Acoustic assessment of experimental reforestation in a Costa Rican rainforest
•Passive acoustic monitoring serves as a useful tool for ecological assessment.•We compared four forest restoration treatments on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica.•Three analysis approaches gave trade-offs between analysis detail and data quantity.•Hand annotation gave detailed presence data but litt...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Ecological indicators Ročník 133; s. 108413 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2021
Elsevier |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1470-160X, 1872-7034 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | •Passive acoustic monitoring serves as a useful tool for ecological assessment.•We compared four forest restoration treatments on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica.•Three analysis approaches gave trade-offs between analysis detail and data quantity.•Hand annotation gave detailed presence data but little about relative abundance.•Automated approaches highlighted differences in diel patterns and acoustic energy.
Effective forest restoration requires tools for evaluating and comparing restoration approaches. Nevertheless, measuring restoration progress can be difficult and expensive. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) can be an inexpensive assessment strategy to collect large amounts of biodiversity information at scale. Nevertheless, analyzing and interpreting this information remains a difficult challenge. In this study we applied and compared three approaches to assess restoration treatments using recordings collected from PAM. We tested the hypothesis that variation in forest structure translates into differences in the species composition and acoustic signature of sites. For this purpose we used a reforestation experiment on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica, where we compared the mature forest to four restoration treatments. The treatments included natural regeneration and three treatments that varied the ratio of balsa, a pioneer tree species, and other native species. Our first approach consisted of visual and acoustic review of recordings to describe taxonomic groups found in each location. Our second approach consisted of measuring the acoustic energy present in the 10–30 kHz frequency band, an acoustic range primarily occupied by the mating signals of katydids and other insects, important elements of the food web and are often less mobile than birds and mammals. In our third approach we created 24-hour spectrograms that represented sites and treatments. Using the 24-hour spectrograms, we calculated a PCA and used a tSNE to evaluate the differences in acoustic signature and visualize clusters of treatments. The first approach revealed that relying on visual and acoustic review would fail to find the diel acoustic patterns that were captured in the other two approaches. The approaches varied substantially in the amount of acoustic data incorporated and the amount of human processing time. Subsampling recordings demonstrated that using only 10 sec instead of 40 sec per recording generated comparable results. The failure to differentiate among restoration treatments could reflect insensitivity in the approaches, but more likely represents the fact that the restoration plots are newly established and that substantial differentiation is more likely to arise during the time course of restoration. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Effective forest restoration requires tools for evaluating and comparing restoration approaches. Nevertheless, measuring restoration progress can be difficult and expensive. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) can be an inexpensive assessment strategy to collect large amounts of biodiversity information at scale. Nevertheless, analyzing and interpreting this information remains a difficult challenge. In this study we applied and compared three approaches to assess restoration treatments using recordings collected from PAM. We tested the hypothesis that variation in forest structure translates into differences in the species composition and acoustic signature of sites. For this purpose we used a reforestation experiment on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica, where we compared the mature forest to four restoration treatments. The treatments included natural regeneration and three treatments that varied the ratio of balsa, a pioneer tree species, and other native species. Our first approach consisted of visual and acoustic review of recordings to describe taxonomic groups found in each location. Our second approach consisted of measuring the acoustic energy present in the 10–30 kHz frequency band, an acoustic range primarily occupied by the mating signals of katydids and other insects, important elements of the food web and are often less mobile than birds and mammals. In our third approach we created 24-hour spectrograms that represented sites and treatments. Using the 24-hour spectrograms, we calculated a PCA and used a tSNE to evaluate the differences in acoustic signature and visualize clusters of treatments. The first approach revealed that relying on visual and acoustic review would fail to find the diel acoustic patterns that were captured in the other two approaches. The approaches varied substantially in the amount of acoustic data incorporated and the amount of human processing time. Subsampling recordings demonstrated that using only 10 sec instead of 40 sec per recording generated comparable results. The failure to differentiate among restoration treatments could reflect insensitivity in the approaches, but more likely represents the fact that the restoration plots are newly established and that substantial differentiation is more likely to arise during the time course of restoration. Effective forest restoration requires tools for evaluating and comparing restoration approaches. Nevertheless, measuring restoration progress can be difficult and expensive. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) can be an inexpensive assessment strategy to collect large amounts of biodiversity information at scale. Nevertheless, analyzing and interpreting this information remains a difficult challenge. In this study we applied and compared three approaches to assess restoration treatments using recordings collected from PAM. We tested the hypothesis that variation in forest structure translates into differences in the species composition and acoustic signature of sites. For this purpose we used a reforestation experiment on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica, where we compared the mature forest to four restoration treatments. The treatments included natural regeneration and three treatments that varied the ratio of balsa, a pioneer tree species, and other native species. Our first approach consisted of visual and acoustic review of recordings to describe taxonomic groups found in each location. Our second approach consisted of measuring the acoustic energy present in the 10–30 kHz frequency band, an acoustic range primarily occupied by the mating signals of katydids and other insects, important elements of the food web and are often less mobile than birds and mammals. In our third approach we created 24-hour spectrograms that represented sites and treatments. Using the 24-hour spectrograms, we calculated a PCA and used a tSNE to evaluate the differences in acoustic signature and visualize clusters of treatments. The first approach revealed that relying on visual and acoustic review would fail to find the diel acoustic patterns that were captured in the other two approaches. The approaches varied substantially in the amount of acoustic data incorporated and the amount of human processing time. Subsampling recordings demonstrated that using only 10 sec instead of 40 sec per recording generated comparable results. The failure to differentiate among restoration treatments could reflect insensitivity in the approaches, but more likely represents the fact that the restoration plots are newly established and that substantial differentiation is more likely to arise during the time course of restoration. •Passive acoustic monitoring serves as a useful tool for ecological assessment.•We compared four forest restoration treatments on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica.•Three analysis approaches gave trade-offs between analysis detail and data quantity.•Hand annotation gave detailed presence data but little about relative abundance.•Automated approaches highlighted differences in diel patterns and acoustic energy. Effective forest restoration requires tools for evaluating and comparing restoration approaches. Nevertheless, measuring restoration progress can be difficult and expensive. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) can be an inexpensive assessment strategy to collect large amounts of biodiversity information at scale. Nevertheless, analyzing and interpreting this information remains a difficult challenge. In this study we applied and compared three approaches to assess restoration treatments using recordings collected from PAM. We tested the hypothesis that variation in forest structure translates into differences in the species composition and acoustic signature of sites. For this purpose we used a reforestation experiment on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica, where we compared the mature forest to four restoration treatments. The treatments included natural regeneration and three treatments that varied the ratio of balsa, a pioneer tree species, and other native species. Our first approach consisted of visual and acoustic review of recordings to describe taxonomic groups found in each location. Our second approach consisted of measuring the acoustic energy present in the 10–30 kHz frequency band, an acoustic range primarily occupied by the mating signals of katydids and other insects, important elements of the food web and are often less mobile than birds and mammals. In our third approach we created 24-hour spectrograms that represented sites and treatments. Using the 24-hour spectrograms, we calculated a PCA and used a tSNE to evaluate the differences in acoustic signature and visualize clusters of treatments. The first approach revealed that relying on visual and acoustic review would fail to find the diel acoustic patterns that were captured in the other two approaches. The approaches varied substantially in the amount of acoustic data incorporated and the amount of human processing time. Subsampling recordings demonstrated that using only 10 sec instead of 40 sec per recording generated comparable results. The failure to differentiate among restoration treatments could reflect insensitivity in the approaches, but more likely represents the fact that the restoration plots are newly established and that substantial differentiation is more likely to arise during the time course of restoration. |
| ArticleNumber | 108413 |
| Author | Symes, Laurel Whitworth, Andrew Vega-Hidalgo, Álvaro Flatt, Eleanor |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Álvaro surname: Vega-Hidalgo fullname: Vega-Hidalgo, Álvaro email: ajv95@cornell.edu organization: Center for Avian Population Studies, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Eleanor surname: Flatt fullname: Flatt, Eleanor organization: Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrew surname: Whitworth fullname: Whitworth, Andrew organization: Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Laurel surname: Symes fullname: Symes, Laurel organization: Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, USA |
| BookMark | eNqFUV1LHDEUDUWhq_YnFPLYl9nmazIT-lCWRauwIoiFvoWYuSlZxmSbzIr-e-869sUXyUNyL_ec3HPOCTlKOQEhXzlbcsb19-0SfB5jGpaCCY69XnH5iSx434mmY1Id4Vt1rOGa_flMTmrdMsQZoxfkeuXzvk7RU1cr1PoAaaI5UHjaQYmHyo20QMgF6uSmmBONiTq6zljS2-hdosXFNA-ckePgxgpf3u5T8vvi_G592Wxufl2tV5vGq7adGumYZgZUG5Rrmfcy4AFzz4Xsw6A5KBNaCVxy76Tqghk0CCFwsOXKeCNPydXMO2S3tTtc1JVnm120r41c_lpXUNQIVvZCdabrWjdwFQaBXL3ohZGgwr3WA3J9m7l2Jf_bowj7EKuHcXQJ0BortNRKGcEP3_6YR33JtaIr1sfZlAk9GC1n9hCI3dq3QOwhEDsHguj2Hfr_4h_hfs44QEcfIxRbfYTkYYgF_ISS4wcML1b4qdQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s44353_024_00014_y crossref_primary_10_1111_2041_210X_14361 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_024_05598_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_14015 crossref_primary_10_1080_09524622_2023_2241046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_111054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2025_122749 crossref_primary_10_1111_conl_13131 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14223323 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13934 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2023_110071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2025_111115 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13864 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_41693_w crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14630 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x 10.1139/cjz-2017-0161 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.006 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00538.x 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1962.tb03234.x 10.21105/joss.01686 10.1080/23766808.2016.1272314 10.1111/rec.13038 10.1111/2041-210X.13101 10.1071/MU15097 10.1650/CONDOR-18-57.1 10.1098/rspb.2020.1212 10.1111/nyas.12451 10.1007/s00265-016-2157-4 10.1111/icad.12470 10.1126/science.1172460 10.1111/fwb.13096 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106852 10.1093/biosci/biy147 10.1101/2021.03.26.437280 10.1007/s10530-017-1612-0 10.1371/journal.pone.0126748 10.1126/science.1153352 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00135-5 10.2307/2388152 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151120 10.3389/fevo.2018.00227 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.006 10.1086/285185 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05266.x 10.1098/rspb.2015.0520 10.7717/peerj.973 10.1104/pp.112.206524 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 10.1038/34166 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2021 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 |
| DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 DOA |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413 |
| DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 1872-7034 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_382479775ad14fd29d6828293e4fb66d 10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_108413 S1470160X21010785 |
| GeographicLocations | Costa Rica |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Costa Rica |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 0SF 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29G 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 6I. 7-5 71M 8P~ AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAFWJ AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATLK AAXUO ABFNM ABFYP ABGRD ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFKWA AFPKN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CBWCG CS3 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KCYFY KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OK1 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SES SEW SPCBC SSA SSJ SSZ T5K ~02 ~G- 9DU AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO ADVLN AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3a0609e45f4a50cc3f3f3e9b1238fd61e49f53e131ca347f9d6e222cc35149c93 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 18 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000728762300008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1470-160X |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:46:12 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 13:43:57 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:05:37 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:50:01 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:40:55 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Bioacoustics Katydids Ecological restoration Reforestation Ecoacoustics Soundscape |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c455t-3a0609e45f4a50cc3f3f3e9b1238fd61e49f53e131ca347f9d6e222cc35149c93 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/382479775ad14fd29d6828293e4fb66d |
| PQID | 2636449219 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_382479775ad14fd29d6828293e4fb66d proquest_miscellaneous_2636449219 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_108413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_108413 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_108413 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2021 2021-12-00 20211201 2021-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2021 text: December 2021 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Ecological indicators |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier |
| References | Campos-Cerqueira, Mena (b0025) 2019 Estrada, Coates-Estrada (b0045) 2002; 103 Brodie, Allen-Ankins, Towsey, Roe, Schwarzkopf (b0210) 2020; 119 Smith, Gehrt (b0170) 2010; 18 Whitworth, Beirne, Flatt, Huarcaya, Diaz, Forsyth, Molnár, Vargas Soto (b0235) 2018; 120 “Colombia to Plant 180 Million Trees by 2022 to Fight Deforestation, Says Duque.” 2021. Reuters. April 22, 2021. https://reuters.screenocean.com/record/1612678. Sueur, Jerome, Thierry Aubin, Caroline Simonis, Laurent Lellouch, Ethan C. Brown, Marion Depraetere, Camille Desjonqueres, et al. 2019. “Package ‘seewave.’” ftp://ftp.openefs.org/pub/cran/web/packages/seewave/seewave.pdf. Klingbeil, Brian T., and Michael R. Willig. 2015. “Bird Biodiversity Assessments in Temperate Forest: The Value of Point Count versus Acoustic Monitoring Protocols.” PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.973. Walker (b0225) 1962; 16 Denzinger, Tschapka, Schnitzler (b0040) 2018; 96 Morris, Beier (b0130) 1982; 108 Schoenly, Beaver, Heumier (b0165) 1991; 137 Arthur, Benjamin J., Yun Ding, Medhini Sosale, Faduma Khalif, Elizabeth Kim, Peter Waddell, Srinivas C. Turaga, David L. Stern, 2021. SongExplorer: A Deep Learning Workflow for Discovery and Segmentation of Animal Acoustic Communication Signals. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437280. Hartshorn (b0080) 1980; 12 Sugai, Moreira, Silva, Ribeiro, Llusia (b0185) 2019; 69 Gottesman, Francomano, Zhao, Bellisario, Ghadiri, Broadhead, Gasc, Pijanowski (b0065) 2020; 65 ter Hofstede, Voigt-Heucke, Lang, Römer, Page, Faure, Dechmann (b0090) 2017; 3 R core team. 2013. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.5851&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Sueur, Farina (b0175) 2015; 8 Symes, Laurel B., Sharon J. Martinson, Ciara E. Kernan, and Hannah M. Ter Hofstede. 2020. Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing: Prey Rely on Proactive Defences When Predator and Non-Predator Cues Are Similar. Proc. Biol. Sci. / Royal Soc. 287 (1933), 20201212. Marc J. Mazerolle (2020) AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg. Greenhalgh, Stone, Fisher, Sayer (b0070) 2021; 1–12 Borker, Buxton, Jones, Major, Williams, Tershy, Croll (b0205) 2020; 28 Hunter, John, and Darren Dale. 2007. “The Matplotlib User’s Guide.” Matplotlib 0. 90. 0 User’s Guide. http://pds3.egloos.com/pds/200707/02/11/users_guide_0.90.0.pdf. Gasc, Anso, Sueur, Jourdan, Desutter-Grandcolas (b0055) 2018; 20 Butler, Stanley, Butler (b0020) 2016; 479 Cigliano, M. M., H. Braun, D. C. Eades, D. Otte, 2018. “Orthoptera Species File. Version 5.0/5.0.”. Kalka, Margareta B., Adam R. Smith, and Elisabeth K. V. Kalko. 2008. “Bats Limit Arthropods and Herbivory in a Tropical Forest.” Frank van Veen, Morris, Godfray (b0220) 2006; 51 Falk, ter Hofstede, Jones, Dixon, Faure, Kalko, Page (b0050) 2015; 282 320 (5872): 71. Taylor, Philip, Gregory Asner, Kyla Dahlin, Christopher Anderson, David Knapp, Roberta Martin, Joseph Mascaro, et al., 2015. Landscape-Scale Controls on Aboveground Forest Carbon Stocks on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. PloS One 10 (6), e0126748. Bates, Sarkar, Bates, Matrix (b0010) 2007; 2 Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund, et al., 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4 (43), 1686. Blignaut, Aronson, de Wit (b0015) 2014; 1322 Gibb, Browning, Glover‐Kapfer, Jones, Börger (b0060) 2019; 10 Symes, Laurel B., Sharon J. Martinson, Lars-Olaf Hoeger, Rachel A. Page, and Hannah M. ter Hofstede. 2018. From Understory to Canopy: In Situ Behavior of Neotropical Forest Katydids in Response to Bat Echolocation Calls. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00227. Pedregosa, Varoquaux, Gramfort, Michel, Thirion, Grisel, Blondel, Prettenhofer, Weiss, Dubourg (b0155) 2011; 12 Page, Ryan (b0145) 2008; 76 Leach, Burwell, Ashton, Jones, Kitching (b0120) 2016; 116 Lawton, Bignell, Bolton, Bloemers, Eggleton, Hammond, Hodda, Holt, Larsen, Mawdsley, Stork, Srivastava, Watt (b0115) 1998; 391 Symes, L.B., Madhusudhana, S.K., Martinson, S.J., Hodge, K.B., Salisbury, D.P., ter Hofstede, H.M, n.d. Spatial and temporal patterns in katydid acoustic activity from annotation of soundscape recordings. J. Orthopteran Res. Submitted for publication. Symes, Page, ter Hofstede (b0200) 2016; 70 Harris, Millman, van der Walt, Gommers, Virtanen, Cournapeau, Wieser, Taylor, Berg, Smith, Kern, Picus, Hoyer, van Kerkwijk, Brett, Haldane, del Río, Wiebe, Peterson, Gérard-Marchant, Sheppard, Reddy, Weckesser, Abbasi, Gohlke, Oliphant (b0075) 2020; 585 Morris, G. K., A. C. Mason, P. Wall, J. J. Belwood. 1994. High Ultrasonic and Tremulation Signals in Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05266.x. Oliphant (b0140) 2007; 9 Hofstede, Hannah M. ter, Laurel B. Symes, Sharon J. Martinson, Tony Robillard, Paul Faure, Shyam Madhusudhana, Rachel A. Page, 2020. Calling Songs of Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Panama. J. Orthoptera Res. 29, 137. Benayas, José, Newton, Diaz, Bullock (b0160) 2009; 325 Jamieson, Trowbridge, Raffa, Lindroth (b0100) 2012; 160 Whitworth, Beirne, Flatt, Froese, Nuñez, Forsyth (b0230) 2021; 14 Sugai (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0185) 2019; 69 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0180 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0105 Whitworth (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0235) 2018; 120 Pedregosa (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0155) 2011; 12 Campos-Cerqueira (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0025) 2019 Gottesman (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0065) 2020; 65 Sueur (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0175) 2015; 8 Bates (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0010) 2007; 2 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0190 Schoenly (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0165) 1991; 137 Butler (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0020) 2016; 479 Smith (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0170) 2010; 18 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0095 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0215 Greenhalgh (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0070) 2021; 1–12 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0135 ter Hofstede (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0090) 2017; 3 Brodie (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0210) 2020; 119 Blignaut (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0015) 2014; 1322 Page (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0145) 2008; 76 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_bib241 Symes (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0200) 2016; 70 Denzinger (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0040) 2018; 96 Oliphant (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0140) 2007; 9 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0085 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0240 Whitworth (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0230) 2021; 14 Hartshorn (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0080) 1980; 12 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0005 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0125 Harris (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0075) 2020; 585 Walker (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0225) 1962; 16 Estrada (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0045) 2002; 103 Morris (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0130) 1982; 108 Gibb (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0060) 2019; 10 Benayas (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0160) 2009; 325 Jamieson (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0100) 2012; 160 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0110 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0030 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0195 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0150 Leach (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0120) 2016; 116 Lawton (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0115) 1998; 391 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0035 Borker (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0205) 2020; 28 Frank van Veen (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0220) 2006; 51 Gasc (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0055) 2018; 20 Falk (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0050) 2015; 282 |
| References_xml | – volume: 119 start-page: 106852 year: 2020 ident: b0210 article-title: Automated species identification of frog choruses in environmental recordings using acoustic indices publication-title: Ecol. Ind. – volume: 108 start-page: 287 year: 1982 end-page: 314 ident: b0130 article-title: Song Structure and Description of Some Costa Rican Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) publication-title: Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. – reference: Taylor, Philip, Gregory Asner, Kyla Dahlin, Christopher Anderson, David Knapp, Roberta Martin, Joseph Mascaro, et al., 2015. Landscape-Scale Controls on Aboveground Forest Carbon Stocks on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. PloS One 10 (6), e0126748. – volume: 12 start-page: 23 year: 1980 end-page: 30 ident: b0080 article-title: Neotropical Forest Dynamics publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 76 start-page: 761 year: 2008 end-page: 769 ident: b0145 article-title: The Effect of Signal Complexity on Localization Performance in Bats That Localize Frog Calls publication-title: Anim. Behav. – volume: 479 start-page: 89 year: 2016 end-page: 96 ident: b0020 article-title: Underwater soundscapes in near-shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration publication-title: J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. – volume: 18 start-page: 914 year: 2010 end-page: 923 ident: b0170 article-title: Bat Response to Woodland Restoration within Urban Forest Fragments publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – reference: Marc J. Mazerolle (2020) AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg. – reference: Cigliano, M. M., H. Braun, D. C. Eades, D. Otte, 2018. “Orthoptera Species File. Version 5.0/5.0.”. – reference: R core team. 2013. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.5851&rep=rep1&type=pdf. – volume: 51 start-page: 187 year: 2006 end-page: 208 ident: b0220 article-title: Apparent Competition, Quantitative Food Webs, and the Structure of Phytophagous Insect Communities publication-title: Annu. Rev. Entomol. – reference: Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund, et al., 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4 (43), 1686. – volume: 12 start-page: 2825 year: 2011 end-page: 2830 ident: b0155 article-title: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python publication-title: J. Mach. Learn. Res. – reference: Arthur, Benjamin J., Yun Ding, Medhini Sosale, Faduma Khalif, Elizabeth Kim, Peter Waddell, Srinivas C. Turaga, David L. Stern, 2021. SongExplorer: A Deep Learning Workflow for Discovery and Segmentation of Animal Acoustic Communication Signals. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437280. – volume: 70 start-page: 1485 year: 2016 end-page: 1495 ident: b0200 article-title: Effects of Acoustic Environment on Male Calling Activity and Timing in Neotropical Forest Katydids publication-title: Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. – reference: Symes, Laurel B., Sharon J. Martinson, Lars-Olaf Hoeger, Rachel A. Page, and Hannah M. ter Hofstede. 2018. From Understory to Canopy: In Situ Behavior of Neotropical Forest Katydids in Response to Bat Echolocation Calls. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00227. – volume: 391 start-page: 72 year: 1998 end-page: 76 ident: b0115 article-title: Biodiversity Inventories, Indicator Taxa and Effects of Habitat Modification in Tropical Forest publication-title: Nature – volume: 14 start-page: 439 year: 2021 end-page: 454 ident: b0230 article-title: Recovery of Dung Beetle Biodiversity and Traits in a Regenerating Rainforest: A Case Study from Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula publication-title: Insect Conserv. Divers. / Royal Entomol. Soc. Lond. – volume: 28 start-page: 252 year: 2020 end-page: 260 ident: b0205 article-title: Do soundscape indices predict landscape-scale restoration outcomes ? A comparative study of restored seabird island soundscapes publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – volume: 2 start-page: 74 year: 2007 ident: b0010 article-title: The lme4 Package publication-title: R Package Version – reference: Morris, G. K., A. C. Mason, P. Wall, J. J. Belwood. 1994. High Ultrasonic and Tremulation Signals in Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05266.x. – volume: 96 start-page: 171 year: 2018 end-page: 181 ident: b0040 article-title: The Role of Echolocation Strategies for Niche Differentiation in Bats publication-title: Can. J. Zool. – year: 2019 ident: b0025 article-title: How Does FSC Forest Certification Affect the Acoustically Active Fauna in Madre de Dios, Peru? publication-title: Remote Sens. in. – volume: 103 start-page: 237 year: 2002 end-page: 245 ident: b0045 article-title: Bats in Continuous Forest, Forest Fragments and in an Agricultural Mosaic Habitat-Island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – reference: “Colombia to Plant 180 Million Trees by 2022 to Fight Deforestation, Says Duque.” 2021. Reuters. April 22, 2021. https://reuters.screenocean.com/record/1612678. – volume: 282 start-page: 20150520 year: 2015 ident: b0050 article-title: Sensory-Based Niche Partitioning in a Multiple Predator–multiple Prey Community publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B – reference: Hofstede, Hannah M. ter, Laurel B. Symes, Sharon J. Martinson, Tony Robillard, Paul Faure, Shyam Madhusudhana, Rachel A. Page, 2020. Calling Songs of Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Panama. J. Orthoptera Res. 29, 137. – reference: Kalka, Margareta B., Adam R. Smith, and Elisabeth K. V. Kalko. 2008. “Bats Limit Arthropods and Herbivory in a Tropical Forest.” – volume: 8 start-page: 493 year: 2015 end-page: 502 ident: b0175 article-title: Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound publication-title: Biosemiotics – volume: 120 start-page: 852 year: 2018 end-page: 862 ident: b0235 article-title: Secondary Forest Is Utilized by Great Curassows (Crax Rubra) and Great Tinamous (Tinamus Major) in the Absence of Hunting publication-title: Condor – volume: 10 start-page: 169 year: 2019 end-page: 185 ident: b0060 article-title: “Emerging Opportunities and Challenges for Passive Acoustics in Ecological Assessment and Monitoring”. Edited by Luca Börger publication-title: Methods Ecol. Evol. / Brit. Ecol. Soc. – volume: 9 start-page: 10 year: 2007 end-page: 20 ident: b0140 article-title: Python for Scientific Computing publication-title: Comput. Sci. Eng. – volume: 65 start-page: 117 year: 2020 end-page: 132 ident: b0065 article-title: Acoustic monitoring reveals diversity and surprising dynamics in tropical freshwater soundscapes publication-title: Freshw. Biol. – volume: 325 start-page: 1121 year: 2009 end-page: 1124 ident: b0160 article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: Science – volume: 137 start-page: 597 year: 1991 end-page: 638 ident: b0165 article-title: On the Trophic Relations of Insects: A Food-Web Approach publication-title: Am. Nat. – volume: 69 start-page: 15 year: 2019 end-page: 25 ident: b0185 article-title: Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives publication-title: Bioscience – reference: Symes, L.B., Madhusudhana, S.K., Martinson, S.J., Hodge, K.B., Salisbury, D.P., ter Hofstede, H.M, n.d. Spatial and temporal patterns in katydid acoustic activity from annotation of soundscape recordings. J. Orthopteran Res. Submitted for publication. – volume: 3 start-page: 41 year: 2017 end-page: 49 ident: b0090 article-title: Revisiting Adaptations of Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) to Gleaning Bat Predation publication-title: Neotropical Biodiversity – volume: 116 start-page: 305 year: 2016 end-page: 309 ident: b0120 article-title: Comparison of Point Counts and Automated Acoustic Monitoring: Detecting Birds in a Rainforest Biodiversity Survey publication-title: The Emu – reference: 320 (5872): 71. – volume: 16 start-page: 407 year: 1962 end-page: 428 ident: b0225 article-title: Factors Responsible for Intraspecific Variation in the Calling Songs of Crickets publication-title: Evol. Int. J. Organ. Evol. – reference: Sueur, Jerome, Thierry Aubin, Caroline Simonis, Laurent Lellouch, Ethan C. Brown, Marion Depraetere, Camille Desjonqueres, et al. 2019. “Package ‘seewave.’” ftp://ftp.openefs.org/pub/cran/web/packages/seewave/seewave.pdf. – volume: 1322 start-page: 35 year: 2014 end-page: 47 ident: b0015 article-title: The Economics of Restoration: Looking Back and Leaping Forward publication-title: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. – volume: 20 start-page: 1099 year: 2018 end-page: 1111 ident: b0055 article-title: Cricket calling communities as an indicator of the invasive ant publication-title: Biol. Invasions – reference: Hunter, John, and Darren Dale. 2007. “The Matplotlib User’s Guide.” Matplotlib 0. 90. 0 User’s Guide. http://pds3.egloos.com/pds/200707/02/11/users_guide_0.90.0.pdf. – volume: 585 start-page: 357 year: 2020 end-page: 362 ident: b0075 article-title: Array Programming with NumPy publication-title: Nature – volume: 1–12 year: 2021 ident: b0070 article-title: Ecoacoustics as a novel tool for assessing pond restoration success : Results of a pilot study publication-title: Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. – reference: Symes, Laurel B., Sharon J. Martinson, Ciara E. Kernan, and Hannah M. Ter Hofstede. 2020. Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing: Prey Rely on Proactive Defences When Predator and Non-Predator Cues Are Similar. Proc. Biol. Sci. / Royal Soc. 287 (1933), 20201212. – volume: 160 start-page: 1719 year: 2012 end-page: 1727 ident: b0100 article-title: Consequences of Climate Warming and Altered Precipitation Patterns for Plant-Insect and Multitrophic Interactions publication-title: Plant Physiol. – reference: Klingbeil, Brian T., and Michael R. Willig. 2015. “Bird Biodiversity Assessments in Temperate Forest: The Value of Point Count versus Acoustic Monitoring Protocols.” PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.973. – volume: 8 start-page: 493 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0175 article-title: Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound publication-title: Biosemiotics doi: 10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x – volume: 96 start-page: 171 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0040 article-title: The Role of Echolocation Strategies for Niche Differentiation in Bats publication-title: Can. J. Zool. doi: 10.1139/cjz-2017-0161 – volume: 585 start-page: 357 issue: 7825 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0075 article-title: Array Programming with NumPy publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0125 – volume: 2 start-page: 74 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0010 article-title: The lme4 Package publication-title: R Package Version – volume: 76 start-page: 761 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0145 article-title: The Effect of Signal Complexity on Localization Performance in Bats That Localize Frog Calls publication-title: Anim. Behav. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.006 – volume: 1–12 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0070 article-title: Ecoacoustics as a novel tool for assessing pond restoration success : Results of a pilot study publication-title: Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. – volume: 18 start-page: 914 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0170 article-title: Bat Response to Woodland Restoration within Urban Forest Fragments publication-title: Restor. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00538.x – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_bib241 – volume: 16 start-page: 407 issue: 4 year: 1962 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0225 article-title: Factors Responsible for Intraspecific Variation in the Calling Songs of Crickets publication-title: Evol. Int. J. Organ. Evol. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1962.tb03234.x – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0240 doi: 10.21105/joss.01686 – volume: 3 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0090 article-title: Revisiting Adaptations of Neotropical Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) to Gleaning Bat Predation publication-title: Neotropical Biodiversity doi: 10.1080/23766808.2016.1272314 – volume: 28 start-page: 252 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0205 article-title: Do soundscape indices predict landscape-scale restoration outcomes ? A comparative study of restored seabird island soundscapes publication-title: Restor. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/rec.13038 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0150 – volume: 10 start-page: 169 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0060 article-title: “Emerging Opportunities and Challenges for Passive Acoustics in Ecological Assessment and Monitoring”. Edited by Luca Börger publication-title: Methods Ecol. Evol. / Brit. Ecol. Soc. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13101 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0180 – volume: 116 start-page: 305 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0120 article-title: Comparison of Point Counts and Automated Acoustic Monitoring: Detecting Birds in a Rainforest Biodiversity Survey publication-title: The Emu doi: 10.1071/MU15097 – volume: 120 start-page: 852 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0235 article-title: Secondary Forest Is Utilized by Great Curassows (Crax Rubra) and Great Tinamous (Tinamus Major) in the Absence of Hunting publication-title: Condor doi: 10.1650/CONDOR-18-57.1 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0195 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1212 – volume: 1322 start-page: 35 issue: August year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0015 article-title: The Economics of Restoration: Looking Back and Leaping Forward publication-title: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12451 – volume: 70 start-page: 1485 issue: 9 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0200 article-title: Effects of Acoustic Environment on Male Calling Activity and Timing in Neotropical Forest Katydids publication-title: Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2157-4 – volume: 14 start-page: 439 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0230 article-title: Recovery of Dung Beetle Biodiversity and Traits in a Regenerating Rainforest: A Case Study from Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula publication-title: Insect Conserv. Divers. / Royal Entomol. Soc. Lond. doi: 10.1111/icad.12470 – volume: 325 start-page: 1121 issue: 5944 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0160 article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1172460 – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0025 article-title: How Does FSC Forest Certification Affect the Acoustically Active Fauna in Madre de Dios, Peru? publication-title: Remote Sens. in. – volume: 65 start-page: 117 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0065 article-title: Acoustic monitoring reveals diversity and surprising dynamics in tropical freshwater soundscapes publication-title: Freshw. Biol. doi: 10.1111/fwb.13096 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0095 – volume: 119 start-page: 106852 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0210 article-title: Automated species identification of frog choruses in environmental recordings using acoustic indices publication-title: Ecol. Ind. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106852 – volume: 69 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0185 article-title: Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives publication-title: Bioscience doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy147 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0005 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.26.437280 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0030 – volume: 20 start-page: 1099 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0055 article-title: Cricket calling communities as an indicator of the invasive ant Wasmannia auropunctata in an insular biodiversity hotspot publication-title: Biol. Invasions doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1612-0 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0215 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126748 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0105 doi: 10.1126/science.1153352 – volume: 103 start-page: 237 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0045 article-title: Bats in Continuous Forest, Forest Fragments and in an Agricultural Mosaic Habitat-Island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico publication-title: Biol. Conserv. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00135-5 – volume: 12 start-page: 23 issue: 2 year: 1980 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0080 article-title: Neotropical Forest Dynamics publication-title: Biotropica doi: 10.2307/2388152 – volume: 51 start-page: 187 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0220 article-title: Apparent Competition, Quantitative Food Webs, and the Structure of Phytophagous Insect Communities publication-title: Annu. Rev. Entomol. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151120 – volume: 108 start-page: 287 issue: 1/2 year: 1982 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0130 article-title: Song Structure and Description of Some Costa Rican Katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) publication-title: Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0190 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00227 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0085 – volume: 479 start-page: 89 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0020 article-title: Underwater soundscapes in near-shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration publication-title: J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.006 – volume: 137 start-page: 597 issue: 5 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0165 article-title: On the Trophic Relations of Insects: A Food-Web Approach publication-title: Am. Nat. doi: 10.1086/285185 – volume: 12 start-page: 2825 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0155 article-title: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python publication-title: J. Mach. Learn. Res. – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0135 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05266.x – volume: 282 start-page: 20150520 issue: 1808 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0050 article-title: Sensory-Based Niche Partitioning in a Multiple Predator–multiple Prey Community publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0520 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0110 doi: 10.7717/peerj.973 – volume: 160 start-page: 1719 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0100 article-title: Consequences of Climate Warming and Altered Precipitation Patterns for Plant-Insect and Multitrophic Interactions publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.206524 – volume: 9 start-page: 10 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0140 article-title: Python for Scientific Computing publication-title: Comput. Sci. Eng. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 – volume: 391 start-page: 72 issue: 6662 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0115 article-title: Biodiversity Inventories, Indicator Taxa and Effects of Habitat Modification in Tropical Forest publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/34166 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413_b0035 |
| SSID | ssj0016996 |
| Score | 2.4156826 |
| Snippet | •Passive acoustic monitoring serves as a useful tool for ecological assessment.•We compared four forest restoration treatments on the Osa Peninsula of Costa... Effective forest restoration requires tools for evaluating and comparing restoration approaches. Nevertheless, measuring restoration progress can be difficult... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 108413 |
| SubjectTerms | acoustics Bioacoustics Costa Rica Ecoacoustics Ecological restoration energy food webs forest restoration humans indigenous species Katydids natural regeneration Ochroma pyramidale pioneer species rain forests Reforestation Soundscape species diversity |
| Title | Acoustic assessment of experimental reforestation in a Costa Rican rainforest |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108413 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636449219 https://doaj.org/article/382479775ad14fd29d6828293e4fb66d |
| Volume | 133 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000728762300008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1872-7034 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0016996 issn: 1470-160X databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1872-7034 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0016996 issn: 1470-160X databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA4iHryIT1xfRPBat2neRxUXDyoiKnsLaZrAirSyu_r7nTTt-rjsRXpqO2nCzCT50ky-QeiMe1tK5WQWSl1kTAUHfc7xjJUyl77glLf_O15u5f29Go_1w49UXzEmLNEDJ8UNqSqYBJDCbUVYqApdCRV3_6hnoRSiiqNvLnW_mOr2D4TW6VyRzDMi8vH32Z3h6zms6wDCRZrQgsQYO0bor1mpJe__NTn9GabbuWe0iTY60IgvUmO30Iqvt9He9fcZNXjZddLZDrq7cE2bowvbBe0mbgL-SeaPoQlNTMvRGgZPamzxVQO3-DGOizgmjkgCu-h5dP10dZN1WRMyxzifZ9TmItee8cAsz52jAS6vS5iiVKgE8UwHTj2hxFnKZACFegAJIAjYSTtN99Bq3dR-H2HGaBCqBIQFkpwRax2VFXFlHilgKjVArNeacR2leMxs8Wb62LFX0ynbRGWbpOwBOl8Ue0-cGssKXEaTLIQjJXb7ABzFdI5iljnKAKneoKZDFwk1wKcmy-o_7R3AQO-LWyq29mBKUwgKgFLDsH_wH208ROux2hQuc4RW59MPf4zW3Od8MpuetC7-BdxY_js |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic+assessment+of+experimental+reforestation+in+a+Costa+Rican+rainforest&rft.jtitle=Ecological+indicators&rft.au=Vega-Hidalgo%2C+%C3%81lvaro&rft.au=Flatt%2C+Eleanor&rft.au=Whitworth%2C+Andrew&rft.au=Symes%2C+Laurel&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.issn=1470-160X&rft.volume=133+p.108413-&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ecolind.2021.108413&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |