Influence of reconstruction algorithms on image quality in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

Summary Introduction We investigated if image‐ and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical physiology and functional imaging Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 655 - 662
Main Authors: Davidsson, Anette, Olsson, Eva, Engvall, Jan, Gustafsson, Agnetha
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2017
Subjects:
ISSN:1475-0961, 1475-097X, 1475-097X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Summary Introduction We investigated if image‐ and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC). Materials and methods Stress‐ and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG‐gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low‐dose CT‐scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR). Results Observer confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P<0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P<0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.). Conclusion SPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
AbstractList INTRODUCTION: We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stress- and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG-gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low-dose CT-scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR). RESULTS: Observer confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P&lt;0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P&lt;0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.). CONCLUSION: SPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC). Stress- and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG-gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low-dose CT-scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR). Observer confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P<0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P<0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.). SPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
Summary Introduction We investigated if image‐ and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC). Materials and methods Stress‐ and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG‐gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low‐dose CT‐scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR). Results Observer confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P<0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P<0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.). Conclusion SPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
Summary Introduction We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC). Materials and methods Stress- and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG-gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low-dose CT-scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR). Results Observer confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P<0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P<0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.). Conclusion SPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
INTRODUCTIONWe investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery (DDRR) for image reconstruction. Images were compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction using Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization with (IRAC) and without (IRNC) attenuation correction (AC).MATERIALS AND METHODSStress- and rest imaging for 15 min was performed on 21 subjects with a dual head gamma camera (Infinia Hawkeye; GE Healthcare), ECG-gating with 8 frames/cardiac cycle and a low-dose CT-scan. A 9 min acquisition was generated using five instead of eight gated frames and was reconstructed with DDRR, with (IRACRR) and without AC (IRNCRR) as well as with FBP. Three experienced nuclear medicine specialists visually assessed anonymized images according to eight criteria on a four point scale, three related to image quality and five to diagnostic confidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Visual Grading Regression (VGR).RESULTSObserver confidence in statements on image quality was highest for the images that were reconstructed using DDRR (P<0·01 compared to FBP). Iterative reconstruction without DDRR was not superior to FBP. Interobserver variability was significant for statements on image quality (P<0·05) but lower in the diagnostic statements on ischemia and scar. The confidence in assessing ischemia and scar was not different between the reconstruction techniques (P = n.s.).CONCLUSIONSPECT MPI collected in 9 min, reconstructed with DDRR and AC, produced better image quality than the standard procedure. The observers expressed the highest diagnostic confidence in the DDRR reconstruction.
Author Olsson, Eva
Engvall, Jan
Davidsson, Anette
Gustafsson, Agnetha
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anette
  surname: Davidsson
  fullname: Davidsson, Anette
  email: anette.davidsson@regionostergotland.se
  organization: Linköping University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Eva
  surname: Olsson
  fullname: Olsson, Eva
  organization: Linköping University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5716-5098
  surname: Engvall
  fullname: Engvall, Jan
  organization: Linköping University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Agnetha
  surname: Gustafsson
  fullname: Gustafsson, Agnetha
  organization: Karolinska University Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-129965$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index (Linköpings universitet)
BookMark eNp1kU1LHTEUhkOx1I920T9QAt3UxWiSm4-ZpdyqFYQKVemmhEwmuY1kkjGZIPffG71XF9KeTU7geV_OOe8-2AkxGAA-Y3SEax3ryR5hsmD0HdjDVLAGdeL3zmvP8S7Yz_kOISwWVHwAu4R3XRWiPfDnIlhfTNAGRguT0THkORU9uxig8quY3Px3zLD-3KhWBt4X5d28hi7AX1eny2s4rqNWaXDKw8kkW7Lbsi6sPoL3VvlsPm3fA3Bzdnq9_NFc_jy_WJ5cNpoyQRvMDCWGDMxqhLhuiRAI9dwwTi0mPRdWc8oRob3GuG17apFWA7JCKzJ0rF0cgGbjmx_MVHo5pTpAWsuonPzubk9kTCvpXZGYdB1nlf-24acU74vJsxxd1sZ7FUwsWeKWcM4RZaSiX9-gd7GkULeRuGO0w4gsaKW-bKnSj2Z4HeDl0BU43gA6xZyTsVK7WT1deU7KeYmRfIpS1ijlc5RVcfhG8WL6L3br_uC8Wf8flMurs43iEfftrH8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2967_jnmt_122_264649
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000002978
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnmt_120_256933
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000001234
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00259-005-1779-y
10.1093/rpd/ncq007
10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
10.1007/s12194-012-0168-z
10.1259/bjr/35254923
10.1007/s00259-010-1654-3
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033149
10.2967/jnumed.107.049387
10.1093/rpd/nch550
10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.061
10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.035
10.1259/bjr/35012658
10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.008
10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00064-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2017 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2017 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7TS
7U5
8FD
K9.
L7M
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
DG8
DOI 10.1111/cpf.12354
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
MEDLINE - Academic
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Physical Education Index
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1475-097X
EndPage 662
ExternalDocumentID oai_DiVA_org_liu_129965
26991110
10_1111_cpf_12354
CPF12354
Genre article
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Swedish Heart‐Lung foundation
  funderid: 20120449
– fundername: Faculty of Health Sciences at Linköping University
  funderid: 284731
– fundername: Region Östergötland
  funderid: 285001
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
29B
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
CITATION
O8X
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AIWBW
AJBDE
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7TS
7U5
8FD
K9.
L7M
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
DG8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15e42e2d5fc006c827700b6e564f12b67fc646024bc1188b4f0cad0f7ca2d9583
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 5
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000413678400015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1475-0961
1475-097X
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 16:52:48 EST 2025
Thu Oct 02 11:46:41 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:59:05 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:11:38 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:01:22 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:08:36 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 03:12:33 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords resolution recovery
image quality
noise regularization
MPI SPECT
Visual Grading Regression
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4574-15e42e2d5fc006c827700b6e564f12b67fc646024bc1188b4f0cad0f7ca2d9583
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5716-5098
PMID 26991110
PQID 1954910234
PQPubID 1006519
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_129965
proquest_miscellaneous_1826660452
proquest_journals_1954910234
pubmed_primary_26991110
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cpf_12354
crossref_primary_10_1111_cpf_12354
wiley_primary_10_1111_cpf_12354_CPF12354
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2017
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2017
  text: November 2017
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Clinical physiology and functional imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Physiol Funct Imaging
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2014; 4
2010; 139
2013; 34
2005; 114
2007; 154
2008; 49
1994; 23
1996a
2008; 15
2007; 80
2005; 32
2000; 90
2011; 38
2001; 25
2013; 6
2010; 83
2014; 21
Carmichael CMJHE (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1996
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
Gustafsson A (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2014; 4
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
References_xml – volume: 4
  start-page: 12155
  year: 2014
  article-title: A visual grading study for different administered activity levels in bone scintigraphy
  publication-title: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging
– volume: 25
  start-page: 135
  year: 2001
  end-page: 146
  article-title: Improvement of image resolution and quantitative accuracy in clinical single photon emission computed tomography
  publication-title: Comput Med Imaging Graph
– volume: 90
  start-page: 89
  year: 2000
  end-page: 99
  article-title: Methods for the evaluation of image quality: a review
  publication-title: Radiat Prot Dosimetry
– volume: 139
  start-page: 26
  year: 2010
  end-page: 36
  article-title: Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications
  publication-title: Radiat Prot Dosimetry
– volume: 114
  start-page: 45
  year: 2005
  end-page: 52
  article-title: A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology
  publication-title: Radiat Prot Dosimetry
– volume: 23
  start-page: 384
  year: 1994
  end-page: 389
  article-title: Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the adenoscan Multicenter trial registry
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 318
  year: 2014
  end-page: 324
  article-title: Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing
  publication-title: Acad Radiol
– volume: 49
  start-page: 915
  year: 2008
  end-page: 922
  article-title: Quantitative diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion SPECT with attenuation correction in women
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
– year: 1996a
– volume: 32
  start-page: 855
  year: 2005
  end-page: 897
  article-title: EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
– volume: 38
  start-page: 499
  year: 2011
  end-page: 508
  article-title: Wide beam reconstruction for half‐dose or half‐time cardiac gated SPECT acquisitions: optimization of resources and reduction in radiation exposure
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
– volume: 154
  start-page: 415
  year: 2007
  end-page: 423
  article-title: Stress echocardiography, stress single‐photon‐emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta‐analysis of diagnostic performance
  publication-title: Am Heart J
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2949
  year: 2013
  end-page: 3003
  article-title: ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 15
  start-page: 547
  year: 2008
  end-page: 563
  article-title: Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction “half‐time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to “full‐time” filtered backprojection
  publication-title: J Nucl Cardiol
– volume: 6
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Quantitative performance of advanced resolution recovery strategies on SPECT images: evaluation with use of digital phantom models
  publication-title: Radiol Phys Technol
– volume: 83
  start-page: 767
  year: 2010
  end-page: 775
  article-title: Visual grading regression: analysing data from visual grading experiments with regression models
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
– volume: 80
  start-page: 169
  year: 2007
  end-page: 176
  article-title: Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non‐parametric rank‐invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1779-y
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq007
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s12194-012-0168-z
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/35254923
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1654-3
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033149
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049387
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch550
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.061
– volume: 4
  start-page: 12155
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  article-title: A visual grading study for different administered activity levels in bone scintigraphy
  publication-title: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging
– volume-title: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.035
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/35012658
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.008
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00064-1
SSID ssj0017347
Score 2.167355
Snippet Summary Introduction We investigated if image‐ and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth...
We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent Resolution Recovery...
Summary Introduction We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth...
INTRODUCTIONWe investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent...
INTRODUCTION: We investigated if image- and diagnostic quality in SPECT MPI could be maintained despite a reduced acquisition time adding Depth Dependent...
SourceID swepub
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 655
SubjectTerms Adenosine - administration & dosage
Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Bicycling
Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques
Computed tomography
Confidence intervals
Diagnostic systems
EKG
Electrocardiography
Evaluation
Exercise Test
Female
Frames
Gating
Heart diseases
Humans
Image acquisition
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Image processing
Image quality
Image reconstruction
Ischemia
Male
Middle Aged
MPI SPECT
Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods
noise regularization
Nuclear medicine
Observer Variation
Organophosphorus Compounds - administration & dosage
Organotechnetium Compounds - administration & dosage
Perfusion
Predictive Value of Tests
Quality
Radiopharmaceuticals - administration & dosage
Regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
resolution recovery
Single photon emission computed tomography
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography
Statistical analysis
Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage
Visual Grading Regression
Visual observation
Title Influence of reconstruction algorithms on image quality in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcpf.12354
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991110
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1954910234
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1826660452
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-129965
Volume 37
WOSCitedRecordID wos000413678400015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1475-097X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017347
  issn: 1475-097X
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB_0LMWX1toPr1XZSim-pOT29iOhT3J6tGDlaFXupYRkP2zgLjnutOB_39lNslRaQfAtyUzIZndmZ2Z35zcAH2SuTWyMiQQzGKCgBY5Sd8jRGm2HapDnhUfguzyVZ2fJdJpO1uBzlwvT4EOEBTenGX6-dgqeF6u_lFwt7CeX6MnWYYOi3LIebBx_H1-chk0EOfT1xQZM8shVNmmBhdxBnvDyXXP0j48ZAETv-q7e-IyfP6rZW_Cs9TnJUSMkL2DNVNvw9Fu7q_4Sfn7tKpWQ2hIfIgdYWZLPruplef1rviJ4V85x_iFNJuYtKSvyY3IyOifzWzSJTtRmZGGW9sYtwXleNIyv4GJ8cj76ErVlFyLFuGTRgBtGDdXcKlRJlVAp47gQhgtmB7QQ0irBBNr2QmF0khTMxirXsZUqpzrlyfA19Kq6MjtA-FBYjU-51pShWBRSKhlrZk1cpMroPhx2vZ-pFpPclcaYZV1sgt2V-e7qw0FgXTRAHP9j2u2GMGt1cZU5TLvUIVQg-X0goxa5rZG8MvUN8mCUJYSDl-_Dm2bow1eoSJ1FiPvwsZGFQHHQ3Mfl5VFWL6-yWelguTF85PhXXgLub2c2moz9xduHs76DTepcCp8HuQs9lAOzB0_U7-tytdyHdTlN9lsN-AN3iQi8
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-NDgEvjM9RNsAghHgJSlN_NNJepm7VJrqqgm7aC7ISf2yR2qRqN6T995ydxNoESEi8JbmL4th3vjvb9zuAjyLTJjbGRJwaDFDQAkepO-RojbZ91cuy3CPwnY3FZDI4P0-nG7DX5sLU-BBhwc1php-vnYK7BelbWq6W9ovL9KT3YJOiGLEObB58G52Owy6C6PsCYz0qWORKmzTIQu4kT3j5rj36zckMCKJ3nVdvfUZb_9fuJ_C48TrJfi0mT2HDlM_gwUmzr_4cfhy3tUpIZYkPkgOwLMnmF9WquLpcrAneFQucgUidi3lDipJ8nx4OZ2Rxg0bRCducLM3KXrtFOM-LpvEFnI4OZ8OjqCm8ECnKBI16zNDEJJpZhUqpBokQcZxzwzi1vSTnwipOOVr3XGF8MsipjVWmYytUluiUDfovoVNWpXkFhPW51fiUaZ1QFIxcCCViTa2J81QZ3YXPbfdL1aCSu-IYc9lGJ9hd0ndXFz4E1mUNxfEnpt12DGWjjWvpUO1Sh1GB5PeBjHrkNkey0lTXyINxFucOYL4L2_XYh68kPHU2Ie7Cp1oYAsWBcx8UZ_uyWl3IeeGAuTGAZPhXXgT-3k45nI78xet_Z30HD49mJ2M5Pp583YFHiXMwfFbkLnRQJswbuK9-XhXr1dtGEX4BC7cLxA
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ba9RAFD70IsUXr61drTqKiC8p2excNuBL2W2wuC6LtqUvMiRzaQO7ybLbCv33npkkg0UFwbckc0ImM-ebc85cvgPwTuTaxMaYiFODAQpa4Ch1mxyt0Xag-nleeAa-84mYTocXF-lsAz52Z2Eafogw4eaQ4cdrB3Cz1PYXlKulPXQnPekmbFOWcoTl9vhrdjYJqwhi4BOM9algkUtt0jILuZ084eW79ug3JzMwiN51Xr31yR7-X70fwYPW6yRHjZo8hg1TPYGdL-26-lP4ftLlKiG1JT5IDsSyJJ9f1qvy-mqxJnhXLnAEIs1ZzFtSVuTb7Hh0Sha3aBSdss3J0qzsjZuE87JoGnfhLDs-HX2K2sQLkaJM0KjPDE1MoplVCEo1TISI44IbxqntJwUXVnHK0boXCuOTYUFtrHIdW6HyRKdsONiDraquzD4QNuBW41OmdUJRMQohlIg1tSYuUmV0Dz50zS9Vy0rukmPMZRedYHNJ31w9eBtElw0Vx5-EDro-lC0a19Kx2qWOowKL34RixJFbHMkrU9-gDMZZnDuC-R48a_o-fCXhqbMJcQ_eN8oQShw597g8P5L16lLOS0fMjQEkw7_yKvD3esrRLPMXz_9d9DXszMaZnJxMP7-A-4nzL_yhyAPYQpUwL-Ge-nFdrlevWhz8BIa0Cz8
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+reconstruction+algorithms+on+image+quality+in+SPECT+myocardial+perfusion+imaging&rft.jtitle=Clinical+physiology+and+functional+imaging&rft.au=Davidsson%2C+Anette&rft.au=Olsson%2C+Eva&rft.au=Engvall%2C+Jan&rft.au=Gustafsson%2C+Agnetha&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.issn=1475-097X&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcpf.12354&rft.externalDocID=oai_DiVA_org_liu_129965
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon