Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury

Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine inj...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Neurospine Ročník 19; číslo 4; s. 1039 - 1048
Hlavní autori:	Conlon, Matthew, Thommen, Rachel, Kazim, Syed Faraz, Dicpinigaitis, Alis J., Schmidt, Meic H., McKee, Rohini G., Bowers, Christian A.
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Korea (South) Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 01.12.2022
Predmet:	frailty modified frailty index Original risk analysis index-administrative risk analysis index-revised spinal trauma Frailty Risk Analysis Index-administrative Spinal trauma Modified frailty index Risk Analysis Index-revised
ISSN:	2586-6583, 2586-6591
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Abstract	Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).Methods: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015–2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.Results: Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.
AbstractList	Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).Methods: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015–2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.Results: Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).Conclusion: Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).OBJECTIVETo assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs).The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.METHODSThe Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes.Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).RESULTSMultivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001).Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.CONCLUSIONBoth RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients. To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs). The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001). Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.
Author	Dicpinigaitis, Alis J. Bowers, Christian A. Schmidt, Meic H. Thommen, Rachel Kazim, Syed Faraz Conlon, Matthew McKee, Rohini G.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Matthew orcidid: 0000-0001-5411-8539 surname: Conlon fullname: Conlon, Matthew – sequence: 2 givenname: Rachel orcidid: 0000-0002-3286-4466 surname: Thommen fullname: Thommen, Rachel – sequence: 3 givenname: Syed Faraz orcidid: 0000-0001-8723-4181 surname: Kazim fullname: Kazim, Syed Faraz – sequence: 4 givenname: Alis J. orcidid: 0000-0001-8625-4949 surname: Dicpinigaitis fullname: Dicpinigaitis, Alis J. – sequence: 5 givenname: Meic H. orcidid: 0000-0003-2259-9459 surname: Schmidt fullname: Schmidt, Meic H. – sequence: 6 givenname: Rohini G. surname: McKee fullname: McKee, Rohini G. – sequence: 7 givenname: Christian A. orcidid: 0000-0001-6299-503X surname: Bowers fullname: Bowers, Christian A.
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNp1kkFv1DAQhSNUREvpmRvykctu7dhOnAtSqSisVNSqLFytiT1pXbL2YjsV-0f4vZjutqJInGz5vfneaDwvqz0fPFbVa0bnTNRCHvs0r2sheN3MWcOfVQe1VM2skR3be7wrvl8dpeR6KkQrBefsRbXPi6dtBD2ofl259J2ceBg3ySWy8BZ_EvCWLHIiV2hgdH2EjJZ8w5hc8OQyonUmk8uQclhjEd0dkospm7DCRN5jzhjJ8gY8kbMzMDlE8jlYN7gCOYvgxrzZ5ThPlhGmVUEY8mXtShdFuZ3i5lX1fIAx4dHuPKy-nn1Ynn6anV98XJyenM-MkF2eqQGACxwoKpBU9RKsMbKTEigdemqZ6FTXt2gsYwOCqpWRyipsmeIwSMMPq8WWawPc6nV0K4gbHcDp-4cQrzXE0t2IupXYGZS8ZaKE00Ex1vO-ZdSaerAtLax3W9Z66ldoDfocYXwCfap4d6Ovw53uFGtk2xTA2x0ghh8TpqxXLhkcR_AYpqTrtqGqZnXDivXN31mPIQ8fWwxyazAxpBRx0MblMufwJ9qNmlF9v0PaF-52h3TZoVJ3_E_dA_p_Fb8BJlzL0Q
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1080_10790268_2025_2554011 crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_32408 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14155379 crossref_primary_10_1177_17585732251355458 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002487 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003632 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_24_06189_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251375072 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_12689 crossref_primary_10_4103_jcvjs_jcvjs_204_24 crossref_primary_10_1136_tsaco_2023_001265 crossref_primary_10_1177_21514593251366161 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2025_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_08_055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2024_09_089 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_025_05071_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2025_05_015 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000003382 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_025_02775_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_024_04703_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2025_08_022 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682251339101 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xnsj_2025_100794 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_025_00690_z crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_70098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_08_063 crossref_primary_10_4103_sja_sja_358_23 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2025_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_024_04830_z crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003443 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05609_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2023_1297848 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_025_09289_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_TA_0000000000004480 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003472 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107724 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2025_123671 crossref_primary_10_1089_neu_2023_0008 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_23_06130_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_15910199251342854 crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOSGlobal_D_25_00086 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11102_025_01507_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_025_04484_4
Cites_doi	10.1093/neuros/nyaa468 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.049 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005 10.1503/cmaj.150085 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.07 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031 10.1089/neu.2019.6581 10.3171/2020.8.JNS203241 10.1007/s11060-017-2644-0 10.1038/sj.sc.3101169 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.013 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.130 10.14245/ns.1938390.195 10.14245/ns.2040688.344 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.07.019 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202 10.1093/neuros/nyab210 10.2307/2531595 10.1007/s00402-021-04250-y 10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753581 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.015 10.1080/03610730802545051 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1962333 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5152 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.115 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.168 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.028 10.1159/000279335 10.1213/ane.0000000000005290
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022
Copyright_xml	– notice: Copyright © 2022 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022
DBID	AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA
DOI	10.14245/ns.2244326.163
DatabaseName	CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN	2586-6591
EndPage	1048
ExternalDocumentID	oai_doaj_org_article_75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 PMC9816576 36597640 10_14245_ns_2244326_163
Genre	Journal Article
GroupedDBID	AAYXX ABDBF ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ HYE PGMZT RPM M~E NPM 7X8 5PM
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8faa34ef0e8a508b5adcc5955a00fb0d14989b7ecd11fea828c58d8e7183af5c3
IEDL.DBID	DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount	50
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000933934100024&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	2586-6583
IngestDate	Fri Oct 03 12:49:26 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:37:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:27:06 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:36 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:16:10 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:22:02 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	true
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	4
Keywords	Frailty Risk Analysis Index-administrative Spinal trauma Modified frailty index Risk Analysis Index-revised
Language	English
License	This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-8faa34ef0e8a508b5adcc5955a00fb0d14989b7ecd11fea828c58d8e7183af5c3
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Matthew Conlon and Rachel Thommen contributed equally to this study as cofirst authors.
ORCID	0000-0003-2259-9459 0000-0002-3286-4466 0000-0001-8625-4949 0000-0001-8723-4181 0000-0001-5411-8539 0000-0001-6299-503X
OpenAccessLink	https://doaj.org/article/75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70
PMID	36597640
PQID	2760821261
PQPubID	23479
PageCount	10
ParticipantIDs	doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9816576 proquest_miscellaneous_2760821261 pubmed_primary_36597640 crossref_citationtrail_10_14245_ns_2244326_163 crossref_primary_10_14245_ns_2244326_163
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2022-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2022-12-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 12 year: 2022 text: 2022-12-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle	Neurospine
PublicationTitleAlternate	Neurospine
PublicationYear	2022
Publisher	Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
Publisher_xml	– name: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
References	ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 Clavien (ref31) 2009 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 (ref5) 2020 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 Zhang (ref3) 2013 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref6 ref40 Arya (ref24) 2020
References_xml	– ident: ref22 doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa468 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.049 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150085 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.07 – year: 2020 ident: ref5 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6581 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.3171/2020.8.JNS203241 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2644-0 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101169 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.013 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.130 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.14245/ns.1938390.195 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.14245/ns.2040688.344 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.07.019 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202 – start-page: 183 volume-title: Spine and spinal cord trauma: diagnosis and management year: 2013 ident: ref3 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab210 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.2307/2531595 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04250-y – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753581 – start-page: 996 volume-title: Recalibration and external validation of the risk analysis index: a surgical frailty assessment tool year: 2020 ident: ref24 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.015 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1080/03610730802545051 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1080/2000656x.2021.1962333 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330 – start-page: 187 volume-title: The ClavienDindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience year: 2009 ident: ref31 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5152 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.115 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.168 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.028 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1159/000279335 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005290
SSID	ssib044754331 ssj0002002413
Score	2.4448457
Snippet	Objective: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the... To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor... Objective To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the...
SourceID	doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref
SourceType	Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source
StartPage	1039
SubjectTerms	frailty modified frailty index Original risk analysis index-administrative risk analysis index-revised spinal trauma
Title	Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury
URI	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597640 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2760821261 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9816576 https://doaj.org/article/75e9ce53714c450f811b3b710dc2fd70
Volume	19
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000933934100024&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2586-6591 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002002413 issn: 2586-6583 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (selected full-text only) customDbUrl: eissn: 2586-6591 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssib044754331 issn: 2586-6583 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20180101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELag4sAFgXgtj2qQOHBJGyfxI0eKuqISLRUUaW-Rn2pK5V1tspV64Wfwexk72dUuAnHhkkNiy45nrPk-P74h5C1SZFO7okbkRuOVHKUzyazPrLZS6lwV3CZ1_U_i7EzOZvX5VqqveCZskAceBu5QMFcbx6KwnKlY7iWlutQYF60pvBWJrSPq2SJT6ElRxS5eBdqstsSjCFXKlVwwyTMMu-Wo8xN3_g7RvhjKKoQyB5SXOyEqKfn_CX7-fopyKyxNH5IHI56E98N_PCJ3XHhMfn5pu--w1huBk6iICCpYOOk7QKCoEklGrAnjchmcL-OGTQ8xd-984QY5cPi86tEhXQdH6dIPXFyqACybphw9cDq3rUcECwh-2-v-dmynDYABcJWkYOHrImbdwi9XaLsn5Nv0-OLDx2xMwJDhUNd9Jr1SZeV87qRCIKeZssawmjGV517nFtmVrLVwxlLqnULyZpi00mG8K5VnpnxK9sI8uOcEclOJ0hjqpVSVwHrS6tJw5T133ttiQg7WY96YUZ08Jsm4biJLiUZqQteMRmrQSBPyblNhMQhz_L3oUTTiplhU1E4v0M-a0c-af_nZhLxZu0CDMzBuq6jg5itsSXDEURSp6IQ8G1xi01TJkbDxCmuLHWfZ6cvul9BeJpXvWlKOZPDF_-j8S3K_iNc20jGcV2SvX67ca3LP3PRtt9wnd8VM7qcJhM_TH8e_ALXJH4w
linkProvider	Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk+Analysis+Index+and+Its+Recalibrated+Version+Predict+Postoperative+Outcomes+Better+Than+5-Factor+Modified+Frailty+Index+in+Traumatic+Spinal+Injury&rft.jtitle=Neurospine&rft.au=Conlon%2C+Matthew&rft.au=Thommen%2C+Rachel&rft.au=Kazim%2C+Syed+Faraz&rft.au=Dicpinigaitis%2C+Alis+J.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.pub=Korean+Spinal+Neurosurgery+Society&rft.issn=2586-6583&rft.eissn=2586-6591&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1048&rft_id=info:doi/10.14245%2Fns.2244326.163&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36597640&rft.externalDocID=PMC9816576
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2586-6583&client=summon