Comparisons of microplastic pollution between mudflats and sandy beaches in Hong Kong

Most of the previous studies of microplastic pollution on coastal habitats focused on high energy beaches although low energy areas such as mudflats are supposed to retain more microplastics, not to mention that mudflats are biologically more diverse. We quantified and characterized microplastics fr...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Environmental pollution (1987) Ročník 236; s. 208 - 217
Hlavní autoři: Lo, Hoi-Shing, Xu, Xiaoyu, Wong, Chun-Yuen, Cheung, Siu-Gin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2018
Témata:
beaches
China
energy
habitats
Marine debris
Microplastic
Mudflats
plastics
pollution
polyethylene terephthalates
polypropylenes
polystyrenes
rivers
Sandy beaches
sediments
sewage treatment
China
Sandy beaches
Microplastic
Mudflats
Marine debris
ISSN:0269-7491, 1873-6424, 1873-6424
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Most of the previous studies of microplastic pollution on coastal habitats focused on high energy beaches although low energy areas such as mudflats are supposed to retain more microplastics, not to mention that mudflats are biologically more diverse. We quantified and characterized microplastics from 10 mudflats and 10 sandy beaches in Hong Kong spanning from the eastern to western waters. Sediment samples were collected at 1.0 m and 1.5 m above chart datum (CD) and at the strandline. Abundance of microplastics ranged between 0.58 and 2116 items kg−1 sediment with that on mudflats being ten times more than on beaches. Polyethylene (46.9%) was the most abundant and followed by polypropylene (13.8%) and polyethylene terephthalate (13.5%). Expanded polystyrene was the most abundant in the strandline samples but not at 1.0 m and 1.5 m above CD. Although previous studies have concluded that the input from Pearl River is a major source of microplastics on Hong Kong shores, this study has demonstrated that the contribution of local pollution sources such as discharge from sewage treatment plants to microplastic pollution should not be neglected. [Display omitted] •Microplastics on mudflats were ten times more than those on sandy beaches.•PE, PP and PET contributed >70% of total microplastics in sediments of both mudflats and sandy beaches.•Shapes of microplastics varied between shore heights.•Sites near sewage treatment plants had significantly more fiber and fragment.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.031