACM Trans. Computers & Education201717419:119:2810.1145/3055258 PhamMTRajićAGreigJDSargeantJMPapadopoulosAMcEwenSAA scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistencyResearch Synthesis Methods20145437138510.1002/jrsm.1123 ISTE (2011). Computational Thinking in K–12 Education leadership toolkit. Computer Science Teacher Association: http://csta. acm. org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11 CTLeadershipt Toolkit-SP-vF. pdf adresinden alındı. KahnKSendovaESacristánAINossRYoung students exploring cardinality by constructing infinite processesTechnology, Knowledge and Learning201116133410.1007/s10758-011-9175-0 WeintropDWilenskyUHow block-based, text-based, and hybrid block/text modalities shape novice programming practicesInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction201817839210.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.005 Moreno-LeónJRoblesGRomán-GonzálezMDr. Scratch: automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinkingRevista De Educacion a Distancia201546123 Román-GonzálezMPérez-GonzálezJ-CMoreno-LeónJRoblesGExtending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factorsComputers in Human Behavior20188044145910.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 StrawhackerALeeMBersMUTeaching tools, teachers’ rules: exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJrInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education201828234737610.1007/s10798-017-9400-9 WingJ(2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: MathematicalPhysical and Engineering Sciences188136618813717372510.1098/rsta.2008.0118 RijkeWJBollenLEysinkTHTolboomJLComputational thinking in primary school: an examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groupsInformatics in Education20181717710.15388/infedu.2018.05 Wing, J. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing. Retrieved from http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/2014/01/computational-thinking. Accessed 15 Oct 2019. YağcıMA valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skillsEducation and Information Technologies201824112310.1007/s10639-018-9801-8 Moreno-LeónJRoblesGRomán-GonzálezMCode to learn: where does it belong in the K-12 curriculumJournal of Information Technology Education: Research20161528330310.28945/3521 TsaravaKMoellerKNinausMTraining computational thinking through board games: the case of crabs & turtlesInternational Journal of Serious Games201852254410.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248 ZhongBWangQChenJLiYInvestigating the period of switching roles in pair programming in a primary schoolEducational Technology & Society2017203220233 ArkseyHO'MalleyLScoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology200581193210.1080/1364557032000119616 Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2016b). Comparing computational thinking development assessment scores with software complexity metrics. Paper presented at the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1040-1045). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474681. GroverSPeaRComputational thinking: a competency whose time has come. Computer Science Education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school2018LondonBloomsbury Academic193710.1080/08993408.2015.1033142 Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., & Järvinen, H. (2005). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 14–18). Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018). Computer and Information Technology Occupations. Retrieved on October 15, 2019 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/home.htm. Sáez-LópezJRomán-GonzálezMVázquez-CanoEVisual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: a two year case study using “scratch” in five schoolsComputers & Education20169712914110.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in EducationAERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing2014Washington, DCAmerican Educational Research Association DurakHYSaritepeciMAnalysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation modelComputers and Education201811619120210.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 JunSHanSKimHLeeWAssessing the computational literacy of elementary students on a national level in KoreaEducational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability201426431933210.1007/s11092-013-9185-7 KneeJAHirsh-PasekKGolinkoffRMSingerDPlay = learning2006New YorkOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.001.0001 Whetton, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2002). Answers to exercises taken from developing management skills. Northwestern University. Rich, K., & Yadav, A. (2019). Infusing computational thinking instruction into elementary mathematics and science: patterns of teacher implementation. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 76-80). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). LooiCKHowMLLongkaiWSeowPLiuLAnalysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinkingComputer Science Education201828325527910.1080/08993408.2018.1533297 HeppnerPPPetersenCHThe development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventoryJournal of Counseling Psychology1982291667510.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66 BarrVStephensonCBringing computational thinking to K-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?ACM Inroads201121485410.1145/1929887.1929905 BasnetRBDoleckTLemayDJBazelaisPExploring computer science students’ continuance intentions to use KattisEducation and Information Technologies20182331145115810.1007/s10639-017-9658-2 GarneliVChorianopoulosKProgramming video games and simulations in science education: exploring computational thinking through code analysisIn PP Heppner (9799_CR35) 1982; 29 I Fronza (9799_CR28) 2017; 17 S Grover (9799_CR33) 2018 9799_CR37 9799_CR1 Ö Korkmaz (9799_CR44) 2012; 59 B Zhong (9799_CR84) 2017; 20 9799_CR78 9799_CR32 9799_CR76 9799_CR31 9799_CR75 S Basu (9799_CR9) 2017; 27 J Wing (9799_CR77) 1881; 366 K Kahn (9799_CR40) 2011; 16 JA Knee (9799_CR42) 2006 WJ Rijke (9799_CR61) 2018; 17 K Tsarava (9799_CR71) 2018; 5 T Doleck (9799_CR23) 2017; 4 9799_CR27 9799_CR25 M Román-González (9799_CR65) 2018; 18 CG von Wangenheim (9799_CR72) 2018; 17 K Bati (9799_CR10) 2018; 5 V Barr (9799_CR6) 2011; 2 9799_CR22 J Moreno-León (9799_CR51) 2015; 46 C Mouza (9799_CR54) 2016; 48 CK Looi (9799_CR48) 2018; 28 VJ Shute (9799_CR69) 2017; 22 Ö Korkmaz (9799_CR45) 2017; 72 9799_CR60 Linda Werner (9799_CR74) 2014; 14 American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (9799_CR2) 2014 TC Hsu (9799_CR36) 2018; 126 A Kay (9799_CR41) 1977; 10 B Zhong (9799_CR83) 2016; 53 JD Bransford (9799_CR12) 1999 R Munoz (9799_CR55) 2018; 6 N Pellas (9799_CR57) 2018; 23 G Fessakis (9799_CR26) 2013; 63 EB Witherspoon (9799_CR79) 2017; 18 S Papert (9799_CR56) 1980 SC Kong (9799_CR43) 2018; 127 D Barr (9799_CR7) 2011; 38 A Strawhacker (9799_CR70) 2018; 28 G Chen (9799_CR16) 2017; 109 9799_CR17 MU Bers (9799_CR11) 2014; 72 9799_CR15 J Leonard (9799_CR47) 2016; 25 9799_CR14 D Seehorn (9799_CR68) 2011 9799_CR13 D Weintrop (9799_CR73) 2018; 17 9799_CR53 (9799_CR39) 1996 PJ Denning (9799_CR20) 2017; 105 M Romero (9799_CR66) 2017; 14 9799_CR50 M Román-González (9799_CR63) 2017; 72 J Sáez-López (9799_CR67) 2016; 97 V Garneli (9799_CR29) 2018; 26 S Jun (9799_CR38) 2014; 26 J Moreno-León (9799_CR52) 2016; 15 PJ Denning (9799_CR21) 2009; 52 S Psycharis (9799_CR59) 2017; 45 J Denner (9799_CR19) 2014; 46 PW Airasian (9799_CR3) 2001 M Yağcı (9799_CR82) 2018; 24 MT Pham (9799_CR58) 2014; 5 BH de Paula (9799_CR18) 2018; 16 9799_CR46 SY Lye (9799_CR49) 2014; 41 RB Basnet (9799_CR8) 2018; 23 M Guzdial (9799_CR34) 2008; 51 S Goldstein (9799_CR30) 2015 A Rojas-López (9799_CR62) 2018; 13 S Atmatzidou (9799_CR5) 2016; 75 9799_CR81 HY Durak (9799_CR24) 2018; 116 9799_CR80 M Román-González (9799_CR64) 2018; 80 H Arksey (9799_CR4) 2005; 8 |
| References_xml | – reference: Román-GonzálezMPérez-GonzálezJCMoreno-LeónJRoblesGCan computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking TestInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction201818475810.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004 – reference: Román-GonzálezMPérez-GonzálezJCJiménez-FernándezCWhich cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking testComputers in Human Behavior20177267869110.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047 – reference: RijkeWJBollenLEysinkTHTolboomJLComputational thinking in primary school: an examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groupsInformatics in Education20181717710.15388/infedu.2018.05 – reference: BasnetRBDoleckTLemayDJBazelaisPExploring computer science students’ continuance intentions to use KattisEducation and Information Technologies20182331145115810.1007/s10639-017-9658-2 – reference: Whetton, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2002). Answers to exercises taken from developing management skills. Northwestern University. – reference: Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., & Järvinen, H. (2005). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 14–18). – reference: Moreno-LeónJRoblesGRomán-GonzálezMDr. Scratch: automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinkingRevista De Educacion a Distancia201546123 – reference: Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018). Computer and Information Technology Occupations. Retrieved on October 15, 2019 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/home.htm. – reference: DurakHYSaritepeciMAnalysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation modelComputers and Education201811619120210.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 – reference: ZhongBWangQChenJLiYAn exploration of three-dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinkingJournal of Educational Computing Research201653456259010.1177/0735633115608444 – reference: DenningPJComputational thinking in scienceAmerican Scientist20171051131710.1511/2017.124.13 – reference: WitherspoonEBHigashiRMSchunnCDBaehrECShoopRDeveloping computational thinking through a virtual robotics programming curriculumACM Trans. Comput. Educ.20171814:14:2010.1145/3104982 – reference: AirasianPWCruikshankKAMayerREPintrichPRRathsJWittrockMCAndersonLWKrathwohlDRA taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition)2001New YorkLongman – reference: DennerJWernerLCampeSOrtizEPair programming: under what conditions is it advantageous for middle school students?Journal of Research on Technology in Education201446327729610.1080/15391523.2014.888272 – reference: ShuteVJChenSAsbell-ClarkJDemystifying computational thinkingEducational Research Review201722201714215810.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003 – reference: AtmatzidouSDemetriadisSAdvancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: a study on age and gender relevant differencesRobotics and Autonomous Systems20167566167010.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008 – reference: GarneliVChorianopoulosKProgramming video games and simulations in science education: exploring computational thinking through code analysisInteractive Learning Environments201826338640110.1080/10494820.2017.1337036 – reference: Yadav, A., Larimore, R., Rich, K., & Schwarz, C. (2019). Integrating computational thinking in elementary classrooms: introducing a toolkit to support teachers. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 93-96). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). – reference: WeintropDWilenskyUHow block-based, text-based, and hybrid block/text modalities shape novice programming practicesInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction201817839210.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.005 – reference: ZhongBWangQChenJLiYInvestigating the period of switching roles in pair programming in a primary schoolEducational Technology & Society2017203220233 – reference: DenningPJFreemanPAThe profession of IT: computing’s paradigmCommunications of the ACM20095212283010.1145/1610252.1610265 – reference: Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199–237. – reference: GroverSPeaRComputational thinking: a competency whose time has come. Computer Science Education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school2018LondonBloomsbury Academic193710.1080/08993408.2015.1033142 – reference: von WangenheimCGHauckJCRDemetrioMFPelleRda Cruz AlvesNBarbosaHAzevedoLFCodeMaster - automatic assessment and grading of App Inventor and Snap! programsInformatics in Education201817111715010.15388/infedu.2018.08 – reference: Buffum, P. S., Lobene, E. V., Frankosky, M. H., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E. N., & Lester, J. C. (2015). A practical guide to developing and validating computer science knowledge assessments with application to middle school. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 622-627). ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677295. – reference: Wilson, C., Sudol, L. A., Stephenson, C., & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: the failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. Association for Computing Machinery, 26. – reference: Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J. M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Unpublished Manuscript in Progress, Referenced in Http://Www.Cs.Cmu.Edu/~ CompThink/Resources/TheLinkWing.Pdf. – reference: PapertSMindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas1980New YorkBasic Books, Inc. – reference: Adams, C., Cutumisu, M., & Lu, C. (2019). Measuring K-12 computational thinking concepts, practices and perspectives: An examination of current CT assessments. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE) (pp. 18–22). Las Vegas, NV: March. – reference: Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2016b). Comparing computational thinking development assessment scores with software complexity metrics. Paper presented at the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1040-1045). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474681. – reference: ArkseyHO'MalleyLScoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology200581193210.1080/1364557032000119616 – reference: ChenGShenJBarth-CohenLJiangSHuangXEltoukhyMAssessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programmingComputers & Education201710916217510.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001 – reference: LooiCKHowMLLongkaiWSeowPLiuLAnalysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinkingComputer Science Education201828325527910.1080/08993408.2018.1533297 – reference: BarrVStephensonCBringing computational thinking to K-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?ACM Inroads201121485410.1145/1929887.1929905 – reference: Rojas-LópezAGarcía-PeñalvoFJLearning scenarios for the subject methodology of programming from evaluating the computational thinking of new studentsRevista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje2018131303610.1109/RITA.2018.2809941 – reference: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in EducationAERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing2014Washington, DCAmerican Educational Research Association – reference: KafaiYBResnickMConstructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world1996HillsdaleErlbaum – reference: Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 1-25. – reference: McMillan, J. H., Hellsten, L. M., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (Canadian ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson. – reference: KorkmazÖA validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS)Computers & Education20125941162116910.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021 – reference: WingJ(2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: MathematicalPhysical and Engineering Sciences188136618813717372510.1098/rsta.2008.0118 – reference: GuzdialMEducation paving the way for computational thinkingCommunications of the ACM2008518252710.1145/1378704.1378713 – reference: KahnKSendovaESacristánAINossRYoung students exploring cardinality by constructing infinite processesTechnology, Knowledge and Learning201116133410.1007/s10758-011-9175-0 – reference: Moreno-LeónJRoblesGRomán-GonzálezMCode to learn: where does it belong in the K-12 curriculumJournal of Information Technology Education: Research20161528330310.28945/3521 – reference: Wing, J. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing. Retrieved from http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/2014/01/computational-thinking. Accessed 15 Oct 2019. – reference: BarrDHarrisonJConeryLComputational thinking: a digital age skill for everyoneLearning & Leading with Technology20113862023 – reference: MunozRVillarroelRBarcelosTSRiquelmeFQuezadaÁBustos-ValenzuelaPDeveloping computational thinking skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder through digital game programmingIEEE Access20186638806388910.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877417 – reference: Sáez-LópezJRomán-GonzálezMVázquez-CanoEVisual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: a two year case study using “scratch” in five schoolsComputers & Education20169712914110.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 – reference: BersMUFlanneryLKazakoffERSullivanAComputational thinking and tinkering: exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculumComputers & Education20147214515710.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020 – reference: BransfordJDBrownACockingRHow people learn: mind, brain, experience, and school1999Washington, DCNational Research Council – reference: BasuSBiswasGKinnebrewJSLearner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environmentUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction201727155310.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 – reference: HsuTCChangSCHungYTHow to learn and how to teach computational thinking: suggestions based on a review of the literatureComputers & Education201812629631010.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004 – reference: Román-GonzálezMPérez-GonzálezJ-CMoreno-LeónJRoblesGExtending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factorsComputers in Human Behavior20188044145910.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 – reference: WernerLindaDennerJillCampeShannonChildren Programming GamesACM Transactions on Computing Education201414412210.1145/2677091 – reference: FessakisGGouliEMavroudiEProblem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case studyComputers & Education201363879710.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 – reference: HeppnerPPPetersenCHThe development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventoryJournal of Counseling Psychology1982291667510.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66 – reference: KneeJAHirsh-PasekKGolinkoffRMSingerDPlay = learning2006New YorkOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.001.0001 – reference: FronzaIIoiniNECorralLTeaching computational thinking using agile software engineering methods: a framework for middle schoolsACM Trans. Computers & Education201717419:119:2810.1145/3055258 – reference: Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2017). Implicit intelligence beliefs of computer science students: Exploring change across the semester. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 179–196. – reference: KayAGoldbergAPersonal dynamic mediaComputer1977103314110.1109/C-M.1977.217672 – reference: Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38–43. – reference: LyeSYKohJHLReview on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: what is next for K-12?Computers in Human Behavior201441516110.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 – reference: Rich, K., & Yadav, A. (2019). Infusing computational thinking instruction into elementary mathematics and science: patterns of teacher implementation. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 76-80). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). – reference: StrawhackerALeeMBersMUTeaching tools, teachers’ rules: exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJrInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education201828234737610.1007/s10798-017-9400-9 – reference: Jacob, S., Nguyen, H., Tofel-Grehl, C., Richardson, D., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Teaching computational thinking to English learners. NYS TESOL Journal, 5(2). – reference: SeehornDCareySFuschettoBLeeIMoixDO’Grady-CunniffDCSTA K–12 computer science standards: Revised 20112011New YorkACM – reference: PellasNVosinakisSThe effect of simulation games on learning computer programming: a comparative study on high school students’ learning performance by assessing computational problem-solving strategiesEducation and Information Technologies20182362423245210.1007/s10639-018-9724-4 – reference: DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy. MIT Press. – reference: JunSHanSKimHLeeWAssessing the computational literacy of elementary students on a national level in KoreaEducational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability201426431933210.1007/s11092-013-9185-7 – reference: BatiKYetişirMIÇalişkanIGüneşGGül SaçanETeaching the concept of time: a steam-based program on computational thinking in science educationCogent Education20185111610.1080/2331186X.2018.1507306 – reference: Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking in teacher education. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 205-220). Springer, Cham. – reference: TsaravaKMoellerKNinausMTraining computational thinking through board games: the case of crabs & turtlesInternational Journal of Serious Games201852254410.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248 – reference: PhamMTRajićAGreigJDSargeantJMPapadopoulosAMcEwenSAA scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistencyResearch Synthesis Methods20145437138510.1002/jrsm.1123 – reference: PsycharisSKalliaMThe effects of computer programming on high school students’ reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solvingInstructional Science201745558360210.1007/s11251-017-9421-5 – reference: DoleckTBazelaisPLemayDJSaxenaABasnetRBAlgorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performanceJournal of Computers in Education20174435536910.1007/s40692-017-0090-9 – reference: GoldsteinSPrinciottaDNaglieriJAHandbook of intelligence. Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts2015New York, NYSpringer – reference: RomeroMLepageALilleBComputational thinking development through creative programming in higher educationInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education201714111510.1186/s41239-017-0080-z – reference: ISTE (2011). Computational Thinking in K–12 Education leadership toolkit. Computer Science Teacher Association: http://csta. acm. org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11 CTLeadershipt Toolkit-SP-vF. pdf adresinden alındı. – reference: YağcıMA valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skillsEducation and Information Technologies201824112310.1007/s10639-018-9801-8 – reference: de PaulaBHBurnANossRValenteJAPlaying Beowulf: bridging computational thinking, arts and literature through game-makingInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction201816394610.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.003 – reference: KongSCChiuMMLaiMA study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking educationComputers & Education201812717818910.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026 – reference: MouzaCMarzocchiAPanYPollockLDevelopment, implementation, and outcomes of an equitable computer science after-school program: Findings from middle-school studentsJournal of Research on Technology in Education20164828410410.1080/15391523.2016.1146561 – reference: KorkmazÖÇakirRÖzdenMYA validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)Computers in Human Behavior20177255856910.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 – reference: LeonardJBussAGamboaRMitchellMFasholaOSHubertTAlmughyirahSUsing robotics and game design to enhance children's self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skillsJournal of Science Education and Technology201625686087610.1007/s10956-016-9628-2 – volume: 105 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR20 publication-title: American Scientist doi: 10.1511/2017.124.13 – volume: 29 start-page: 66 issue: 1 year: 1982 ident: 9799_CR35 publication-title: Journal of Counseling Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66 – ident: 9799_CR53 doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474681 – ident: 9799_CR14 doi: 10.1145/2676723.2677295 – volume: 5 start-page: 371 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR58 publication-title: Research Synthesis Methods doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123 – volume: 28 start-page: 347 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR70 publication-title: International Journal of Technology and Design Education doi: 10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9 – volume-title: Play = learning year: 2006 ident: 9799_CR42 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.001.0001 – volume: 59 start-page: 1162 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 9799_CR44 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021 – volume: 13 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR62 publication-title: Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje doi: 10.1109/RITA.2018.2809941 – ident: 9799_CR15 – ident: 9799_CR76 doi: 10.1145/3414583 – volume: 48 start-page: 84 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR54 publication-title: Journal of Research on Technology in Education doi: 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146561 – volume: 116 start-page: 191 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR24 publication-title: Computers and Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 – volume-title: CSTA K–12 computer science standards: Revised 2011 year: 2011 ident: 9799_CR68 – volume: 8 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 9799_CR4 publication-title: International Journal of Social Research Methodology doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616 – ident: 9799_CR31 doi: 10.3102/0013189X12463051 – ident: 9799_CR25 – volume: 16 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 9799_CR40 publication-title: Technology, Knowledge and Learning doi: 10.1007/s10758-011-9175-0 – ident: 9799_CR46 – volume-title: Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world year: 1996 ident: 9799_CR39 – ident: 9799_CR17 – volume: 26 start-page: 319 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR38 publication-title: Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability doi: 10.1007/s11092-013-9185-7 – volume: 23 start-page: 2423 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR57 publication-title: Education and Information Technologies doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9724-4 – volume: 75 start-page: 661 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR5 publication-title: Robotics and Autonomous Systems doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008 – volume: 2 start-page: 48 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 9799_CR6 publication-title: ACM Inroads doi: 10.1145/1929887.1929905 – volume: 46 start-page: 277 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR19 publication-title: Journal of Research on Technology in Education doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.888272 – volume: 5 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR10 publication-title: Cogent Education doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507306 – volume: 24 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR82 publication-title: Education and Information Technologies doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8 – volume: 53 start-page: 562 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR83 publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research doi: 10.1177/0735633115608444 – volume-title: Handbook of intelligence. Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts year: 2015 ident: 9799_CR30 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0 – volume: 17 start-page: 117 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR72 publication-title: Informatics in Education doi: 10.15388/infedu.2018.08 – start-page: 19 volume-title: Computational thinking: a competency whose time has come. Computer Science Education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR33 doi: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR74 publication-title: ACM Transactions on Computing Education doi: 10.1145/2677091 – volume: 63 start-page: 87 year: 2013 ident: 9799_CR26 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 – volume: 27 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR9 publication-title: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction doi: 10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 – volume: 20 start-page: 220 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR84 publication-title: Educational Technology & Society – volume: 41 start-page: 51 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR49 publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 – volume: 5 start-page: 25 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR71 publication-title: International Journal of Serious Games doi: 10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248 – volume: 10 start-page: 31 issue: 3 year: 1977 ident: 9799_CR41 publication-title: Computer doi: 10.1109/C-M.1977.217672 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR66 publication-title: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0080-z – volume: 126 start-page: 296 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR36 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004 – ident: 9799_CR80 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13 – volume: 366 start-page: 3717 issue: 1881 year: 1881 ident: 9799_CR77 publication-title: Physical and Engineering Sciences doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 – ident: 9799_CR22 – volume: 17 start-page: 19:1 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR28 publication-title: ACM Trans. Computers & Education doi: 10.1145/3055258 – volume: 80 start-page: 441 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR64 publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 – volume-title: AERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR2 – volume-title: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition) year: 2001 ident: 9799_CR3 – volume-title: How people learn: mind, brain, experience, and school year: 1999 ident: 9799_CR12 – ident: 9799_CR78 – ident: 9799_CR1 – volume: 46 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 9799_CR51 publication-title: Revista De Educacion a Distancia – ident: 9799_CR32 doi: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142 – volume: 6 start-page: 63880 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR55 publication-title: IEEE Access doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877417 – volume: 18 start-page: 47 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR65 publication-title: International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004 – ident: 9799_CR13 – ident: 9799_CR27 doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.003 – volume: 25 start-page: 860 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR47 publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2 – volume: 97 start-page: 129 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR67 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 – volume: 51 start-page: 25 issue: 8 year: 2008 ident: 9799_CR34 publication-title: Communications of the ACM doi: 10.1145/1378704.1378713 – volume: 17 start-page: 83 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR73 publication-title: International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.005 – volume: 26 start-page: 386 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR29 publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1337036 – volume: 22 start-page: 142 issue: 2017 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR69 publication-title: Educational Research Review doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003 – ident: 9799_CR50 – volume: 45 start-page: 583 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR59 publication-title: Instructional Science doi: 10.1007/s11251-017-9421-5 – volume: 18 start-page: 4:1 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR79 publication-title: ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. doi: 10.1145/3104982 – volume: 38 start-page: 20 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 9799_CR7 publication-title: Learning & Leading with Technology – volume: 4 start-page: 355 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR23 publication-title: Journal of Computers in Education doi: 10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9 – volume: 72 start-page: 145 year: 2014 ident: 9799_CR11 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020 – volume: 23 start-page: 1145 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR8 publication-title: Education and Information Technologies doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9658-2 – ident: 9799_CR75 – volume: 16 start-page: 39 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR18 publication-title: International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.003 – volume: 52 start-page: 28 issue: 12 year: 2009 ident: 9799_CR21 publication-title: Communications of the ACM doi: 10.1145/1610252.1610265 – ident: 9799_CR60 – ident: 9799_CR37 – volume: 72 start-page: 678 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR63 publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047 – volume: 15 start-page: 283 year: 2016 ident: 9799_CR52 publication-title: Journal of Information Technology Education: Research doi: 10.28945/3521 – volume: 28 start-page: 255 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR48 publication-title: Computer Science Education doi: 10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297 – ident: 9799_CR81 – volume: 109 start-page: 162 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR16 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001 – volume: 72 start-page: 558 year: 2017 ident: 9799_CR45 publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 – volume: 17 start-page: 77 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR61 publication-title: Informatics in Education doi: 10.15388/infedu.2018.05 – volume-title: Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas year: 1980 ident: 9799_CR56 – volume: 127 start-page: 178 year: 2018 ident: 9799_CR43 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026 |
| SSID | ssj0009890 |
| Score | 2.4819226 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Computational thinking (CT) is regarded as an essential twenty-first century competency and it is already embedded in K-12 curricula across the globe. However,... |
| SourceID | proquest gale eric crossref springer jstor |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 651 |
| SubjectTerms | 21st Century Skills Abstract Reasoning Assessments Cognitive ability Computation Computer applications Curricula Design of experiments Developmentally Appropriate Practices Education Educational Research Educational Technology Elementary Secondary Education Experimental design Learning strategies Logical Thinking Problem Solving Quasiexperimental Design Research Design Science Education Student Evaluation Test Format Test Items Thinking Skills |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Materials Science Database dbid: KB. link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB4V2gMXKLSI8JIPSC2CFMevJCe0VIsqDqgSReJmeW1HQoLdhSz8fjyOsyuQ4FIph0hJHCcztscz33wDcMC4lbQRaLnVPBcKQQBKlLk3lZTe1oxKE4tNlJeX1c1N_Tc53NoEq-znxDhRu4lFH_lJWPnDUSpRnU4fcqwahdHVVEJjCT4XLNj6GJQ9-7Ug3a3qjo1AIiZIyJQ0k1LnkIGPYgoPRrZy_mphStjnNEt3SMVXNuibsGlcjc7X_vc7vsJqskPJoFOcdfjkxxtYwjnBPTZgPY36lvxM1NSH3-BqQK5sTLEiXVCBTBoyvJ_eRqIR0sP4yGQczhH3SbqqEcnjSLBKKPrmyWBOCNp-h-vz4b_ff_JUliG3QlWz3ChlhKGiYQ0tTbDnSl9WNXOjYhT2u7YoXMMc50Ya4bhlXFJTq5Iz5yTzjku-CcvjydhvAZE19XQU_oVUyHMfduO0cAq3WcZbyW0GRS8TbRNnOZbOuNMLtmWUow5y1FGOmmdwNH9m2jF2fHj3Jop6fufwAulogo2VwQ8UvsZxHl5pTUpXCB1Hxiw9KIO-VaHVOjQR9WPehqhUsPoEy2C3VwGdZoZWL-SfwXGvRIvL7_d0--PWdmCFoTZHpM0uLM8en_wefLHPs9v2cT-OixdTJQvy priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Recent Computational Thinking Assessments |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/48699342 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3 http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1236554 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2322327648 |
| Volume | 28 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000501074700006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Agricultural Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: M0K dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/agriculturejournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: PCBAR dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/eaasdb providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Engineering Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: M7S dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Environmental Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: PATMY dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/environmentalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Materials Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: KB. dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/materialsscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 20241214 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-1839 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009890 issn: 1059-0145 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3_a9QwFH-4zR_8RbfpWHUe-UFQ0Uqar-2P3bghjh3FmzL9JeTSFgbb3VhP_37z0vTOjSkolFBomqbJS_Je8nmfB_CKcSdpK1BzK3gqFIIAlNBpY3MpG1cwKm0INqEnk_z8vKiiU1g3oN2HI8kwU__m7IaceRSdbvAsKuUbsCWRbQZt9OnXNdVuXvQcBBKRQEJGV5n7y7i1HEXEc5ybe3ziLc3zzmFpWIOOn_xf7bfhcdQ5SdkLyQ48aOa7GK45Qjt2YSeO8I68iTTUb5_CtCRTF9ypSH-AQBYtGV9dXwRSETJA9shi7u8R40n6CBFxd5FgRFDchyflivyzewZfjsdnRx_TGIIhdULly9QqZYWlomUt1dbrbrrRecHqWTbztq3LsrplNedWWlFzx7iktlCas7qWrKm55HuwOV_Mm30gsqANnSmRS4Wc9t7yplmt0KSyjZPcJZANPWFc5CfHMBmXZs2sjG1ofBua0IaGJ_Bu9c51z87x19x72MGrnONPSD3j9akEXmOXGxzT_pPORtcEX3FkxzKl9nZk7kstfBFBKlZliFx5DU-wBA4GMTFxFuiM11b9pf0_J_B-EIv14z_X9Pm_ZX8BjxhKVkDZHMDm8uZH8xIeup_Li-5mBFuH40n1eQQbJ4cffHpKTzDVVUinPq3kd5-rKs9Ov43CWPoFQeQKZg |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Nb9NAEB1VBQku0BYqTFvYAwgQWNj7ZfuAUASpWlqiSi1Sb9vNei1VgiStA4g_xW9kZr1OVCR66wEph0hxNrbzdnbW8-Y9gGdcOJU1kjK3SqRSEwlAyyL1tlTKu4pnygaziWI0Kk9Pq6MV-N33whCtso-JIVDXU0fPyN_iyo-vQsvy_ewiJdcoqq72FhodLA78r5-4ZWvf7X_E__c557vDkw97aXQVSJ3U5Ty1WltpM9nwJisspiOFL8qK1-N8jNs1l-d1w2shrLKyFo4LldlKF4LXteK-Di4RGPJvYRrBs0AVPFqK_JZVp36giIMkVWzSia16pPiXUcsQVdJScWUhjFzruCp0zMgrOe9fZdqw-u3e_9_u2xrci3k2G3QTYx1W_GSDLKojnWUD1mNUa9nLKL396gEcD9ixCy1krCuasGnDht9m50FIhfU0RTad4HvitbLOFSM-UWXkgkq1BzZYCJ62D-HLjVzoJqxOphP_CJiqMp-N8d4rTTr-JQbLvNa0jbTeKeESyHsMGBc12cka5KtZqkkTbgzixgTcGJHA68V3Zp0iybVHbxK0FkcOP5HcDuaQCbwgsBmKY_iTzsZ2DDxxUgQzgwL3ziWOWuEQAY-LMWSpMauVPIHtHnImRr7WLPGWwJsetMuP_32mj68f7Snc2Tv5fGgO90cHW3CX00wKrKJtWJ1ffvc7cNv9mJ-3l0_CnGRwdtNg_gN9qGfo |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-NDaG9MDaYyDbAD5MAQTTHX0keK2jFx1RNFNDeLNd2pEkjrdZufz8-x2k3BEgIKQ-R4jj-ODt3vt_9DuCYcStpI1Bzq3kuFIIAlChzbyopva0ZlSYmmyjH4-r8vD67FcUf0e69S7KLaUCWpnZ5MnfNya3AN-TPoxiAg36pnN-DLREsGQR1fZl8X9PuVnXHRyARFSRkCpv5fR13fk0J_Zz26Q6reEcL_cVxGv9Ho53_78kjeJh0UTLohGcXNny7h2mcE-RjD3bTyl-QV4me-vVjmAzIxMYwK9I5FsisIcMf84tINkJ6KB-ZteEesZ-kyxyRTh0JZgrF83kyWJGCLp7At9Hw67sPeUrNkFuhqmVulDLCUNGwhpYm6HSlL6uauWkxDTavLQrXMMe5kUY4bhmX1NSq5Mw5ybzjku_DZjtr_VMgsqaeTpWopEKu-2CR08IpNLWMt5LbDIp-VrRNvOWYPuNSrxmXcQx1GEMdx1DzDN6s3pl3rB1_Lb2Pk70qOfyElDRBz8rgJU6_xrUePmlNClkIDUfWLD0og31ZhVrrUEWUkFUdolJB8xMsg6NeZHTaHRY6aLHhKkOfM3jbi8j68Z9bevBvxV_Ag7P3I336cfz5ELYZClkE4hzB5vLq2j-D-_ZmebG4eh4XzU8TmA40 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Scoping+Review+of+Empirical+Research+on+Recent+Computational+Thinking+Assessments&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+science+education+and+technology&rft.au=Cutumisu%2C+Maria&rft.au=Adams%2C+Cathy&rft.au=Lu%2C+Chang&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.pub=Springer+Science+%2B+Business+Media&rft.issn=1059-0145&rft.eissn=1573-1839&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10956-019-09799-3&rft.externalDocID=48699342 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1059-0145&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1059-0145&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1059-0145&client=summon |