Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance

•Building geometry is optimized for energy and daylighting performance.•Daylighting performance increase is 38.7%, 31.6%, and 28.8%.•Energy demand reduction is 20.2%, 18.5%, and 17.9%.•The influence of design variables is evaluated through sensitivity analysis.•The skylight width and length are the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solar energy Vol. 191; pp. 7 - 18
Main Authors: Fang, Yuan, Cho, Soolyeon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2019
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects:
ISSN:0038-092X, 1471-1257
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Building geometry is optimized for energy and daylighting performance.•Daylighting performance increase is 38.7%, 31.6%, and 28.8%.•Energy demand reduction is 20.2%, 18.5%, and 17.9%.•The influence of design variables is evaluated through sensitivity analysis.•The skylight width and length are the most important variables for all locations. With the increasing demand for sustainable design and green buildings, building performance is having a greater influence on design decisions. Design decisions on building envelop, especially on building geometry, window and skylight size and placement are essential in the early design stage. This research proposes a building performance optimization process that can help designers simultaneously evaluate the daylighting and energy performance of numerous design options and generate optimized design. The proposed method utilizes parametric design, building simulation modeling, and genetic algorithms. A case study of a small office building is conducted to test and verify the effectiveness of the optimization process. The geometry of the case study building is optimized in three different climates, Miami, Atlanta, and Chicago. After the optimization, the daylighting performance metric UDI is increased by 38.7%, 31.6%, and 28.8%, and the energy performance metric EUI is decreased by 20.2%, 18.5%, and 17.9% compared to average performance values. Sensitivity analysis is performed to analyze the relationship between design variables and performance metrics. The skylight width and length are the most important variables for all locations, while the influence of the other variables varies greatly.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039