Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis

Objectives/Hypothesis To evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral implantation in children with sensorineural hearing loss. Data Sources Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Review Methods All studies comparing a bilateral cochlear implant group with a unilateral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope Jg. 124; H. 7; S. 1694 - 1699
Hauptverfasser: Lammers, Marc J.W., van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G., Pourier, Vanessa E.C., Grolman, Wilko
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Schlagworte:
best-evidence synthesis
bilateral
bimodal
Child
Cochlear implantation
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear implants
deafness
Deafness - physiopathology
Deafness - surgery
hearing loss
Humans
Language Development
Speech Perception
systematic review
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
unilateral
Cochlear implantation
bimodal
bilateral
unilateral
best-evidence synthesis
hearing loss
deafness
systematic review
ISSN:0023-852X, 1531-4995, 1531-4995
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis To evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral implantation in children with sensorineural hearing loss. Data Sources Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Review Methods All studies comparing a bilateral cochlear implant group with a unilateral implant group were included. Results Twenty‐one studies compared a bilateral cochlear implant group with a unilateral group. No randomized trials were identified. Due to the clinical heterogeneity, statistical pooling was not feasible and a best‐evidence synthesis was performed. The results of this best‐evidence synthesis indicate the positive effect of the second implant for especially sound localization and possibly for preverbal communication and language development. There was insufficient evidence to make a valid comparison between bilateral implantation and a bimodal fitting. Conclusion Although randomized trials are lacking, the results of our best‐evidence synthesis indicate that the second cochlear implant might be especially useful in sound localization and possibly also in language development. Level of Evidence Laryngoscope, 124:1694–1699, 2014
Bibliographie:ark:/67375/WNG-C61KNLTT-W
ArticleID:LARY24582
istex:0D3899631A254617E674BC6E09BE5D14F66E8C1C
Wilko Grolman, MD, received unrestrictive research grants from Cochlear Ltd., Med‐El GmbH, and Advanced Bionics. The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.24582