The Validity of a Simple Outcome Measure to Assess Stuttering Therapy

Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. Patients and Method: The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica Jg. 59; H. 2; S. 91 - 99
Hauptverfasser:	Huinck, Wendy, Rietveld, Toni
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	Basel, Switzerland S. Karger AG 01.01.2007
Schlagworte:	Adolescent Adult Cognitive Therapy Difference scores Dutch language Efficacy Emotions Evaluation Female Fluency Group therapy Humans Listeners Male Measurement Measures Medical treatment Middle Aged Naturalness Objectives Original Paper Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Patient Satisfaction Patients Perceptions Questionnaires Rating Scales Reproducibility of Results Self Evaluation Speech Production Measurement - statistics & numerical data Speech Therapy Stuttering Stuttering - psychology Stuttering - therapy Surveys and Questionnaires Syllables Test Validity and Reliability Therapy progress assessment Validity Stuttering therapy Speech fluency Self-assessment scale Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory
ISSN:	1021-7762, 1421-9972
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Abstract	Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. Patients and Method: The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering. Results: Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores. Conclusion: We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied.
AbstractList	The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy.OBJECTIVEThe validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy.The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering.PATIENTS AND METHODThe scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering.Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores.RESULTSResults showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores.We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied.CONCLUSIONWe concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied. Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. Patients and Method: The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering. Results: Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores. Conclusion: We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering. Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores. We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied. Objective: The validity of a simple & not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. Patients and Method: The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, & syllables per minute) & (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires & perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness & comfort by naive listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy & 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, & the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions & cognitions related to stuttering. Results: Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, & significant correlations between the SA scale & syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory & judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores. Conclusion: We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved & therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied. Adapted from the source document Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. Patients and Method: The scores on the SA scale were related to (1) objective measures (percentage of stuttered syllables, and syllables per minute) and (2) (self-)evaluation tests (self-evaluation questionnaires and perceptual evaluations or judgments of disfluency, naturalness and comfort by naïve listeners). Data were collected from two groups of stutterers at four measurement times: pretherapy, posttherapy, 12 months after therapy and 24 months after therapy. The first group attended the Comprehensive Stuttering Program: an integrated program based on fluency shaping techniques, and the second group participated in a Dutch group therapy: the Doetinchem Method that focuses on emotions and cognitions related to stuttering. Results: Results showed similar score patterns on the SA scale, the self-evaluation questionnaires, the objective measures over time, and significant correlations between the SA scale and syllables per minute, percentage of stuttered syllables, Struggle subscale of the Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory and judged fluency on the T1-T2 difference scores. Conclusion: We concluded that the validity of the SA measure was proved and therefore encourage the use of such an instrument when (stuttering) treatment efficacy is studied.
Author	Rietveld, Toni Huinck, Wendy
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Wendy surname: Huinck fullname: Huinck, Wendy – sequence: 2 givenname: Toni surname: Rietveld fullname: Rietveld, Toni
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17337899$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqF0TFP3DAUB3CrAhWOMnSuVFkdqBiuF9tJbI8I0RYJxMDBaj0nL9Q0ia-2M9y3x6eDG1AFXvwk_95fen4zsjf6EQn5zIofjFV6UeSjlSj5B3LISs7mWku-l-si11LW_IDMYnzMinPFP5IDJoWQSutDcrH8g_Qeete6tKa-o0Bv3bDqkd5MqfED0muEOAWkydOzGDFGepumlDC48YHm7gCr9Sey30Ef8fj5PiJ3Py-W57_nVze_Ls_PruZNWek0h7aytVVNAYpB1bRFh2WtOmANorZCom1RyU4LpRi3yrYdoNVStQBW15aLI3KyzV0F_2_CmMzgYoN9DyP6KRpV1bKWvM7w-5tQSqaYYKV-N1IWPDu1ifz2Cj76KYx5XMMF16UoS5bR12c02QFbswpugLA2Lx-ewWILmuBjDNiZxiVIzo8pgOsNK8xmpWa30txx-qpjF_of-2Vr_0J4wLCT29cnC0anpg
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1044_2021_AJSLP_21_00107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2015_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_15211 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcomdis_2009_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1044_2020_JSLHR_19_00142 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2020_105767 crossref_primary_10_1210_clinem_dgaa988 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2018_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1044_1092_4388_2008_061 crossref_primary_10_1080_14015430802638620 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2023_105991 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcomdis_2015_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2016_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2011_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_1460_6984_12113 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfludis_2016_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcomdis_2011_02_002
Cites_doi	10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2801%2900103-6 10.1901%2Fjaba.1993.26-53 10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2897%2900027-2 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990011-R 10.3109%2F13682826709031315 10.1177%2F0013164487474001 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2889%2990034-X 10.1044%2F1092-4388%282004%2F080%29 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990009-S 10.1037%2F0033-2909.86.2.420
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2007 S. Karger AG, Basel Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel – notice: Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
DBID	AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7T9 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 88I 8AF 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU CPGLG CRLPW DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2M M2P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA PSYQQ Q9U S0X 7X8 8BM
DOI	10.1159/000098342
DatabaseName	CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Linguistics Collection Linguistics Database ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Psychology Database Science Database ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China One Social Sciences One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial MEDLINE - Academic ComDisDome
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Linguistics Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Linguistics Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ComDisDome MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	ComDisDome ProQuest One Psychology MEDLINE Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) CrossRef
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine
EISSN	1421-9972
EndPage	99
ExternalDocumentID	1227750091 17337899 10_1159_000098342 98342
Genre	Comparative Study Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- --Z 0R~ 0~5 0~B 29H 30W 329 3O. 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 6P2 6PF 7RV 7X7 85S 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8UI AALGM AAWTL AAYIC ABDBF ABIVO ABJNI ABPAZ ABUWG ACGFS ACGOD ACHQT ACPSR ADAGL ADBBV AENEX AETEA AEYAO AFJJK AFKRA AHMBA ALDHI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AZPMC AZQEC BENPR BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CPGLG CRLPW CS3 CYUIP DU5 DWQXO E0A EBS EJD EX3 F5P FB. FYUFA GNUQQ HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ IY7 KUZGX M1P M2M M2P N9A NAPCQ O1H O9- OHT PCD PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ RIG RKO RXVBD S0X TN5 TWZ UJ6 UKHRP WH7 WOW AAYXX ABBTS ABWCG ACQXL ACUHS AFFHD AFSIO AHFRZ CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PRQQA CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7T9 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 8BM PUEGO
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-ad5b6b8c0a81a5cd0fe468fa1cee9b37ebde87f938812b8bdfaeb978daab96b23
IEDL.DBID	M2P
ISICitedReferencesCount	19
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000244747100006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	1021-7762
IngestDate	Fri Sep 05 07:26:25 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 11:32:59 EST 2025 Sun Aug 24 04:06:39 EDT 2025 Mon Dec 01 00:11:39 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:44:21 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:58:03 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:21:41 EST 2025 Thu Aug 29 12:04:31 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	2
Keywords	Stuttering therapy Speech fluency Self-assessment scale Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory
Language	English
License	Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-ad5b6b8c0a81a5cd0fe468fa1cee9b37ebde87f938812b8bdfaeb978daab96b23
Notes	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID	17337899
PQID	232943441
PQPubID	40950
PageCount	9
ParticipantIDs	pubmed_primary_17337899 crossref_primary_10_1159_000098342 proquest_miscellaneous_85676726 proquest_miscellaneous_771813149 proquest_journals_232943441 crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000098342 karger_primary_98342 proquest_miscellaneous_70231486
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2007-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2007-01-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 01 year: 2007 text: 2007-01-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2000
PublicationPlace	Basel, Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Basel, Switzerland – name: Switzerland – name: Basel
PublicationTitle	Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica
PublicationTitleAlternate	Folia Phoniatr Logop
PublicationYear	2007
Publisher	S. Karger AG
Publisher_xml	– name: S. Karger AG
References	Conture EG, Guitar B: Evaluating efficacy of treatment of stuttering. J Fluency Disord1993;18:253-287.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990009-S Huinck WJ, Peters HFM: Effectiviteitonderzoek bij stottertherapieën. Een observationale studie naar therapeutische effecten van drie verschillende therapievormen. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 2004. Craig A: Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data. J Fluency Disord1998;23:1-30.10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2897%2900027-2 Boberg E, Kully D: Long-term results of an intensive treatment program for adults and adolescents who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1050-1059.7823551 Conture EG: Treatment efficacy: stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:518-526.8783131 Ingham RJ, Cordes: On watching a discipline shoot itself in the foot: some observations on current trends in stuttering; in Healey EC, Bernstein N, Ratner AK (eds): Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, pp 211-230. Hasbrouck JM, Lowry F: Elimination of stuttering and maintenance of fluency by means of airflow, tension reduction and discriminative stimulus control procedures. J Fluency Disord 1989;14:165-183.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2889%2990034-X Brutten GJ: Stuttering: topography, assessment and behavior change strategies; in Eisenson J (ed): Stuttering: A Second Symposium. New York, Harper & Row, 1975, pp 226-234. Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM: Evaluation of Dutch Precision Fluency-Shaping Program; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 2nd World Congr Fluency Disord. San Francisco, Nijmegen University Press, 1997, pp 303-308. Thomas C, Howell P: Assessing efficacy of stuttering treatments. J Fluency Disord 2001;26:311-333.10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2801%2900103-6 Ingham JC, Riley G: Guidelines for documentation of treatment efficacy for young children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res1998;41:753-770.9712124 Langevin M, Boberg E: Results of an intensive stuttering therapy program. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1993;17:158-166. Wagaman JR, Miltneberger RG, Arndorfer RE: Analysis of a simplified treatment for stuttering in children. J Appl Behav Anal 1993;26:53-61.847325810.1901%2Fjaba.1993.26-53 Blood GW: Treatment efficacy in adults who stutter: review and recommendations. J Fluency Disord 1993;18:303-318.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990011-R Ladouceur R, Auger J: Where have all the follow ups gone? Behav Ther 1980;3:10-11. Kully D, Langevin M: Intensive treatment for stuttering adolescents; in Curlee RF (ed): Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency, ed 2. New York, Thieme, 1999, pp 139-159. Bloodstein O: A Handbook on Stuttering, ed 5. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 1995. Andrews G, Cutler J: Stuttering therapy: the relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. J Speech Hear Disord 1974;39:312-319.4415970 Woolf G: The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance and expectancy. Br J Disord Commun 1967;2:158-171.559273010.3109%2F13682826709031315 Lanyon RI: The measurement of stutter severity. J Speech Hear Res 1967;10:836-843.5586950 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;2:420-428.10.1037%2F0033-2909.86.2.420 Conture EG: Evaluating childhood stuttering; in Curlee RF, Siegel GM (eds): Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. Needham Heights, Allyn & Bacon, 1996, pp 239-256. Blood GW, Conture EG: Outcomes measurement issues in fluency disorders; in Frattali CM (ed): Measuring Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathology. New York, Thieme, 1998, pp 387-405. Brutten GJ, Janssen P: A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to the Speech Situations Checklist; in Proc 18th Congr Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr, Washington, 1981, pp 469-478. Gardner RC, Neufeld RWJ: Use of the simple change score in correlation analyses. Educ Psychol Meas 1987;47:849-863.10.1177%2F0013164487474001 Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM, Webster RL: Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:280-288.7596094 Boberg E, Kully D: Comprehensive Stuttering Program. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1985. Van Alphen W, Hoogerwerf N: Stotteren, helpt de Doetinchemse Methode? Een evaluatie-onderzoek naar resultaten van stottertherapie volgens de Doetinchemse Methode. Stichting tot voorlichting over stotteren, 1984. O'Brian S, Packman A, Onslow M, O'Brian N: Measurement of stuttering in adults: comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47:1081-1087.1560346310.1044%2F1092-4388%282004%2F080%29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref10 ref2 ref1
References_xml	– reference: Ingham JC, Riley G: Guidelines for documentation of treatment efficacy for young children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res1998;41:753-770.9712124 – reference: Kully D, Langevin M: Intensive treatment for stuttering adolescents; in Curlee RF (ed): Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency, ed 2. New York, Thieme, 1999, pp 139-159. – reference: Ingham RJ, Cordes: On watching a discipline shoot itself in the foot: some observations on current trends in stuttering; in Healey EC, Bernstein N, Ratner AK (eds): Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, pp 211-230. – reference: Boberg E, Kully D: Comprehensive Stuttering Program. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1985. – reference: Craig A: Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data. J Fluency Disord1998;23:1-30.10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2897%2900027-2 – reference: Ladouceur R, Auger J: Where have all the follow ups gone? Behav Ther 1980;3:10-11. – reference: Conture EG: Evaluating childhood stuttering; in Curlee RF, Siegel GM (eds): Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. Needham Heights, Allyn & Bacon, 1996, pp 239-256. – reference: Brutten GJ, Janssen P: A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to the Speech Situations Checklist; in Proc 18th Congr Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr, Washington, 1981, pp 469-478. – reference: Boberg E, Kully D: Long-term results of an intensive treatment program for adults and adolescents who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1050-1059.7823551 – reference: Conture EG, Guitar B: Evaluating efficacy of treatment of stuttering. J Fluency Disord1993;18:253-287.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990009-S – reference: O'Brian S, Packman A, Onslow M, O'Brian N: Measurement of stuttering in adults: comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47:1081-1087.1560346310.1044%2F1092-4388%282004%2F080%29 – reference: Huinck WJ, Peters HFM: Effectiviteitonderzoek bij stottertherapieën. Een observationale studie naar therapeutische effecten van drie verschillende therapievormen. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 2004. – reference: Lanyon RI: The measurement of stutter severity. J Speech Hear Res 1967;10:836-843.5586950 – reference: Blood GW: Treatment efficacy in adults who stutter: review and recommendations. J Fluency Disord 1993;18:303-318.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990011-R – reference: Bloodstein O: A Handbook on Stuttering, ed 5. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 1995. – reference: Brutten GJ: Stuttering: topography, assessment and behavior change strategies; in Eisenson J (ed): Stuttering: A Second Symposium. New York, Harper & Row, 1975, pp 226-234. – reference: Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;2:420-428.10.1037%2F0033-2909.86.2.420 – reference: Thomas C, Howell P: Assessing efficacy of stuttering treatments. J Fluency Disord 2001;26:311-333.10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2801%2900103-6 – reference: Wagaman JR, Miltneberger RG, Arndorfer RE: Analysis of a simplified treatment for stuttering in children. J Appl Behav Anal 1993;26:53-61.847325810.1901%2Fjaba.1993.26-53 – reference: Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM, Webster RL: Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:280-288.7596094 – reference: Blood GW, Conture EG: Outcomes measurement issues in fluency disorders; in Frattali CM (ed): Measuring Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathology. New York, Thieme, 1998, pp 387-405. – reference: Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM: Evaluation of Dutch Precision Fluency-Shaping Program; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 2nd World Congr Fluency Disord. San Francisco, Nijmegen University Press, 1997, pp 303-308. – reference: Langevin M, Boberg E: Results of an intensive stuttering therapy program. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1993;17:158-166. – reference: Van Alphen W, Hoogerwerf N: Stotteren, helpt de Doetinchemse Methode? Een evaluatie-onderzoek naar resultaten van stottertherapie volgens de Doetinchemse Methode. Stichting tot voorlichting over stotteren, 1984. – reference: Conture EG: Treatment efficacy: stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:518-526.8783131 – reference: Woolf G: The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance and expectancy. Br J Disord Commun 1967;2:158-171.559273010.3109%2F13682826709031315 – reference: Hasbrouck JM, Lowry F: Elimination of stuttering and maintenance of fluency by means of airflow, tension reduction and discriminative stimulus control procedures. J Fluency Disord 1989;14:165-183.10.1016%2F0094-730X%2889%2990034-X – reference: Andrews G, Cutler J: Stuttering therapy: the relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. J Speech Hear Disord 1974;39:312-319.4415970 – reference: Gardner RC, Neufeld RWJ: Use of the simple change score in correlation analyses. Educ Psychol Meas 1987;47:849-863.10.1177%2F0013164487474001 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2801%2900103-6 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1901%2Fjaba.1993.26-53 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016%2FS0094-730X%2897%2900027-2 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990011-R – ident: ref6 doi: 10.3109%2F13682826709031315 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1177%2F0013164487474001 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2889%2990034-X – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1044%2F1092-4388%282004%2F080%29 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1016%2F0094-730X%2893%2990009-S – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1037%2F0033-2909.86.2.420
SSID	ssj0002282
Score	1.8095481
Snippet	Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy.... The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy. The scores on... The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy.OBJECTIVEThe... Objective: The validity of a simple and not time-consuming self- assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy.... Objective: The validity of a simple & not time-consuming self-assessment (SA) Scale was tested to establish progress after or during stuttering therapy....
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref karger
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	91
SubjectTerms	Adolescent Adult Cognitive Therapy Difference scores Dutch language Efficacy Emotions Evaluation Female Fluency Group therapy Humans Listeners Male Measurement Measures Medical treatment Middle Aged Naturalness Objectives Original Paper Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Patient Satisfaction Patients Perceptions Questionnaires Rating Scales Reproducibility of Results Self Evaluation Speech Production Measurement - statistics & numerical data Speech Therapy Stuttering Stuttering - psychology Stuttering - therapy Surveys and Questionnaires Syllables Test Validity and Reliability Therapy progress assessment Validity
Title	The Validity of a Simple Outcome Measure to Assess Stuttering Therapy
URI	https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000098342 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17337899 https://www.proquest.com/docview/232943441 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70231486 https://www.proquest.com/docview/771813149 https://www.proquest.com/docview/85676726
Volume	59
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000244747100006&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Linguistics Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: CRLPW dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/linguistics providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Psychology Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: M2M dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/psychology providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1421-9972 dateEnd: 20150731 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002282 issn: 1021-7762 databaseCode: M2P dateStart: 19980701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/sciencejournals providerName: ProQuest
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9swDCbWB4Zd2m3dI-uaCcUOuxjzSxZ1GtohRQ9NGrRdkZshWTJQbIi7xNnvL2UpLgYsu_Sig0zIgknro0jiI8DnrKg1oZ6IpIoxogNPRWiljmJVGEcRRjMdZf6FmExwNpPTUJuzDGWV6zOxO6hNU7kY-VdCfkdlliff7n9HrmmUS66GDhpbsEOOTeIqusbptD-I0xR9sjNNyIks0kAsRADecTZKzPL0Lzja_emqrxebnc0OdM72n7jdl7AXvE124s3jFTyz89fwfBzy6QcwIitht-SKG3LGWVMzxa7vHF8wu1y19CLLxj6GyNqG-fwwu2673tYEeezGUxK8gR9no5vv51ForBBVOZdtpAzXhcYqVpgoXpm4tnmBtUoIMaXOhNXGoqhlhgT_GrWpldV03TRKaVnoNHsL2_Nmbt8Ds3GNXOcaucHcGq6UFVyqvKJ1jNJmAF_W37esAuu4a37xq-xuH1yWvSoGcNyL3nuqjX8JHXgl9SJh-nCthjL8hMuy18EAPvVP6e9xKRE1t81qWQpHf5djMQC2SYLAOyEZuXkR5I71LqVF3nljedy-yDJBN9oP_93eIbzwEWMX2PkI2-1iZY9gt_rT3i0XQ9gSV7dunIluxCHsnI4m06uhs_ZxN04fAIxQA7k
linkProvider	ProQuest
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LT9wwEB4hWFEufUBbtrSsVVGJS9TEsRP7UFVVCwKxuyCxRdxSO3YkBNrQ3SxVf1T_Y8dxkqpStzcOXJORZWfG8843AHtxUmi0emkgVSgCVHgqEFbqIFSJcRBh-KSGzB-m47G4vJRnK_Cr_RfGtVW2OrFW1KbMXY78PVp-B2XGoo-33wM3NMoVV9sJGl4qTuzPHxixzT8cf0H2vqP08GDy-ShohgoEOeOyCpThOtEiD5WIFM9NWFiWiEJFaC2kjlOrjRVpIWOBpk8LbQplNYZaRiktE-1wDlDjrzEHLOY6BelZp_gpFb64SiN0WhPaABmhw1BjREoRM_qX-etdu27v2XLntjZyh08e2Od5Co8bb5p88uL_DFbsdBPWR02_wBYc4C0gFxhqGAw2SFkQRc6vHB4yOV1UeDBLRj5HSqqS-Po3Oa_q2d1o0snEQy48h6_3cogXsDotp3YbiA0LwTXTghvBrOFK2ZRLxXJcxyht-rDf8jPLG1R1N9zjJqujKy6zjvV9eNuR3nookX8RbXmh6Eiaxzst27NGycyzjud9GHRvUTu4ko-a2nIxz1IH78dE0geyjAKdkwhp5PJFBHeofhQXeemF88_20zhOMWJ_9d_tDeDR0WQ0zIbH45Md2PDZcZfEeg2r1Wxh30Avv6uu5rPd-j4R-HbfEvobAPpg1g
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB5V26riUh4FupRSC4HEJWoedmwfEIJ2V1RtlxUtqLdgx45UgTZlNwvip_HvGMdOEBLLrQeuyciy4_F8M57JNwDPsrzSiHo8kioWERo8FQkrdRSr3DiKMHzSUuaf8slEXF7K6Rr87P6FcWWVnU1sDbWpS3dHfoDI76jMaHJQhaqI6dH41fXXyDWQconWrpuG15AT--M7Rm-Ll8dHuNXP03Q8ujh8G4UGA1FJmWwiZZjOtShjJRLFShNXluaiUgkih9QZt9pYwSuZCYRBLbSplNUYdhmltMy14zxA67_O0cegA1h_M5pM3_cwkKbCp1rTBF3YPA20Rug-tIyRUmQ0_QMMNz672u_5ale3hbzx7f_4Y92BreBnk9f-YNyFNTu7B5tnoZJgG0Z4PshHDEIMhiGkrogi51eOKZm8Wza4SEvO_O0paWriM-PkvGm7eiPYkwtPxnAfPtzIIh7AYFbP7A4QG1eCaaoFM4Jaw5SynElFSxzHKG2G8KLb26IMfOuu7ceXoo27mCx6NRjC01702pOM_E1o2ytILxIe73YqUATzsyj6_R_Cfv8W7YZLBqmZrZeLgjviPyryIZBVEui2JCgjVw8imOP7S3GQh15Rf0-fZxnHWP7RP6e3D5uomMXp8eRkF275a3N3u_UYBs18afdgo_zWXC3mT8LhIvDpplX0FwgFavA
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Validity+of+a+Simple+Outcome+Measure+to+Assess+Stuttering+Therapy&rft.jtitle=Folia+phoniatrica+et+logopaedica&rft.au=Huinck%2C+Wendy&rft.au=Rietveld%2C+Toni&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.issn=1021-7762&rft.eissn=1421-9972&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=99&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000098342&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1159_000098342
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1021-7762&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1021-7762&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1021-7762&client=summon