On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques

On surveys that assess sensitive personal attributes, indirect questioning aims at increasing respondents’ willingness to answer truthfully by protecting confidentiality. However, the assumption that subjects understand questioning procedures fully and trust them to protect their privacy is rarely t...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Behavior research methods Ročník 49; číslo 4; s. 1470 - 1483
Hlavní autori: Hoffmann, Adrian, Waubert de Puiseau, Berenike, Schmidt, Alexander F., Musch, Jochen
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: New York Springer US 01.08.2017
Predmet:
ISSN:1554-3528, 1554-3528
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:On surveys that assess sensitive personal attributes, indirect questioning aims at increasing respondents’ willingness to answer truthfully by protecting confidentiality. However, the assumption that subjects understand questioning procedures fully and trust them to protect their privacy is rarely tested. In a scenario-based design, we compared four indirect questioning procedures in terms of their comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection. All indirect questioning techniques were found to be less comprehensible by respondents than a conventional direct question used for comparison. Less-educated respondents experienced more difficulties when confronted with any indirect questioning technique. Regardless of education, the crosswise model was found to be the most comprehensible among the four indirect methods. Indirect questioning in general was perceived to increase privacy protection in comparison to a direct question. Unexpectedly, comprehension and perceived privacy protection did not correlate. We recommend assessing these factors separately in future evaluations of indirect questioning.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1554-3528
1554-3528
DOI:10.3758/s13428-016-0804-3