In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design

The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of human-computer studies Vol. 74; pp. 93 - 106
Main Authors: Frauenberger, Christopher, Good, Judith, Fitzpatrick, Geraldine, Iversen, Ole Sejer
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2015
Academic Press
Subjects:
ISSN:1071-5819, 1095-9300, 1071-5819
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a “tool-to-think-with” that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: epistemology, values, stakeholders and outcomes. In a subsequent step, the coherence between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this coherence of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings. •Participatory Design (PD) requires nuanced concepts of accountability and rigour.•Accountability and rigour are constructed through debate, critique and reflection.•Our "tool-to-think-with" guides designers in systematic and critical reflection.•We provide four lenses for reflection: epistemology, values, stakeholders, outcomes.•The "coherence" between reflective perspectives indicates internal rigour of PD work.
AbstractList The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a “tool-to-think-with” that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: epistemology, values, stakeholders and outcomes. In a subsequent step, the coherence between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this coherence of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings. • Participatory Design (PD) requires nuanced concepts of accountability and rigour. • Accountability and rigour are constructed through debate, critique and reflection. • Our "tool-to-think-with" guides designers in systematic and critical reflection. • We provide four lenses for reflection: epistemology, values, stakeholders, outcomes. • The "coherence" between reflective perspectives indicates internal rigour of PD work.
The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a "tool-to-think-with" that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: epistemology, values, stakeholders and outcomes. In a subsequent step, the coherence between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this coherence of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings.The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a "tool-to-think-with" that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: epistemology, values, stakeholders and outcomes. In a subsequent step, the coherence between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this coherence of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings.
The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a “tool-to-think-with” that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: epistemology, values, stakeholders and outcomes. In a subsequent step, the coherence between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this coherence of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings. •Participatory Design (PD) requires nuanced concepts of accountability and rigour.•Accountability and rigour are constructed through debate, critique and reflection.•Our "tool-to-think-with" guides designers in systematic and critical reflection.•We provide four lenses for reflection: epistemology, values, stakeholders, outcomes.•The "coherence" between reflective perspectives indicates internal rigour of PD work.
The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its role in designing future interactive technologies, a discussion about accountability and rigour across this spectrum is needed. Rejecting the traditional, positivistic framework, we take inspiration from related fields such as Design Research and Action Research to develop interpretations of these concepts that are rooted in PD׳s own belief system. We argue that unlike in other fields, accountability and rigour are nuanced concepts that are delivered through debate, critique and reflection. A key prerequisite for having such debates is the availability of a language that allows designers, researchers and practitioners to construct solid arguments about the appropriateness of their stances, choices and judgements. To this end, we propose a "tool-to-think-with" that provides such a language by guiding designers, researchers and practitioners through a process of systematic reflection and critical analysis. The tool proposes four lenses to critically reflect on the nature of a PD effort: , , and . In a subsequent step, the between the revealed features is analysed and shows whether they pull the project in the same direction or work against each other. Regardless of the flavour of PD, we argue that this of features indicates the level of internal rigour of PD work and that the process of reflection and analysis provides the language to argue for it. We envision our tool to be useful at all stages of PD work: in the planning phase, as part of a reflective practice during the work, and as a means to construct knowledge and advance the field after the fact. We ground our theoretical discussions in a specific PD experience, the ECHOES project, to motivate the tool and to illustrate its workings.
Author Fitzpatrick, Geraldine
Iversen, Ole Sejer
Frauenberger, Christopher
Good, Judith
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: Frauenberger
  fullname: Frauenberger, Christopher
  email: christopher.frauenberger@tuwien.ac.at
  organization: Human Computer Interaction Group, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Judith
  surname: Good
  fullname: Good, Judith
  email: j.good@sussex.ac.uk
  organization: Human Centred Technology Group, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Geraldine
  surname: Fitzpatrick
  fullname: Fitzpatrick, Geraldine
  email: geraldine.fitzpatrick@tuwien.ac.at
  organization: Human Computer Interaction Group, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ole Sejer
  surname: Iversen
  fullname: Iversen, Ole Sejer
  email: oiversen@cavi.au.dk
  organization: Participatory IT Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kc1O3DAUha2KqsC0T1AJZckm4Tr-SbxoEULQIiF1064tj-MMd5Sxp7aDNG9fTwcqyoKVLfl851zfc0qOfPCOkM8UGgpUXqwbXD_Y1LRAeQOqAeDvyAkFJWrFAI72947WoqfqmJymtAaAjgN8IMetLLKesRNyeeer7RzTjLkKYxVxFeZYGT9Uxtow-2yWOGHeVVh0Jma0uDU5xF01uIQr_5G8H82U3Kenc0F-3d78vP5e3__4dnd9dV9bLlSuJefSMN53kiuheicU5QOHsYWWtVz0ZV5hGYxuGMExzrplJ0ZphOkBqGCMLcjXg-92Xm7cYJ3P0Ux6G3Fj4k4Hg_r_F48PehUedfESXfnrgpw_GcTwe3Yp6w0m66bJeBfmpGnfSkkVtLJIz15m_Qt53loRqIPAxpBSdKO2mE3GsI_GSVPQ-4b0Wv9tSO8b0qB0aaiw7BX7bP829eVAubLjR3RRJ4vOWzdgdDbrIeCb_B9jSKp-
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2023_103065
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1234892
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1280941
crossref_primary_10_1093_iwc_iwaf003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2019_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_faam_12425
crossref_primary_10_2196_28342
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13384_020_00417_5
crossref_primary_10_2196_58318
crossref_primary_10_1089_jayao_2020_0098
crossref_primary_10_1002_pad_70020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_destud_2018_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10163_025_02239_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_1034912X_2024_2427606
crossref_primary_10_1680_jmuen_18_00008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_023_10252_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_24750158_2025_2540229
crossref_primary_10_3389_frsus_2024_1411041
crossref_primary_10_4102_td_v20i1_1477
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2024_2434971
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18189504
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2024_09_005
crossref_primary_10_2196_45750
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2015_1081246
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2022_2096906
crossref_primary_10_1145_3626494
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13084504
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_destud_2021_101073
crossref_primary_10_2196_17914
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_020_10147_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_020_00801_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2018_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_renene_2020_02_078
crossref_primary_10_1111_lit_12278
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2020_1753333
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2024_2317233
crossref_primary_10_1386_jmte_00016_1
crossref_primary_10_1093_iwc_iwaf034
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10798_023_09857_3
crossref_primary_10_1017_dsj_2022_24
crossref_primary_10_16993_sjdr_798
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2016_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_iwc_iww031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsis_2025_101910
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2024_105688
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_022_01900_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2018_1540641
crossref_primary_10_1093_intqhc_mzae013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobe_2020_101900
crossref_primary_10_1145_3637293
crossref_primary_10_2196_37472
crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23658
crossref_primary_10_1080_14606925_2020_1857050
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15054468
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2024_2396945
crossref_primary_10_1145_3574156
crossref_primary_10_1177_10468781241246566
crossref_primary_10_1111_jade_12242
crossref_primary_10_17645_mac_v8i4_3261
crossref_primary_10_2196_13780
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_destud_2021_101016
crossref_primary_10_1111_jade_12324
crossref_primary_10_1111_jan_16648
crossref_primary_10_2196_10235
crossref_primary_10_1177_15248380221078891
crossref_primary_10_1108_JIC_10_2019_0234
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2022_104981
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2017_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_23299460_2024_2408814
crossref_primary_10_4000_14hoh
crossref_primary_10_1080_17512786_2020_1819381
crossref_primary_10_1002_pra2_432
crossref_primary_10_2196_12327
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10803_019_03898_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_03069885_2020_1729341
crossref_primary_10_3390_su14094916
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_destud_2018_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_iwc_iwaf015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_024_00517_z
crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517211065248
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2016_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_12471
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12599_021_00734_8
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_071280
crossref_primary_10_1080_13527258_2020_1795905
crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_4444
crossref_primary_10_1111_opn_70044
crossref_primary_10_1177_14733250221105081
crossref_primary_10_1080_15710882_2023_2214145
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13731_025_00510_y
crossref_primary_10_2196_40017
Cites_doi 10.1145/572020.572023
10.1145/1147261.1147281
10.1145/1011870.1011872
10.1080/15710880902920960
10.1145/2348144.2348147
10.1080/01944366908977225
10.1145/1900441.1900473
10.1016/j.ijcci.2013.02.001
10.1145/1240624.1240704
10.1145/2307096.2307112
10.1145/1900441.1900455
10.1145/1900441.1900461
10.1007/s10111-012-0226-7
10.1145/2212776.2212427
10.1145/1011870.1011883
10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005
10.1145/242485.242493
10.1145/2556288.2557137
10.1145/2347635.2347642
10.1080/01449290301782
10.1080/14626268.2010.548869
10.1145/153571.163264
10.1162/074793601750357196
10.21606/nordes.2011.021
10.1145/2207676.2208399
10.1145/1858171.1858228
10.1145/2347635.2347643
10.1207/s15327051hci1103_1
10.1145/1900441.1900474
10.1145/2347635.2347645
10.1007/BF01405730
10.3233/IRG-2006-16(4)04
10.1145/1182475.1182500
10.1145/2347635.2347641
10.1080/01449290110108659
10.1007/s00779-011-0384-2
10.1080/15710882.2011.587013
10.1145/1467247.1467265
10.1080/15710882.2012.672575
10.1145/2347635.2347638
10.1145/62266.62296
10.1145/2207676.2208538
10.1145/1124772.1124853
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 The Authors
2014 The Authors 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 The Authors
– notice: 2014 The Authors 2014
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1095-9300
1071-5819
EndPage 106
ExternalDocumentID PMC4375798
26109833
10_1016_j_ijhcs_2014_09_004
S1071581914001232
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Austrian Science Fund FWF
  grantid: P 26281
GroupedDBID --K
--M
-~X
.DC
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29J
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6I.
6TJ
7-5
71M
77K
8P~
9JN
9JO
AABNK
AACTN
AADFP
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAFTH
AAGJA
AAGUQ
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYFN
ABBOA
ABEFU
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABOYX
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACNNM
ACRLP
ACXNI
ACZNC
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADFGL
ADJOM
ADMUD
ADTZH
AEBSH
AECPX
AEKER
AENEX
AETEA
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFYLN
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHJVU
AHZHX
AI.
AIALX
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKYCK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOMHK
AOUOD
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
B-7
BJAXD
BKOJK
BLXMC
CAG
COF
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
G8K
GBLVA
GBOLZ
HLZ
HMW
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
JJJVA
K-O
KOM
LG5
LX9
M41
MO0
MVM
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OKEIE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SBC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPC
SPS
SSB
SSO
SST
SSV
SSY
SSZ
T5K
VH1
WH7
WUQ
XJE
XPP
ZMT
ZU3
~G-
77I
9DU
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABDPE
ABWVN
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
~HD
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGRNS
BNPGV
NPM
SSH
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-6446a3487649598e5914d40f202324583005c30fedf0e3437b75f6a5a80015333
ISICitedReferencesCount 154
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000347765000008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1071-5819
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 16:47:58 EDT 2025
Sun Nov 09 11:24:46 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:40 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:07:30 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:36:36 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:30:17 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Reflective design
Rigour
Participatory design
Accountability
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c459t-6446a3487649598e5914d40f202324583005c30fedf0e3437b75f6a5a80015333
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4375798
PMID 26109833
PQID 1826619026
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4375798
proquest_miscellaneous_1826619026
pubmed_primary_26109833
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2014_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2014_09_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijhcs_2014_09_004
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle International journal of human-computer studies
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Hum Comput Stud
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Academic Press
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Academic Press
References Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.E., Pain, H., 2012b. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In: Bødker, S., Olsen, D. (Eds.), CHI ׳12: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, May 4–10, pp. 2377–2386.
Ehn (bib14) 1989
Friedman (bib22) 1996; 3
Sengers, Kirsten, Shay, jofish Kaye (bib57) 2005
Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., Forlizzi, J., 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In: DIS ׳10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 310–319.
Shenton (bib58) 2004; 22
(bib4) 1987
Stolterman (bib59) 2008; 2
van Rijn, H., Stappers, P.J., 2008. Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In: Proceedings Participatory Design Conference, pp. 36–39.
Friedman, Kahn_Jr., Borning (bib23) 2008
Gidlund, K.L., 2012. Designing for all and no one – practitioners understandings of citizen driven development of public e-services. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11–19.
Iversen, Halskov, Leong (bib40) 2012; 8
Wolf, T.V., Rode, J.A., Sussman, J., Kellogg, W.A., 2006. Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 521–530.
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., Sundblad, Y., 1987. A UTOPIAN experience: on design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 251–278.
Merkel, C.B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C.H., Lee, R., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., 2004. Participatory design in community computing contexts: tales from the field. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–10.
(bib50) 2014
Good, Robertson (bib29) 2006; 16
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S., 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: CHI ׳07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 493–502.
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.E., 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, November, pp. 187–190.
Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Stolterman, E., 2014. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1951–1960. URL
Guba (bib33) 1981; 29
Iversen, O.S., Halskov, K., Leong, T.W., 2010. Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 91–100.
.
Bødker, S., Iversen, O.S., 2002. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. NordiCHI ׳02. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11–18.
Kensing, F., 2003. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design (Ph.D. thesis). The ITU University of Copenhagen.
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M., Madsen, K., 1988. Computer support for cooperative design (invited paper). In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. CSCW ׳88. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 377–394.
Harrison, Sengers, Tatar (bib36) 2011; 23
Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2012. Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 31–40.
Murray, D., Lesser, M., 1999. Autism and computing. In: Proceedings of Autism99 Online Conference organised by the NAS with the Shirley Foundation.
Foth, M., Axup, J., 2006. Participatory design and action research: identical twins or synergetic pair?. In: Jacucci, G., Kensing, F., Wagner, I., Blomberg, J. (Eds.), Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design, August, pp. 93–96.
Arnstein (bib1) 1969; 35
Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sanders, E., Westerlund, B., 2011. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference, May 29–31.
Balka, E., 2006. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design. PDC ׳06, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 134–143.
Garde, J.A., van der Voort, M.C., 2012. Participants׳ interpretations of PD workshop results. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases. PDC ׳12, vol. 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 5–8.
Guba, Lincoln (bib34) 1994
Halloran, Hornecker, Stringer, Harris, Fitzpatrick (bib35) 2009; 5
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Alcorn, A., Pain, H., 2012a. Supporting the design contributions of children with autism spectrum conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. IDC׳12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 367–370 (ranked top 3 papers of IDC׳12). URL
Frauenberger, Good, Keay-Bright (bib20) 2011; 7
Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 141–150.
Irestig, M., Eriksson, H., Timpka, T., 2004. The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 102–111.
Fallman, Stolterman (bib15) 2010; 21
Frauenberger, Good, Alcorn, Pain (bib18) 2013; 1
Light, A., 2010. The unit of analysis in understanding the politics of participatory practice. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 183–186.
Rittel, Webber (bib53) 1973; 4
Greenwood, Levin (bib30) 2007
Gärtner, Wagner (bib26) 1996; 11
Kyng (bib43) 2010; 22
Galliers, J., Wilson, S., Roper, A., Cocks, N., Marshall, J., Muscroft, S., Pring, T., 2012. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 51–60.
Porayska-Pomsta, Frauenberger, Pain, Rajendran, Smith, Menzies, Foster, Alcorn, Wass, Bernadini, Avramides, Keay-Bright, Chen, Waller, Guldberg, Good, Lemon (bib51) 2011; 16
Hayes (bib37) 2011; 18
Druin (bib13) 2002; 21
Schön (bib55) 1983
Gregory (bib31) 2003; 19
Light, A., Akama, Y., 2012. The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 61–70.
Grönvall, E., Kyng, M., 2012. On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cogn. Technol. Work (April 23).
Clement, Besselaar (bib11) 1993; 36
Cross (bib12) 2001; 17
Sellen, Rogers, Harper, Rodden (bib56) 2009; 52
O׳Connor, C., Fitzpatrick, G., Buchannan-Dick, M., McKeown, J., 2006. Exploratory prototypes for video: interpreting PD for a complexly disabled participant. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. NordiCHI ׳06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 232–241.
Bratteteig, T., Wagner, I., 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 41–50.
Prizant, B., Wetherby, A., Rubin, E., Laurent, A., Rydell, P., 2005. The
Löwgren, Stolterman (bib46) 2007
Kujala (bib42) 2003; 22
Gaver, W., 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 937–946. URL
Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., Iversen, O.S., Leong, T.W., McCarthy, J., Olivier, P., 2013. Summary Report on CHI 2012 Invited SIG: Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design? URL
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib62
Schön (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib55) 1983
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib61
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib64
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib63
Sellen (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib56) 2009; 52
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib60
Shenton (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib58) 2004; 22
Sengers (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib57) 2005
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib19
Friedman (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib22) 1996; 3
Guba (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib33) 1981; 29
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib17
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib16
Frauenberger (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib18) 2013; 1
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib10
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib54
Friedman (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib23) 2008
(10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib4) 1987
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib9
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib52
Frauenberger (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib20) 2011; 7
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib3
Fallman (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib15) 2010; 21
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib2
Gärtner (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib26) 1996; 11
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib8
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib7
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib6
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib5
Clement (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib11) 1993; 36
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib48
Löwgren (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib46) 2007
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib47
Halloran (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib35) 2009; 5
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib49
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib44
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib45
Druin (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib13) 2002; 21
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib41
Stolterman (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib59) 2008; 2
Harrison (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib36) 2011; 23
Gregory (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib31) 2003; 19
Iversen (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib40) 2012; 8
Hayes (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib37) 2011; 18
Ehn (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib14) 1989
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib39
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib38
Good (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib29) 2006; 16
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib32
Kujala (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib42) 2003; 22
Greenwood (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib30) 2007
(10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib50) 2014
Guba (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib34) 1994
Porayska-Pomsta (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib51) 2011; 16
Rittel (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib53) 1973; 4
Kyng (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib43) 2010; 22
Cross (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib12) 2001; 17
Arnstein (10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib1) 1969; 35
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib25
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib28
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib27
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib21
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib24
References_xml – volume: 16
  start-page: 117
  year: 2011
  end-page: 127
  ident: bib51
  article-title: Developing technology for autism
  publication-title: Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 155
  year: 1973
  end-page: 169
  ident: bib53
  article-title: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
  publication-title: Policy Sci.
– reference: Light, A., Akama, Y., 2012. The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 61–70.
– reference: Wolf, T.V., Rode, J.A., Sussman, J., Kellogg, W.A., 2006. Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 521–530.
– reference: Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S., 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: CHI ׳07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 493–502.
– reference: O׳Connor, C., Fitzpatrick, G., Buchannan-Dick, M., McKeown, J., 2006. Exploratory prototypes for video: interpreting PD for a complexly disabled participant. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. NordiCHI ׳06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 232–241.
– reference: Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M., Madsen, K., 1988. Computer support for cooperative design (invited paper). In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. CSCW ׳88. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 377–394.
– reference: Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2012. Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 31–40.
– reference: Foth, M., Axup, J., 2006. Participatory design and action research: identical twins or synergetic pair?. In: Jacucci, G., Kensing, F., Wagner, I., Blomberg, J. (Eds.), Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design, August, pp. 93–96.
– reference: Garde, J.A., van der Voort, M.C., 2012. Participants׳ interpretations of PD workshop results. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases. PDC ׳12, vol. 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 5–8.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 216
  year: 1969
  end-page: 224
  ident: bib1
  article-title: A ladder of citizen participation
  publication-title: J. Am. Inst. Plan.
– year: 1983
  ident: bib55
  article-title: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
– volume: 17
  start-page: 49
  year: 2001
  end-page: 55
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Designerly ways of knowing
  publication-title: Des. Issues
– year: 2014
  ident: bib50
  publication-title: Ways of Knowing in HCI
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2011
  end-page: 28
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Designing technology for children with special needs – bridging perspectives through participatory design
  publication-title: CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts
– volume: 22
  start-page: 63
  year: 2004
  end-page: 76
  ident: bib58
  article-title: Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
  publication-title: Educ. Inf.
– year: 1989
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts
– reference: 〉.
– volume: 18
  year: 2011
  ident: bib37
  article-title: The relationship of action research to human–computer interaction
  publication-title: ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.
– reference: Irestig, M., Eriksson, H., Timpka, T., 2004. The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 102–111.
– reference: Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 141–150.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 62
  year: 2003
  end-page: 74
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Scandinavian approaches to participatory design
  publication-title: Int. J. Eng. Educ.
– reference: Balka, E., 2006. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design. PDC ׳06, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 134–143.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 265
  year: 2010
  end-page: 272
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research
  publication-title: Digit. Creat.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 245
  year: 2009
  end-page: 273
  ident: bib35
  article-title: The value of values
  publication-title: CoDesign
– reference: Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., Sundblad, Y., 1987. A UTOPIAN experience: on design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 251–278.
– year: 1987
  ident: bib4
  publication-title: Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge
– reference: Galliers, J., Wilson, S., Roper, A., Cocks, N., Marshall, J., Muscroft, S., Pring, T., 2012. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 51–60.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 58
  year: 2009
  end-page: 66
  ident: bib56
  article-title: Reflecting human values in the digital age
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
– volume: 23
  start-page: 385
  year: 2011
  end-page: 392
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Making epistemological trouble
  publication-title: Interact. Comput.
– reference: Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Stolterman, E., 2014. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1951–1960. URL:
– volume: 11
  start-page: 187
  year: 1996
  end-page: 214
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Mapping actors and agendas
  publication-title: Hum.–Comput. Interact.
– volume: 8
  start-page: 87
  year: 2012
  end-page: 103
  ident: bib40
  article-title: Values-led participatory design
  publication-title: CoDesign
– reference: Merkel, C.B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C.H., Lee, R., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., 2004. Participatory design in community computing contexts: tales from the field. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–10.
– year: 2005
  ident: bib57
  article-title: “Reflective Design.” In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility 49–58
– reference: Grönvall, E., Kyng, M., 2012. On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cogn. Technol. Work (April 23).
– reference: Gaver, W., 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ׳12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 937–946. URL:
– reference: Bødker, S., Iversen, O.S., 2002. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. NordiCHI ׳02. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11–18.
– volume: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: bib59
  article-title: The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research
  publication-title: Int. J. Des.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib13
  article-title: The role of children in the design of new technology
  publication-title: Behav. Inf. Technol.
– reference: Gidlund, K.L., 2012. Designing for all and no one – practitioners understandings of citizen driven development of public e-services. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11–19.
– reference: Murray, D., Lesser, M., 1999. Autism and computing. In: Proceedings of Autism99 Online Conference organised by the NAS with the Shirley Foundation.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 38
  year: 2013
  end-page: 49
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Conversing through and about technologies
  publication-title: Int. J. Child–Comput. Interact.
– year: 2008
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Value sensitive design and information systems
  publication-title: The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, 69–101
– reference: Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., Forlizzi, J., 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In: DIS ׳10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 310–319.
– reference: Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Alcorn, A., Pain, H., 2012a. Supporting the design contributions of children with autism spectrum conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. IDC׳12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 367–370 (ranked top 3 papers of IDC׳12). URL: 〈
– reference: Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.E., Pain, H., 2012b. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In: Bødker, S., Olsen, D. (Eds.), CHI ׳12: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, May 4–10, pp. 2377–2386.
– reference: Prizant, B., Wetherby, A., Rubin, E., Laurent, A., Rydell, P., 2005. The
– reference: Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, USA.
– volume: 22
  year: 2010
  ident: bib43
  article-title: Bridging the gap between politics and techniques
  publication-title: Scand. J. Inf. Syst.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 381
  year: 2006
  end-page: 413
  ident: bib29
  article-title: CARSS
  publication-title: Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 75
  year: 1981
  end-page: 91
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
  publication-title: Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 16
  ident: bib42
  article-title: User involvement
  publication-title: Behav. Inf. Technol.
– year: 2007
  ident: bib46
  article-title: Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology
– reference: Bratteteig, T., Wagner, I., 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC ׳12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 41–50.
– reference: Iversen, O.S., Halskov, K., Leong, T.W., 2010. Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 91–100.
– reference: .
– volume: 36
  start-page: 29
  year: 1993
  end-page: 37
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A retrospective look at PD projects
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
– reference: Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., Iversen, O.S., Leong, T.W., McCarthy, J., Olivier, P., 2013. Summary Report on CHI 2012 Invited SIG: Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design? URL: 〈
– year: 2007
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change
– reference: Sanders, E., Westerlund, B., 2011. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference, May 29–31.
– reference: Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.E., 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, November, pp. 187–190.
– reference: van Rijn, H., Stappers, P.J., 2008. Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In: Proceedings Participatory Design Conference, pp. 36–39.
– start-page: 105
  year: 1994
  end-page: 117
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Competing paradigms in qualitative research
  publication-title: Handbook of Qualitative Research
– reference: Light, A., 2010. The unit of analysis in understanding the politics of participatory practice. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC ׳10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 183–186.
– volume: 3
  start-page: 16
  year: 1996
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Value-sensitive design
  publication-title: Interactions
– reference: Kensing, F., 2003. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design (Ph.D. thesis). The ITU University of Copenhagen.
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib7
  doi: 10.1145/572020.572023
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib2
  doi: 10.1145/1147261.1147281
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib47
  doi: 10.1145/1011870.1011872
– volume: 2
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib59
  article-title: The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research
  publication-title: Int. J. Des.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 245
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib35
  article-title: The value of values
  publication-title: CoDesign
  doi: 10.1080/15710880902920960
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib25
  doi: 10.1145/2348144.2348147
– volume: 35
  start-page: 216
  issue: 4
  year: 1969
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib1
  article-title: A ladder of citizen participation
  publication-title: J. Am. Inst. Plan.
  doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib44
  doi: 10.1145/1900441.1900473
– volume: 1
  start-page: 38
  issue: May (2)
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib18
  article-title: Conversing through and about technologies
  publication-title: Int. J. Child–Comput. Interact.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2013.02.001
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib63
  doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240704
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib17
  doi: 10.1145/2307096.2307112
– volume: 19
  start-page: 62
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib31
  article-title: Scandinavian approaches to participatory design
  publication-title: Int. J. Eng. Educ.
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib39
  doi: 10.1145/1900441.1900455
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib48
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib23
  article-title: Value sensitive design and information systems
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib8
  doi: 10.1145/1900441.1900461
– year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib55
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib32
  doi: 10.1007/s10111-012-0226-7
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib61
  doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212427
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib38
  doi: 10.1145/1011870.1011883
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib16
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib50
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib46
– volume: 23
  start-page: 385
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib36
  article-title: Making epistemological trouble
  publication-title: Interact. Comput.
  doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005
– volume: 3
  start-page: 16
  issue: December
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib22
  article-title: Value-sensitive design
  publication-title: Interactions
  doi: 10.1145/242485.242493
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib3
  doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557137
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib10
  doi: 10.1145/2347635.2347642
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib42
  article-title: User involvement
  publication-title: Behav. Inf. Technol.
  doi: 10.1080/01449290301782
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib60
– volume: 22
  start-page: 63
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib58
  article-title: Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
  publication-title: Educ. Inf.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 265
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib15
  article-title: Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research
  publication-title: Digit. Creat.
  doi: 10.1080/14626268.2010.548869
– year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib57
– volume: 22
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib43
  article-title: Bridging the gap between politics and techniques
  publication-title: Scand. J. Inf. Syst.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 29
  issue: 6
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib11
  article-title: A retrospective look at PD projects
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
  doi: 10.1145/153571.163264
– volume: 17
  start-page: 49
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib12
  article-title: Designerly ways of knowing
  publication-title: Des. Issues
  doi: 10.1162/074793601750357196
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib54
  doi: 10.21606/nordes.2011.021
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib21
  doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208399
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib52
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib64
  doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858228
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib24
  doi: 10.1145/2347635.2347643
– volume: 11
  start-page: 187
  issue: September (3)
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib26
  article-title: Mapping actors and agendas
  publication-title: Hum.–Comput. Interact.
  doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1103_1
– volume: 18
  issue: August
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib37
  article-title: The relationship of action research to human–computer interaction
  publication-title: ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib19
  doi: 10.1145/1900441.1900474
– year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib4
– year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib14
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib45
  doi: 10.1145/2347635.2347645
– volume: 4
  start-page: 155
  issue: 2
  year: 1973
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib53
  article-title: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
  publication-title: Policy Sci.
  doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
– volume: 16
  start-page: 381
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib29
  article-title: CARSS
  publication-title: Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ.
  doi: 10.3233/IRG-2006-16(4)04
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib49
  doi: 10.1145/1182475.1182500
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib9
  doi: 10.1145/2347635.2347641
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib13
  article-title: The role of children in the design of new technology
  publication-title: Behav. Inf. Technol.
  doi: 10.1080/01449290110108659
– start-page: 105
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib34
  article-title: Competing paradigms in qualitative research
– volume: 16
  start-page: 117
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib51
  article-title: Developing technology for autism
  publication-title: Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.
  doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0384-2
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib30
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  issue: March (1)
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib20
  article-title: Designing technology for children with special needs – bridging perspectives through participatory design
  publication-title: CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts
  doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.587013
– volume: 29
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 1981
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib33
  article-title: Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
  publication-title: Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib5
– volume: 52
  start-page: 58
  issue: March
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib56
  article-title: Reflecting human values in the digital age
  publication-title: Commun. ACM
  doi: 10.1145/1467247.1467265
– volume: 8
  start-page: 87
  issue: 2–3
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib40
  article-title: Values-led participatory design
  publication-title: CoDesign
  doi: 10.1080/15710882.2012.672575
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib28
  doi: 10.1145/2347635.2347638
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib6
  doi: 10.1145/62266.62296
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib27
  doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208538
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib62
  doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124853
– ident: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004_bib41
SSID ssj0007400
Score 2.534027
Snippet The field of Participatory Design (PD) has greatly diversified and we see a broad spectrum of approaches and methodologies emerging. However, to foster its...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 93
SubjectTerms Accountability
Participatory design
Reflective design
Rigour
Title In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109833
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1826619026
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4375798
Volume 74
WOSCitedRecordID wos000347765000008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-9300
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007400
  issn: 1071-5819
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELa2LQc4VLxZoFWQuEFQXo7tU1WhViyHwqFIe7PysNWkJRvtbqoK8eMZv5JsV63gwCVaJbY38jeezNgz3yD0XuRBmROM_TzCwk_go-LnMmSw8HJCUomzMCh0sQlydkbnc_Z9MvntcmGur0jT0Jsb1v5XqOEegK1SZ_8B7n5QuAG_AXS4Auxw_SvgZ82Htluuukqf8YPzDZ0MJaspDGGIuXW6X5u5oGp10l4OwRz1EN8-bBeOSCZ0ZT-_sBUhNEdtNc4kyToTOGazDAcCgz7cx0b6mKSQvmO1_tXqmgGXZr9e7ZeNDv5nKobE6MlvKgZS1HZEu20RYhfp3GtasG18TK2-tKqYJCNdaionbql4s9tQf6rqi0LxrYeGqNYUMR7h2_7UAEeKT54aso1bzNru0Q7aiwhmoBP3jmcn86_9l5wkgWGzsK_qWKt0fODW_yteaTviXUbOthNzOxZ3ZNycP0b71ivxjo00PUET0TxFj0Zclc_Q0azxrFx5C-kZufJArrxNufIqaDeWK8_I1XP04_Tk_PMX31bf8IsEs7UPhnKaxeDPpuBDMyowC5MyCWQUKCMcU1XnoIgDKUoZiDiJYXFjmWY4o8oOj-P4BdptFo14hTzKCA4LmdNMyCQTIcMlLkBFSDCPclmKKYrcdPHCUtOrCilX3MUg1lxPN1fTzQPGYbqn6GPfqTXMLPc3Tx0O3BqXxmjkIFj3d3znUOOgetV5WtaIRbfiyjVPwaCO0il6aVDs38RJwhSRDXz7BorWffNJU11oeneYSkwYfX3nmG_Qw2FFvUW762UnDtCD4npdrZaHaIfM6aEV5T-F08A1
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In+pursuit+of+rigour+and+accountability+in+participatory+design&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+human-computer+studies&rft.au=Frauenberger%2C+Christopher&rft.au=Good%2C+Judith&rft.au=Fitzpatrick%2C+Geraldine&rft.au=Iversen%2C+Ole+Sejer&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.volume=74&rft.spage=93&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijhcs.2014.09.004&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26109833&rft.externalDocID=26109833
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1071-5819&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1071-5819&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1071-5819&client=summon