Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury
Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine inj...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Neurospine Ročník 19; číslo 4; s. 1039 - 1048 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Korea (South)
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
01.12.2022
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 2586-6583, 2586-6591 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).Methods: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015–2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.Results: Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).
The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.
Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).
Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. Objective To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs). Methods The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015–2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes. Results Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).OBJECTIVETo assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.METHODSThe Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).RESULTSMultivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.CONCLUSIONBoth RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. |
| Author | Dicpinigaitis, Alis J. Bowers, Christian A. Schmidt, Meic H. Thommen, Rachel Kazim, Syed Faraz Conlon, Matthew McKee, Rohini G. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Matthew orcidid: 0000-0001-5411-8539 surname: Conlon fullname: Conlon, Matthew – sequence: 2 givenname: Rachel orcidid: 0000-0002-3286-4466 surname: Thommen fullname: Thommen, Rachel – sequence: 3 givenname: Syed Faraz orcidid: 0000-0001-8723-4181 surname: Kazim fullname: Kazim, Syed Faraz – sequence: 4 givenname: Alis J. orcidid: 0000-0001-8625-4949 surname: Dicpinigaitis fullname: Dicpinigaitis, Alis J. – sequence: 5 givenname: Meic H. orcidid: 0000-0003-2259-9459 surname: Schmidt fullname: Schmidt, Meic H. – sequence: 6 givenname: Rohini G. surname: McKee fullname: McKee, Rohini G. – sequence: 7 givenname: Christian A. orcidid: 0000-0001-6299-503X surname: Bowers fullname: Bowers, Christian A. |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kkFv1DAQhSNUREvpmRvykctu7dhOnAtSqSisVNSqLFytiT1pXbL2YjsV-0f4vZjutqJInGz5vfneaDwvqz0fPFbVa0bnTNRCHvs0r2sheN3MWcOfVQe1VM2skR3be7wrvl8dpeR6KkQrBefsRbXPi6dtBD2ofl259J2ceBg3ySWy8BZ_EvCWLHIiV2hgdH2EjJZ8w5hc8OQyonUmk8uQclhjEd0dkospm7DCRN5jzhjJ8gY8kbMzMDlE8jlYN7gCOYvgxrzZ5ThPlhGmVUEY8mXtShdFuZ3i5lX1fIAx4dHuPKy-nn1Ynn6anV98XJyenM-MkF2eqQGACxwoKpBU9RKsMbKTEigdemqZ6FTXt2gsYwOCqpWRyipsmeIwSMMPq8WWawPc6nV0K4gbHcDp-4cQrzXE0t2IupXYGZS8ZaKE00Ex1vO-ZdSaerAtLax3W9Z66ldoDfocYXwCfap4d6Ovw53uFGtk2xTA2x0ghh8TpqxXLhkcR_AYpqTrtqGqZnXDivXN31mPIQ8fWwxyazAxpBRx0MblMufwJ9qNmlF9v0PaF-52h3TZoVJ3_E_dA_p_Fb8BJlzL0Q |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_10790268_2025_2554011 crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_32408 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14155379 crossref_primary_10_1177_17585732251355458 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002487 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003632 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_24_06189_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251375072 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_12689 crossref_primary_10_4103_jcvjs_jcvjs_204_24 crossref_primary_10_1136_tsaco_2023_001265 crossref_primary_10_1177_21514593251366161 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2025_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_08_055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2024_09_089 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_025_05071_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2025_05_015 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000003382 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_025_02775_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_024_04703_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2025_08_022 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251339101 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xnsj_2025_100794 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_025_00690_z crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_70098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_08_063 crossref_primary_10_4103_sja_sja_358_23 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2025_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_024_04830_z crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003443 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05609_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2023_1297848 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_025_09289_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_TA_0000000000004480 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003472 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107724 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2025_123671 crossref_primary_10_1089_neu_2023_0008 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_23_06130_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_15910199251342854 crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOSGlobal_D_25_00086 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11102_025_01507_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_025_04484_4 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1093/neuros/nyaa468 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.049 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005 10.1503/cmaj.150085 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.07 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031 10.1089/neu.2019.6581 10.3171/2020.8.JNS203241 10.1007/s11060-017-2644-0 10.1038/sj.sc.3101169 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.013 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.130 10.14245/ns.1938390.195 10.14245/ns.2040688.344 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.07.019 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202 10.1093/neuros/nyab210 10.2307/2531595 10.1007/s00402-021-04250-y 10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753581 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.015 10.1080/03610730802545051 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1962333 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5152 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.115 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.168 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.028 10.1159/000279335 10.1213/ane.0000000000005290 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.14245/ns.2244326.163 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 2586-6591 |
| EndPage | 1048 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 PMC9816576 36597640 10_14245_ns_2244326_163 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | AAYXX ABDBF ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ HYE PGMZT RPM M~E NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8faa34ef0e8a508b5adcc5955a00fb0d14989b7ecd11fea828c58d8e7183af5c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 50 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000933934100024&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2586-6583 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:49:26 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:37:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:27:06 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:36 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:16:10 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:22:02 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | Frailty Risk Analysis Index-administrative Spinal trauma Modified frailty index Risk Analysis Index-revised |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-8faa34ef0e8a508b5adcc5955a00fb0d14989b7ecd11fea828c58d8e7183af5c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Matthew Conlon and Rachel Thommen contributed equally to this study as cofirst authors. |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2259-9459 0000-0002-3286-4466 0000-0001-8625-4949 0000-0001-8723-4181 0000-0001-5411-8539 0000-0001-6299-503X |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 |
| PMID | 36597640 |
| PQID | 2760821261 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9816576 proquest_miscellaneous_2760821261 pubmed_primary_36597640 crossref_citationtrail_10_14245_ns_2244326_163 crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2244326_163 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2022 text: 2022-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
| PublicationTitle | Neurospine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Neurospine |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
| References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 Clavien (ref31) 2009 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 (ref5) 2020 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 Zhang (ref3) 2013 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref6 ref40 Arya (ref24) 2020 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa468 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.049 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150085 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.07 – year: 2020 ident: ref5 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6581 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.3171/2020.8.JNS203241 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2644-0 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101169 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.013 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.130 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.14245/ns.1938390.195 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.14245/ns.2040688.344 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.07.019 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202 – start-page: 183 volume-title: Spine and spinal cord trauma: diagnosis and management year: 2013 ident: ref3 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab210 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.2307/2531595 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04250-y – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753581 – start-page: 996 volume-title: Recalibration and external validation of the risk analysis index: a surgical frailty assessment tool year: 2020 ident: ref24 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.015 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1080/03610730802545051 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1962333 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330 – start-page: 187 volume-title: The ClavienDindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience year: 2009 ident: ref31 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5152 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.115 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.168 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.028 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1159/000279335 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005290 |
| SSID | ssib044754331 ssj0002002413 |
| Score | 2.4448457 |
| Snippet | Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the... To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor... Objective To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 1039 |
| SubjectTerms | frailty modified frailty index Original risk analysis index-administrative risk analysis index-revised spinal trauma |
| Title | Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597640 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2760821261 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9816576 https://doaj.org/article/75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 |
| Volume | 19 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000933934100024&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2586-6591 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002002413 issn: 2586-6583 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2586-6591 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssib044754331 issn: 2586-6583 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20180101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JbtRAEG1BxIELImIblqiROHBx4q3b3UcSZZQcEiII0tys6sWKIeoZjT1IXPgMvpeqtmc0E4G4cPHBi9ruela918srxt4pgzjSyiQSaJpRVmmiLdBInKtcjpoLoIzFJqrLSzWb6autUl-0JmywBx467qgSXlsvyFjOliJtVJaZwmBedDZvXBXVOrKeLTGFSCIXO9oKtBltoaUIZayVnAslE0y7xejzQzN_RxhfTGUlUpnDTBY7KSo6-f-Jft5dRbmVlqaP2aORT_IPw3fss3s-PGG_PrXdN772G-Hn5IjIITh-3ncciSJEkYxck4_DZfxqSRM2PafavfOFH-zA-cdVj4D0HT-Om3749Q0ELpJprNHDL-aubZDBciS_7W3_Y2ynDRwT4CpawfLPC6q6hVe-Yuyesi_T0-uTs2QswJBgV-s-UQ1AUfom9QqQyBkBzlqhhYA0bUzqUF0pbSpvXZY1HlC8WaGc8pjvCmiELZ6xvTAP_gXjII0xTjpHjoRKezAqd8qqVOlcGYAJO1z3eW1Hd3IqknFbk0qhINWhq8cg1RikCXu_eWAxGHP8_dZjCuLmNnLUjicQZ_WIs_pfOJuwt2sI1PgH0rQKBD9fYUuVRB6VoRSdsOcDJDZNFRIFmyzx6WoHLDvvsnsltDfR5VurTKIYfPk_Xv4Ve5jTto24DOc12-uXK_-GPbDf-7ZbHrD71UwdxB8Ijxc_T38DuZ8e-A |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk+Analysis+Index+and+Its+Recalibrated+Version+Predict+Postoperative+Outcomes+Better+Than+5-Factor+Modified+Frailty+Index+in+Traumatic+Spinal+Injury&rft.jtitle=Neurospine&rft.au=Conlon%2C+Matthew&rft.au=Thommen%2C+Rachel&rft.au=Kazim%2C+Syed+Faraz&rft.au=Dicpinigaitis%2C+Alis+J&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.issn=2586-6583&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1039&rft_id=info:doi/10.14245%2Fns.2244326.163&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36597640&rft.externalDocID=36597640 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon |