Disengaged response behavior when the response button is blocked: Evaluation of a micro-intervention

In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation’s validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Frontiers in psychology Ročník 13; s. 954532
Hlavní autoři: Persic-Beck, Lothar, Goldhammer, Frank, Kroehne, Ulf
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 03.11.2022
Témata:
ISSN:1664-1078, 1664-1078
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation’s validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, post hoc methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the post hoc detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.
AbstractList In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation's validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.
In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation's validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, post hoc methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the post hoc detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation's validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, post hoc methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the post hoc detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.
In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation’s validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, post hoc methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the post hoc detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.
In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation’s validity. This study analyzes data from a linear computer-based assessment to evaluate a micro-intervention that blocked the possibility to respond for 2 s. The blocked response was implemented to prevent participants from accidental navigation and as a naive attempt to prevent rapid guesses and rapid omissions. The response process was analyzed by interpreting log event sequences within a finite-state machine approach. Responses were assigned to different response classes based on the event sequence. Additionally, post hoc methods for detecting rapid responses based on response time thresholds were applied to validate the classification. Rapid guesses and rapid omissions could be distinguished from accidental clicks by the log events following the micro-intervention. Results showed that the blocked response interfered with rapid responses but hardly led to behavioral changes. However, the blocked response could improve the post hoc detection of rapid responding by identifying responses that narrowly exceed time-bound thresholds. In an assessment context, it is desirable to prevent participants from accidentally skipping items, which in itself may lead to an increasing popularity of initially blocking responses. If, however, data from those assessments is analyzed for rapid responses, additional log data information should be considered.
Author Goldhammer, Frank
Persic-Beck, Lothar
Kroehne, Ulf
AuthorAffiliation 2 Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB) , Frankfurt , Germany
1 DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education , Frankfurt , Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB) , Frankfurt , Germany
– name: 1 DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education , Frankfurt , Germany
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lothar
  surname: Persic-Beck
  fullname: Persic-Beck, Lothar
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Frank
  surname: Goldhammer
  fullname: Goldhammer, Frank
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ulf
  surname: Kroehne
  fullname: Kroehne, Ulf
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kstu1DAUhi1URC_0AdigLNlk8D0xCyRUSqlUiQ2sLcc-ybhk7MFOBvXtcWZaNEXCG1vn8v06x_85OgkxAEJvCF4x1qr3_TY_DCuKKV0pwQWjL9AZkZLXBDftydH7FF3mfI_L4ZhiTF-hUyY5FoTzM-Q--wxhMAO4KkHexpCh6mBtdj6m6vcaQjWt4Sg1T1MMlc9VN0b7E9yH6npnxtlMvoRjX5lq422KtQ8TpB2EJf4avezNmOHy8b5AP75cf7_6Wt99u7m9-nRXWy7FVDsBRNmGdj1hRjkqWSt7rkQrgVhphKNWtL3BlDTGcoNJp1jjWtawjtIeDLtAtweui-Zeb5PfmPSgo_F6H4hp0CZN3o6gixYlgjaWsI4DxQaIbJhZKAJzB4X18cDazt0GnC2TJDM-gz7PBL_WQ9xpJaVqlCiAd4-AFH_NkCe98dnCOJoAcc6aNqzliku8lL491vor8vRNpaA5FJTN5pyg19ZP-5UXaT9qgvXiCb33hF48oQ-eKJ3kn84n-P97_gAzLLzq
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1479249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2025_105245
Cites_doi 10.1007/s41237-018-0063-y
10.1080/15366367.2017.1411651
10.1080/08957347.2013.739453
10.1080/08957347.2016.1171766
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01533
10.1111/jedm.12290
10.1007/BF02296272
10.1186/s40536-017-0051-9
10.1111/emip.12165
10.1207/s15324818ame1902_2
10.1207/s15324818ame1802_2
10.1177/0013164406294779
10.1186/s40536-020-00082-1
10.1080/08957347.2015.1042155
10.1007/s11336-006-1478-z
10.1186/s40536-014-0008-1
10.1080/08957347.2019.1660350
10.1080/08957347.2017.1353992
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00516.x
10.1111/bmsp.12188
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne.
Copyright © 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne. 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne.
– notice: Copyright © 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne. 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954532
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1664-1078
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d5e21527c13b4e20ae1673afea3504de
PMC9669795
36405144
10_3389_fpsyg_2022_954532
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABIVO
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEGXH
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
ACXDI
IPNFZ
NPM
RIG
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d5e19c72bf13a9d26386f49586e1c6a5d2c58fa0217ac4a01b937d8373b22fea3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 3
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000885790100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1664-1078
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:53:00 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 17:17:47 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 02 11:05:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:31 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:53:16 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:35:19 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords rapid responding
rapid guessing behavior
finite state machine
log data analysis
rapid omission
test taking behavior
process data analysis
Language English
License Copyright © 2022 Persic-Beck, Goldhammer and Kroehne.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c465t-d5e19c72bf13a9d26386f49586e1c6a5d2c58fa0217ac4a01b937d8373b22fea3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Hong Jiao, University of Maryland, College Park, United States; Michalis P. Michaelides, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
Edited by: Erin M. Buchanan, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, United States
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/d5e21527c13b4e20ae1673afea3504de
PMID 36405144
PQID 2738494605
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d5e21527c13b4e20ae1673afea3504de
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9669795
proquest_miscellaneous_2738494605
pubmed_primary_36405144
crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_954532
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_954532
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-11-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-11-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-11-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in psychology
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Psychol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Lindner (ref10) 2019; 10
Sahin (ref13) 2020; 8
DeMars (ref1) 2013; 8
Setzer (ref16) 2013; 26
Wise (ref25) 2012
Guo (ref6) 2016; 29
Schnipke (ref15) 1997; 34
Kroehne (ref8) 2018; 43
van der Linden (ref18) 2007; 72
(ref12) 2021
Ulitzsch (ref17) 2020; 73
Wise (ref20) 2015; 28
Kong (ref7) 2007; 67
Schnipke (ref14) 1995
Goldhammer (ref4) 2017; 5
Masters (ref11) 1982; 47
Wise (ref19) 2006; 19
Goldhammer (ref5) 2017; 15
ref3
Wise (ref23) 2017; 30
Deribo (ref2) 2021; 58
Wise (ref21) 2017; 36
Wise (ref22) 2019; 32
Wise (ref24) 2005; 18
Lee (ref9) 2014; 2
References_xml – year: 1995
  ident: ref14
  article-title: Assessing speededness in computer-based tests using item response times
– volume: 43
  start-page: 611
  year: 2018
  ident: ref8
  article-title: How to conceptualize, represent, and analyze log data from technology-based assessments? A generic framework and an application to questionnaire items
  publication-title: Behaviormetrika
  doi: 10.1007/s41237-018-0063-y
– ident: ref3
– volume: 15
  start-page: 128
  year: 2017
  ident: ref5
  article-title: What to make of and how to interpret process data
  publication-title: Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect.
  doi: 10.1080/15366367.2017.1411651
– volume: 26
  start-page: 34
  year: 2013
  ident: ref16
  article-title: An investigation of examinee test-taking effort on a large-scale assessment
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1080/08957347.2013.739453
– volume: 29
  start-page: 173
  year: 2016
  ident: ref6
  article-title: A new procedure for detection of students’ rapid guessing responses using response time
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1080/08957347.2016.1171766
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1533
  year: 2019
  ident: ref10
  article-title: The onset of rapid-guessing behavior over the course of testing time: a matter of motivation and cognitive resources
  publication-title: Front. Psychol.
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01533
– volume: 58
  start-page: 281
  year: 2021
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Model–based treatment of rapid guessing
  publication-title: J. Educ. Meas.
  doi: 10.1111/jedm.12290
– volume: 47
  start-page: 149
  year: 1982
  ident: ref11
  article-title: A rasch model for partial credit scoring
  publication-title: Psychometrika
  doi: 10.1007/BF02296272
– volume: 8
  start-page: 69
  year: 2013
  ident: ref1
  article-title: The role of gender in test-taking motivation under low-stakes conditions
  publication-title: Res. Pract. Assess.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 92
  year: 2017
  ident: ref4
  article-title: Conditioning factors of test-taking engagement in PIAAC: an exploratory IRT modelling approach considering person and item characteristics
  publication-title: Large Scale Assess. Educ.
  doi: 10.1186/s40536-017-0051-9
– volume: 36
  start-page: 52
  year: 2017
  ident: ref21
  article-title: Rapid-guessing behavior: its identification, interpretation, and implications
  publication-title: Educ. Meas. Issues Pract.
  doi: 10.1111/emip.12165
– volume: 19
  start-page: 95
  year: 2006
  ident: ref19
  article-title: An investigation of the differential effort received by items on a low-stakes computer-based test
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1902_2
– volume: 18
  start-page: 163
  year: 2005
  ident: ref24
  article-title: Response time effort: a new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1802_2
– volume: 67
  start-page: 606
  year: 2007
  ident: ref7
  article-title: Setting the response time threshold parameter to differentiate solution behavior from rapid-guessing behavior
  publication-title: Educ. Psychol. Meas.
  doi: 10.1177/0013164406294779
– volume: 8
  start-page: 18
  year: 2020
  ident: ref13
  article-title: Enhancing response time thresholds with response behaviors for detecting disengaged examinees
  publication-title: Large Scale Assess. Educ.
  doi: 10.1186/s40536-020-00082-1
– year: 2012
  ident: ref25
  article-title: Setting response time thresholds for a CAT item pool: the normative threshold method
– volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  year: 2021
  ident: ref12
– volume: 28
  start-page: 237
  year: 2015
  ident: ref20
  article-title: Effort analysis: individual score validation of achievement test data
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1080/08957347.2015.1042155
– volume: 72
  start-page: 287
  year: 2007
  ident: ref18
  article-title: A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items
  publication-title: Psychometrika
  doi: 10.1007/s11336-006-1478-z
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: ref9
  article-title: Using response time to investigate students’ test-taking behaviors in a NAEP computer-based study
  publication-title: Large Scale Assess. Educ.
  doi: 10.1186/s40536-014-0008-1
– volume: 32
  start-page: 325
  year: 2019
  ident: ref22
  article-title: An information-based approach to identifying rapid-guessing thresholds
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1080/08957347.2019.1660350
– volume: 30
  start-page: 343
  year: 2017
  ident: ref23
  article-title: A general approach to measuring test-taking effort on computer-based tests
  publication-title: Appl. Meas. Educ.
  doi: 10.1080/08957347.2017.1353992
– volume: 34
  start-page: 213
  year: 1997
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: a new method of measuring speededness
  publication-title: J. Educ. Meas.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00516.x
– volume: 73
  start-page: 83
  year: 2020
  ident: ref17
  article-title: A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response
  publication-title: Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol.
  doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12188
SSID ssj0000402002
Score 2.34056
Snippet In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation’s validity. This...
In large-scale assessments, disengaged participants might rapidly guess on items or skip items, which can affect the score interpretation's validity. This...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 954532
SubjectTerms log data analysis
process data analysis
Psychology
rapid guessing behavior
rapid omission
rapid responding
test taking behavior
Title Disengaged response behavior when the response button is blocked: Evaluation of a micro-intervention
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405144
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2738494605
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9669795
https://doaj.org/article/d5e21527c13b4e20ae1673afea3504de
Volume 13
WOSCitedRecordID wos000885790100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1664-1078
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000402002
  issn: 1664-1078
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1664-1078
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000402002
  issn: 1664-1078
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB5BxaEXVN4pUBmJE1Jo4jgP98ZjKy5UHEDam-VnGwHZarPbqhd-e2ec3SiLEFy45BA7ijUzHs-nGX8D8NoZ3YTautRwHRCgNCFtdG7SIHSQ1hk0oxCbTdRnZ818Lr9MWn1RTdhADzwI7tiVPrZetXlhhOeZ9nlVFzp4XZSZcJ68L0Y9EzAVfTDBoowPaUxEYfI4XPY354gHOX8rMWoo-M5BFPn6_xRk_l4rOTl8Tg_g_iZqZO-G1T6AO757CPuj87p5BO5j2_vuHL2DY8uh7tWz7R18dn3hO4ah3mRovcKoj7U9M3icfffuhM1G4m-2CEyzn1Srl7aTosjH8O109vXDp3TTQSG1oipXKQovl7bmJuSFlo7jZqsCQqKm8rmtdOm4LZugCZdoK3SWG4xWHGLWwnBOIn4Ce92i88-ABWsdzTdZHoSwhoASpdicqE3pC5lAthWnsht6cepy8UMhzCANqKgBRRpQgwYSeDN-cjlwa_xt8nvS0TiRaLHjCzQWtTEW9S9jSeDVVsMKtxHlRnTnF-te0Q0lISlJnMDTQePjr4pKEEu8SKDesYWdteyOdO1FpOpGMClrWR7-j8U_h32SR7wIWbyAvdVy7V_CPXu1avvlEdyt581R3AX4_PxrdgvvNxFl
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disengaged+response+behavior+when+the+response+button+is+blocked%3A+Evaluation+of+a+micro-intervention&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+psychology&rft.au=Lothar+Persic-Beck&rft.au=Frank+Goldhammer&rft.au=Frank+Goldhammer&rft.au=Ulf+Kroehne&rft.date=2022-11-03&rft.pub=Frontiers+Media+S.A&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft.volume=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2022.954532&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_d5e21527c13b4e20ae1673afea3504de
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon