No Significant Difference Between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review
To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the Preferred...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Arthroscopy Vol. 41; no. 7; p. 2598 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
01.07.2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1526-3231, 1526-3231 |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.
Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.
A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of 2 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, 4 indicated significantly higher Constant scores in the SB group compared with the HP group whereas the remaining 5 found no difference between the groups. Among the 5 included studies that reported VAS scores, 2 showed statistically significant differences favoring the SB group. Among the 10 included studies that reported operation time, 3 found a shorter operation time in the SB group than in the HP group whereas 2 indicated a longer operation time for SB surgery compared with HP treatment. However, there was no statistically significant difference in coracoclavicular distance or the incidence of complications between the 2 groups.
The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SBs over HPs in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. Whereas some studies show that SB treatment may offer benefits such as higher Constant scores and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences.
Level Ⅲ, systematic review of Level II and Ⅲ studies. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.
Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.
A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of 2 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, 4 indicated significantly higher Constant scores in the SB group compared with the HP group whereas the remaining 5 found no difference between the groups. Among the 5 included studies that reported VAS scores, 2 showed statistically significant differences favoring the SB group. Among the 10 included studies that reported operation time, 3 found a shorter operation time in the SB group than in the HP group whereas 2 indicated a longer operation time for SB surgery compared with HP treatment. However, there was no statistically significant difference in coracoclavicular distance or the incidence of complications between the 2 groups.
The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SBs over HPs in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. Whereas some studies show that SB treatment may offer benefits such as higher Constant scores and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences.
Level Ⅲ, systematic review of Level II and Ⅲ studies. To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.PURPOSETo systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.METHODSTwo reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of 2 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, 4 indicated significantly higher Constant scores in the SB group compared with the HP group whereas the remaining 5 found no difference between the groups. Among the 5 included studies that reported VAS scores, 2 showed statistically significant differences favoring the SB group. Among the 10 included studies that reported operation time, 3 found a shorter operation time in the SB group than in the HP group whereas 2 indicated a longer operation time for SB surgery compared with HP treatment. However, there was no statistically significant difference in coracoclavicular distance or the incidence of complications between the 2 groups.RESULTSA total of 16 studies were included, consisting of 2 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, 4 indicated significantly higher Constant scores in the SB group compared with the HP group whereas the remaining 5 found no difference between the groups. Among the 5 included studies that reported VAS scores, 2 showed statistically significant differences favoring the SB group. Among the 10 included studies that reported operation time, 3 found a shorter operation time in the SB group than in the HP group whereas 2 indicated a longer operation time for SB surgery compared with HP treatment. However, there was no statistically significant difference in coracoclavicular distance or the incidence of complications between the 2 groups.The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SBs over HPs in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. Whereas some studies show that SB treatment may offer benefits such as higher Constant scores and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, systematic review of Level II and Ⅲ studies.CONCLUSIONSThe evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SBs over HPs in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. Whereas some studies show that SB treatment may offer benefits such as higher Constant scores and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, systematic review of Level II and Ⅲ studies. |
| Author | Hong, Zhenghua Xie, Chengxin Luo, Hua Jiang, Jiao Su, Yongwei |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chengxin surname: Xie fullname: Xie, Chengxin organization: Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Zhenghua surname: Hong fullname: Hong, Zhenghua organization: Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Yongwei surname: Su fullname: Su, Yongwei organization: Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Jiao surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Jiao organization: Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Hua surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Hua email: 18732196660@163.com organization: Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China. Electronic address: 18732196660@163.com |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39393427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNUMtOwzAQtFARLY8_QMhHLg1-xHHLrbyLKkC0nCvHWRe3iV0ch6rfws8SQZHQHmZnNDMr7SHqOO8AoVNKEkpodrFMVIjvwSeMsDQhw4QIsYd6VLCszxmnnX97Fx3W9ZIQwvmAH6AuH7aTMtlDX08eT-3CWWO1chHfWGMggNOAryBuAByeNrEJLW1i9A4rV-AH71f4pVQRsHV4FkBF6xZ4pJtWefV6tfG-wLPtGvB4PG714Cvrdak-rW5KFfCjtz-36tLrNuvdJR7h6baOULVU41f4tLA5RvtGlTWc7PAIvd3dzq4f-pPn-_H1aNLXaTZI-5IbXUA-1DnLZGEMZ0RQJaUpZK41gQEXOaRSCqMMZYXKGBRaAAWR00xTw47Q-W_vOviPBuo4r2ytoSyVA9_Uc06pkJJILlrr2c7a5BUU83WwlQrb-d9D2TcA5n6K |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_024_08100_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2025_03_035 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.055 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1526-3231 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 39393427 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO AAYWO ABLJU ABMAC ABWVN ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO AEVXI AFCTW AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGQPQ AHHHB AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CAG CGR COF CUY CVF EBS ECM EFJIC EFKBS EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB G-2 GBLVA HEE HEK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M28 M31 M41 MO0 N9A NPM NQ- O9- OF~ OR- R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ UHS UV1 WUQ XH2 Z5R ZXP 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4684-73fcdeb9cb267dff32051a77fd7bcc0e835be4775faf12da62edc5e1e5b16c1f2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 2 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001519123300014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1526-3231 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 17:44:05 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 01:33:45 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4684-73fcdeb9cb267dff32051a77fd7bcc0e835be4775faf12da62edc5e1e5b16c1f2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 39393427 |
| PQID | 3115770735 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3115770735 pubmed_primary_39393427 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | July 2025 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2025 text: July 2025 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| SSID | ssj0003383 |
| Score | 2.4871657 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixation for treating acute... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 2598 |
| SubjectTerms | Acromioclavicular Joint - injuries Acromioclavicular Joint - surgery Bone Plates Humans Joint Dislocations - surgery Suture Techniques - instrumentation Treatment Outcome |
| Title | No Significant Difference Between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39393427 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3115770735 |
| Volume | 41 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001519123300014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fSxwxEA61-uBLW6la6w-m0NdQN7tJbvsiZ1vxCj2OnoV7OzaTxC7YRO_Uf8Z_tpPsXn0ShLKwsIFll8kk8yUz-T7GPspCpcBiuUFheWWM5E1RKm4t1iiMcroXm9Dj8WA2qyf9htuyL6tczYl5orYR0x75p8wKo8kh5cn1DU-qUSm72ktorLH1kqBM8mo9e2QLLzsaTgpRipcEZFZH53J9F_XM70U6_ic6plMpnwaZOdicvf7f33zDXvUwE4adX2yxFy68ZQ_jCNP2MqTqIDIofO3FUdDBaVeuBdNMMQJJvjoGaIKFc0LhMLkiSAptgIuMMcMlDPGOWn7GJDAdLaTlLIxGI2pfxD9txKvmvs0lrvA9tvlbyxQ2kxt8hiFM_xFIQ5ed2Ga_zr5dfDnnvTgDx0oNKq5Lj9aZGo1Q2npfChrejdbeaoN47AjZGVdpLX3jC2EbJZxF6QonTaGw8GKHvQwxuHcMCLJpaaWppTMVKlrre6ldfWxwQE-l2mMfVraek_OnjEYTXLxbzh-tvcd2uw6bX3csHfOypqsS-v0z3t5nmyLp-uYy3AO27mnou0O2gfe37XJxlL2K7uPJj78qD9q_ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No+Significant+Difference+Between+Suture+Button+and+Hook+Plate+in+Treating+Acute+Rockwood+Type+III+Acromioclavicular+Joint+Dislocation%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Xie%2C+Chengxin&rft.au=Hong%2C+Zhenghua&rft.au=Su%2C+Yongwei&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Jiao&rft.date=2025-07-01&rft.issn=1526-3231&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2024.09.055&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |