No Clear Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Knotted and Knotless Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review
To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair. A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clini...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Arthroscopy Ročník 41; číslo 5; s. 1637 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
United States
01.05.2025
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1526-3231, 1526-3231 |
| On-line prístup: | Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.
A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.
A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.
The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.
Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.PURPOSETo analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair.A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.METHODSA comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software.A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.RESULTSA total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups.The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.CONCLUSIONSThe available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors.Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III, systematic review of Level I to III studies. To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart repair. A comprehensive literature search was done in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2023. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of Bankart repair using knotless and knot-tying techniques were included in the study. In vitro, animal, and Level IV and V studies were excluded. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was calculated according to the RoB 2 tool, and for nonrandomized studies, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used. Statistical analysis was done using RevMan software. A total of 9 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized comparative studies involving 720 patients, were included in the systematic review. The ROWE score ranged from 81.7 to 94.3 in the knot-tying group and 86 to 96.3 in the knotless group. Visual Analog Scale scores at the final follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 in the knot-tying group and 0.7 to 2.5 in the knotless group. The rate of redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery in the knot-tying group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, 16.7% to 29.7%, and 1.6% to 17.6%, respectively, whereas that in the knotless group ranged from 2.4% to 23.8%, 7.4% to 22.2%, and 2.4% to 19%, respectively. The mean external rotation was 54° to 65° in the knot-tying group and 61° to 99° in the knotless group. The mean forward-flexion was 164 to 172 in the knot-tying group and 165 to 174 in the knotless group. Our subjective synthesis does not reveal any difference in the outcome between the 2 groups. The available literature does not demonstrate a clear difference in functional outcomes, residual pain, and rate of complications as redislocation, subluxation, and revision surgery between Bankart repairs performed with knotted and knotless anchors. Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies. |
| Author | Jain, Gunjar Datt, Rameshwar Krishna, Anant Morankar, Rahul Patro, Bishnu Prasad |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gunjar surname: Jain fullname: Jain, Gunjar organization: Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India – sequence: 2 givenname: Rameshwar surname: Datt fullname: Datt, Rameshwar email: rameshwar5189@gmail.com organization: Department of Orthopaedics, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: rameshwar5189@gmail.com – sequence: 3 givenname: Anant surname: Krishna fullname: Krishna, Anant organization: Department of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College & Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, New Delhi, India – sequence: 4 givenname: Bishnu Prasad surname: Patro fullname: Patro, Bishnu Prasad organization: Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India – sequence: 5 givenname: Rahul surname: Morankar fullname: Morankar, Rahul organization: Division of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38942097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkEtLw0AUhQep2If-A5FZukmcVyaJu7Y-sVioug6TyQ1OTWZqJmnpvzfUCq7O4dyPy-GM0cA6CwhdUhJSQuXNOlRN-9m4kBEmQhKFhMsTNKIRkwFnnA7--SEae78mhHCe8DM05EkqGEnjEdq-OjyvQDX4zpQlNGA1YGP7zFijVYWXXatdDR7PoN0BWPxiXdtCgZUtDr4C7_H0UMVrtzEaz5T96rvhFWyUaW7xFL_tfQu1avvjCrYGdufotFSVh4ujTtDHw_37_ClYLB-f59NFoIVMoiAXMeeSq1jxlEYJ5JEmmoKOSlqSvEgpL3JaSikSGbM4EkIlUuuCq1z1BC3ZBF3__t007rsD32a18RqqSllwnc84ibmMuGCsR6-OaJfXUGSbxtSq2Wd_W7EfEK5v1g |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_5397_cise_2025_00451 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_25_00666 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_025_08832_4 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.036 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1526-3231 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 38942097 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABLJU ABMAC ABWVN ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO AEVXI AFCTW AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGQPQ AHHHB AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CAG CGR COF CUY CVF EBS ECM EFJIC EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB G-2 GBLVA HEE HEK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M28 M31 M41 MO0 N9A NPM NQ- O9- OF~ OR- R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ UHS UV1 WUQ XH2 Z5R ZXP 7X8 EFKBS |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4685-b473363a7a39158eb5c0c1ec5f1f0bd913db1f66486727544a86ccd3abaf1f1f2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 3 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001493873200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1526-3231 |
| IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 11:05:48 EDT 2025 Sat May 10 01:40:52 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4685-b473363a7a39158eb5c0c1ec5f1f0bd913db1f66486727544a86ccd3abaf1f1f2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 38942097 |
| PQID | 3073653422 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3073653422 pubmed_primary_38942097 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | May 2025 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2025 text: May 2025 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| SSID | ssj0003383 |
| Score | 2.4779434 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | To analyze whether the arthroscopic Bankart repair using a knotless suture anchor has a better functional outcome than the conventional knot-tying Bankart... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1637 |
| SubjectTerms | Arthroscopy - adverse effects Arthroscopy - instrumentation Arthroscopy - methods Bankart Lesions - surgery Humans Suture Anchors - adverse effects Suture Techniques - adverse effects Suture Techniques - instrumentation Treatment Outcome |
| Title | No Clear Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Knotted and Knotless Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38942097 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3073653422 |
| Volume | 41 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001493873200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ1bS8MwFMeDOh988YK3eSOCr8E1SZvOF9mmQ1DrQIW9jdzKiiOd67bP70nb6ZMg-FL60FuS05M_OSe_g9AVp9IGXGliwtgQHmtDZEhjwtKQ8lRwUCQlxPVJJEk8HLYH9YJbUadVrnxi6ahNrv0a-bW3xShknNLb6SfxVaN8dLUuobGOGgykjLdqMfyhhbMKwwlTVEQYCJnV1rkyvwtGZjzz2_8oL9mdLPpdZJaTTX_nv5-5i7ZrmYk7lV3soTXr9tEyyXHPl4nAd3VZFG1x5nDNBp3gl8Uc3mIL3K2yt_Cjy-cgSbF0pjyfgF_0Dx17BmY-zTTuSvcBbcQg5GU2u8Ed_PrNhsZV4OEAvffv33oPpK67QDSP4pAo7hmJTArp6fGxVaFu6cDqMA3SljLtgBkVpFHkYX3UA_RkHGltmFQSrghSeog2XO7sMcJCCaFAVjERGC5SqcAvh0ILE-mAWm6b6HLVjSOwax-skM7mi2L005FNdFSNxWhaAThGILI4bbXFyR_uPkVb1JfsLXMUz1Ajhb_anqNNvZxnxeyiNBg4JoPnLyRBy04 |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No+Clear+Difference+in+Clinical+Outcomes+Between+Knotted+and+Knotless+Arthroscopic+Bankart+Repair%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Jain%2C+Gunjar&rft.au=Datt%2C+Rameshwar&rft.au=Krishna%2C+Anant&rft.au=Patro%2C+Bishnu+Prasad&rft.date=2025-05-01&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2024.05.036&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38942097&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38942097&rft.externalDocID=38942097 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |