Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research

Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier selection, and service operations capacity. Many recent advances in this area have raised questions about the most appropriate form of conjoint an...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	European journal of operational research Ročník 197; číslo 1; s. 340 - 348
Hlavní autoři:	Karniouchina, Ekaterina V., Moore, William L., van der Rhee, Bo, Verma, Rohit
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 16.08.2009 Elsevier Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Edice:	European Journal of Operational Research
Témata:	Applied sciences Bayesian analysis Choice-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Exact sciences and technology Firm modelling Mathematical programming Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Operations management Operations research Product and service design Ratings-based conjoint analysis Ratings-based conjoint analysis Choice-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Product and service design Studies Product and service design Ratings-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Choice-based conjoint analysis Bayes estimation Operations research Similarity Trademark Modeling Open market Compatibility Service quality Mathematical programming
ISSN:	0377-2217, 1872-6860
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Abstract	Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier selection, and service operations capacity. Many recent advances in this area have raised questions about the most appropriate form of conjoint analysis for this research. We review recent developments in the literature and provide new evidence on how the choice between ratings- and choice-based conjoint models might affect the estimates of customer demand used in operations management models. The biggest systematic difference between ratings-based (RB) and choice-based (CB) parameters is consistent with the compatibility effect, i.e., some enriched attributes like brand name tend to be more important in RB models and some comparable attributes like price are likely to be more important in CB models. Still, there were reasonably small differences between choice- and ratings-based parameters. Parameter similarity was also seen in the lack of differences both in the choice share validations when the “keep on shopping” alternative was not considered and in the profiles that were predicted to maximize choice shares. This suggests that the two approaches will produce similar estimates of the relative importance of various attributes. In spite of demonstrated success with each method, several reasons lead us to recommend the use of hierarchical Bayesian choice-based conjoint models. First, the slightly higher individual hit rate validations give us greater confidence in predictive accuracy overall as well as an increased ability to target individual customers. Additionally, the greater ease of modeling both changes in market size and competitive reactions are attractive benefits of choice-based models.
AbstractList	Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier selection, and service operations capacity. Many recent advances in this area have raised questions about the most appropriate form of conjoint analysis for this research. We review recent developments in the literature and provide new evidence on how the choice between ratings- and choice-based conjoint models might affect the estimates of customer demand used in operations management models. The biggest systematic difference between ratings-based (RB) and choice-based (CB) parameters is consistent with the compatibility effect, i.e., some enriched attributes like brand name tend to be more important in RB models and some comparable attributes like price are likely to be more important in CB models. Still, there were reasonably small differences between choice- and ratings-based parameters. Parameter similarity was also seen in the lack of differences both in the choice share validations when the “keep on shopping” alternative was not considered and in the profiles that were predicted to maximize choice shares. This suggests that the two approaches will produce similar estimates of the relative importance of various attributes. In spite of demonstrated success with each method, several reasons lead us to recommend the use of hierarchical Bayesian choice-based conjoint models. First, the slightly higher individual hit rate validations give us greater confidence in predictive accuracy overall as well as an increased ability to target individual customers. Additionally, the greater ease of modeling both changes in market size and competitive reactions are attractive benefits of choice-based models. Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier selection, and service operations capacity. Many recent advances in this area have raised questions about the most appropriate form of conjoint analysis for this research. We review recent developments in the literature and provide new evidence on how the choice between ratings- and choice-based conjoint models might affect the estimates of customer demand used in operations management models. The biggest systematic difference between ratings-based (RB) and choice-based (CB) parameters is consistent with the compatibility effect, i.e., some enriched attributes like brand name tend to be more important in RB models and some comparable attributes like price are likely to be more important in CB models. Still, there were reasonably small differences between choice- and ratings-based parameters. Parameter similarity was also seen in the lack of differences both in the choice share validations when the "keep on shopping" alternative was not considered and in the profiles that were predicted to maximize choice shares. This suggests that the two approaches will produce similar estimates of the relative importance of various attributes. In spite of demonstrated success with each method, several reasons lead us to recommend the use of hierarchical Bayesian choice-based conjoint models. First, the slightly higher individual hit rate validations give us greater confidence in predictive accuracy overall as well as an increased ability to target individual customers. Additionally, the greater ease of modeling both changes in market size and competitive reactions are attractive benefits of choice-based models. Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier selection, and service operations capacity. Many recent advances in this area have raised questions about the most appropriate form of conjoint analysis for this research. We review recent developments in the literature and provide new evidence on how the choice between ratings- and choice-based conjoint models might affect the estimates of customer demand used in operations management models. The biggest systematic difference between ratings-based (RB) and choice-based (CB) parameters is consistent with the compatibility effect, i.e., some enriched attributes like brand name tend to be more important in RB models and some comparable attributes like price are likely to be more important in CB models. Still, there were reasonably small differences between choice- and ratings-based parameters. Parameter similarity was also seen in the lack of differences both in the choice share validations when the "keep on shopping" alternative was not considered and in the profiles that were predicted to maximize choice shares. This suggests that the two approaches will produce similar estimates of the relative importance of various attributes. In spite of demonstrated success with each method, several reasons lead us to recommend the use of hierarchical Bayesian choice-based conjoint models. First, the slightly higher individual hit rate validations give us greater confidence in predictive accuracy overall as well as an increased ability to target individual customers. Additionally, the greater ease of modeling both changes in market size and competitive reactions are attractive benefits of choice-based models. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author	Moore, William L. Karniouchina, Ekaterina V. Verma, Rohit van der Rhee, Bo
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Ekaterina V. surname: Karniouchina fullname: Karniouchina, Ekaterina V. email: karniouc@chapman.edu organization: Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: William L. surname: Moore fullname: Moore, William L. email: mktbm@business.utah.edu organization: David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Bo surname: van der Rhee fullname: van der Rhee, Bo email: B.vdRhee@nyenrode.nl organization: Cluster Marketing & Supply Chain Management, Nyenrode Business University, Breukelen, The Netherlands – sequence: 4 givenname: Rohit surname: Verma fullname: Verma, Rohit email: rohit.verma@cornell.edu, rv54@cornell.edu organization: School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, 338 Statler Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
BackLink	http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21273633$$DView record in Pascal Francis http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeejores/v_3a197_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a340-348.htm$$DView record in RePEc
BookMark	eNp9UU1r3DAQNSWFbtL-gZ5MoUc7kixLMvRSQj9CA720ZyGPx1mZXcnVeBf231fObnvIIYLRwOO9p9Gb6-IqxIBF8Z6zmjOubqcap5hqwZipWVsz0b0qNtxoUSmj2FWxYY3WlRBcvymuiSbGGG95uymme6IDUulDuWyxPBCWcSyTW3x4pKp3hEN5xEQHKmEbPeAFgxim6MNSuuB2J_JPDnHGVRkDlfuMP-IeMyMhoUuwfVu8Ht2O8N2l3xS_v375dfe9evj57f7u80MFslVL1chuQGWwHyX0rRm0406D1qqVIJlw0EnozMiUMYKrURg39sJxDXIExnpobooPZ985xT_5b4ud4iHlMckKJrkUSvBM-nEmJZwR7Jz83qWTxXxykEj2aBvHO53vU64cbJebX8Fcc65GMttIY7fLPrt9vDzpCNxuTC6Ap_-uggvdqKbJPHPmQYpECUcLfnlKbEnO7yxndl2nnew6hV3XaVlr8zqzVDyT_nN_UfTpLMKc99FjsgQeA-DgE8Jih-hfkv8F0BK8Nw
CODEN	EJORDT
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocm_2020_100250 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2015_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00291_017_0478_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2022_04_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2016_06_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2014_09_051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2017_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11042_017_4865_9 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_01_2016_0026 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOPM_07_2020_0495 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2014_03_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2014_05_044 crossref_primary_10_1080_03610918_2011_654035 crossref_primary_10_3390_su132011517 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2024_103283 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jretconser_2014_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13731_022_00227_2 crossref_primary_10_1108_APJML_10_2013_0124 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2010_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2012_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1108_JHLSCM_03_2023_0017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2020_07_055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_culher_2009_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1479262115000520 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbl_12210 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0294576 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2016_08_047 crossref_primary_10_1080_17461391_2015_1130751 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12525_020_00447_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2013_10_008 crossref_primary_10_2501_IJMR_53_6_831_857 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJPDLM_03_2012_0081 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41262_025_00379_y crossref_primary_10_1108_APJML_08_2015_0130 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2019_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1287_serv_2022_0301 crossref_primary_10_1057_ejis_2010_62 crossref_primary_10_1057_ejis_2013_33 crossref_primary_10_1093_humrep_deu023 crossref_primary_10_2501_IJMR_2015_059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2011_03_049 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2016_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2015_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1109_TEM_2023_3244422 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_2158_1592_2011_01012_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2021_05_056
Cites_doi	10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.013 10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.004 10.1108/09564239910264361 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90330-C 10.2139/ssrn.893890 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00138.x 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.002 10.1108/09604520510634023 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00147-3 10.2307/2290986 10.2307/3152127 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00526-X 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00034-4 10.2307/3150684 10.1108/09564230710751479 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00088-2 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00047-3 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.051 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 10.1287/mnsc.17.6.B371 10.1007/978-0-387-28692-1_8 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00113.x 10.1016/j.jom.2005.10.001 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00499.x 10.1287/mksc.1060.0240 10.1177/147078539804000304 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026 10.1006/obhd.1996.0077 10.1509/jmkr.42.1.67.56890 10.2307/3172746 10.1006/obhd.2001.2955 10.1287/mnsc.48.10.1350.272 10.1086/208769 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371 10.2307/3151859 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668 10.2307/3152141 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00957.x 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00023-1 10.1147/sj.471.0179 10.1086/208843 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00350-1 10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057 10.1287/mksc.1030.0032 10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.580 10.1287/mksc.15.2.173 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.151.10669 10.2307/1251954 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00102.x 10.1080/07408170108936886 10.1086/209535 10.1023/A:1007913100332 10.2307/1914185 10.1287/msom.2.4.317.12337 10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0331-Q 10.1287/mksc.1060.0213
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2008 Elsevier B.V. 2009 INIST-CNRS Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 16, 2009
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2008 Elsevier B.V. – notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 16, 2009
DBID	AAYXX CITATION IQODW DKI X2L 7SC 7TB 8FD FR3 JQ2 L7M L~C L~D
DOI	10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029
DatabaseName	CrossRef Pascal-Francis RePEc IDEAS RePEc Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Engineering Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitleList	Technology Research Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Engineering Computer Science Business Applied Sciences
EISSN	1872-6860
EndPage	348
ExternalDocumentID	1647860801 eeeejores_v_3a197_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a340_348_htm 21273633 10_1016_j_ejor_2008_05_029 S0377221708004542
Genre	Feature
GroupedDBID	--K --M -~X .DC .~1 0R~ 1B1 1OL 1RT 1~. 1~5 29G 4.4 41~ 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 6OB 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JN 9JO AAAKF AAAKG AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AARIN AAXUO AAYFN AAYOK ABAOU ABBOA ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABUCO ABXDB ABYKQ ACAZW ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACNCT ACNNM ACRLP ACZNC ADBBV ADEZE ADGUI ADIYS ADJOM ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AFFNX AFKWA AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHZHX AI. AIALX AIEXJ AIGVJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOUOD APLSM ARUGR ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BKOMP BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA GBOLZ HAMUX HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LY1 M41 MHUIS MO0 MS~ N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ RXW SCC SDF SDG SDP SDS SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSB SSD SSV SSW SSZ T5K TAE TN5 U5U VH1 WUQ XPP ZMT ~02 ~G- 9DU AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO ADXHL AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD AFXIZ AGCQF AGRNS BNPGV IQODW SSH 02 08R 0R 1 41 6XO 8P AAPBV ABFLS ADALY DKI G- HZ IPNFZ K M MS PQEST STF X X2L 7SC 7TB 8FD FR3 JQ2 L7M L~C L~D
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-349de68ebf4cb58d7a1a7c77654c402ac94c98f0688216f28afb2a17c4fc00bc3
ISICitedReferencesCount	52
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000264387400035&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0377-2217
IngestDate	Fri Jul 25 03:30:54 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 18 03:50:56 EDT 2021 Mon Jul 21 09:17:42 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:40:56 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 20:59:32 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:27:50 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	1
Keywords	Product and service design Ratings-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Choice-based conjoint analysis Bayes estimation Operations research Similarity Trademark Modeling Open market Compatibility Service quality Mathematical programming
Language	English
License	https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c456t-349de68ebf4cb58d7a1a7c77654c402ac94c98f0688216f28afb2a17c4fc00bc3
Notes	SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14
PQID	204142621
PQPubID	45678
PageCount	9
ParticipantIDs	proquest_journals_204142621 repec_primary_eeeejores_v_3a197_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a340_348_htm pascalfrancis_primary_21273633 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ejor_2008_05_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2008_05_029 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ejor_2008_05_029
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2009-08-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2009-08-16
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2009 text: 2009-08-16 day: 16
PublicationDecade	2000
PublicationPlace	Amsterdam
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Amsterdam
PublicationSeriesTitle	European Journal of Operational Research
PublicationTitle	European journal of operational research
PublicationYear	2009
Publisher	Elsevier B.V Elsevier Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier – name: Elsevier Sequoia S.A
References	Verma, Plaschka, Hanlon, Livingston, Kalcher (bib60) 2008; 47 Moore, Gray-Lee, Louviere (bib37) 1998; 9 Green, Krieger (bib17) 1991; 55 Business Media Inc., pp. 169–199. Jedidi, Zhang (bib24) 2002; 48 Bendoly, Donohue, Schultz (bib2) 2006; 24 Kim, S.-H., Srinivasan, V., 2006. A multiattribute model of the timing of buyers’ upgrading to improved versions of high technology products. Research Paper No. 1720(R), September, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Oliphant, K., Eagle, T.G., Louviere, J.J., Anderson, D., 1992. Cross-task comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint. In: Metegrano, M. (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, pp. 383–404. Verma, Pullman (bib58) 1998; 26 Elrod, Louviere, Davey (bib10) 1992; 24 Moore (bib36) 2004; 21 Tatikonda, Montoya-Weiss (bib53) 2001; 47 Scholl, Manthey, Helm, Steiner (bib51) 2005; 164 Allenby, Lenk (bib1) 1994; 89 Hsee (bib20) 1996; 67 Butler, Dyer, Jia, Tomak (bib4) 2008; 186 Yee, Dahan, Hauser, Orlin (bib65) 2007; 26 Luo, Kannan, Basharati, Azarm (bib32) 2005; 22 Bettman, Luce, Payne (bib3) 1998; 25 Victorino, Verma, Plaschka, Dev (bib61) 2005; 15 Krishnan, Ulrich (bib29) 2001; 47 Mankila (bib34) 2004; 155 Kahneman, Tversky (bib25) 1979; 47 Schmidt, Porteus (bib50) 2000; 2 Moore, Louviere, Verma (bib38) 1999; 16 Orme, B.K., Alpert, M.I., Christensen, E., 1997. Assessing the validity of conjoint analysis – continued. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series 1997. Fischer, Hawkins (bib12) 1993; 19 Dahan, Hauser (bib6) 2002 + Morgan, Daniels, Kouvelis (bib40) 2001; 33 Green, Krieger (bib18) 1992; 60 Huber J., 1987. Conjoint analysis: How we got there and where we are. In: 1987 Sawtooth Software Proceedings. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, pp. 237–253. Gilbride, Allenby (bib13) 2004; 23 Goldstein, Einhorn (bib14) 1987; 94 Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M., Wind, Y., 2005. Buyer choice simulators, optimizers, and dynamic models. In: Wind, Y., Green, P., (Eds.), Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute to Paul E. Green. Springer Science Krieger, A.M., Green, P.E., Wind, Y.J., 2004. Adventures in conjoint analysis: A practitioner’s guide to trade-off modeling and applications, 2004 Draft Manuscript. Li, Madhok, Plaschka, Verma (bib30) 2006; 37 Tversky, Sattath, Slovic (bib55) 1988; 95 Sawtooth Software (2000–2005). The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation, Version 4.0 technical paper, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, Sequim, WA. Fischer, Carmon, Ariely, Zauberman (bib11) 1999; 45 Huber, Ariely, Fischer (bib22) 2002; 87 Natter, Feurstein (bib42) 2002; 137 Payne, Bettman, Johnson (bib46) 1992; 43 (last accessed 5/21/2008). Weitz, Wright (bib63) 1979; 6 Goodale, Verma, Pullman (bib15) 2003; 12 Pessemier, Burger, Teach, Tigert (bib47) 1971; 17 Lenk, DeSarbo, Green, Young (bib31) 1996; 15 Pullman, Moore (bib48) 1999; 10 Tarasewich, McMullen (bib52) 2001; 128 (accessed 2/21/2008). Nowlis, Simonson (bib43) 1997; 34 Yano, Dobson (bib64) 1998 Ding, Grewal, Liechty (bib8) 2005; 42 Moore, Pessemier, Little (bib39) 1979; 16 Ülengin, Ülengin, Güvenç (bib56) 2001; 130 Vriens, Oppewal, Wedel (bib62) 1998; 40 Conlon, B., Dellaert, B.G.C., van Soest, A., 2000. Combining and comparing consumers’ stated preference ratings and choice responses. Research Paper 2000-119. Center for Economic Research 2000. Day, Venkataramanan (bib7) 2006; 175 Karmarkar (bib26) 1996; 33 Huber, Zwerina (bib23) 1996; 33 Turksen, Willson (bib54) 1995; 82 Verma, Thompson, Moore, Louviere (bib59) 2001; 32 Verma, Louviere, Burke (bib57) 2006; 24 Ding, Verma, Iqbal (bib9) 2007; 18 Michalek, Feinberg, Papalambros (bib35) 2005; 22 Luo, Kannan, Ratchford (bib33) 2007; 26 Green, Carroll, DeSarbo (bib16) 1981; 8 Nair, Tarasewich (bib41) 2003; 150 Moore (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib39) 1979; 16 Luo (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib32) 2005; 22 Weitz (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib63) 1979; 6 Goldstein (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib14) 1987; 94 Ding (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib9) 2007; 18 Fischer (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib11) 1999; 45 Nowlis (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib43) 1997; 34 Moore (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib38) 1999; 16 Tatikonda (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib53) 2001; 47 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib45 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib44 Tarasewich (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib52) 2001; 128 Moore (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib37) 1998; 9 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib49 Jedidi (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib24) 2002; 48 Victorino (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib61) 2005; 15 Pullman (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib48) 1999; 10 Pessemier (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib47) 1971; 17 Kahneman (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib25) 1979; 47 Yee (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib65) 2007; 26 Dahan (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib6) 2002 Schmidt (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib50) 2000; 2 Turksen (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib54) 1995; 82 Morgan (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib40) 2001; 33 Huber (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib22) 2002; 87 Krishnan (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib29) 2001; 47 Tversky (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib55) 1988; 95 Green (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib16) 1981; 8 Mankila (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib34) 2004; 155 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib5 Day (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib7) 2006; 175 Verma (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib60) 2008; 47 Vriens (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib62) 1998; 40 Michalek (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib35) 2005; 22 Verma (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib58) 1998; 26 Bettman (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib3) 1998; 25 Karmarkar (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib26) 1996; 33 Ülengin (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib56) 2001; 130 Green (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib17) 1991; 55 Luo (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib33) 2007; 26 Verma (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib57) 2006; 24 Hsee (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib20) 1996; 67 Natter (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib42) 2002; 137 Lenk (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib31) 1996; 15 Li (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib30) 2006; 37 Elrod (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib10) 1992; 24 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib21 Yano (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib64) 1998 Allenby (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib1) 1994; 89 Nair (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib41) 2003; 150 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib27 Huber (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib23) 1996; 33 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib28 Scholl (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib51) 2005; 164 Bendoly (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib2) 2006; 24 Fischer (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib12) 1993; 19 Ding (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib8) 2005; 42 Butler (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib4) 2008; 186 Gilbride (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib13) 2004; 23 Green (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib18) 1992; 60 Payne (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib46) 1992; 43 Moore (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib36) 2004; 21 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib19 Goodale (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib15) 2003; 12 Verma (10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib59) 2001; 32
References_xml	– volume: 128 start-page: 58 year: 2001 end-page: 73 ident: bib52 article-title: A pruning heuristic for use with multisource product design publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 47 start-page: 18 year: 1979 end-page: 36 ident: bib25 article-title: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk publication-title: Econometrica – volume: 186 start-page: 748 year: 2008 end-page: 765 ident: bib4 article-title: Enabling e-transactions with multi-attribute preference models publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 37 start-page: 547 year: 2006 end-page: 576 ident: bib30 article-title: Supplier-switching inertia and competitive asymmetry: A demand side perspective publication-title: Decision Sciences – volume: 17 start-page: 371 year: 1971 end-page: 385 ident: bib47 article-title: Using laboratory brand preference scales to predict consumer brand purchases publication-title: Management Science – reference: Krieger, A.M., Green, P.E., Wind, Y.J., 2004. Adventures in conjoint analysis: A practitioner’s guide to trade-off modeling and applications, 2004 Draft Manuscript. – volume: 15 start-page: 555 year: 2005 end-page: 576 ident: bib61 article-title: Service innovation and customer choices in hospitality industry publication-title: Managing Service Quality – volume: 16 start-page: 27 year: 1999 end-page: 39 ident: bib38 article-title: Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management – volume: 175 start-page: 1782 year: 2006 end-page: 1797 ident: bib7 article-title: Profitability in product line pricing and composition with manufacturing commonalities publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 15 start-page: 173 year: 1996 end-page: 191 ident: bib31 article-title: Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs publication-title: Marketing Science – start-page: 145 year: 1998 end-page: 173 ident: bib64 article-title: Profit-optimizing product line design, selection and pricing with manufacturing cost consideration publication-title: Product variety management: Research advances – volume: 6 start-page: 280 year: 1979 end-page: 294 ident: bib63 article-title: Retrospective self-insight on factors considered in product evaluations publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research – volume: 19 start-page: 580 year: 1993 end-page: 597 ident: bib12 article-title: Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance – volume: 60 start-page: 31 year: 1992 end-page: 44 ident: bib18 article-title: Modeling competitive pricing and market share: Anatomy of a decision support system publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 33 start-page: 125 year: 1996 end-page: 133 ident: bib26 article-title: Integrative research in marketing and operations management publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – volume: 48 start-page: 1350 year: 2002 end-page: 1368 ident: bib24 article-title: Augmenting conjoint analysis to estimate consumer reservation price publication-title: Management Science – volume: 164 start-page: 760 year: 2005 end-page: 777 ident: bib51 article-title: Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 47 start-page: 179 year: 2008 end-page: 191 ident: bib60 article-title: Predicting customer choice in services using discrete choice analysis publication-title: IBM Systems Journal – volume: 9 start-page: 195 year: 1998 end-page: 208 ident: bib37 article-title: A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation publication-title: Marketing Letters – volume: 24 start-page: 737 year: 2006 end-page: 752 ident: bib2 article-title: Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions publication-title: Journal of Operations Management – reference: (accessed 2/21/2008). – reference: Sawtooth Software (2000–2005). The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation, Version 4.0 technical paper, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, Sequim, WA. – volume: 89 start-page: 1218 year: 1994 end-page: 1231 ident: bib1 article-title: Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression publication-title: Journal of the American Statistical Association – volume: 155 start-page: 299 year: 2004 end-page: 316 ident: bib34 article-title: Retaining students in retail banking through price bundling: Evidence from the Swedish market publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 150 start-page: 672 year: 2003 end-page: 687 ident: bib41 article-title: A model and solution method for multi-period sales promotion design publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 47 start-page: 1 year: 2001 end-page: 21 ident: bib29 article-title: Product development decisions: A review of the literature publication-title: Management Science – volume: 137 start-page: 448 year: 2002 end-page: 458 ident: bib42 article-title: Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 130 start-page: 361 year: 2001 end-page: 374 ident: bib56 article-title: A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 26 start-page: 739 year: 1998 end-page: 750 ident: bib58 article-title: An analysis of the supplier selection process publication-title: Omega: The International Journal of Management Science – volume: 42 start-page: 67 year: 2005 end-page: 82 ident: bib8 article-title: Incentives-aligned conjoint analysis publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – volume: 26 start-page: 532 year: 2007 end-page: 549 ident: bib65 article-title: Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference publication-title: Marketing Science – reference: Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M., Wind, Y., 2005. Buyer choice simulators, optimizers, and dynamic models. In: Wind, Y., Green, P., (Eds.), Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute to Paul E. Green. Springer Science – volume: 32 start-page: 165 year: 2001 end-page: 194 ident: bib59 article-title: Effective design of products/services: An approach based on integration of marketing and operations management decisions publication-title: Decision Sciences – volume: 23 start-page: 391 year: 2004 end-page: 406 ident: bib13 article-title: A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules publication-title: Marketing Science – volume: 2 start-page: 317 year: 2000 end-page: 336 ident: bib50 article-title: The impact of an integrated marketing and manufacturing innovation publication-title: Manufacturing and Service Operations Management – volume: 25 start-page: 187 year: 1998 end-page: 217 ident: bib3 article-title: Constructive consumer choice processes publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research – volume: 94 start-page: 236 year: 1987 end-page: 254 ident: bib14 article-title: Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena publication-title: Psychological Review – volume: 55 start-page: 20 year: 1991 end-page: 31 ident: bib17 article-title: Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis publication-title: Journal of Marketing – volume: 95 start-page: 371 year: 1988 end-page: 384 ident: bib55 article-title: Contingent weighting in judgment and choice publication-title: Psychological Review – volume: 12 start-page: 165 year: 2003 end-page: 185 ident: bib15 article-title: A market utility-based model for capacity scheduling in mass services publication-title: Production and Operations Management – volume: 87 start-page: 66 year: 2002 end-page: 90 ident: bib22 article-title: Expressing preferences in a principal-agent task: A comparison of choice, rating, and matching publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes – volume: 33 start-page: 949 year: 2001 end-page: 962 ident: bib40 article-title: Marketing/manufacturing tradeoffs in product line management publication-title: IIE Transactions – volume: 47 start-page: 151 year: 2001 end-page: 172 ident: bib53 article-title: Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance publication-title: Management Science – volume: 82 start-page: 39 year: 1995 end-page: 52 ident: bib54 article-title: A fuzzy set model for market share and preference prediction publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research – volume: 40 start-page: 237 year: 1998 end-page: 248 ident: bib62 article-title: Rating-based versus choice-based latent class conjoint models: An empirical comparison publication-title: Journal of the Market Research Society – volume: 18 start-page: 246 year: 2007 end-page: 268 ident: bib9 article-title: Self-service technology and online financial service choice publication-title: International Journal of Service Industry Management – volume: 16 start-page: 203 year: 1979 end-page: 210 ident: bib39 article-title: Predicting brand choice behavior: A marketing application of the Schönemann and Wang unfolding model publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – volume: 34 start-page: 205 year: 1997 end-page: 218 ident: bib43 article-title: Attribute task comparability as a determinant of consumer preference reversals publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – reference: Business Media Inc., pp. 169–199. – volume: 22 start-page: 42 year: 2005 end-page: 62 ident: bib35 article-title: Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytic target cascading publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management – start-page: 179 year: 2002 end-page: 222 ident: bib6 article-title: Managing a dispersed product development process publication-title: The Handbook of Marketing – reference: + – volume: 21 start-page: 299 year: 2004 end-page: 312 ident: bib36 article-title: A cross-validity comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models publication-title: International Journal of Research in Marketing – reference: Conlon, B., Dellaert, B.G.C., van Soest, A., 2000. Combining and comparing consumers’ stated preference ratings and choice responses. Research Paper 2000-119. Center for Economic Research 2000. – volume: 45 start-page: 1057 year: 1999 end-page: 1075 ident: bib11 article-title: Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect publication-title: Management Science – volume: 33 start-page: 307 year: 1996 end-page: 317 ident: bib23 article-title: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice set designs publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – reference: Oliphant, K., Eagle, T.G., Louviere, J.J., Anderson, D., 1992. Cross-task comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint. In: Metegrano, M. (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, pp. 383–404. – volume: 22 start-page: 177 year: 2005 end-page: 192 ident: bib32 article-title: Design of robust new products under variability: Marketing meets design publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management – volume: 24 start-page: 368 year: 1992 end-page: 377 ident: bib10 article-title: An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research – volume: 10 start-page: 239 year: 1999 end-page: 260 ident: bib48 article-title: Optimal service design: Integrating marketing and operations perspectives publication-title: International Journal of Service Industry Management – reference: (last accessed 5/21/2008). – reference: Orme, B.K., Alpert, M.I., Christensen, E., 1997. Assessing the validity of conjoint analysis – continued. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series 1997. – volume: 26 start-page: 149 year: 2007 end-page: 163 ident: bib33 article-title: New product development under channel acceptance publication-title: Marketing Science – reference: Huber J., 1987. Conjoint analysis: How we got there and where we are. In: 1987 Sawtooth Software Proceedings. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, pp. 237–253. – volume: 43 start-page: 87 year: 1992 end-page: 131 ident: bib46 article-title: Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology – volume: 8 start-page: 76 year: 1981 end-page: 84 ident: bib16 article-title: Estimating choice probabilities in multiattribute decision making publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research – volume: 67 start-page: 247 year: 1996 end-page: 257 ident: bib20 article-title: The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes – reference: Kim, S.-H., Srinivasan, V., 2006. A multiattribute model of the timing of buyers’ upgrading to improved versions of high technology products. Research Paper No. 1720(R), September, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. – volume: 24 start-page: 407 year: 2006 end-page: 416 ident: bib57 article-title: Using market-utility-based approach to designing government and public services: Case illustration from United States Forest Service publication-title: Journal of Operations Management – volume: 175 start-page: 1782 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib7 article-title: Profitability in product line pricing and composition with manufacturing commonalities publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.013 – volume: 24 start-page: 407 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib57 article-title: Using market-utility-based approach to designing government and public services: Case illustration from United States Forest Service publication-title: Journal of Operations Management doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.004 – volume: 10 start-page: 239 issue: 2 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib48 article-title: Optimal service design: Integrating marketing and operations perspectives publication-title: International Journal of Service Industry Management doi: 10.1108/09564239910264361 – volume: 60 start-page: 31 issue: 1 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib18 article-title: Modeling competitive pricing and market share: Anatomy of a decision support system publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90330-C – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib45 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib27 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.893890 – volume: 37 start-page: 547 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib30 article-title: Supplier-switching inertia and competitive asymmetry: A demand side perspective publication-title: Decision Sciences doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00138.x – volume: 21 start-page: 299 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib36 article-title: A cross-validity comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models publication-title: International Journal of Research in Marketing doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.002 – volume: 15 start-page: 555 issue: 6 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib61 article-title: Service innovation and customer choices in hospitality industry publication-title: Managing Service Quality doi: 10.1108/09604520510634023 – volume: 137 start-page: 448 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib42 article-title: Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00147-3 – volume: 89 start-page: 1218 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib1 article-title: Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression publication-title: Journal of the American Statistical Association doi: 10.2307/2290986 – volume: 33 start-page: 307 issue: 3 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib23 article-title: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice set designs publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.2307/3152127 – volume: 150 start-page: 672 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib41 article-title: A model and solution method for multi-period sales promotion design publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00526-X – volume: 16 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib38 article-title: Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00034-4 – volume: 16 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib39 article-title: Predicting brand choice behavior: A marketing application of the Schönemann and Wang unfolding model publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.2307/3150684 – volume: 18 start-page: 246 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib9 article-title: Self-service technology and online financial service choice publication-title: International Journal of Service Industry Management doi: 10.1108/09564230710751479 – volume: 155 start-page: 299 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib34 article-title: Retaining students in retail banking through price bundling: Evidence from the Swedish market publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00088-2 – start-page: 179 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib6 article-title: Managing a dispersed product development process – volume: 130 start-page: 361 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib56 article-title: A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00047-3 – volume: 94 start-page: 236 issue: 2 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib14 article-title: Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236 – volume: 186 start-page: 748 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib4 article-title: Enabling e-transactions with multi-attribute preference models publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.051 – volume: 43 start-page: 87 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib46 article-title: Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 – volume: 17 start-page: 371 issue: 6 year: 1971 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib47 article-title: Using laboratory brand preference scales to predict consumer brand purchases publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.17.6.B371 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib19 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-28692-1_8 – volume: 22 start-page: 177 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib32 article-title: Design of robust new products under variability: Marketing meets design publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00113.x – volume: 24 start-page: 737 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib2 article-title: Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions publication-title: Journal of Operations Management doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.10.001 – volume: 12 start-page: 165 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib15 article-title: A market utility-based model for capacity scheduling in mass services publication-title: Production and Operations Management doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2003.tb00499.x – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib28 – volume: 26 start-page: 149 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib33 article-title: New product development under channel acceptance publication-title: Marketing Science doi: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0240 – volume: 40 start-page: 237 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib62 article-title: Rating-based versus choice-based latent class conjoint models: An empirical comparison publication-title: Journal of the Market Research Society doi: 10.1177/147078539804000304 – volume: 164 start-page: 760 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib51 article-title: Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib21 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib49 – volume: 67 start-page: 247 issue: 3 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib20 article-title: The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0077 – volume: 42 start-page: 67 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib8 article-title: Incentives-aligned conjoint analysis publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.1509/jmkr.42.1.67.56890 – volume: 24 start-page: 368 issue: 3 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib10 article-title: An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.2307/3172746 – volume: 87 start-page: 66 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib22 article-title: Expressing preferences in a principal-agent task: A comparison of choice, rating, and matching publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2955 – volume: 48 start-page: 1350 issue: 10 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib24 article-title: Augmenting conjoint analysis to estimate consumer reservation price publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.10.1350.272 – volume: 6 start-page: 280 issue: 3 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib63 article-title: Retrospective self-insight on factors considered in product evaluations publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research doi: 10.1086/208769 – volume: 95 start-page: 371 issue: 3 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib55 article-title: Contingent weighting in judgment and choice publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371 – volume: 34 start-page: 205 issue: 2 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib43 article-title: Attribute task comparability as a determinant of consumer preference reversals publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.2307/3151859 – volume: 47 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib29 article-title: Product development decisions: A review of the literature publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib5 – volume: 33 start-page: 125 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib26 article-title: Integrative research in marketing and operations management publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research doi: 10.2307/3152141 – volume: 32 start-page: 165 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib59 article-title: Effective design of products/services: An approach based on integration of marketing and operations management decisions publication-title: Decision Sciences doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00957.x – volume: 26 start-page: 739 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib58 article-title: An analysis of the supplier selection process publication-title: Omega: The International Journal of Management Science doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00023-1 – volume: 47 start-page: 179 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib60 article-title: Predicting customer choice in services using discrete choice analysis publication-title: IBM Systems Journal doi: 10.1147/sj.471.0179 – volume: 8 start-page: 76 issue: 1 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib16 article-title: Estimating choice probabilities in multiattribute decision making publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research doi: 10.1086/208843 – volume: 128 start-page: 58 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib52 article-title: A pruning heuristic for use with multisource product design publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00350-1 – volume: 45 start-page: 1057 issue: 8 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib11 article-title: Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057 – volume: 23 start-page: 391 issue: 30 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib13 article-title: A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules publication-title: Marketing Science doi: 10.1287/mksc.1030.0032 – volume: 19 start-page: 580 issue: 3 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib12 article-title: Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.580 – volume: 15 start-page: 173 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib31 article-title: Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs publication-title: Marketing Science doi: 10.1287/mksc.15.2.173 – volume: 47 start-page: 151 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib53 article-title: Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.151.10669 – volume: 55 start-page: 20 issue: 4 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib17 article-title: Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis publication-title: Journal of Marketing doi: 10.2307/1251954 – ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib44 – volume: 22 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib35 article-title: Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytic target cascading publication-title: Journal of Product Innovation Management doi: 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00102.x – volume: 33 start-page: 949 issue: 11 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib40 article-title: Marketing/manufacturing tradeoffs in product line management publication-title: IIE Transactions doi: 10.1080/07408170108936886 – volume: 25 start-page: 187 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib3 article-title: Constructive consumer choice processes publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research doi: 10.1086/209535 – volume: 9 start-page: 195 issue: 2 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib37 article-title: A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation publication-title: Marketing Letters doi: 10.1023/A:1007913100332 – volume: 47 start-page: 18 issue: 2 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib25 article-title: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk publication-title: Econometrica doi: 10.2307/1914185 – volume: 2 start-page: 317 issue: 4 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib50 article-title: The impact of an integrated marketing and manufacturing innovation publication-title: Manufacturing and Service Operations Management doi: 10.1287/msom.2.4.317.12337 – start-page: 145 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib64 article-title: Profit-optimizing product line design, selection and pricing with manufacturing cost consideration – volume: 82 start-page: 39 issue: 1 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib54 article-title: A fuzzy set model for market share and preference prediction publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0331-Q – volume: 26 start-page: 532 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029_bib65 article-title: Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference publication-title: Marketing Science doi: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0213
SSID	ssj0001515
Score	2.226338
Snippet	Conjoint analysis has played an important role in helping make a number of operations management decisions including product and service design, supplier...
SourceID	proquest repec pascalfrancis crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	340
SubjectTerms	Applied sciences Bayesian analysis Choice-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Exact sciences and technology Firm modelling Mathematical programming Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Operations management Operations research Product and service design Ratings-based conjoint analysis Ratings-based conjoint analysis Choice-based conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis in operations management research Product and service design Studies
Title	Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.029 http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeejores/v_3a197_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a340-348.htm https://www.proquest.com/docview/204142621
Volume	197
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000264387400035&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1872-6860 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001515 issn: 0377-2217 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950105 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELeqFiEQ4qOAKIPJD7xFqfLhxPHjgCJA04RgTH2LHMehLVsSNW01_kT-K861nTZMmwCJSkkrJ7bT3u_O5-t9IPQqYcDNmWTA31EEGxSQg5yQwGWC8lxEIpdim13_mJ6cJNMp-9Tr_bSxMJtzWpbJ5SWr_yupoQ2IrUJn_4Lc7aDQAJ-B6HAGssP5jwiv6-lZ_8W1ttUrOpffGlctWrmjXDHWjQOSD8SEaYN98aKabx3OTZoSGKGq5dL4yl20fjKOSRA0u9aqbzTctve2eMBeHyXglUWmUpVYdFDa5DtXWaNL7pyNWxBUxgnYGIWc4_aSirpSWTA-z7Qj0evKXjlTS432GZ_NVx2jBlNWWh1zqS1tV6JtdIQXpW4Q6FjPsdQCO6GBGye6JkEr0bXLbwe6Wj6HOjeUWepDneTzyiqiDRqLsVxUS-NuG409Y5npZuf-oh5KPZPSvElEQBsYBDRiSR8Njj5Mph9btUBpjtu_tMyXMBFc2tnw95mu05Lu1bwB3i100ZXOrmiwlLUUe8rR6UN03-xq8JFG4yPUk-UQ3bZBFUP0wBYPwWYtGaK7e5kwH6OFRi2elxhQiwG1uCpwB7VYoxbvoxZb1GKLWjXCDrV4h1psEfgEfX03OX3z3jVlQFwB2v3KDQnLZZzIrCAii5Kccp9TQWkcEUG8gAtGBEsKVT0p8OMiSHiRBdynghTC8zIRPkX9sirlM4Qpj_K4ALmVCwoSqWA5QCeiXsbizCsCMkK-_dlTYXLkq1It56l1hlykilSmeGuUAqlGyGn71DpDzI13R5aaqdFxte6aAvhu7HfYIX07larQEMZhOEIHFgup4fQGBiC-Kjnhj9DbLTzabhJeMIVs0k0acmAYOP-AQzEjvM1VIxw1HMAzKXBKOltdPP_Hpz9Ad3Zc_gL1V8u1fIluic1q3iwPDaf8AmUI_N0
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Issues+in+the+use+of+ratings-based+versus+choice-based+conjoint+analysis+in+operations+management+research&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+operational+research&rft.au=Karniouchina%2C+Ekaterina+V.&rft.au=Moore%2C+William+L.&rft.au=van+der+Rhee%2C+Bo&rft.au=Verma%2C+Rohit&rft.date=2009-08-16&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0377-2217&rft.eissn=1872-6860&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ejor.2008.05.029&rft.externalDocID=S0377221708004542
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0377-2217&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0377-2217&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0377-2217&client=summon