Skin Penetration And Lag Times Of Neat And Aqueous Diethyl Phthalate, 1,2-Dichloroethane And Naphthalene

Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or labo...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Cutaneous and ocular toxicology Ročník 26; číslo 2; s. 147 - 160
Hlavní autori: Frederick Frasch, H., Barbero, Ana M., Alachkar, Houda, McDougal, James N.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Philadelphia, PA Informa UK Ltd 01.01.2007
Taylor & Francis
Predmet:
ISSN:1556-9527, 1556-9535
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean±SD; µg cm−2hour−1) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8±4.1 and 23.9±7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280±1380 and 3842±712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4±2.0 and 7.5±4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 ×) but lower with DCE (0.17 ×) and NAP (0.45 ×). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
AbstractList Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean+/-SD; microg cm(-2)hour(-1)) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8+/-4.1 and 23.9+/-7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280+/-1380 and 3842+/-712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4+/-2.0 and 7.5+/-4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 x) but lower with DCE (0.17 x) and NAP (0.45 x). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean+/-SD; microg cm(-2)hour(-1)) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8+/-4.1 and 23.9+/-7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280+/-1380 and 3842+/-712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4+/-2.0 and 7.5+/-4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 x) but lower with DCE (0.17 x) and NAP (0.45 x). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean+/-SD; microg cm(-2)hour(-1)) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8+/-4.1 and 23.9+/-7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280+/-1380 and 3842+/-712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4+/-2.0 and 7.5+/-4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 x) but lower with DCE (0.17 x) and NAP (0.45 x). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean±SD; µg cm−2hour−1) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8±4.1 and 23.9±7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280±1380 and 3842±712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4±2.0 and 7.5±4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 ×) but lower with DCE (0.17 ×) and NAP (0.45 ×). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean±SD; µg cm −2 hour −1 ) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8±4.1 and 23.9±7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280±1380 and 3842±712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4±2.0 and 7.5±4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 ×) but lower with DCE (0.17 ×) and NAP (0.45 ×). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity front dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (nonvolatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean plus or minus SD; mu g cm super(-2)hour super(-1)) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8 plus or minus 4.1 and 23.9 plus or minus 7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280 plus or minus 1380 and 3842 plus or minus 712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4 plus or minus 2.0 and 7.5 plus or minus 4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9x) but lower with DCE (0.17x) and NAP (0.45X). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.
Author Alachkar, Houda
Frederick Frasch, H.
Barbero, Ana M.
McDougal, James N.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: H.
  surname: Frederick Frasch
  fullname: Frederick Frasch, H.
  email: hbf9@cdc.gov
  organization: Health Effects Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ana M.
  surname: Barbero
  fullname: Barbero, Ana M.
  email: hbf9@cdc.gov
  organization: Health Effects Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Houda
  surname: Alachkar
  fullname: Alachkar, Houda
  email: hbf9@cdc.gov
  organization: Health Effects Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: James N.
  surname: McDougal
  fullname: McDougal, James N.
  email: hbf9@cdc.gov
  organization: Health Effects Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18910437$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17612981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkVtvFCEYhompsQf9Ad6YudGrjgIzDBC92bSekk3bxHo9-QYYh8rCCmzM_nvZQ23UZL2CwPN8vOE9RUc-eIPQc4JfEyzwG8JYJxnFHBNKKOXtI3SyOasla9jR7z3lx-g0pTuMG9FK-gQdE94RKgU5QdOX79ZXN8abHCHb4KuZ19UcvlW3dmFSdT1WVwby9nT2Y2XCKlWX1uRp7aqbKU_gIJvzipzT-tKqyYUYyiV4szWuYLllyvin6PEILpln-_UMff3w_vbiUz2__vj5YjavVduxXEvgTAvBOjboQeFBt1gI0TSdHATDUsmWa4lxyxhRHRDdSUOBjHRkSmpdwDP0ajd3GUPJm3K_sEkZ50qmEr7nmBPKcfdfkEiOJeGbiS_24GpYGN0vo11AXPf3n1iAl3sAkgI3RvDKpgdOSILbhheO7DgVQ0rRjA8I7jeF9v8UWhz-l6Ns3hZV-rLuoPluZ1o_hriAnyE63WdYl47uIzaH9Ld_6JMBlycF0fR3YRV96fDA478AHa7Fbg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2022_133909
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2022_121826
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1539_6924_2012_01901_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfaa117
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_toxlet_2013_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2008_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0668_2012_00772_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2009_06_035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2008_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2016_01_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_toxics12080588
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2014_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0205458
Cites_doi 10.2307/3430564
10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00538-0
10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05050.x
10.1289/ehp.8774223
10.1080/10629369808039155
10.1080/15428119591016665
10.1093/toxsci/48.2.180
10.1021/js960198e
10.1016/0378-5173(84)90145-5
10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05012.x
10.1152/physrev.1971.51.4.702
10.1016/0378-5173(92)90032-W
10.1016/j.tiv.2004.03.004
10.1093/annhyg/meg018
10.1007/s004200050402
10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.004
10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00124-1
10.1002/jps.20229
10.1016/j.tiv.2004.10.001
10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01111-1
10.1002/jps.20735
10.1023/A:1018915416930
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2007 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2007
2007 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2007 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2007
– notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T2
7U7
C1K
7X8
DOI 10.1080/15569520701212274
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Toxicology Abstracts
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Toxicology Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1556-9535
EndPage 160
ExternalDocumentID 17612981
18910437
10_1080_15569520701212274
221147
Genre Research Article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
00X
03L
0BK
0R~
29F
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
AAJNR
AALIY
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABBKH
ABCRQ
ABEIZ
ABLKL
ABUPF
ACENM
ACFUF
ACGFS
ACLSK
ADCVX
ADFCX
ADRBQ
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AEYQI
AFKVX
AFWLO
AGAFX
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJEBJ
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALIIL
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AWYRJ
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CAG
CCCUG
COF
CS3
DEIEU
DKSSO
DTRLO
DU5
DZHFC
EBD
EBS
EDH
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
LJTGL
M44
M4Z
O9-
QRXOQ
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
UHWXJ
V1S
~1N
AAGDL
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACIEZ
AFRVT
AHZWE
ALYBC
AQTUD
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TUROJ
AARSK
AAYXX
ACKYO
BANNL
CITATION
NUSFT
ADYSH
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T2
7U7
C1K
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-9a75d88565bdbc0bd408883369b8509c947d9004551c6a1d69e2a1f2f5c9dd833
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 14
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000247726800006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1556-9527
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 13:02:08 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 10:12:11 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:35 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:24:51 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:27:13 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:43:53 EDT 2025
Wed Jun 21 08:14:53 EDT 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Hairless guinea pig
Rodentia
Maximum flux
Permeability
Time lag
Vertebrata
Mammalia
Absorption
Guinea pig
Naphthalene
Penetration
Animal
Skin absorption
Skin
Diffusion
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c465t-9a75d88565bdbc0bd408883369b8509c947d9004551c6a1d69e2a1f2f5c9dd833
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 17612981
PQID 19709173
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs informahealthcare_journals_10_1080_15569520701212274
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_15569520701212274
pascalfrancis_primary_18910437
crossref_primary_10_1080_15569520701212274
proquest_miscellaneous_19709173
proquest_miscellaneous_70712706
pubmed_primary_17612981
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_15569520701212274
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Philadelphia, PA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Philadelphia, PA
– name: England
PublicationTitle Cutaneous and ocular toxicology
PublicationTitleAlternate Cutan Ocul Toxicol
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Informa UK Ltd
Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Informa UK Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis
References CIT0030
CIT0010
CIT0031
CIT0012
CIT0011
Higuchi T (CIT0009) 1960; 2
Scheuplein RJ (CIT0004) 1973; 60
Vecchia BE (CIT0003) 2003
CIT0014
CIT0013
CIT0016
CIT0015
CIT0018
CIT0017
Flynn GL. (CIT0001) 1990
CIT0019
CIT0021
CIT0023
CIT0022
Scheuplein RJ (CIT0028) 1971; 51
(CIT0025) 2000
Scheuplein RJ (CIT0020) 1974; 62
CIT0002
CIT0024
CIT0005
CIT0027
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0029
CIT0006
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.2307/3430564
– ident: CIT0013
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00538-0
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05050.x
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.8774223
– volume: 60
  start-page: 286
  year: 1973
  ident: CIT0004
  publication-title: IV. Penetration of nonelectrolytes (alcohols) from aqueous solutions and from pure liquids. J Invest Dermatol
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1080/10629369808039155
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1080/15428119591016665
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1093/toxsci/48.2.180
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1021/js960198e
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(84)90145-5
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb05012.x
– start-page: 93
  volume-title: Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment
  year: 1990
  ident: CIT0001
– volume: 51
  start-page: 702
  year: 1971
  ident: CIT0028
  publication-title: Physiol Rev
  doi: 10.1152/physrev.1971.51.4.702
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(92)90032-W
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.03.004
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg018
– start-page: 428
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0025
  publication-title: Draft Guideline
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1007/s004200050402
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.004
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00124-1
– ident: CIT0012
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1002/jps.20229
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.10.001
– volume: 2
  start-page: 85
  year: 1960
  ident: CIT0009
  publication-title: J Soc Cosmet Chem
– volume: 62
  start-page: 353
  year: 1974
  ident: CIT0020
  publication-title: V. Percutaneous absorption of solvent deposited solids. J Invest Dermatol
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01111-1
– ident: CIT0031
  doi: 10.1002/jps.20735
– start-page: 57
  volume-title: Transdermal drug delivery (2nd Ed.)
  year: 2003
  ident: CIT0003
– ident: CIT0019
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1023/A:1018915416930
SSID ssj0038492
Score 1.7479913
Snippet Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on...
Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity front dermal exposure depends on...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
informaworld
informahealthcare
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 147
SubjectTerms Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Calibration
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diffusion
Diffusion Chambers, Culture
Ethylene Dichlorides - pharmacokinetics
Guinea Pigs
Hairless guinea pig
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Maximum flux
Medical sciences
Naphthalenes - pharmacokinetics
Permeability
Phthalic Acids - pharmacokinetics
Reference Standards
Skin absorption
Skin Absorption - physiology
Solutions
Temperature
Toxicology
Title Skin Penetration And Lag Times Of Neat And Aqueous Diethyl Phthalate, 1,2-Dichloroethane And Naphthalene
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15569520701212274
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17612981
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19709173
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70712706
Volume 26
WOSCitedRecordID wos000247726800006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1556-9535
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0038492
  issn: 1556-9527
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 20050101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagQogLLe9t6eIDJ9SIOHH8OK4oKw6w7KGIvUV-kpVWu9Um5fd37DgtpXQPJYccorHj2N-MP9uTGYTeC028VYZlGshFRgWVQaXgxok2yuUOrphsgs9mYrGQ8-Sb0ya3yrCG9n2giGirg3Ir3Q4ecR9hCmSyKgCsBAwvLKvAAgOrDw59Z9Ofgx0u4b3xrBOkMxDnw5nmv2q4MSsdpJilzZUH1l9xTIMDpWqhD32f_OJudhpnqen-f37fAXqa6Cme9Hh6hh649XP0-Fs6gH-BmpCsC8_BQKZwu3iytvir-oXjvyT4u8czsO7x6QSaurlo8enSARpWeN50jVoBtz3B5KTITpemWW22Gxc2710sMVPnUQaqf4l-TD-fffqSpWQNmaGs6jKpeGWFAH6orTa5thTslyhLJrUAUmIk5VYGAlkRwxSxTLpCEV_4ykhrQfAV2ltv1u4Nwrmm3FPtGSsUdZ7J0klpqXY8174SeoTyYbBqkyKZh4Qaq5qkgKe3enCEPlwVOe_DeOwSprcQUCfVbncVq_4ESd3FLZcEkbrcUW58A03XDRTA5WjJR-jdAK8alD-c6MC4wADWRHLge7y8W4IDhSx4zkbodY_L69o5kFspyOE9m32EnvT73GE76i3a67YX7hg9Mr-7Zbsdo4d8IcZRIS8BIeUtFQ
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagIOAC5b08Wh84oUbk4fhxXFFWRWzDHhbRW-QnWWm1W23S_v6OHaellO4BcsghGjuO_c3489iZQegDV5kzUtNEAblICCfCqxTcWKa0tKmFKySbYFXFT07ELDrc2nis0q-hXR8oIthqr9zeGT0cifsEcyAVZQ5ozcDywrrqLrrnM9P5xdd88nOwxAW8Oex2gngC8mzY1fxbFdfmpd0YtbS5PIP1RyRTf4RSttCLrk9_cTs_DfPU5Mn_fuEuehwZKh73kHqK7tjVM_TgOO7BP0eNz9eFZ2AjY8RdPF4ZPJW_cPidBH93uAIDH56Ooa3rsxYfLiwAYolnTdfIJdDbA5wd5MnhQjfL9WZtvf_ehhKVPA0yUP0L9GPyZf75KIn5GhJNaNklQrLScA4UURmlU2UImDBeFFQoDrxEC8KM8ByyzDSVmaHC5jJzuSu1MAYEX6Kd1XplXyOcKsIcUY7SXBLrqCisEIYoy1LlSq5GKB1Gq9YxmLnPqbGssxjz9EYPjtDHyyKnfSSPbcLkBgTqqN3ttmLl7yipu-B1iRipiy3l9q7B6aqBHOgcKdgI7Q_4qkH__aYOjAsMYJ0JBpSPFbdLMGCROUvpCL3qgXlVOwN-K3j25h-bvY8eHs2Pp_X0a_XtLXrUu729d-od2uk2Z_Y9uq_Pu0W72Qt6eQHyyTBQ
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagoIoLlPfyaH3ghBoRJ44fxxXLCkRZ9lBEb5GfZKXV7mqT8vsZO05LKd0D5JBDNHYc-5vxZ3syg9AboYm3yrBMA7nIqKAyqBTcONFGudzBFZNN8NlMnJ3JefLNaZNbZVhD-z5QRLTVQbk31g8ece9gCmSyKgCsBAwvLKtuoztAm6sA6tPp98EQl_DieNgJ4hnI8-FQ829VXJmWDlLQ0ubCBeuPQKbBg1K10Im-z35xMz2N09T0wX9-4AG6n_gpHveAeohuudUjtP8lncA_Rk3I1oXnYCFTvF08Xll8on7g-DMJ_urxDMx7fDqGpq7PWzxZOIDDEs-brlFLILfHmBwX2WRhmuV6u3Zh997FEjO1iTJQ_RP0bfrh9P3HLGVryAxlVZdJxSsrBBBEbbXJtaVgwERZMqkFsBIjKbcyMMiKGKaIZdIVivjCV0ZaC4JP0d5qvXLPEc415Z5qz1ihqPNMlk5KS7XjufaV0COUD4NVmxTKPGTUWNYkRTy91oMj9PaiyKaP47FLmF5DQJ10u91VrPodJHUX91wSROpyR7nDK2i6bKAAMkdLPkJHA7xq0P5wpAPjAgNYE8mB8PHyZgkOHLLgORuhZz0uL2vnwG6lIC_-sdlHaH8-mdYnn2afX6J7_Z532Jp6hfa67bl7je6an92i3R5GrfwFLT8vAg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skin+Penetration+And+Lag+Times+Of+Neat+And+Aqueous+Diethyl+Phthalate%2C+1%2C2-Dichloroethane+And+Naphthalene&rft.jtitle=Cutaneous+and+ocular+toxicology&rft.au=Frederick+Frasch%2C+H.&rft.au=Barbero%2C+Ana+M.&rft.au=Alachkar%2C+Houda&rft.au=McDougal%2C+James+N.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.issn=1556-9527&rft.eissn=1556-9535&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=160&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F15569520701212274&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_15569520701212274
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1556-9527&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1556-9527&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1556-9527&client=summon