Effects of sustained natural apophyseal glides versus rocabado 6 × 6 program in subjects with cervicogenic headache

Background Cervicogenic headache is designated as the most common type of secondary headache that results from conditions affecting the neck’s bony components, muscles, and intervertebral discs rather than the head itself. Objective The purpose was to determine the effects of Sustained Natural Apoph...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:BMC musculoskeletal disorders Ročník 25; číslo 1; s. 169 - 8
Hlavní autori: Murtza, Sadia, Noor, Rabiya, Bashir, Muhammad Salman, Ikram, Mehwish
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: London BioMed Central 22.02.2024
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Predmet:
Cervicogenic headache
Epidemiology
Headache
Headaches
Internal Medicine
Intervertebral discs
Manipulative therapy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Migraine
Mobilization
Muscles
Neck
Orthopedics
Pain
Patients
Physical therapy
Posture
Range of motion
Rehabilitation
Rheumatology
Spinal cord
Spinal manipulation
Sports Medicine
Temporomandibular disorders
Temporomandibular joint disorders
Mobilization
Temporomandibular disorders
Range of motion
Pain
Cervicogenic headache
ISSN:1471-2474, 1471-2474
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Background Cervicogenic headache is designated as the most common type of secondary headache that results from conditions affecting the neck’s bony components, muscles, and intervertebral discs rather than the head itself. Objective The purpose was to determine the effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) versus the Rocabado 6 × 6 program in subjects with cervicogenic headaches. Methods This study was a randomized clinical trial. The sample size was 38, and participants aged 20–60 years (mean age 40.22 ± 9.66) suffering from cervicogenic headaches were randomly allocated using the lottery method into two groups with 19 participants in each group. Assessment of subjects was done before starting treatment and by the end of the 8th week for all the variables. Outcome measures were the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Flexion-Rotation test (FRT) to assess the rotation range of motion at the level of C1-C2 (goniometer) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for the intensity of pain. Data analysis was done by SPSS (IBM) 25. To check the normality of the data the Shapiro-Wilk test was used. Results In the Shapiro-Wilk test p-value of all the testing variables i.e. NDI, HIT-6 score, FRT and NPRS was > 0.05, data was normally distributed and parametric tests were used. Group A showed a considerable improvement ( p  < 0.05) in all variables compared to Group B, while within-group analysis of both groups shows that all outcome measures show significant results ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion It was concluded that both SNAGs and Rocabado’s 6 × 6 exercises were effective for the treatment of cervicogenic headache but the effects of headache SNAG were superior and produced more improvement in intensity of headache, disability, frequency of headache, duration of headache as compared to Rocabado 6 × 6 exercises. Trial registration number This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05865808 on date 19/05/2023.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07290-8