An open access database for the evaluation of respiratory sound classification algorithms

Over the last few decades, there has been significant interest in the automatic analysis of respiratory sounds. However, currently there are no publicly available large databases with which new algorithms can be evaluated and compared. Further developments in the field are dependent on the creation...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Physiological measurement Ročník 40; číslo 3; s. 035001
Hlavní autoři: Rocha, Bruno M, Filos, Dimitris, Mendes, Luís, Serbes, Gorkem, Ulukaya, Sezer, Kahya, Yasemin P, Jakovljevic, Nikša, Turukalo, Tatjana L, Vogiatzis, Ioannis M, Perantoni, Eleni, Kaimakamis, Evangelos, Natsiavas, Pantelis, Oliveira, Ana, Jácome, Cristina, Marques, Alda, Maglaveras, Nicos, Pedro Paiva, Rui, Chouvarda, Ioanna, de Carvalho, Paulo
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England 22.03.2019
Témata:
Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Child, Preschool
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Male
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications
Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
ISSN:1361-6579, 1361-6579
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Over the last few decades, there has been significant interest in the automatic analysis of respiratory sounds. However, currently there are no publicly available large databases with which new algorithms can be evaluated and compared. Further developments in the field are dependent on the creation of such databases. This paper describes a public respiratory sound database, which was compiled for an international competition, the first scientific challenge of the IFMBE's International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. The database includes 920 recordings acquired from 126 participants and two sets of annotations. One set contains 6898 annotated respiratory cycles, some including crackles, wheezes, or a combination of both, and some with no adventitious respiratory sounds. In the other set, precise locations of 10 775 events of crackles and wheezes were annotated. The best system that participated in the challenge achieved an average score of 52.5% with the respiratory cycle annotations and an average score of 91.2% with the event annotations. The creation and public release of this database will be useful to the research community and could bring attention to the respiratory sound classification problem.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1361-6579
1361-6579
DOI:10.1088/1361-6579/ab03ea